1
|
Kotelnikov S, Ashizawa R, Popov KI, Khan O, Ignatov M, Li SX, Hassan M, Coutsias EA, Poda G, Padhorny D, Tropsha A, Vajda S, Kozakov D. Accurate ligand-protein docking in CASP15 using the ClusPro LigTBM server. Proteins 2023; 91:1822-1828. [PMID: 37697630 PMCID: PMC10947245 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
In the ligand prediction category of CASP15, the challenge was to predict the positions and conformations of small molecules binding to proteins that were provided as amino acid sequences or as models generated by the AlphaFold2 program. For most targets, we used our template-based ligand docking program ClusPro ligTBM, also implemented as a public server available at https://ligtbm.cluspro.org/. Since many targets had multiple chains and a number of ligands, several templates, and some manual interventions were required. In a few cases, no templates were found, and we had to use direct docking using the Glide program. Nevertheless, ligTBM was shown to be a very useful tool, and by any ranking criteria, our group was ranked among the top five best-performing teams. In fact, all the best groups used template-based docking methods. Thus, it appears that the AlphaFold2-generated models, despite the high accuracy of the predicted backbone, have local differences from the x-ray structure that make the use of direct docking methods more challenging. The results of CASP15 confirm that this limitation can be frequently overcome by homology-based docking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Kotelnikov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Ryota Ashizawa
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Konstantin I. Popov
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Omeir Khan
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mikhail Ignatov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Stan Xiaogang Li
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Mosavverul Hassan
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Evangelos A. Coutsias
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Gennady Poda
- Drug Discovery Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dzmitry Padhorny
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Tropsha
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schumann W, Loschwitz J, Reiners J, Degrandi D, Legewie L, Stühler K, Pfeffer K, Poschmann G, Smits SHJ, Strodel B. Integrative modeling of guanylate binding protein dimers. Protein Sci 2023; 32:e4818. [PMID: 37916607 PMCID: PMC10683561 DOI: 10.1002/pro.4818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) are essential interferon-γ-activated large GTPases that play a crucial role in host defense against intracellular bacteria and parasites. While their protective functions rely on protein polymerization, our understanding of the structural intricacies of these multimerized states remains limited. To bridge this knowledge gap, we present dimer models for human GBP1 (hGBP1) and murine GBP2 and 7 (mGBP2 and mGBP7) using an integrative approach, incorporating the crystal structure of hGBP1's GTPase domain dimer, crosslinking mass spectrometry, small-angle X-ray scattering, protein-protein docking, and molecular dynamics simulations. Our investigation begins by comparing the protein dynamics of hGBP1, mGBP2, and mGBP7. We observe that the M/E domain in all three proteins exhibits significant mobility and hinge motion, with mGBP7 displaying a slightly less pronounced motion but greater flexibility in its GTPase domain. These dynamic distinctions can be attributed to variations in the sequences of mGBP7 and hGBP1/mGBP2, resulting in different dimerization modes. Unlike hGBP1 and its close ortholog mGBP2, which exclusively dimerize through their GTPase domains, we find that mGBP7 exhibits three equally probable alternative dimer structures. The GTPase domain of mGBP7 is only partially involved in its dimerization, primarily due to an accumulation of negative charge, allowing mGBP7 to dimerize independently of GTP. Instead, mGBP7 exhibits a strong tendency to dimerize in an antiparallel arrangement across its stalks. The results of this work go beyond the sequence-structure-function relationship, as the sequence differences in mGBP7 and mGBP2/hGBP1 do not lead to different structures, but to different protein dynamics and dimerization. The distinct GBP dimer structures are expected to encode specific functions crucial for disrupting pathogen membranes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wibke Schumann
- Institute of Theoretical and Computational ChemistryHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
- Institute of Biological Information Processing: Structural BiochemistryForschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany
| | - Jennifer Loschwitz
- Institute of Theoretical and Computational ChemistryHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
- Institute of Biological Information Processing: Structural BiochemistryForschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany
| | - Jens Reiners
- Center for Structural StudiesHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Daniel Degrandi
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital HygieneHeinrich Heine UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Larissa Legewie
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital HygieneHeinrich Heine UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Kai Stühler
