In memoriam of Narayanaswamy Srinivasan (1962-2021)

An agnostic analysis of the human AlphaFold2 proteome using local protein conformations

Knowledge of the 3D structure of proteins is a valuable asset for understanding their precise biological mechanisms. However, the cost of production of 3D structures and experimental difficulties limit their obtaining. The proposal of 3D structural models is consequently an appealing alternative. The release of the AlphaFold Deep Learning approach has revolutionized the field. The recent near-complete human proteome proposal makes it possible to analyse large amounts of data and evaluate the results of the approach in greater depth. The 3D human proteome was thus analysed in light of the classic secondary structures, and many less-used protein local conformations (PolyProline II helices, type of γ-turns, of β-turns and of β-bulges, curvature of the helices, and a structural alphabet). Without questioning the global quality of the approach, this analysis highlights certain local conformations, which maybe poorly predicted and they could therefore be better addressed.

A Perspective on the (Rise and Fall of) Protein β-Turns

The β-turn is the third defined secondary structure after the α-helix and the β-sheet. The β-turns were described more than 50 years ago and account for more than 20% of protein residues. Nonetheless, they are often overlooked or even misunderstood. This poor knowledge of these local protein conformations is due to various factors, causes that I discuss here. For example, confusion still exists about the assignment of these local protein structures, their overlaps with other structures, the potential absence of a stabilizing hydrogen bond, the numerous types of β-turns and the software's difficulty in assigning or visualizing them. I also propose some ideas to potentially/partially remedy this and present why β-turns can still be helpful, even in the AlphaFold 2 era.