Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), November 2011

Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Does Increased Resolution Equal Increased Yield?

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is considered a first-tier test for patients with developmental disabilities and congenital anomalies and is also routinely applied in prenatal diagnosis. The current consensus size cut-off for reporting copy number variants (CNVs) in the prenatal setting ranges from 200 Kb to 400 Kb, with the intention of minimizing the impact of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Very limited data are currently available on the application of higher resolution platforms prenatally. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and impact of applying high-resolution CMA in the prenatal setting. To that end, we report on the outcomes of applying CMA with a size cut-off of 20 Kb in 250 prenatal samples and discuss the findings and diagnostic yield and also provide follow-up for cases with variants of uncertain significance. Overall, 19.6% (49) showed one or more chromosomal abnormalities, with the findings classified as Pathogenic (P) or Likely Pathogenic (LP) in 15.6% and as VUS in 4%. When excluding the cases with known familial aberrations, the diagnostic yield was 12%. The smallest aberration detected was a 32 Kb duplication of the 16p11.2 region. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that prenatal diagnosis with a high-resolution aCGH platform can reliably detect smaller CNVs that are often associated with neurodevelopmental phenotypes while providing an increased diagnostic yield, regardless of the indication for testing, with only a marginal increase in the VUS incidence. Thus, it can be an important tool in the prenatal setting.

Contribution of chromosomal microarray analysis and next-generation sequencing to genetic diagnosis in fetuses with normal karyotype

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to genetic diagnosis in fetuses with normal karyotype who underwent invasive testing for different indications.

METHODS

The results of invasive genetic testing performed at a tertiary center between September 2020 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Indications for invasive tests were classified as fetal structural malformation, presence of soft markers, and high risk in screening tests. CMA results were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic (pCNVs), benign (bCNVs), and variants of unknown clinical significance (VOUS).

RESULTS

A total of 830 invasive tests were performed and aneuploidy was detected in 11.2% of the fetuses. CMA was performed in 465 fetuses with normal karyotype, and pCNVs were detected in 6.9%. pCNVs were detected in 8.2% of fetuses with structural malformations, 6.5% in soft markers, and 4.7% in high risk in screening tests. Pathogenic variants were detected by NGS in 33.8% of fetuses with bCNVs.

CONCLUSIONS

pCNVs can be significantly detected not only in fetuses with structural malformations, but also in invasive testing with other indications. NGS significantly contributes to genetic diagnosis in fetuses with structural malformations.

Should prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis be offered for isolated fetal growth restriction? A French multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Compared with standard karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis improves the detection of genetic anomalies and is thus recommended in many prenatal indications. However, evidence is still lacking on the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in cases of isolated fetal growth restriction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the proportion of copy number variants detected by chromosomal microarray analysis and the incremental yield of chromosomal microarray analysis compared with karyotype in the detection of genetic abnormalities in fetuses with isolated fetal growth restriction.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study included all singleton fetuses diagnosed with fetal growth restriction and no structural ultrasound anomalies and referred to 13 French fetal medicine centers over 1 year in 2016. Fetal growth restriction was defined as an estimated fetal weight of <tenth percentile for gestational age identified in ultrasound reports. For this analysis, we selected fetuses who underwent invasive genetic testing with karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis results. Data were obtained from medical records and ultrasound databases and postmortem and placental examination reports in case of spontaneous stillbirths and terminations of pregnancy. Following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, copy number variants were classified into 5 groups as following: pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of unknown significance, likely benign, and benign.

RESULTS

Of 682 referred fetuses diagnosed with isolated fetal growth restriction, both karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis were performed in 146 fetuses. Overall, the detection rate of genetic anomalies found by chromosomal microarray analysis was estimated to be 7.5% (11 of 146 [95% confidence interval, 3.3-11.8]), including 10 copy number variants classified as pathogenic and 1 copy number variant classified as likely pathogenic. Among the 139 fetuses with normal karyotype, 5 were detected with pathogenic and likely pathogenic copy number variants, resulting in an incremental yield of 3.6% (95% confidence interval, 0.5-6.6) in chromosomal microarray analysis compared with karyotype. All fetuses detected with pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants resulted in terminations of pregnancy. In addition, 3 fetuses with normal karyotype were detected with a variant of unknown significance (2.1%). Among the 7 fetuses with abnormal karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis did not detect trisomy 18 mosaicism in all fetuses.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that compared with karyotype, chromosomal microarray analysis improves the detection of genetic anomalies in fetuses diagnosed with isolated fetal growth restriction. These results support the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in addition to karyotype for isolated fetal growth restriction.