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Proteome ResearchMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
- Molecular Proteomics Laboratory, Biomedical Research Centre (BMFZ)Heinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Klaus Pfeffer
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital HygieneHeinrich Heine UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Gereon Poschmann
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, Proteome ResearchMedical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Sander H. J. Smits
- Center for Structural StudiesHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
- Institute for BiochemistryHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Birgit Strodel
- Institute of Theoretical and Computational ChemistryHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
- Institute of Biological Information Processing: Structural BiochemistryForschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Desta IT, Kotelnikov S, Jones G, Ghani U, Abyzov M, Kholodov Y, Standley DM, Beglov D, Vajda S, Kozakov D. The ClusPro AbEMap web server for the prediction of antibody epitopes. Nat Protoc 2023; 18:1814-1840. [PMID: 37188806 PMCID: PMC10898366 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-023-00826-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Antibodies play an important role in the immune system by binding to molecules called antigens at their respective epitopes. These interfaces or epitopes are structural entities determined by the interactions between an antibody and an antigen, making them ideal systems to analyze by using docking programs. Since the advent of high-throughput antibody sequencing, the ability to perform epitope mapping using only the sequence of the antibody has become a high priority. ClusPro, a leading protein-protein docking server, together with its template-based modeling version, ClusPro-TBM, have been re-purposed to map epitopes for specific antibody-antigen interactions by using the Antibody Epitope Mapping server (AbEMap). ClusPro-AbEMap offers three different modes for users depending on the information available on the antibody as follows: (i) X-ray structure, (ii) computational/predicted model of the structure or (iii) only the amino acid sequence. The AbEMap server presents a likelihood score for each antigen residue of being part of the epitope. We provide detailed information on the server's capabilities for the three options and discuss how to obtain the best results. In light of the recent introduction of AlphaFold2 (AF2), we also show how one of the modes allows users to use their AF2-generated antibody models as input. The protocol describes the relative advantages of the server compared to other epitope-mapping tools, its limitations and potential areas of improvement. The server may take 45-90 min depending on the size of the proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Israel T Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sergei Kotelnikov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - George Jones
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Usman Ghani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Daron M Standley
- Department of Genome Informatics, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Center for Infectious Disease Education and Research, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Dmitri Beglov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wodak SJ, Vajda S, Lensink MF, Kozakov D, Bates PA. Critical Assessment of Methods for Predicting the 3D Structure of Proteins and Protein Complexes. Annu Rev Biophys 2023; 52:183-206. [PMID: 36626764 PMCID: PMC10885158 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-102622-084607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Advances in a scientific discipline are often measured by small, incremental steps. In this review, we report on two intertwined disciplines in the protein structure prediction field, modeling of single chains and modeling of complexes, that have over decades emulated this pattern, as monitored by the community-wide blind prediction experiments CASP and CAPRI. However, over the past few years, dramatic advances were observed for the accurate prediction of single protein chains, driven by a surge of deep learning methodologies entering the prediction field. We review the mainscientific developments that enabled these recent breakthroughs and feature the important role of blind prediction experiments in building up and nurturing the structure prediction field. We discuss how the new wave of artificial intelligence-based methods is impacting the fields of computational and experimental structural biology and highlight areas in which deep learning methods are likely to lead to future developments, provided that major challenges are overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoshana J Wodak
- VIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marc F Lensink
- Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576-UGSF-Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France;
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA;
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Paul A Bates
- Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Desta IT, Kotelnikov S, Jones G, Ghani U, Abyzov M, Kholodov Y, Standley DM, Sabitova M, Beglov D, Vajda S, Kozakov D. Mapping of antibody epitopes based on docking and homology modeling. Proteins 2023; 91:171-182. [PMID: 36088633 PMCID: PMC9822860 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Antibodies are key proteins produced by the immune system to target pathogen proteins termed antigens via specific binding to surface regions called epitopes. Given an antigen and the sequence of an antibody the knowledge of the epitope is critical for the discovery and development of antibody based therapeutics. In this work, we present a computational protocol that uses template-based modeling and docking to predict epitope residues. This protocol is implemented in three major steps. First, a template-based modeling approach is used to build the antibody structures. We tested several options, including generation of models using AlphaFold2. Second, each antibody model is docked to the antigen using the fast Fourier transform (FFT) based docking program PIPER. Attention is given to optimally selecting the docking energy parameters depending on the input data. In particular, the van der Waals energy terms are reduced for modeled antibodies relative to x-ray structures. Finally, ranking of antigen surface residues is produced. The ranking relies on the docking results, that is, how often the residue appears in the docking poses' interface, and also on the energy favorability of the docking pose in question. The method, called PIPER-Map, has been tested on a widely used antibody-antigen docking benchmark. The results show that PIPER-Map improves upon the existing epitope prediction methods. An interesting observation is that epitope prediction accuracy starting from antibody sequence alone does not significantly differ from that of starting from unbound (i.e., separately crystallized) antibody structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Israel T. Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Sergei Kotelnikov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - George Jones
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Usman Ghani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | | | | | - Daron M. Standley
- Department of Genome Informatics, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
- Center for Infectious Disease Education and Research, Osaka University, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Maria Sabitova
- Department of Mathematics, CUNY Queens College, Flushing, NY 11367, USA
| | - Dmitri Beglov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scalable multiplex co-fractionation/mass spectrometry platform for accelerated protein interactome discovery. Nat Commun 2022; 13:4043. [PMID: 35831314 PMCID: PMC9279285 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31809-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Co-fractionation/mass spectrometry (CF/MS) enables the mapping of endogenous macromolecular networks on a proteome scale, but current methods are experimentally laborious, resource intensive and afford lesser quantitative accuracy. Here, we present a technically efficient, cost-effective and reproducible multiplex CF/MS (mCF/MS) platform for measuring and comparing, simultaneously, multi-protein assemblies across different experimental samples at a rate that is up to an order of magnitude faster than previous approaches. We apply mCF/MS to map the protein interaction landscape of non-transformed mammary epithelia versus breast cancer cells in parallel, revealing large-scale differences in protein-protein interactions and the relative abundance of associated macromolecules connected with cancer-related pathways and altered cellular processes. The integration of multiplexing capability within an optimized workflow renders mCF/MS as a powerful tool for systematically exploring physical interaction networks in a comparative manner. Co-fractionation/mass spectrometry (CF/MS) allows mapping protein interactomes but efficiency and quantitative accuracy are limited. Here, the authors develop a reproducible multiplexed CF/MS method and apply it to characterize interactome rewiring in breast cancer cells.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaber A, Pavšič M. Modeling and Structure Determination of Homo-Oligomeric Proteins: An Overview of Challenges and Current Approaches. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:9081. [PMID: 34445785 PMCID: PMC8396596 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22169081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein homo-oligomerization is a very common phenomenon, and approximately half of proteins form homo-oligomeric assemblies composed of identical subunits. The vast majority of such assemblies possess internal symmetry which can be either exploited to help or poses challenges during structure determination. Moreover, aspects of symmetry are critical in the modeling of protein homo-oligomers either by docking or by homology-based approaches. Here, we first provide a brief overview of the nature of protein homo-oligomerization. Next, we describe how the symmetry of homo-oligomers is addressed by crystallographic and non-crystallographic symmetry operations, and how biologically relevant intermolecular interactions can be deciphered from the ordered array of molecules within protein crystals. Additionally, we describe the most important aspects of protein homo-oligomerization in structure determination by NMR. Finally, we give an overview of approaches aimed at modeling homo-oligomers using computational methods that specifically address their internal symmetry and allow the incorporation of other experimental data as spatial restraints to achieve higher model reliability.
