Population pharmacokinetics of letermovir following oral and intravenous administration in healthy participants and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients

Optimizing CMV therapy: Population pharmacokinetics and Monte Carlo simulations for letermovir and maribavir dosage

PURPOSE

This study seeks to reassess and enhance the dosing strategies of letermovir and maribavir for treating cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, aiming to propose adjustments that could improve therapeutic effectiveness.

METHODS

Pre-existing population pharmacokinetic models were used alongside Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the dosing strategies of letermovir and maribavir in CMV treatment. The simulations assessed the probability of target attainment for current and alternative dosing regimens, including scenarios with missed doses.

RESULTS

For letermovir, a loading dose on the first day of treatment initiation appeared more effective than the current strategy without a loading dose. Additionally, in cases of missed doses, doubling the dose upon resumption was more effective than returning to the normal dosage. For maribavir, the current 400mg BID regimen only covers the lower end of the inhibitory concentration 50 range, suggesting a potential benefit from increasing the doses. Simulations indicated that for missed doses, all tested regimens only covered the lower range of inhibitory concentrations, but the current strategy of resuming the normal dosage provided the lowest chances of target attainment.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a strong rationale to reconsider and potentially modify the approved dosing guidelines for letermovir and maribavir in CMV treatment. Adjusting dosing regimens, including the use of loading doses and increased doses after missed doses, could enhance treatment outcomes by ensuring higher probabilities of achieving therapeutic targets and better managing missed doses.

Role of letermovir therapeutic drug monitoring for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a prospective study

PURPOSE

The role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients receiving letermovir has not yet been clarified. This study is to explore letermovir trough concentration (Cmin) correlation with its clinical efficacy and adverse events, and factors affecting its plasma concentrations.

METHODS

A prospective, non-interventional study was performed in allo-HSCT recipients receiving letermovir prophylaxis. Plasma concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Data analysis was performed using logistic regression, linear regression, and classification and regression tree (CART) models.

RESULTS

701 trough concentrations from 71 recipients were included, uncovering pronounced intra- and inter-individual variability in letermovir Cmin. During 24-week follow-up, CMV infection incidence was 16.4%. A significant correlation was identified between letermovir Cmin and its clinical efficacy, and the CART model showed an increased risk of CMV infection when Cmin ≤ 2731 ng/mL. However, no clear correlation was found between Cmin and adverse events. Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease, cyclosporine Cmin, gender, and concomitant medications, including mycophenolate mofetil, ondansetron, caspofungin, and methylprednisolone, may impact letermovir Cmin. Additionally, coadministration with cyclosporine injection significantly decreased median letermovir Cmin compared with cyclosporine capsules (2311 vs. 3386 ng/mL). Moreover, with the extension of time post-transplant, trough concentrations of both cyclosporine and letermovir significantly decreased.

CONCLUSION

TDM for letermovir may be beneficial in allo-HSCT recipients considering the variability in letermovir Cmin and its correlation with clinical efficacy. Moreover, drug interactions and the effects of changes in cyclosporine dosage forms or concentrations require careful monitoring for their effect on letermovir Cmin.

Drug-Drug Interaction Management with the Novel Anti-Cytomegalovirus Agents Letermovir and Maribavir: Guidance for Clinicians

Letermovir and maribavir have demonstrated efficacy in the prevention and treatment, respectively, of immunosuppressed patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease. These patients often have polypharmacy making them at risk for drug-drug interactions. Both letermovir and maribavir can be perpetrators and victims of drug-drug interactions. Letermovir is a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A, CYP2C8 and OATP1B1/3, and a moderate inducer of CYP2C19. It is a substrate of UGT1A1/3, BCRP, P-gp and OATP1B1/3. Maribavir is a moderate CYP2C9 inhibitor and a substrate of CYP3A. Drug-drug interactions between these anti-CMV agents and a number of therapeutic classes, such as immunosuppressants, antifungal agents, and hemato-oncological agents, can have clinical consequences and deserve dose modification or close monitoring. In a number of examples, three-way drug interactions need to be assessed. The objective of this review is to provide clinicians with guidance for drug-drug interaction management, based on existing data from drug-drug interaction studies, and extrapolation to other relevant co-medications that have not (yet) been studied but that are frequently used in these patient populations.

