Thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Treatment outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists

How I approach the treatment of thrombotic complications in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

ABSTRACT

Arterial and venous thromboses are the most significant complications in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), with the primary treatment goal being thrombotic risk reduction. In MPN with no history of thrombosis, primary prevention mainly involves the use of aspirin, and cytoreduction is added in high-risk patients. However, thrombotic complications can unveil an MPN in ∼20% of cases, necessitating the initiation of both antithrombotic therapy for the thrombosis and cytoreductive treatment for the MPN. The duration of anticoagulant therapy after an initial venous thromboembolic event is subject to discussion. Furthermore, the occurrence of a thrombotic complication in patients with a known diagnosis of MPN prompts a reconsideration of both antithrombotic and hematologic management. This review uses case-based discussions to explore the management of thrombotic complications in patients with MPN. It addresses the nature and duration of antithrombotic treatments, as well as the approach to cytoreduction. Special attention is given to the place of direct oral anticoagulants and to the management of patients with MPN with splanchnic vein thrombosis, which is disproportionately common in this group.

Real-world data on direct oral anticoagulants in BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): a multicenter retrospective study on behalf of scientific subcommittee on MPNs for Turkish society of hematology

BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) pose a substantial risk of thrombosis, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulant therapy, historically based on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), has limitations in preventing recurrent thrombotic events and managing bleeding complications. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer a potential alternative with improved pharmacokinetics and compliance. However, evidence on DOAC efficacy and safety in MPNs remains limited, necessitating further investigation. In this multicenter retrospective study in Türkiye, we assessed real-world usage patterns and outcomes of DOACs in MPN patients. Data from 220 patients with PV, ET, or PMF receiving DOACs or VKAs for thrombosis or nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were collected from medical records. Thrombotic events and bleeding episodes were documented based on ISTH criteria. DOACs were used in 126 patients as first-line anticoagulant therapy or following VKAs. Ninety-four patients were on VKAs, of which 83 as a first-line treatment. There were eight thromboses (6.3%) seen in 126 DOAC patients, and similarly, seven episodes (9.4%) of thrombosis were observed in 94 patients using VKA. Major bleeding occurred in seven patients (5.6%) on DOAC and 3 (3.2%) in VKA. Thrombotic and bleeding risks were comparable between DOACs and VKAs (p = 0.708 and p = 0.158, respectively). The incidence rate of thrombosis in the VKA group is 1.1% and in the DOAC group is 1.9%. The incidence of major bleeding in the VKA group is 0.6% and 1.6% in the DOAC group. To the best of our knowledge, our study included the largest number of MPN patients to date, comparing DOACs with VKA in terms of both efficacy and safety, which suggests DOACs as promising alternatives to VKAs for managing thrombotic risk in MPNs with manageable toxicity. Despite the limitations of retrospective studies, DOACs' benefits in terms of efficacy and compliance warrant further investigation through prospective trials. Individualized treatment decisions should consider patient-specific factors, emphasizing collaborative efforts between specialists to optimize DOAC therapy in patients with MPNs. Comparable efficacy and safety between DOACs and VKAs were observed in MPN patients.

Current evidence on the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Thromboembolic events in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity, in which vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been used mostly. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). With the adoption of data from CAT and VTE, the usage of DOACs in MPNs is increasing.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, we performed a systematic review to the current literature regarding the usage of DOACs in MPNs. Eleven studies involving 944 patients were included. The reasons for initiating DOACs were secondary prophylaxis for thrombosis (arterial or venous) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in 562 and 382 patients, respectively. A total of 84 (8.9%) recurrent thrombotic (arterial or venous) events recorded. Forty-six (8.1%) events occurred in the thrombosis group (arterial or venous) and 38 (9.9%) events occurred in patients with AF.

EXPERT OPINION

Ease of management and patient comfort should be regarded as benefits of DOACs compared to VKAs. However, it would be appropriate to bring an individualized approach until we obtain high-quality data with prospectively designed studies involving more patients and longer follow-up time concerning the use of DOACs in patients with MPNs.