High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue for breast cancer: yesterday, today and tomorrow

Treating Metastatic Brain Cancers With Stem Cells

Stem cell therapy may present an effective treatment for metastatic brain cancer and glioblastoma. Here we posit the critical role of a leaky blood-brain barrier (BBB) as a key element for the development of brain metastases, specifically melanoma. By reviewing the immunological and inflammatory responses associated with BBB damage secondary to tumoral activity, we identify the involvement of this pathological process in the growth and formation of metastatic brain cancers. Likewise, we evaluate the hypothesis of regenerating impaired endothelial cells of the BBB and alleviating the damaged neurovascular unit to attenuate brain metastasis, using the endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) phenotype of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Specifically, there is a need to evaluate the efficacy for stem cell therapy to repair disruptions in the BBB and reduce inflammation in the brain, thereby causing attenuation of metastatic brain cancers. To establish the viability of stem cell therapy for the prevention and treatment of metastatic brain tumors, it is crucial to demonstrate BBB repair through augmentation of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. BBB disruption is strongly linked to metastatic melanoma, worsens neuroinflammation during metastasis, and negatively influences the prognosis of metastatic brain cancer. Using stem cell therapy to interrupt inflammation secondary to this leaky BBB represents a paradigm-shifting approach for brain cancer treatment. In this review article, we critically assess the advantages and disadvantages of using stem cell therapy for brain metastases and glioblastoma.

The renaissance of anti-neoplastic immunity from tumor cell demise

Cancer therapies can temporarily reduce tumor burdens by inducing malignant cell death. However, cancer cure is still far from realization because tumors often gain resistance to current treatment and eventually relapse. Accumulating evidence suggests that successful cancer interventions require anti-tumor immunity. Therapy-induced cell stress responses ultimately result in one or more cell death modalities, including apoptosis, autophagy, necroptosis, and pyroptosis. These irreversible dying processes are accompanied by active or passive release of cell death-associated molecular patterns (CDAMPs), which can be sensed by corresponding pattern recognition receptors (PRR) on tumor-infiltrating immune cells. This crosstalk with the immune system can reawaken immune surveillance in the tumor microenvironment (TME). This review focuses on immune-modulatory properties of anti-cancer regimens and CDAMP-mediated communications between cell stress responses and the immune contexture of TME. In addition, we describe how immunogenic cell death can elicit strong and durable anti-tumor immune responses.

Cardiac and pulmonary toxicity in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy for lymphoma and breast cancer: prognostic factors

We sought to define risk factors predisposing breast cancer and lymphoma patients to cardiac and pulmonary toxicity when undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR). Additionally, we evaluated in depth the predictive value of the ejection fraction measured prior to HDC in determining cardiac toxicity. In this retrospective analysis, 24 variables were examined in 138 patients undergoing HDC and ASCR from 1990 until 1995. Logistic regression models were used to model the probability of experiencing cardiac and pulmonary toxicity as a function of the 24 prognostic covariates. Cardiac toxicity occurred in 12% of patients and pulmonary toxicity in 24% of patients. Bivariate analyses showed that patients with lymphoma (as opposed to breast cancer) and those with a higher cardiac risk factor score were more likely to experience cardiac toxicity. Multivariate logistic regression models predicted lymphoma and older age to be risk factors for cardiac toxicity. History of an abnormal ejection fraction and higher doses of anthracyclines prior to HDC may also contribute to cardiac toxicity. Pulmonary toxicity occurred more commonly in lymphoma than breast cancer patients, likely due to the busulfan used in the HDC regimen. No other risk factors for pulmonary toxicity were identified. We conclude that older patients with lymphoma should be carefully evaluated prior to being accepted for HDC programs. Older patients with breast cancer may tolerate this procedure well. There is a trend towards cardiac toxicity in patients with a past history of low ejection fraction, although seemingly poor cardiac risk patients may fare well with HDC if carefully selected with the aid of a thorough cardiac evaluation.

Metastasectomy as a cytoreductive strategy for treatment of isolated pulmonary and hepatic metastases from breast cancer

The authors sought to examine the utility of resection in conjunction with adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of metastases from breast cancer isolated to the liver or lungs. Limitations of regional therapy were examined and potential agents for systemic therapy were reviewed. As resection of metastases is a controversial therapeutic approach, no clinical trials are available for review. Rather, evidence for a potential role for surgery rests on retrospective studies of small series of patients. Technical advances have rendered resection of liver and lung metastases safe. Long-term results as reported by other investigators support the role of metastasectomy in selected patients. The site of failure following ablation of liver metastases is usually in the liver. Following resection of lung metastases, nonpulmonary and disseminated recurrences are most common. Adjuvant therapy with docetaxel or any other agent or combination with significant activity against visceral metastases might potentiate long-term results.

Hematopoietic cell culture therapies (Part II): Clinical aspects and applications

High-dose chemotherapy, followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, holds significant promise for increasing the probability of long-term remission and possibly cure in a variety of cancers. Hematopoietic cell culture, or ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic cells, may play a significant role in reducing the danger and expense associated with the transplantation procedure. Phase I clinical trials have shown that ex vivo expanded cells have no significant toxicities, and some benefits. Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic cells is likely to find other applications in gene therapy, tumor purging, production of dendritic cells for immunotherapy and the production of mature blood cells for transfusion therapies.