Letermovir safety and efficacy for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in adult Japanese kidney transplant recipients: a multicenter, open-label, noncomparative Phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Letermovir is approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients worldwide and is also approved in the United States for CMV prophylaxis in adult high-risk (D+/R-) kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The safety and efficacy of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in adult Japanese KTRs are reported here.

METHODS

In this Phase 3, single-arm, open-label study, adult Japanese KTRs with CMV serostatuses D+/R-, D+/R+, and D-/R+ received letermovir 480 mg daily orally within 7 days post-transplant through Week 28. Participants were followed through Week 52. The primary objective was to evaluate letermovir safety and tolerability. Efficacy was a secondary objective, measured by CMV disease, CMV disease or infection requiring intervention, and quantifiable CMV DNAemia. All CMV disease cases were confirmed by an independent adjudication committee.

RESULTS

Among 22 participants (12 were D+/R-) who received letermovir prophylaxis, 20 (90.9%) experienced ≥ 1 AE through Week 28. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity; no deaths were reported. During the prophylaxis period through Week 28, one transient case of quantifiable CMV DNAemia was detected, but no CMV disease or infection requiring intervention was reported. Through Week 52, four D+/R- participants met the endpoint of CMV disease or infection requiring intervention, of whom two had committee-confirmed CMV syndrome; all recovered with CMV therapy. A total of 5 participants had quantifiable CMV DNAemia through Week 52.

CONCLUSION

Letermovir was generally well tolerated, and the data support its use for the prevention of CMV disease/infection in adult Japanese KTRs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04129398.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Letermovir in Allogenic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Letermovir is a newly developed antiviral agent used for the prophylaxis of human cytomegalovirus infections in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. This novel anti-cytomegalovirus drug, used for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus reactivation until approximately 200 days after transplantation, effectively reduces the risk of clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection. No human counterpart exists for the terminase complex; letermovir is virus specific and lacks some toxicities previously observed with other anti-cytomegalovirus drugs, such as cytopenia and nephrotoxicity. The absolute bioavailability of letermovir in healthy individuals is estimated to be 94% based on a population-pharmacokinetic analysis. In contrast, oral administration of letermovir to patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation results in lower exposure than that in healthy individuals. Renal or hepatic impairment does not influence the intrinsic clearance of letermovir. Co-administration of letermovir may alter the plasma concentrations of other drugs, including itself, as it acts as a substrate and inhibitor/inducer of several drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. In particular, attention should be paid to the drug-drug interactions between letermovir and calcineurin inhibitors or azole antifungal agents, which are commonly used in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. This article reviews and summarizes the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of letermovir, focusing on patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation, healthy individuals, and specific patient subsets.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Adolescent Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients

INTRODUCTION

Letermovir is a cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase complex inhibitor approved for prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in adult CMV-seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients (R+). We report pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of letermovir in adolescent (12-18 years) allogeneic HCT recipients from an ongoing clinical study.

METHODS

In this phase 2b, multicenter, open-label study (NCT03940586), 28 adolescents received 480 mg letermovir [240 mg with cyclosporin A (CsA)] once daily orally or intravenously. Blood was collected for intensive (n = 14) plasma concentrations of letermovir. Intensive PK data were used for dose confirmation. Target exposure range 34,400-100,000 h × ng/mL for pediatric median exposures was based on model-predicted phase 3 population PK simulations in adult HCT recipients.

