1
|
Guo X, Wei W, Liu M, Cai T, Wu C, Wang J. Assessing the Most Vulnerable Subgroup to Type II Diabetes Associated with Statin Usage: Evidence from Electronic Health Record Data. J Am Stat Assoc 2023; 118:1488-1499. [PMID: 38223220 PMCID: PMC10786632 DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2157727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
There have been increased concerns that the use of statins, one of the most commonly prescribed drugs for treating coronary artery disease, is potentially associated with the increased risk of new-onset Type II diabetes (T2D). Nevertheless, to date, there is no robust evidence supporting as to whether and what kind of populations are indeed vulnerable for developing T2D after taking statins. In this case study, leveraging the biobank and electronic health record data in the Partner Health System, we introduce a new data analysis pipeline and a novel statistical methodology that address existing limitations by (i) designing a rigorous causal framework that systematically examines the causal effects of statin usage on T2D risk in observational data, (ii) uncovering which patient subgroup is most vulnerable for developing T2D after taking statins, and (iii) assessing the replicability and statistical significance of the most vulnerable subgroup via a bootstrap calibration procedure. Our proposed approach delivers asymptotically sharp confidence intervals and debiased estimate for the treatment effect of the most vulnerable subgroup in the presence of high-dimensional covariates. With our proposed approach, we find that females with high T2D genetic risk are at the highest risk of developing T2D due to statin usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinzhou Guo
- Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Waverly Wei
- Division of Biostatistics, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
| | - Molei Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY
| | - Tianxi Cai
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Chong Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jingshen Wang
- Division of Biostatistics, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cintron DW, Adler NE, Gottlieb LM, Hagan E, Tan ML, Vlahov D, Glymour MM, Matthay EC. Heterogeneous treatment effects in social policy studies: An assessment of contemporary articles in the health and social sciences. Ann Epidemiol 2022; 70:79-88. [PMID: 35483641 DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE . Social policies are important determinants of population health but may have varying effects on subgroups of people. Evaluating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) of social policies is critical to determine how social policies will affect health inequities. Methods for evaluating HTEs are not standardized. Little is known about how often and by what methods HTEs are assessed in social policy and health research. METHODS . A sample of 55 articles from 2019 on the health effects of social policies were evaluated for frequency of reporting HTEs; for what subgroupings HTEs were reported; frequency of a priori specification of intent to assess HTEs; and methods used for assessing HTEs. RESULTS . 24 (44%) studies described some form of HTE assessment, including by age, gender, education, race/ethnicity, and/or geography. Among studies assessing HTEs, 63% specified HTE assessment a priori, and most (71%) used descriptive methods such as stratification; 21% used statistical tests (e.g., interaction terms in a regression); and no studies used data-driven algorithms. CONCLUSIONS . Although understanding HTEs could enhance policy and practice-based efforts to reduce inequities, it is not routine research practice. Increased evaluation of HTEs across relevant subgroups is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dakota W Cintron
- Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 465, Campus Box 0844, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0844, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 2nd Floor, Campus Box 0560, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Nancy E Adler
- Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 465, Campus Box 0844, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0844, USA
| | - Laura M Gottlieb
- Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 465, Campus Box 0844, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0844, USA
| | - Erin Hagan
- Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 465, Campus Box 0844, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0844, USA
| | - May Lynn Tan
- Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 465, Campus Box 0844, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0844, USA
| | - David Vlahov
- Yale School of Nursing at Yale University, 400 West Campus Drive, Room 32306, Orange, CT, 06477, USA
| | - M Maria Glymour
- Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 465, Campus Box 0844, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0844, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 2nd Floor, Campus Box 0560, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Ellicott C Matthay