Collapse
|
8
|
van Noort CW, Honorato RV, Bonvin AMJJ. Information-driven modeling of biomolecular complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2021; 70:70-77. [PMID: 34139639 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Proteins play crucial roles in every cellular process by interacting with each other, nucleic acids, metabolites, and other molecules. The resulting assemblies can be very large and intricate and pose challenges to experimental methods. In the current era of integrative modeling, it is often only by a combination of various experimental techniques and computations that three-dimensional models of those molecular machines can be obtained. Among the various computational approaches available, molecular docking is often the method of choice when it comes to predicting three-dimensional structures of complexes. Docking can generate particularly accurate models when taking into account the available information on the complex of interest. We review here the use of experimental and bioinformatics data in protein-protein docking, describing recent software developments and highlighting applications for the modeling of antibody-antigen complexes and membrane protein complexes, and the use of evolutionary and shape information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte W van Noort
- Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, Netherlands
| | - Rodrigo V Honorato
- Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, Netherlands
| | - Alexandre M J J Bonvin
- Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht, 3584CH, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pal A, Pal D, Mitra P. A computational framework for modeling functional protein-protein interactions. Proteins 2021; 89:1353-1364. [PMID: 34076296 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Protein interactions and their assemblies assist in understanding the cellular mechanisms through the knowledge of interactome. Despite recent advances, a vast number of interacting protein complexes is not annotated by three-dimensional structures. Therefore, a computational framework is a suitable alternative to fill the large gap between identified interactions and the interactions with known structures. In this work, we develop an automated computational framework for modeling functionally related protein-complex structures utilizing GO-based semantic similarity technique and co-evolutionary information of the interaction sites. The framework can consider protein sequence and structure information as input and employ both rigid-body docking and template-based modeling exploiting the existing structural templates and sequence homology information from the PDB. Our framework combines geometric as well as physicochemical features for re-ranking the docking decoys. The proposed framework has an 83% success rate when tested on a benchmark dataset while considering Top1 models for template-based modeling and Top10 models for the docking pipeline. We believe that our computational framework can be used for any pair of proteins with higher confidence to identify the functional protein-protein interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abantika Pal
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India
| | - Debnath Pal
- Department of Computational and Data Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bangalore, India
| | - Pralay Mitra
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Desta IT, Porter KA, Xia B, Kozakov D, Vajda S. Performance and Its Limits in Rigid Body Protein-Protein Docking. Structure 2020; 28:1071-1081.e3. [PMID: 32649857 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 268] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The development of fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithms enabled the sampling of billions of complex conformations and thus revolutionized protein-protein docking. FFT-based methods are now widely available and have been used in hundreds of thousands of docking calculations. Although the methods perform "soft" docking, which allows for some overlap of component proteins, the rigid body assumption clearly introduces limitations on accuracy and reliability. In addition, the method can work only with energy expressions represented by sums of correlation functions. In this paper we use a well-established protein-protein docking benchmark set to evaluate the results of these limitations by focusing on the performance of the docking server ClusPro, which implements one of the best rigid body methods. Furthermore, we explore the theoretical limits of accuracy when using established energy terms for scoring, provide comparison with flexible docking algorithms, and review the historical performance of servers in the CAPRI docking experiment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Israel T Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Kathryn A Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Bing Xia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Andreani J, Quignot C, Guerois R. Structural prediction of protein interactions and docking using conservation and coevolution. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR SCIENCE 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Andreani
- Université Paris‐Saclay CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC) Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| | - Chloé Quignot
- Université Paris‐Saclay CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC) Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| | - Raphael Guerois
- Université Paris‐Saclay CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC) Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Padhorny D, Porter KA, Ignatov M, Alekseenko A, Beglov D, Kotelnikov S, Ashizawa R, Desta I, Alam N, Sun Z, Brini E, Dill K, Schueler-Furman O, Vajda S, Kozakov D. ClusPro in rounds 38 to 45 of CAPRI: Toward combining template-based methods with free docking. Proteins 2020; 88:1082-1090. [PMID: 32142178 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Targets in the protein docking experiment CAPRI (Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions) generally present new challenges and contribute to new developments in methodology. In rounds 38 to 45 of CAPRI, most targets could be effectively predicted using template-based methods. However, the server ClusPro required structures rather than sequences as input, and hence we had to generate and dock homology models. The available templates also provided distance restraints that were directly used as input to the server. We show here that such an approach has some advantages. Free docking with template-based restraints using ClusPro reproduced some interfaces suggested by weak or ambiguous templates while not reproducing others, resulting in correct server predicted models. More recently we developed the fully automated ClusPro TBM server that performs template-based modeling and thus can use sequences rather than structures of component proteins as input. The performance of the server, freely available for noncommercial use at https://tbm.cluspro.org, is demonstrated by predicting the protein-protein targets of rounds 38 to 45 of CAPRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dzmitry Padhorny