A case of corpus callosum dysplasia with different development of the corpus callosum in the right and left brain hemispheres

The corpus callosum (CC) is a thick band of nerve fibers that divides the cerebral cortex lobes into the left and right hemispheres. Prenatal diagnosis of corpus callosum agenesis (partial/total) has been described frequently in the literature. In this case report, a case of corpus callosum dysplasia with different development of the halves of the corpus callosum in the right and left brain hemispheres, which was not previously discussed in the literature, will be described. Whenever we have any doubts about CC, axial, coronal, and sagittal scans of the fetal brain should be performed with TVUSG (transvaginal ultrasonography) or TAUSG (transabdominal ultrasonography) according to the position of the fetal head, and both length and thickness should be measured.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnancies With Corpus Callosum or Posterior Fossa Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the detection rate of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) results in pregnancies with sonographic diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum anomalies (CCA) or posterior fossa anomalies (PFA).

METHODS

All CMA tests in pregnancies with CCA or PFA performed between January 2015 and June 2020 were retrospectively evaluated from the Israeli Ministry of Health database. The rate of CMA with clinically significant (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) findings was calculated and compared to a local Israeli cohort of 5,541 pregnancies with normal ultrasound.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-two pregnancies were enrolled: 102 cases with CCA and 89 with PFA (9 cases had both). Clinically significant CMA results were found in 7/102 of CCA (6.9%) and in 7/89 of PFA (7.9%) cases. The CMA detection rate in pregnancies with isolated CCA (2/57, 3.5%) or PFA (2/50, 4.0%) was lower than in nonisolated cases, including additional CNS and/or extra-CNS sonographic anomalies (CCA-5/45, 11.1%; PFA-5/39, 12.8%), but this was not statistically significant. However, the rate among pregnancies that had extra-CNS anomalies, with or without additional CNS involvement (CCA-5/24, 20.8%; PFA-5/29, 17.2%), was significantly higher compared to all other cases (p = 0.0075 for CCA; p = 0.035 for PFA). Risk of CMA with clinically significant results for all and nonisolated CCA or PFA pregnancies was higher compared to the background risk reported in the control cohort (p < 0.001), but was not significant for isolated cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that CMA testing is beneficial for the genetic workup of pregnancies with CCA or PFA, and is probably most informative when additional extra-CNS anomalies are observed.

Prenatal Diagnosis by Chromosome Microarray Analysis, An Indian Experience

BACKGROUND

Karyotyping has been the gold standard for prenatal chromosome analysis. The resolution should be higher by chromosome microarray analysis (CMA). The challenge lies in recognizing benign and pathogenic or clinically significant copy number variations (pCNV) and variations of unknown significance (VOUS). The aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of CMA, to stratify the CMA results in various prenatal referral groups and to accumulate Indian data of pCNVs and VOUS for further interpretation to assist defined genetic counseling.

METHODS

Karyotyping and CMA were performed on consecutive referrals of 370 prenatal samples of amniotic fluid (n = 274) and chorionic villi (n = 96) from Indian pregnant women with high maternal age (n = 23), biochemical screen positive (n = 61), previous child abnormal (n = 59), abnormal fetal ultrasound (n = 205) and heterozygous parents (n = 22).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The overall diagnostic yield of abnormal results was 5.40% by karyotyping and 9.18% by CMA. The highest percentage of pCNVs were found in the group with abnormal fetal ultrasound (5.40%) as compared to other groups, such as women with high maternal age (0.81%), biochemical screen positive (0.54%), previous abnormal offspring (0.81%) or heterozygous parents group (1.62%). Therefore, all women with abnormal fetal ultrasound must undergo CMA test for genotype-phenotype correlation. CMA detects known and rare deletion/duplication syndromes and characterizes marker chromosomes. Accumulation of CNV data will form an Indian Repository and also help to resolve the uncertainty of VOUS. Pretest and posttest genetic counseling is essential to convey benefits and limitations of CMA and help the patients to take informed decisions.

The role of chromosomal microarray analysis among fetuses with normal karyotype and single system anomaly or nonspecific sonographic findings

INTRODUCTION

Chromosomal microarray analysis is recommended as the first-tier test for the evaluation of fetuses with structural anomalies. This study aims to investigate the incremental diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray over conventional karyotyping analysis in fetuses with anomalies restricted to one anatomic system and those with nonspecific anomalies detected by sonography.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 749 fetuses undergoing prenatal diagnosis for abnormal ultrasound findings isolated to one anatomic system and normal karyotype, utilizing chromosomal microarray. Overall, 495 (66%) fetuses had anomalies confined to one anatomic system and 254 (34%) had other nonspecific anomalies including increased nuchal translucency (≥3.5 mm), cystic hygroma, intrauterine growth restriction and hydrops fetalis.

