Four pillars are required to support a successful biocontrol fungus

Bioacaricides in Crop Protection-What Is the State of Play?

Growing demands for environmentally safe and sustainable pest management have increased interest in biopesticides as alternatives to synthetic chemical pesticides. This review presents the current status of bioacaricides, defined as commercial biopesticide products based on microorganisms (microbial acaricides) and biologically active substances of microbial, plant or animal origin (biochemicals and semiochemicals) used in crop protection against spider mites (Tetranychidae) and other plant-feeding mites. The most important microbial bioacaricides are mycopesticides, which are products manufactured from living propagules of Beauveria bassiana s.l. and several other acaropathogenic fungi. Products based on avermectins and milbemycins, secondary metabolites of actinomycetes, are well-known examples of biochemicals of microbial origin. Among the biochemicals of plant origin, the most widely used to date have been the products based on pyrethrum-obtained from the Dalmatian daisy, Tanacetum cinerariifolium (Asteraceae)-and azadirachtin, obtained from the Indian neem tree, Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae). In recent years, products based on essential oils from aromatic plants belonging to the families Lamiaceae, Myrtaceae, Rutaceae and others have also gained increasing importance in the market. Special emphasis in this review is given to the compatibility of bioacaricides with predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae as biological control agents used in the integrated management of plant-feeding mites.

Why are there no widely successful microbial bioherbicides for weed management in crops?

Microbial biopesticides to control plant pathogens and insects in crops have had significant success. However, there have been relatively few successes for microbial bioherbicides in crops, despite considerable numbers of publications and commercial product introductions in this area. Marketed microbial bioherbicide products for use in agriculture have been largely unsuccessful. This article covers the potential advantages of successful microbial bioherbicides, as well as the biological and technical issues that have limited their success. Technologies to overcome the problems that have limited the success of these products are discussed. The many advantages of using killed microbial products (e.g. cell-free filtrates) over living microbial products as bioherbicides are detailed. A commercialized mycoherbicide that has been selected for in the laboratory for control of the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica is being used with some success in Africa, indicating that non-transgenic modification of the genetics of bioherbicide microbes for improved efficacy is acceptable to some regulatory authorities. Genetic modifications to improve efficacy and host range, as well as improved application technology to greatly reduce the amount of product needed are two technologies that are likely to expand the use of microbial bioherbicides in the future. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

The Toothpick Project: commercialization of a virulence-selected fungal bioherbicide for Striga hermonthica (witchweed) biocontrol in Kenya

The high-level view of global food systems identifies three all-encompassing barriers to the adoption of food systems solutions: knowledge, policy, and finance. These barriers, and the siloed characteristics of each of these, have hindered the development and adoption of microbial herbicides. How knowledge, policy, and finance are related to the Toothpick Project's path of commercializing a new bioherbicide, early in the scope of the industry, is discussed here. The Toothpick Project's innovation, developed over four decades and commercialized in 2021, uses strains of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. strigae selected for overproduction and excretion of specific amino acids, killing the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica (Striga or witchweed), Africa's worst pest threat to food security. Historically, bioherbicides have not been a sufficient alternative to the dominant use of synthetic chemical herbicides. To be used safely as bioherbicides, plant pathogens need to be host specific, non-toxic, and yet sufficiently virulent to control a specific weed. For commercialization, bioherbicides must be affordable and require a sufficient shelf life for distribution. Given the current triple storm encountered by the chemical herbicide industry (herbicide-resistant weeds, lawsuits, and consumer pushback), there exists an opportunity to use certain plant pathogens as bioherbicides by enhancing their virulence. By discussing barriers in the scope of knowledge, policy, and finance in the development of the Toothpick Project's new microbial bioherbicide, we hope to help others to anticipate the challenges and provide change-leaders, particularly in policy and finance, a ground level perspective of bioherbicide development. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.