Cancer Stem Cell DNA Enabled Real-Time Genotyping with Self-Functionalized Quantum Superstructures-Overcoming the Barriers of Noninvasive cfDNA Cancer Diagnostics

Multi-Biomarker Profiling for Precision Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

Multi-biomarker analysis can enhance the accuracy of the single-biomarker analysis by reducing the errors caused by genetic and environmental differences. For this reason, multi-biomarker analysis shows higher accuracy in early and precision diagnosis. However, conventional analysis methods have limitations for multi-biomarker analysis because of their long pre-processing times, inconsistent results, and large sample requirements. To solve these, a fast and accurate precision diagnostic method is introduced for lung cancer by multi-biomarker profiling using a single drop of blood. For this, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic immunoassay (SERSIA) is employed for the accurate, quick, and reliable quantification of biomarkers. Then, it is checked the statistical relation of the multi-biomarkers to differentiate between healthy controls and lung cancer patients. This approach has proven effective; with 20 µL of blood serum, lung cancer is diagnosed with 92% accuracy. It also accurately identifies the type and stage of cancer with 87% and 85%, respectively. These results show the importance of multi-biomarker analysis in overcoming the challenges posed by single-biomarker diagnostics. Furthermore, it markedly improves multi-biomarker-based analysis methods, illustrating its important impact on clinical diagnostics.

Nanobiotechnology augmented cancer stem cell guided management of cancer: liquid-biopsy, imaging, and treatment

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent both a key driving force and therapeutic target of tumoral carcinogenesis, tumor evolution, progression, and recurrence. CSC-guided tumor diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance are strategically significant in improving cancer patients' overall survival. Due to the heterogeneity and plasticity of CSCs, high sensitivity, specificity, and outstanding targeting are demanded for CSC detection and targeting. Nanobiotechnologies, including biosensors, nano-probes, contrast enhancers, and drug delivery systems, share identical features required. Implementing these techniques may facilitate the overall performance of CSC detection and targeting. In this review, we focus on some of the most recent advances in how nanobiotechnologies leverage the characteristics of CSC to optimize cancer diagnosis and treatment in liquid biopsy, clinical imaging, and CSC-guided nano-treatment. Specifically, how nanobiotechnologies leverage the attributes of CSC to maximize the detection of circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells, and exosomes, to improve positron emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and to enhance the therapeutic effects of cytotoxic therapy, photodynamic therapy, immunotherapy therapy, and radioimmunotherapy are reviewed.

Predictive Performance of Cell-Free Nucleic Acid-Based Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tests: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cancer-screening tests that can detect multiple cancer types, or multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests, have emerged recently as a potential new tool in decreasing cancer morbidity and mortality. Most MCED assays are based on detecting cell-free tumor DNA (CF-DNA) in the blood. MCEDs offer the potential for screening for cancer organ sites with high mortality, both with and without recommended screening. However, their clinical utility has not been established. Before clinical utility can be established, the clinical validity of MCEDs, i.e., their ability to predict cancer status, must be demonstrated. In this study we performed a systematic review of the predictive ability for cancer of cell-free-nucleic acid-based MCED tests.

CONTENT

We searched PubMed for relevant publications from January 2017 to February 2023, using MeSH terms related to multi-cancer detection, circulating DNA, and related concepts. Of 1811 publications assessed, 61 were reviewed in depth and 20 are included in this review. For almost all studies, the cancer cases were assessed at time of diagnosis. Most studies reported specificity (generally 95% or higher) and overall sensitivity (73% median). The median number of cancer types assessed per assay was 5. Many studies also reported sensitivity by stage and/or cancer type. Sensitivity generally increased with stage.

SUMMARY

To date, relatively few published studies have assessed the clinical validity of MCED tests. Most used cancer cases assessed at diagnosis, with generally high specificity and variable sensitivity depending on cancer type and stage. The next steps should be testing in the intended-use population, i.e., asymptomatic persons.