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Kathryn A Porter
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mikhail Ignatov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Andrey Alekseenko
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Institute of Computer Aided Design of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitri Beglov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Acpharis Inc., Holliston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sergei Kotelnikov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia
| | - Ryota Ashizawa
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Israel Desta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nawsad Alam
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Zhuyezi Sun
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emiliano Brini
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Ken Dill
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Ora Schueler-Furman
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute for Medical Research Israel-Canada, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sandor Vajda
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.,Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singh A, Dauzhenka T, Kundrotas PJ, Sternberg MJE, Vakser IA. Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins. Proteins 2020; 88:1180-1188. [PMID: 32170770 DOI: 10.1002/prot.25889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Protein docking is essential for structural characterization of protein interactions. Besides providing the structure of protein complexes, modeling of proteins and their complexes is important for understanding the fundamental principles and specific aspects of protein interactions. The accuracy of protein modeling, in general, is still less than that of the experimental approaches. Thus, it is important to investigate the applicability of docking techniques to modeled proteins. We present new comprehensive benchmark sets of protein models for the development and validation of protein docking, as well as a systematic assessment of free and template-based docking techniques on these sets. As opposed to previous studies, the benchmark sets reflect the real case modeling/docking scenario where the accuracy of the models is assessed by the modeling procedure, without reference to the native structure (which would be unknown in practical applications). We also expanded the analysis to include docking of protein pairs where proteins have different structural accuracy. The results show that, in general, the template-based docking is less sensitive to the structural inaccuracies of the models than the free docking. The near-native docking poses generated by the template-based approach, typically, also have higher ranks than those produces by the free docking (although the free docking is indispensable in modeling the multiplicity of protein interactions in a crowded cellular environment). The results show that docking techniques are applicable to protein models in a broad range of modeling accuracy. The study provides clear guidelines for practical applications of docking to protein models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar Singh
- Computational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Taras Dauzhenka
- Computational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Petras J Kundrotas
- Computational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| | - Michael J E Sternberg
- Centre for Integrative Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, UK
| | - Ilya A Vakser
- Computational Biology Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.,Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kotelnikov S, Alekseenko A, Liu C, Ignatov M, Padhorny D, Brini E, Lukin M, Coutsias E, Dill KA, Kozakov D. Sampling and refinement protocols for template-based macrocycle docking: 2018 D3R Grand Challenge 4. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2019; 34:179-189. [PMID: 31879831 DOI: 10.1007/s10822-019-00257-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
We describe a new template-based method for docking flexible ligands such as macrocycles to proteins. It combines Monte-Carlo energy minimization on the manifold, a fast manifold search method, with BRIKARD for complex flexible ligand searching, and with the MELD accelerator of Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics simulations for atomistic degrees of freedom. Here we test the method in the Drug Design Data Resource blind Grand Challenge competition. This method was among the best performers in the competition, giving sub-angstrom prediction quality for the majority of the targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Kotelnikov
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia
| | - Andrey Alekseenko
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Cong Liu
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Mikhail Ignatov
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Institute for Advanced Computational Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Dzmitry Padhorny
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Emiliano Brini
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Mark Lukin
- Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Evangelos Coutsias
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Ken A Dill
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Dima Kozakov
- Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. .,Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. .,Institute for Advanced Computational Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|