Robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) procedures in general surgery

Safety Issues in the Development of an Innovative Medical Parallel Robot Used in Renal Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

Robotic-assisted single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is becoming an increasingly widespread field worldwide due to the benefits it brings to both the patient and the surgeon. The goal of this study is to develop a secure robotic solution for SILS, focusing specifically on urology, by identifying and addressing various safety concerns from an early design stage. Starting with the medical tasks and protocols, the technical specifications of the robotic system as well as potential; hazards have been identified. By employing competitive engineering design methods such as Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Risk assessment, and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), a safe design solution is proposed. A set of experiments is conducted to validate the proposed concept, and the results strongly support the development of the experimental model. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method is applied to validate the mechanical architecture within a set of simulations, demonstrating the compliance of the robotic system with the proposed technical specifications and its capability to safely perform SILS procedures.

Conversion rates in robotic thyroid surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Objective

To define the conversion risk to open procedure during robot‐assisted thyroid surgery (RATS) identifying potential specific subclasses of procedures or accesses at higher conversion risk.

Methods

In a PRISMA‐compliant framework, all original prospective studies providing RATS conversion rates from multiple databases were pooled in a random‐effects meta‐analysis. Conversion rates were compared between different typologies of thyroid surgery and robotic access.

Results

13 studies were deemed eligible. Four conversions from two studies were reported out of 398 procedures. No significant heterogeneity was observed (Cochran's Q p = 0.932; I2 = 0%). The pooled conversion rate was 1% (95% confidence interval, 0.1%–2%). The ANOVA‐Q test failed to show significant differences when comparing type of thyroid surgery or robotic access (respectively p = 0.766 and p = 0.457).

Conclusion

While the conversion rate appears consistently low across studies, prospective data collection and systematic reporting of procedural complications are required for framing high‐risk procedures and accesses.

Integrating Robotic Technology Into Resident Training: Challenges and Recommendations From the Front Lines

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for improving the integration of robotic technology into today's apprentice-based resident training.

METHOD

During a national meeting in 2017, 24 robotic surgeons were interviewed about their experiences integrating robotic technology into resident training. Qualitative thematic analysis of interview notes and recordings revealed themes related to challenges and recommendations.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged, each corresponding to a general recommendation for integrating robotic technology into training. The first, surgical techniques versus tools, contrasts faculty's sequential mastery-surgical techniques first, then the robotic tool-with residents' simultaneous learning. The recommendation is to create separate learning opportunities for focused skill acquisition. The second theme, timing of exposure to the robotic tool, describes trainees' initial focus on tool use for basic surgical steps. The recommendation is to increase access to basic robotic cases. The third theme covers the relationship of laparoscopic and robotic surgery. The recommendation is to emphasize similar and dissimilar features during all minimally invasive surgical cases. The fourth theme, use of the dual console (which enables two consoles to operate the robot, the primary determines the secondary's functionality), highlights the unique teaching opportunities this console creates. The recommendation is for surgeons to give verbal guidance so residents completely understand surgical techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical educators should consider technique versus tool, timing of exposure to the tool, overlapping and varying features of robotic and laparoscopic surgery, and use of the dual console as they develop curricula to ensure thorough acquisition and synthesis of all elements of robotic surgery.