The feasibility and value of assessing patient reported outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Assessing quality of life in pulmonary arterial hypertension: An independent prognostic marker

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, or PH Group 1), a disease of aberrant pulmonary vascular remodeling, causing progressive right heart failure (RHF) due to elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Patient mortality risk stratification guides choice and intensity of pharmacological intervention and is assessed by haemodynamics (especially PVR) as well as noninvasive tools including WHO functional class (FC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and NT-proBNP levels. Quality of life (QOL) assessment is acknowledged as a central aspect of patient-centered care, but our study sought to extend QOL's role as an additional noninvasive risk marker that could further refine risk stratification and hence therapeutic choices within a "treatment to target" paradigm (aiming to achieve low-risk status). This study found that QOL assessment using the PAH-SYMPACT© physical activity tool provided enhanced, independent mortality risk information, with one unit rise in this score associated with a 41% increase in likelihood risk (odds ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.98 (p < 0.05)) of falling within intermediate versus low-group category. We therefore found further support for additional prognostic value being conferred by measurement of QOL as part of routine PAH evaluation, reinforcing its critical role.

Clinical Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in the Management of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Despite the greater sensitivity and specificity of disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) to detect clinical change, only recently have such instruments been developed for pulmonary hypertension (PH), specifically pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic disease (CTEPH). Although these valuable tools are now being incorporated into clinical studies of PH, they have not yet reached widespread integration into routine clinical care.

OBJECTIVES

In this systematic review, the authors assess the psychometric properties of PROM developed for PH, compare PROM with other clinical outcomes in PH, and address the utility of PROM in clinical care.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic search of papers published between January 1, 2006, and October 1, 2022, using the MEDLINE database to identify PROM developed and validated for PH. The identified PROM were found to have been developed only in groups with PAH and CTEPH. The authors evaluated the identified instruments according to established psychometric criteria. An additional search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing these PROM for comparison with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

From 527 papers retrieved, a total of 35 PROM were identified. Of these, 5 disease-specific instruments were included in the final analysis. While both CAMPHOR (Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review) and emPHasis-10 performed well in patients with PAH and CTEPH with regard to their psychometric properties, emPHasis-10 demonstrated superior feasibility for use in clinical practice due to its concise format. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire performed well in the authors' analysis, though additional data is needed regarding interpretability and feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

EmPHasis-10 demonstrated strong psychometric properties and the greatest feasibility for clinical use. Further study assessing the integration of PROM into routine clinical care for PH is needed.

Pulmonary hypertension patient perspectives toward pulmonary rehabilitation

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a supervised exercise program for patients with chronic lung disease. Among patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), PR has been shown to improve both quality of life and exercise capacity. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of PR participation among PH patients, patient perspectives regarding PR, and to identify potential barriers to PR participation. We performed a cross-sectional survey of patients with self-reported PH who attended the Pulmonary Hypertension Association (PHA) conference in June 2022 in Atlanta, Georgia, and patients within the PHA listserv. A total of 429 participants completed the survey and were enrolled in the study. The average age of participants was 61 ± 14 years with 83% of participants identifying as female, 51% of patients self-reported as having group 1 PH. Among patients who completed the survey, 41% had previously attended a PR program. Of those who had completed a PR program, 83% reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the program and 86% reported that they would recommend PR to other PH patients. After completion of a PR program, 76% of patients reported an improvement in their quality of life and 88% reported improvement in exercise capacity. Among the patients who had not previously participated in PR (n = 254), 63% reported an interest in participation while 64% cited a lack of discussion from their treatment team as the primary reason for the lack of PR participation. Limitations of the study include sampling and response bias. According to this cross-sectional survey, the majority of PH patients who have participated in PR report improvement in both quality of life and exercise capacity and would recommend PR to other PH patients. The majority of PH patients who have not participated in PR were interested in participation and cited a lack of discussion with their treatment team as one of the primary reasons for the lack of participation. PR is associated with self-reported improvements in quality of life and exercise capacity but remains underutilized among patients with PH.