RESULTS

All participants were CMV-seropositive (body weight 28.7-95.0 kg). Of 12 PK-evaluable participants, 8 receiving 480 mg letermovir without CsA and 4 receiving 240 mg letermovir with CsA achieved exposures comparable to the adult exposure range. Exposure above the target but below the adult clinical program maximum was observed in 1 patient. Safety was consistent with previously described safety in adults. The proportion of participants with clinically significant CMV infection through week 24 post-HCT was comparable (24%) to that in the pivotal phase 3 study in adults (37.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of adult letermovir doses in this adolescent cohort resulted in exposures within adult clinical program margins and was associated with safety and efficacy similar to adults. Results support a letermovir dose of 480 mg (240 mg with CsA) in adolescent allo-HCT recipients.

Letermovir for CMV Prophylaxis in Very High-Risk Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients for Inborn Errors of Immunity

The burden of CMV infection and disease is important in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), notably in the subgroup of patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEIs). Letermovir (LMV) is now a standard of care for CMV prophylaxis in adult sero-positive (R+) recipients, but is not yet labeled for children. Published pediatric studies are still scarce. We report a monocentric real-life use of LMV in 36 HSCT pediatric recipients with IEIs considered at high-risk of CMV infection including 14 patients between 2 and 12 months of age. A homogenous dosage proportional to the body surface area was used. Pharmacokinetic (PK) was performed in 8 patients with a median of 6 years of age (range 0,6;15). The cumulative incidence of clinically significant CMV infections (CS-CMVi) and the overall survival of patients under LMV were compared to a very similar historical cohort under (val)aciclovir prophylaxis. LMV tolerance was good. As compared to the historical cohort, the incidence of CS-CMVi was significantly lower in LMV group (5 out of 36 transplants (13.9%) versus 28 of the 62 HSCT (45.2%)) (p = 0.002). Plasma LMV exposures did not significantly differ with those reported in adult patients. In this high-risk pediatric HSCT cohort transplanted for IEIs, CMV prophylaxis with LMV at a homogenous dosage was well tolerated and effective in preventing CS-CMVi compared with a historical cohort.

Evaluation of the inhibitory effects of itraconazole on letermovir

AIMS

Letermovir, a cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA terminase complex inhibitor, is a substrate of ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein; P-gp), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1/3, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1, UGT1A3 and possibly ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein; BCRP). A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of itraconazole, a prototypic ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitor, on letermovir pharmacokinetics (PK) and the effects of letermovir on itraconazole PK.

METHODS

In an open-label, fixed-sequence study in 14 healthy participants, 200 mg oral itraconazole was administered once daily for 4 days. Following a 10-day washout, 480 mg oral letermovir was administered once daily for 14 days (Days 1-14) and then coadministered with 200 mg itraconazole once daily for 4 days (Days 15-18). Intensive PK sampling was performed for letermovir and itraconazole. PK and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

Letermovir geometric mean ratio (GMR; 90% confidence interval [CI]) for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24 ) was 1.33 (1.17, 1.51) and for maximum concentration (Cmax ) was 1.21 (1.05, 1.39) following administration with/without itraconazole. Itraconazole GMR (90% CI) for AUC0-24 was 0.76 (0.71, 0.81) and for Cmax was 0.84 (0.76, 0.92) following administration with/without letermovir. Coadministration of letermovir with itraconazole was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in letermovir exposure with coadministration of itraconazole is likely predominantly due to inhibition of intestinal ABCB1 and potentially ABCG2 transport. The mechanism for the decrease in itraconazole exposure is unknown. The modest changes in letermovir and itraconazole PK are not considered clinically meaningful.

Cytomegalovirus Therapy: Role of Letermovir in Prophylaxis and Treatment in Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common viral pathogen in the transplant population and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. CMV prevention is paramount; however, selecting the best preventive strategy depends on many factors including donor-recipient CMV serostatus, transplant-specific risks, antiviral toxicities and cost. Novel CMV therapeutics such as letermovir (LTV) are desperately needed to optimize CMV management. Uniquely among CMV antiviral therapies, LTV inhibits the viral terminase complex in the CMV DNA synthesis pathway and disrupts viral genome packaging. Further, it lacks side effects frequently associated with other CMV antiviral therapies and evades common mechanisms of resistance. LTV is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for CMV prevention in adult CMV-seropositive hematopoietic cell transplant recipients but is increasingly applied off-label for prophylaxis and treatment. This review summarizes important concepts of CMV management in transplantation, with a specific focus on LTV pharmacology and clinical experience to date alongside future prospects for its application.