RESULTS

Fetuses with ultrasound anomalies restricted to one anatomic system had a 3.0% risk of carrying a pathogenic copy number variant; the risk varied dependent on the anatomic system affected. Fetuses with confined anomalies of the cardiac system had the highest diagnostic yield at 4.6%, but there were none in the urogenital system. Fetuses with nonspecific ultrasound anomalies had the highest diagnostic yield in fetuses with an intrauterine growth restriction at 5.9%. Overall, fetuses with a nonspecific ultrasound anomaly were affected with pathogenic copy number variants in 1.6% in the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray in fetuses with normal karyotype and ultrasound abnormality confined to a single anatomic system was highest if it involved cardiac defects or intrauterine growth restriction. This diagnostic yield ranges from 0% to 4.6% depending on the anatomic system involved. Chromosomal microarray has considerable diagnostic value in these pregnancies.

Autism Spectrum Disorders: Prenatal Genetic Testing and Abortion Decision-Making among Taiwanese Mothers of Affected Children

With the rapid growing rate of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), prenatal genetic testing (PGT) has been offered to detect various genomic disorders, including ASD, in Taiwan. However, disparities exist in this area, as there is limited research on factors associated with PGT utilization and relevant decision-making that may guide the regulations and ethical guidelines for culturally appropriate PGT services in Taiwan. This study proposed a comprehensively integrated theoretical framework for examining the intention to undergo PGT to detect ASD susceptibility genes and subsequent abortion decision-making among Taiwanese mothers of children affected by ASD. Survey data from 333 mothers of children with ASD in 236 elementary schools with special education services in Taiwan were collected and analyzed using structural equation modeling. Approximately two-thirds of the participants (66.6%) would undergo PGT to detect ASD susceptibility genes; more than half (53.1%) would terminate the hypothetically ASD-affected pregnancy. Abortion intention was associated with age, religion, attitudes toward PGT for detecting ASD susceptibility genes, and willingness to undergo such PGT. This study explores the potential impacts of PGT on Taiwanese society, and the findings are applicable to countries heavily influenced by Chinese culture, areas with Asian immigrants, and Western countries with such PGT services and/or research available.

C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to indentify chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structural abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis

BACKGROUND

In prenatal diagnosis, CMA has begun to emerge as a favorable alternative to karyotype analysis, but it could not identify balanced translocations, triploidies, inversion and heteromorphisms. Therefore, conventional cytogenetic and specific staining methods still play an important role in the work-up of chromosome anomaly. This study investigated the application of C-banding and AgNOR-staining techniques in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal heteromorphisms and some structure abnormalities.

RESULTS

Among the 2970 samples, the incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms was 8.79% (261/2970). The most frequent was found to be chromosome Y (2.93%, 87/2970), followed by chromosome 1 (1.65 %, 49/2970), 9 (1.52 %, 45/2970), 22 (0.77 %, 23/2970) and 15 (0.64 %, 19/2970). We compared the incidence of chromosomal heteromorphisms between recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) group and control group. The frequency of autosomal hetermorphisms in RSA group was 7.63% higher than that in control group (5.78%), while the frequency of Y chromosomal heteromorphisms was 4.76% lower than that in control group (5.71%). Here we summarized 4 representative cases, inv (1) (p12q24), psu dic (4;17) (p16.3;p13.3), r(X)(p11; q21) and an isodicentric bisatellited chromosome to illustrate the application of C-banding or AgNOR-staining, CMA or NGS was performed to detect CNVs if necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that C-banding and AgNOR-staining were still effective complementary methods to identify chromosomal heteromorphisms and marker chromosomes or some structural rearrangements involving the centromere or acrocentric chromosomes. Our results suggested that there was no evidence for an association between chromosomal heteromorphisms and infertility or recurrent spontaneous abortions. Undoubtedly, sometimes we needed to combine the results of CMA or CNV-seq to comprehensively reflect the structure and aberration of chromosome segments. Thus, accurate karyotype reports and genetic counseling could be provided.

Incidental finding of unreported large duplication in F8 gene during prenatal analysis: Which management for genetic counselling?

Detection of incidental finding and variant of unknown significance (VUS) during prenatal diagnosis has particularly increased with the emergence of genetic tests such chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Many factors and clear guidelines need to be applied in the interpretation of the potential clinical consequences of unreported complex copy number variations (deletions/duplications). From a clinical case where an unreported and not completely intragenic duplication in F8 gene has been identified in a 12-week-old fetus without haemophilia A history documented in the family, we will examine and study the difficulties of interpretation and the challenges that the detection of such variant has on genetic counselling.