- Center for Health and Community, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 465, Campus Box 0844, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0844, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 2nd Floor, Campus Box 0560, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Graham PL, Moran JL. ECMO, ARDS and meta-analyses: Bayes to the rescue? J Crit Care 2020; 59:49-54. [PMID: 32516642 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A recent meta-analysis by Munshi et al. (Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2019) claimed mortality treatment efficacy for extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the acute respitratory syndrome (ARDS) despite very low meta-analytic study numbers (n = 2 (RCTs), risk-ratio (RR) 0·73 (95%CI: 0·58-0·92); n = 5 (2 RCT, 3 observational), RR 0·69 (95%CI: 0·50-0·95)). We explore this efficacy claim by a comprehensive re-analysis of the data. METHODS Data were sourced from the two- and five-study meta-analyses, conducted using the Der-Simonian & Laird (DSL) method. A variety of frequentist (DSL, restricted maximum likelihood (REML), Paul-Mandel (PM), with/without Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman variance correction), a beta-binomial model (BBN)) and Bayesian models (2 finite-mixture and several Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo) were used to estimate treatment effects. Fragility-indices, the minimum patients changing mortality outcome needed to induce a conclusion change were also applied. RESULTS For the 2-study and 5-study meta-analysis only the uncorrected frequentist estimators (DSL, REML, PM) demonstrated significant RR. Except for the BBN model, which was significant for the 2-study meta-analysis, intervals for all other models included the null. Both meta-analyses demonstrated fragility. CONCLUSIONS Having canvassed the conduct of both meta-analyses presented by Munshi et al. and proffered alternative methods, we find no certainty regarding the efficacy of ECMO in ARDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra L Graham
- Centre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine (GenIMPACT), Macquarie Business School and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
| | - John L Moran
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Affiliation(s)
- Xinzhou Guo
- Department of Statistics, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI
| | - Xuming He
- Department of Statistics, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ballarini NM, Chiu Y, König F, Posch M, Jaki T. A critical review of graphics for subgroup analyses in clinical trials. Pharm Stat 2020; 19:541-560. [PMID: 32216035 PMCID: PMC8647927 DOI: 10.1002/pst.2012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Subgroup analyses are a routine part of clinical trials to investigate whether treatment effects are homogeneous across the study population. Graphical approaches play a key role in subgroup analyses to visualise effect sizes of subgroups, to aid the identification of groups that respond differentially, and to communicate the results to a wider audience. Many existing approaches do not capture the core information and are prone to lead to a misinterpretation of the subgroup effects. In this work, we critically appraise existing visualisation techniques, propose useful extensions to increase their utility and attempt to develop an effective visualisation approach. We focus on forest plots, UpSet plots, Galbraith plots, subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot, and contour plots, and comment on other approaches whose utility is more limited. We illustrate the methods using data from a prostate cancer study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolás M. Ballarini
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Yi‐Da Chiu
- Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK
- MRC Biostatistics Unit University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine Cambridge UK
| | - Franz König
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Martin Posch
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Thomas Jaki
- Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics Lancaster University Lancaster UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Götte H, Kirchner M, Kieser M. Adjustment for exploratory cut‐off selection in randomized clinical trials with survival endpoint. Biom J 2019; 62:627-642. [DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201800302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marietta Kirchner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
| | - Meinhard Kieser
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thomas M, Bornkamp B, Posch M, König F. A multiple comparison procedure for dose-finding trials with subpopulations. Biom J 2019; 62:53-68. [PMID: 31544265 PMCID: PMC6973002 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201800111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Identifying subgroups of patients with an enhanced response to a new treatment has become an area of increased interest in the last few years. When there is knowledge about possible subpopulations with an enhanced treatment effect before the start of a trial it might be beneficial to set up a testing strategy, which tests for a significant treatment effect not only in the full population, but also in these prespecified subpopulations. In this paper, we present a parametric multiple testing approach for tests in multiple populations for dose-finding trials. Our approach is based on the MCP-Mod methodology, which uses multiple comparison procedures (MCPs) to test for a dose-response signal, while considering multiple possible candidate dose-response shapes. Our proposed methods allow for heteroscedastic error variances between populations and control the family-wise error rate over tests in multiple populations and for multiple candidate models. We show in simulations that the proposed multipopulation testing approaches can increase the power to detect a significant dose-response signal over the standard single-population MCP-Mod, when the specified subpopulation has an enhanced treatment effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Thomas
- Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Campus, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Martin Posch
