Template-based modeling of diverse protein interactions in CAPRI rounds 38-45

FTDMP: A Framework for Protein-Protein, Protein-DNA, and Protein-RNA Docking and Scoring

FTDMP is a software framework for biomolecular docking and scoring. It can perform docking of subunits containing one or more protein, DNA, or RNA chains, followed by subsequent scoring of the resulting models. FTDMP can also be used for the ranking of user-provided models of biomolecular complexes, generated by any structure prediction method. FTDMP evaluates models according to the consensus-based method VoroIF-jury, which combines individual scores derived from the Voronoi tessellation of biomolecular structures. In addition to the default scoring mode, FTDMP can easily adopt additional scores; thus, it may be used as a tool to assess newly developed scoring functions. FTDMP was evaluated during blind testing in recent CAPRI experiments and using protein-protein, protein-DNA, and protein-RNA docking benchmarks. It proved to be a useful tool for different research tasks, related to modeling biomolecular interactions. The software, cleaned docking benchmarks, and benchmarking results are available at https://bioinformatics.lt/software/ftdmp/.

Modeling of protein complexes in CASP14 with emphasis on the interaction interface prediction

The goal of CASP experiments is to monitor the progress in the protein structure prediction field. During the 14th CASP edition we aimed to test our capabilities of predicting structures of protein complexes. Our protocol for modeling protein assemblies included both template‐based modeling and free docking. Structural templates were identified using sensitive sequence‐based searches. If sequence‐based searches failed, we performed structure‐based template searches using selected CASP server models. In the absence of reliable templates we applied free docking starting from monomers generated by CASP servers. We evaluated and ranked models of protein complexes using an improved version of our protein structure quality assessment method, VoroMQA, taking into account both interaction interface and global structure scores. If reliable templates could be identified, generally accurate models of protein assemblies were generated with the exception of an antibody‐antigen interaction. The success of free docking mainly depended on the accuracy of initial subunit models and on the scoring of docking solutions. To put our overall results in perspective, we analyzed our performance in the context of other CASP groups. Although the subunits in our assembly models often were not of the top quality, these models had, overall, the best‐predicted intersubunit interfaces according to several accuracy measures. We attribute our relative success primarily to the emphasis on the interaction interface when modeling and scoring.

Conservation of binding properties in protein models

We study the models submitted to round 12 of the Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) experiment to assess how well the binding properties are conserved when the X-ray structures of the target proteins are replaced by their models. To explore small molecule binding we generate distributions of molecular probes - which are fragment-sized organic molecules of varying size, shape, and polarity - around the protein, and count the number of interactions between each residue and the probes, resulting in a vector of interactions we call a binding fingerprint. The similarity between two fingerprints, one for the X-ray structure and the other for a model of the protein, is determined by calculating the correlation coefficient between the two vectors. The resulting correlation coefficients are shown to correlate with global measures of accuracy established in CASP, and the relationship yields an accuracy threshold that has to be reached for meaningful binding surface conservation. The clusters formed by the probe molecules reliably predict binding hot spots and ligand binding sites in both X-ray structures and reasonably accurate models of the target, but ensembles of models may be needed for assessing the availability of proper binding pockets. We explored ligand docking to the few targets that had bound ligands in the X-ray structure. More targets were available to assess the ability of the models to reproduce protein-protein interactions by docking both the X-ray structures and models to their interaction partners in complexes. It was shown that this application is more difficult than finding small ligand binding sites, and the success rates heavily depend on the local structure in the potential interface. In particular, predicted conformations of flexible loops are frequently incorrect in otherwise highly accurate models, and may prevent predicting correct protein-protein interactions.