Practice guideline: joint CCMG-SOGC recommendations for the use of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis and assessment of fetal loss in Canada

Background

The aim of this guideline is to provide updated recommendations for Canadian genetic counsellors, medical geneticists, maternal fetal medicine specialists, clinical laboratory geneticists and other practitioners regarding the use of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for prenatal diagnosis. This guideline replaces the 2011 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC)-Canadian College of Medical Geneticists (CCMG) Joint Technical Update.

Methods

A multidisciplinary group consisting of medical geneticists, genetic counsellors, maternal fetal medicine specialists and clinical laboratory geneticists was assembled to review existing literature and guidelines for use of CMA in prenatal care and to make recommendations relevant to the Canadian context. The statement was circulated for comment to the CCMG membership-at-large for feedback and, following incorporation of feedback, was approved by the CCMG Board of Directors on 5 June 2017 and the SOGC Board of Directors on 19 June 2017.

Results and conclusions

Recommendations include but are not limited to: (1) CMA should be offered following a normal rapid aneuploidy screen when multiple fetal malformations are detected (II-1A) or for nuchal translucency (NT) ≥3.5 mm (II-2B) (recommendation 1); (2) a professional with expertise in prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis should provide genetic counselling to obtain informed consent, discuss the limitations of the methodology, obtain the parental decisions for return of incidental findings (II-2A) (recommendation 4) and provide post-test counselling for reporting of test results (III-A) (recommendation 9); (3) the resolution of chromosomal microarray analysis should be similar to postnatal microarray platforms to ensure small pathogenic variants are detected. To minimise the reporting of uncertain findings, it is recommended that variants of unknown significance (VOUS) smaller than 500 Kb deletion or 1 Mb duplication not be routinely reported in the prenatal context. Additionally, VOUS above these cut-offs should only be reported if there is significant supporting evidence that deletion or duplication of the region may be pathogenic (III-B) (recommendation 5); (4) secondary findings associated with a medically actionable disorder with childhood onset should be reported, whereas variants associated with adult-onset conditions should not be reported unless requested by the parents or disclosure can prevent serious harm to family members (III-A) (recommendation 8).

The working group recognises that there is variability across Canada in delivery of prenatal testing, and these recommendations were developed to promote consistency and provide a minimum standard for all provinces and territories across the country (recommendation 9).

Microarrays in prenatal diagnosis

In prenatal diagnosis, chromosomal microarray (CMA) has not yet fully replaced conventional karyotyping but has rapidly become the recommended test in pregnancies with ultrasound abnormalities. In this review, we provide an overview of the published data concerning this technology and the controversies concerning its use in the prenatal setting. There is abundant evidence indicating the added detection of pathogenic abnormalities with CMA in comparison to the traditional karyotyping, especially in fetuses with multiple or isolated ultrasound abnormalities such as congenital heart disease, increased nuchal translucency, or oral cleft. On the other hand, there is also a risk to detect variants of unknown significance, late-onset disorders, and variants in susceptibility loci. However, it has been shown that pregnant couples tend to prefer a maximum of information about the health of their unborn child. Taken together, CMA has considerable diagnostic and prognostic values during pregnancy and should therefore be the test of choice.

The use of chromosomal microarray for prenatal diagnosis

Chromosomal microarray analysis is a high-resolution, whole-genome technique used to identify chromosomal abnormalities, including those detected by conventional cytogenetic techniques, as well as small submicroscopic deletions and duplications referred to as copy number variants. Because chromosomal microarray analysis has a greater resolution than conventional karyotyping, it can detect deletions and duplications down to a 50- to 100-kb level. The purpose of this document is to discuss the technique, advantages, and disadvantages of chromosomal microarray analysis and its indications and limitations. We recommend the following: (1) that chromosomal microarray analysis be offered when genetic analysis is performed in cases with fetal structural anomalies and/or stillbirth and replaces the need for fetal karyotype in these cases (GRADE 1A); (2) that providers discuss the benefits and limitations of chromosomal microarray analysis and conventional karyotype with patients who are considering amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling (CVS), and that both options should be available to women who choose to undergo diagnostic testing (GRADE 1B); (3) that pre- and posttest counseling should be performed by trained genetic counselors, geneticists, or other providers with expertise in the complexities of interpreting chromosomal microarray analysis results (Best Practice); (4) that patients be informed that chromosomal microarray analysis does not detect every genetic disease or syndrome and specifically does not detect autosomal-recessive disorders associated with single gene point mutations, as well as that chromosomal microarray analysis can detect consanguinity and nonpaternity in some cases (Best Practice); (5) that patients in whom a fetal variant of uncertain significance is detected by prenatal diagnosis receive counseling from experts who have access to databases that provide updated information concerning genotype-phenotype correlations (Best Practice).