A drug-drug interaction study with letermovir and acyclovir in healthy participants

Letermovir inhibits renal tubular organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3) in vitro and is predicted to inhibit OAT3 in vivo. Acyclovir, a substrate for OAT3, is likely to be coadministered with letermovir; therefore, letermovir may increase acyclovir concentrations. A drug-drug interaction study was conducted in healthy participants (N = 16) to assess the effect of letermovir on acyclovir pharmacokinetics. On Day 1, participants received a single oral dose of 400 mg acyclovir; on Days 2-7, participants received oral doses of 480 mg letermovir once daily with a single oral dose of 400 mg acyclovir coadministered on Day 7. Coadministration with letermovir resulted in geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for acyclovir area under the concentration-time curve from administration to infinity and maximum plasma concentration of 1.02 (0.87-1.20) and 0.82 (0.71-0.93), respectively. No notable safety issues were reported. No clinically significant interaction was observed between letermovir and acyclovir in healthy participants and no dose adjustment is required for coadministration.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Orally Administered Letermovir Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

With balanced safety-efficacy profile, letermovir anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis is used in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (HSCTR). We assessed feasibility and usefulness of letermovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in HSCTR. We performed a prospective observational study on letermovir-TDM including 40 consecutive adult CMV-seropositive allogeneic-HSCTR who received orally (PO) administered letermovir. Minimal blood concentrations of letermovir (C_trough) were measured on days 3 and 7 postletermovir initiation and weekly thereafter. Letermovir-C_trough remained stable during the first 70 days post-HSCT at a median of 286 μg/L (interquartile range, 131 to 591 μg/L), with large interpatient/intrapatient variability. No associations between breakthrough clinically significant CMV infection or detectable CMV DNAemia and letermovir-C_trough were observed. Patients with letermovir-associated adverse events had higher letermovir-C_trough than patients without (400 versus 266 μg/L, P = 0.02). Letermovir-C_trough was similar in patients with or without gastrointestinal symptoms (280 versus 300 μg/L, P = 0.49). Acute grade ≥2 GvHD was associated with higher letermovir-C_trough (479 versus 248 μg/L, P = 0.001), including gastrointestinal GvHD (499 versus 263 μg/L, P = 0.004). Concomitantly administered posaconazole and cyclosporine were associated with higher letermovir-C_trough (707 versus 259 μg/L, P < 0.001 and 437 versus 248 μg/L, P = 0.01, respectively). In multivariable analysis, both posaconazole (odds ratio [OR], 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4 to 9.7; P < 0.0001) and cyclosporine-adjusted letermovir dose at 240 mg daily (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 9.0; P = 0.01) were independently associated with higher letermovir-C_trough. In conclusion, administration of PO letermovir led to measurable and relatively stable letermovir-C_trough, without noticeable associations with clinical efficacy. Letermovir exposure was not affected by gastrointestinal symptoms, but with posaconazole and cyclosporine administration. Associations between letermovir and concomitantly administered agents and adverse events warrant additional clinical studies.

Real-world efficacy of letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single-center retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) and is associated with increased mortality. Letermovir (LET) is a novel antiviral drug used to prevent CMV infection.

METHODS

We analyzed 111 consecutive patients who underwent aHSCT, retrospectively, to evaluate the efficacy of LET prophylaxis for clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) in real-world situations. In addition, we analyzed the influence of LET on transplant outcomes. Thirty-eight patients who were administered LET prophylactically were compared with 73 patients without LET prophylaxis after aHSCT.

