Ultrasound findings are not associated with tendon pain in recreational athletes with chronic Achilles tendinopathy

Diagnostic domains, differential diagnosis and conditions requiring further medical attention that are considered important in the assessment for Achilles tendinopathy: a Delphi consensus study

The absence of agreed methods to diagnose Achilles tendinopathy impedes research and clinical practice. This gap results in heterogeneous and/or poorly described study samples, making it challenging to apply findings in clinical practice. The aim of this Delphi study was to define consensus on (1) diagnostic domains; (2) differential diagnoses; and (3) conditions requiring further medical attention, when assessing for Achilles tendinopathy.We conducted a sequential three-stage process which included: (1) identifying diagnostic domains, differential diagnoses and conditions requiring further medical attention based on existing scoping reviews and clinical practice guidelines; (2) developing Delphi survey questions; and (3) administering a five-round Delphi online survey. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement.52 participants completed the surveys. Four diagnostic domains were deemed essential and reached consensus (pain location (93%); pain during activity (97%); tests that provoke pain (87%); palpation to assess pain (83%)). 15 differential diagnoses reached consensus: 2 for both midportion and insertional (partial tear (80%); posterior ankle impingement (78%)), 6 for midportion (plantaris tendinopathy (84%); tibialis posterior or flexor hallucis longus tendinopathy/tenosynovitis (72%); flexor digitorum longus tendinopathy (77%); accessory soleus muscle (74%); paratendinopathy (86%); sural nerve neuropathy (81%)) and 7 for insertional (superficial (88%) and retrocalcaneal bursitis (86%); Haglund's/calcaneal exostosis (80%), intratendinous calcifications (73%); Sever's disease (78%); calcaneal stress reaction/fracture (80%); subtalar/ankle pain (71%)). Six conditions requiring further medical attention reached consensus: (Achilles tendon rupture (83%); systemic inflammatory joint disease (86%); metabolic syndrome (75%); familial hypercholesterolaemia (77%); endocrine and hormonal disorders (80%); drug reactions (77%)).This consensus identified essential diagnostic domains, differential diagnoses and conditions requiring further medical attention that should be considered when assessing for Achilles tendinopathy.

Tendoscopic peritendon shaving of midportion Achilles tendinopathy: A randomized, placebo-controlled study

Achilles tendinopathy is among the most frequent tendon injuries in sport. Despite evidence-based management, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience symptoms. This is the first randomized trial to investigate the effect of tendoscopic treatment of midportion Achilles tendinopathy compared with placebo at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Patients with midportion Achilles tendinopathy (non-responsive to more than 6 months of nonsurgical treatments) were randomly assigned to receive either tendoscopic peritendon shaving or placebo tendoscopic treatment. The primary outcome measure was the total score of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire. Due to three adverse events (sural nerve injuries), in the group receiving tendoscopic treatment, the trial was stopped short of the planned 48 participants. All 23 patients included completed 3 months' follow-up (100%), 22 (96%) 6 months' and 19 (83%) completed 12 months' follow-up. The between-group estimates favored endoscopic treatment and ranged from 19 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1-38) at 3 months, 14 points (-7 to 34) at 6 months and 5 points (95% CI: -19 to 28) at 12 months. After 12 months, the tendoscopic group improved 47 points (95% CI: 29-65) versus 40 points (95% CI: 22-57) in the placebo-operated group. Despite a smaller sample size due to adverse events, VISA-A indicate faster recovery from tendoscopic treatment compared to placebo. These data suggest that tendoscopic treatment of midportion Achilles tendinopathy should be tested in further research; however, the technique needs to be refined to avoid sural nerve injuries.

Gagnon D. To What Extent Do Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Biomarkers Relate to Pain, Flexibility, Strength, and Function in Individuals With Chronic Symptomatic Achilles Tendinopathy?

Introduction: Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is a chronic musculoskeletal pathology best evaluated by ultrasound imaging. This cross-sectional study aimed at better understanding the relationship between musculoskeletal ultrasound biomarkers (MUBs) of Achilles tendon and localized pain, ankle flexibility, ankle strength, and functional abilities.

Method: Forty-one participants with unilateral midportion chronic AT had their tendon images analyzed bilaterally in the longitudinal and transverse planes. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) assessed pain and function, respectively, during standing and walking-related activities. Ankle flexibility was evaluated by weight-bearing lunge tests, while ankle isometric peak strength was measured using an instrumented dynamometer. Achilles tendon ultrasonographic images were analyzed using geometric (thickness), composition (echogenicity), and texture (homogeneity) MUBs. Discriminative validity was evaluated using paired Student's t-tests to compare MUBs between symptomatic and asymptomatic sides. Predictive validity was evaluated by computing the Pearson product-moment correlations coefficient between MUBs and pain, ankle flexibility, ankle strength, and function.

Results: Significant differences were found in MUBs between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides, confirming the discriminative validity of the selected MUBs. On the symptomatic side, thickness was found 29.9% higher (p < 0.001), echogenicity 9.6% lower (p < 0.001), and homogeneity 3.8% higher (p = 0.001) when compared with the asymptomatic side. However, predictive validity was scarcely confirmed, as most of the correlation coefficients were found negligible for the associations investigated between MUBs with localized pain, ankle flexibility, strength, and function. Only 14 statistically significant low to moderate associations were found, with negative and positive correlations ranging between −0.31 and −0.55 and between 0.34 and 0.54, respectively.

Discussion: Musculoskeletal ultrasound biomarkers have a clinical utility in visualizing in vivo tendon integrity and diagnosing AT. MUBs should be valued as part of a comprehensive neuro-musculoskeletal assessment as they complement pain, flexibility, strength, and function measures. Altogether, they may inform the development and monitoring of a personalized rehabilitation treatment plan.

Explaining Variability in the Prevalence of Achilles Tendon Abnormalities: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Imaging Studies in Asymptomatic Individuals

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of, and factors associated with, Achilles tendon abnormalities observed on imaging in asymptomatic individuals.

DESIGN

Systematic review with stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression.

LITERATURE SEARCH

Embase, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched from 1980 to August 2020.

STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies that reported the prevalence of Achilles tendon abnormalities, observed with any imaging modality, in an asymptomatic population. We excluded studies if participant mean age was younger than 12 years or if participants had current/previous lower-limb tendon injuries/symptoms or other systemic conditions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Random-effects proportion meta-analysis was used to estimate prevalence. We used meta-regression for continuous variables (mean age and body mass index [BMI], sample size, proportion of female participants) and stratified categorical variables (imaging modality and participation in physical activity) to explain between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We included 91 studies (10 156 limbs, 5841 participants). The prevalence of Achilles tendon abnormalities on imaging ranged from 0% to 80% per participant. Between-study heterogeneity was high (I²>90%, P<.001), precluding data pooling. Between-study heterogeneity was partly explained by participant mean BMI (slope, 2.8% per 1-unit increase in BMI; 95% confidence interval: 0.57%, 5.03%; P = .015) and participation in physical activity per limb, and mean age of 40 years old or older (P = .022) per participant.

CONCLUSION

There was substantial variability in the prevalence of Achilles tendon abnormalities on imaging in asymptomatic individuals. Higher prevalence of abnormalities was associated with older age (40 years old or older), higher BMI, and participation in physical activity. A large proportion of heterogeneity remains unaccounted for, likely due to variations in abnormality definitions and study design. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(5):232-252. Epub 28 Mar 2021. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.9970.