1
|
Hardy NB. Delaying quantitative resistance to pesticides and antibiotics. Evol Appl 2022; 15:2067-2077. [PMID: 36540637 PMCID: PMC9753825 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
How can we best vary the application of pesticides and antibiotics to delay resistance evolution? Previous theoretical comparisons of deployment strategies have focused on qualitative resistance traits and have mostly assumed that resistance alleles are already present in a population. But many real resistance traits are quantitative, and the evolution of resistant genotypes in the field may depend on de novo mutation and recombination. Here, I use an individual-based, forward-time, quantitative-genetic simulation model to investigate the evolution of quantitative resistance. I evaluate the performance of four application strategies for delaying resistance evolution, to wit, the (1) sequential, (2) mosaic, (3) periodic, and (4) combined strategies. I find that which strategy is best depends on initial efficacy. When at the onset, xenobiotics completely prevent reproduction in treated demes, a combined strategy is best. On the other hand, when populations are partially resistant, the combined strategy is inferior to mosaic and periodic strategies, especially when resistance alleles are antagonistically pleiotropic. Thus, the optimal application strategy for managing against the rise of quantitative resistance depends on pleiotropy and whether or not partial resistance is already present in a population. This result appears robust to variation in pest reproductive mode and migration rate, direct fitness costs for resistant phenotypes, and the extent of refugial habitats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nate B Hardy
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holmes KH, Lindquist JL, Rebarber R, Werle R, Yerka M, Tenhumberg B. Modeling the evolution of herbicide resistance in weed species with a complex life cycle. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 32:e02473. [PMID: 34652876 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
A growing number of weed species have evolved resistance to herbicides in recent years, which causes an immense financial burden to farmers. An increasingly popular method of weed control is the adoption of crops that are resistant to specific herbicides, which allows farmers to apply the herbicide during the growing season without harming the crop. If such crops are planted in the presence of closely related weed species, it is possible that resistance genes could transfer from the crop species to feral populations of the wild species via gene flow and become stably introgressed under ongoing selective pressure by the herbicide. We use a density-dependent matrix model to evaluate the effect of planting such crops on the evolution of herbicide resistance under a range of management scenarios. Our model expands on previous simulation studies by considering weed species with a more complex life cycle (perennial, rhizomatous weed species), studying the effect of environmental variation in herbicide effectiveness, and evaluating the role of common simplifying genetic assumptions on resistance evolution. Our model predictions are qualitatively similar to previous modeling studies using species with a simpler life cycle, which is, crop rotation in combination with rotation of herbicide site of action effectively controls weed populations and slows the evolution of herbicide resistance. We find that ignoring the effect of environmental variation can lead to an over- or under-prediction of the speed of resistance evolution. The effect of environmental variation in herbicide effectiveness depends on the resistance allele frequency in the weed population at the beginning of the simulation. Finally, we find that degree of dominance and ploidy level have a much larger effect on the predicted speed of resistance evolution compared to the rate of gene flow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Harrison Holmes
- Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, USA
| | - John L Lindquist
- Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, USA
| | - Richard Rebarber
- Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, USA
| | - Rodrigo Werle
- Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA
| | - Melinda Yerka
- Department of Agriculture, Nutrition and Veterinary Sciences, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA
| | - Brigitte Tenhumberg
- School of Biological Sciences and Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu G, Sarkar A, Qian L. Does organizational participation affect farmers' behavior in adopting the joint mechanism of pest and disease control? A study of Meixian County, Shaanxi Province. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2021; 77:1428-1443. [PMID: 33131160 DOI: 10.1002/ps.6161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In China, there are a lack of well-established relationships regarding farmers' behavior and participation in farmer organizations. The main objective of this study was to explore the effects and mechanisms of organizational participation in the joint control of pest and disease among kiwifruit growers (within the members of organizations). To fulfill this objective, the present study utilized survey data from 577 kiwifruit growers collected from Meixian County, Shaanxi Province, China. A combined method utilizing the instrumental variable (IV) ordered probit and bootstrap multiple mediation effect models were employed to determine the effects of participation by farmers' organizations in the joint control of pest and disease among kiwifruit growers. RESULTS A positive relationship was found between organizational participation and the joint control of pests and diseases. The empirical analysis of this study found that organizational support, organizational learning and organizational norms have mediating effects in the process of farmers' participation in the joint control of pests and disease. It is essential to go beyond individual behavior and tackle group decision-making at the farm level. CONCLUSION This study found a positive effect of organizational participation in joint pest and disease control mechanisms. Moreover, whether the farm is situated in the demonstration zone for kiwifruit cultivation, planting experience, planting area, whether there are people in the family who are village cadres, and the number of older adults in the family significantly positively affect the degree of pest and disease control. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Xu