RESULTS

On day 180, the cumulative incidence of csCMVi in patients who received LET prophylaxis was significantly lower than that in patients without LET prophylaxis (29.7% vs. 56.2%, P < 0.001). Among the patients who developed csCMVi, the interval from aHSCT to the initiation of preemptive therapy was significantly longer in patients who received LET prophylaxis than in those who did not (129.5 days vs. 42 days, P < 0.001). The six-month overall survival was 86.1% in patients who received LET prophylaxis and 66.8% in the non-LET group (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

LET prophylaxis was highly effective in preventing csCMVi and could potentially improve transplant outcomes, particularly when initiated early after transplantations.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Letermovir Following Single- and Multiple-Dose Administration in Healthy Japanese Subjects

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus terminase inhibitor for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of letermovir were assessed in healthy Japanese subjects in 2 phase 1 trials: trial 1-single ascending oral doses (240, 480, and 720 mg) and intravenous (IV) doses (240, 480, and 960 mg), and trial 2-multiple oral doses (240 and 480 mg once daily for 7 days). Following administration of oral single and multiple doses, letermovir was absorbed with a median time to maximum plasma concentration of 2 to 4 hours, and concentrations declined in a biphasic manner with a terminal half-life of ≈10 to 13 hours. The post absorption plasma concentration-time profile of letermovir following oral administration was similar to the profile observed with IV dosing. There was minimal accumulation with multiple-dose administration. Letermovir exposure in healthy Japanese subjects was ≈1.5- to 2.5-fold higher than that observed in non-Japanese subjects. Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, weight differences primarily accounted for the higher exposures observed in Asians. Letermovir was generally well tolerated following oral and IV administration to healthy Japanese subjects.

Acute and Chronic Effects of Rifampin on Letermovir Suggest Transporter Inhibition and Induction Contribute to Letermovir Pharmacokinetics

Rifampin has acute inhibitory and chronic inductive effects that can cause complex drug-drug interactions. Rifampin inhibits transporters including organic-anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and induces enzymes and transporters including cytochrome P450 3A, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A, and P-gp. This study aimed at separating inhibitory and inductive effects of rifampin on letermovir disposition and elimination (indicated for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients). Letermovir is a substrate of UGT1A1/3, P-gp, and OATP1B, with its clearance primarily mediated by OATP1B. Letermovir (single-dose) administered with rifampin (single-dose) resulted in increased letermovir exposure through transporter inhibition. Chronic coadministration with rifampin (inhibition plus potential OATP1B induction) resulted in modestly decreased letermovir exposure versus letermovir alone. Letermovir administered 24 hours after last rifampin dose (potential OATP1B induction) resulted in markedly decreased letermovir exposure. These data suggest rifampin may induce transporters that clear letermovir; the modestly reduced letermovir exposure with chronic rifampin coadministration likely reflects the net effect of inhibition and induction. OATP1B endogenous biomarkers coproporphyrin (CP) I and glycochenodeoxycholic acid-sulfate (GCDCA-S) were also analyzed; their exposures increased after single-dose rifampin plus letermovir, consistent with OATP1B inhibition and prior reports of inhibition by rifampin alone. CP I and GCDCA-S exposures were substantially reduced with letermovir administered 24 hours after the last dose of rifampin versus letermovir plus chronic rifampin coadministration, This study suggests that OATP1B induction may contribute to reduced letermovir exposure after chronic rifampin administration, although given the complexity of letermovir disposition, alternative mechanisms are not fully excluded.

Exposure-Response Analyses of Letermovir Following Oral and Intravenous Administration in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients

The cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral terminase inhibitor letermovir is approved for prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in adult CMV-seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. In a phase III trial (NCT02137772), letermovir significantly reduced clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) rate vs. placebo through Week 24 (primary end point) and Week 14 (secondary end point) post transplantation. Here, exposure-response relationships were investigated using efficacy and selected safety end points from the phase III trial to inform the proposed clinical dose. Post hoc exposure estimates were derived from a population pharmacokinetic model. No significant exposure dependencies were found for CS-CMVi through Week 24 or Week 14 among letermovir-treated participants. Evaluated covariates had no impact on exposure-efficacy relationships and letermovir plasma exposure did not affect time of CS-CMVi onset. There was no dependence between adverse event incidence and letermovir exposure. These results support current dosing recommendations in several countries and regions, including the United States and European Union.