- Section of Medical Statistics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Franz König
- Section of Medical Statistics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
De Pretis F, Osimani B. New Insights in Computational Methods for Pharmacovigilance: E-Synthesis, a Bayesian Framework for Causal Assessment. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16122221. [PMID: 31238543 PMCID: PMC6617215 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16122221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Today’s surge of big data coming from multiple sources is raising the stakes that pharmacovigilance has to win, making evidence synthesis a more and more robust approach in the field. In this scenario, many scholars believe that new computational methods derived from data mining will effectively enhance the detection of early warning signals for adverse drug reactions, solving the gauntlets that post-marketing surveillance requires. This article highlights the need for a philosophical approach in order to fully realize a pharmacovigilance 2.0 revolution. A state of the art on evidence synthesis is presented, followed by the illustration of E-Synthesis, a Bayesian framework for causal assessment. Computational results regarding dose-response evidence are shown at the end of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco De Pretis
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Marche Polytechnic University, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
- Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 42121 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Barbara Osimani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Marche Polytechnic University, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
- Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80539 München, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ballarini NM, Rosenkranz GK, Jaki T, König F, Posch M. Subgroup identification in clinical trials via the predicted individual treatment effect. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0205971. [PMID: 30335831 PMCID: PMC6193713 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Identifying subgroups of treatment responders through the different phases of clinical trials has the potential to increase success in drug development. Recent developments in subgroup analysis consider subgroups that are defined in terms of the predicted individual treatment effect, i.e. the difference between the predicted outcome under treatment and the predicted outcome under control for each individual, which in turn may depend on multiple biomarkers. In this work, we study the properties of different modelling strategies to estimate the predicted individual treatment effect. We explore linear models and compare different estimation methods, such as maximum likelihood and the Lasso with and without randomized response. For the latter, we implement confidence intervals based on the selective inference framework to account for the model selection stage. We illustrate the methods in a dataset of a treatment for Alzheimer disease (normal response) and in a dataset of a treatment for prostate cancer (survival outcome). We also evaluate via simulations the performance of using the predicted individual treatment effect to identify subgroups where a novel treatment leads to better outcomes compared to a control treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolás M Ballarini
- Section for Medical Statistics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerd K Rosenkranz
- Section for Medical Statistics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Jaki
- Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Franz König
- Section for Medical Statistics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Posch
- Section for Medical Statistics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Röver C, Wandel S, Friede T. Model averaging for robust extrapolation in evidence synthesis. Stat Med 2018; 38:674-694. [PMID: 30302781 DOI: 10.1002/sim.7991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Revised: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Extrapolation from a source to a target, eg, from adults to children, is a promising approach to utilize external information when data are sparse. In the context of meta-analyses, one is commonly faced with a small number of studies, whereas potentially relevant additional information may also be available. Here, we describe a simple extrapolation strategy using heavy-tailed mixture priors for effect estimation in meta-analysis, which effectively results in a model-averaging technique. The described method is robust in the sense that a potential prior-data conflict, ie, a discrepancy between source and target data, is explicitly anticipated. The aim of this paper is to develop a solution for this particular application to showcase the ease of implementation by providing R code, and to demonstrate the robustness of the general approach in simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Röver
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Tim Friede
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Personalized reproductive medicine: regulatory considerations. Fertil Steril 2018; 109:964-967. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
12
|
Lipkovich I, Dmitrienko A, Muysers C, Ratitch B. Multiplicity issues in exploratory subgroup analysis. J Biopharm Stat 2017; 28:63-81. [DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1397009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
13
|
Thomas M, Bornkamp B. Comparing Approaches to Treatment Effect Estimation for Subgroups in Clinical Trials. Stat Biopharm Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2016.1251490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|