- College of Economics and Management, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, China
| | - Apurbo Sarkar
- College of Economics and Management, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, China
| | - Lu Qian
- College of Economics and Management, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jordan N, Gutknecht J, Bybee‐Finley KA, Hunter M, Krupnik TJ, Pittelkow CM, Prasad PVV, Snapp S. To meet grand challenges, agricultural scientists must engage in the politics of constructive collective action. CROP SCIENCE 2021; 61:24-31. [PMID: 33664524 PMCID: PMC7894515 DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Agriculture now faces grand challenges, with crucial implications for the global future. These include the need to increase production of nutrient-dense food, to improve agriculture's effects on soil, water, wildlife, and climate, and to enhance equity and justice in food and agricultural systems. We argue that certain politics of constructive collective action-and integral involvement of agricultural scientists in these politics-are essential for meeting grand challenges and other complex problems facing agriculture in the 21st century. To spur reflection and deliberation about the role of politics in the work of agricultural scientists, we outline these politics of constructive collective action. These serve to organize forceful responses to grand challenges through coordinated and cooperative action taken by multiple sectors of society. In essence, these politics entail (1) building bonds of affinity within a heterogenous network, (2) developing a shared roadmap for collective action, and (3) taking sustained action together. These emerging politics differ markedly from more commonly discussed forms of political activity by scientists, e.g., policy advisory, policy advocacy, and protest. We present key premises for our thesis, and then describe and discuss a politics of constructive collective action, the necessary roles of agricultural scientists, and an agenda for exploring and expanding their engagement in these politics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Jordan
- University of Minnesota1991 Upper Buford CircleSt. PaulMN55108USA
| | - J. Gutknecht
- University of Minnesota1529 Gortner AvenueSt. PaulMN55108USA
| | | | - M. Hunter
- American Farmland Trust1991 Upper Buford CircleSt. PaulMN55108USA
| | - T. J. Krupnik
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)House 10/B. Road 53. Gulshan‐2Dhaka1213Bangladesh
| | - C. M. Pittelkow
- University of California, DavisOne Shields AvenueDavisCA95616USA
| | - P. V. V. Prasad
- Kansas State University108 Waters Hall, 1603 Old Claflin PlaceManhattanKS66506USA
| | - S. Snapp
- Michigan State UniversityPlant and Soil Sciences Building, 1066 Bogue St., Room 490East LansingMI48824USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baek Y, Bobadilla LK, Giacomini DA, Montgomery JS, Murphy BP, Tranel PJ. Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds. REVIEWS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY 2021; 255:93-128. [PMID: 33932185 DOI: 10.1007/398_2020_55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Widespread adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops and concomitant reliance on glyphosate for weed control set an unprecedented stage for the evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds. There are now 48 weed species that have evolved glyphosate resistance. Diverse glyphosate-resistance mechanisms have evolved, including single, double, and triple amino acid substitutions in the target-site gene, duplication of the gene encoding the target site, and others that are rare or nonexistent for evolved resistance to other herbicides. This review summarizes these resistance mechanisms, discusses what is known about their evolution, and concludes with some of the impacts glyphosate-resistant weeds have had on weed management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousoon Baek
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Lucas K Bobadilla
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Darci A Giacomini
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
| | | | - Brent P Murphy
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Patrick J Tranel
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Busi R, Powles SB, Beckie HJ, Renton M. Rotations and mixtures of soil-applied herbicides delay resistance. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2020; 76:487-496. [PMID: 31251459 DOI: 10.1002/ps.5534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weed resistance to foliar herbicides has dramatically increased worldwide in the last two decades. As a consequence, current practices of weed management have changed, with an increased adoption of soil-applied herbicides to restore control of herbicide-resistant weeds. We foresee metabolism-based resistance and cross-resistance to soil-applied herbicides as a potential global consequence to the increased and widespread adoption of new and old soil-applied herbicides. Thus, the aim of this study is to use computer simulation modelling to quantify and rank the risk of weeds evolving resistance to soil-applied herbicides under different usage strategies (single herbicide use, rotations and mixtures) and population genetic hypotheses. RESULTS Simulations indicate that without rotation it takes twice as long to select for resistance to a particular soil-applied herbicide - trifluralin - than to any other herbicide option considered. Relative to trifluralin-only use, simple herbicide rotation patterns have no effect in delaying resistance, whereas more complex rotation patterns can delay resistance two- or three-fold. Herbicide mixtures further delay resistance up to six-fold in comparison to single use or simple herbicide rotations. CONCLUSION By computer modelling simulations we demonstrate that mixtures maximize herbicide effectiveness and the selection heterogeneity of soil-applied herbicides, and delay herbicide resistance evolution in weedy plants. Our study is consistent with previous state-of-art scientific evidence (i.e. epidemiological and modelling studies across different systems and pests) and extension efforts (i.e. 'rotate herbicide mixtures') to provide insight to manage the selection and evolution of weed resistance. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Busi
- Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Stephen B Powles
- Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Hugh J Beckie
- Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Michael Renton
- Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|