A new case of interstitial 1q 25.3-32.1 deletion: cytogenetic analysis molecular characterization and ultrasound findings

INTRODUCTION

deletion of long arm of chromosome 1(1q-) is a rare condition. Clinical features include Dwarfism, severe mental retardation, microcephaly and short neck delineating the "intermediate 1q deletion syndrome".

CASE REPORT

we report a new case of interstitial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 1, diagnosed in a 22+3 weeks gestation fetus in which cytogenetic analysis localized a loss of genetic materials of 18Mb in the 1q25.3-32.1. Fetal ultrasound showed neurodegenerative defects resembling Dandy-Walker's syndrome and bilateral clubfoot.

CONCLUSIONS

clinical characteristics of our case are markedly mild. This suggests that the type and the extension of the mutation obtained through cytogenetic studies, CGH array and ultrasound evaluation should be taken into account for prognostic evaluation and management of these patients.

What results to disclose, when, and who decides? Healthcare professionals' views on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis

Objectives

This study explored the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the UK about what information should be disclosed, when; and whether women/parents should be given a choice as to what they wish to know.

Methods

Q‐methodology was used to assess the views of 40 HCPs (genetic HCPs, fetal medicine experts, lab‐scientists).

Results

Most participants agreed that variants of unknown clinical significance should not be disclosed. Participants were divided between those who considered variants of uncertain clinical significance helpful for parents and clinicians, and those who considered them harmful. Although recognising the potential disadvantages of disclosing risks for adult‐onset conditions, participants thought it would be difficult to withhold such information once identified. Participants largely supported some parental involvement in determining which results should be returned. Most participants believed that information obtained via CMA testing in pregnancy should either be disclosed during pregnancy, or not at all.

Conclusion

HCPs taking part in the study largely believed that variants that will inform the management of the pregnancy, or are relevant to other family members, should be reported. Recent UK guidelines, published after this research was completed, reflect these opinions. © 2016 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

What's already known about this topic?

Empirical data on healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and parents' experience with prenatal CMA are scarce.

Published data mainly focused on issues around uncertain results obtained via CMA, and on genetic health professionals.

The two main difficulties expressed by genetic counsellors associated with testing were interpreting uncertain results, and termination of pregnancies based on uncertain results

What does this study add?

It is the first study examining attitudes of a wide range of professionals involved in CMA testing: laboratory professionals, fetal medicine experts, and genetic health professionals.

We describe what types of results professionals think should or should not be disclosed and with whom they consider the onus for such decision making should lie.

These views are reflected in the recent UK guidelines about CMA testing.

408 kb 15q11.2 microduplication by array comparative genomic hybridization in a fetus presenting with exomphalos, micrognathia, tetralogy of Fallot and normal karyotype: a genetic counseling dilemma in paternal carrier status

Exomphalos may be associated with chromosomal abnormalities and syndromes. Severe exomphalos (herniation of liver, midgut and spleen) associated with increased nuchal translucency was seen at first trimester screening test. Karyotype by chorionic villus sampling showed normal male fetus. Follow up scan at 16 and 18 weeks of gestation confirmed the severe exomphalos and detected micrognathia and tetralogy of Fallot. Array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) further demonstrated a 408 kb 15q11.2 microduplication, with the father-to-be as healthy carrier. This is the first case of an association between 15q11.2 micorduplication and fetal sonographic anomalies. Genetic counseling for estimation of recurrent risk of congenital anomalies is discussed.

Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection

Genomic microarray analysis is increasingly being applied as a prenatal diagnostic tool. Microarrays enable searching the genome at a higher resolution and with higher sensitivity than conventional karyotyping for identifying clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities. As yet, no clear guidelines exist on whether microarrays should be applied prenatally for all indications or only in selected cases such as ultrasound abnormalities, whether a targeted or genome-wide array should be used, and what these should include exactly. In this paper, we present some ethical considerations on the prenatal use of microarrays. There is a strong consensus, at least in Western countries, that the aim of prenatal screening for foetal abnormalities should be understood as facilitating autonomous reproductive choice for prospective parents. The tests offered should be valid and useful to reach that purpose. Against this background, we address several ethical issues raised by the prenatal application of microarrays. First, we argue that the general distinction between a targeted and a genome-wide microarray needs to be scrutinised. Then we examine whether microarrays are 'suitable tests' to serve either a screening or a diagnostic purpose. Given the wide range of findings possibly generated by microarrays, the question arises whether microarrays actually promote or interfere with autonomous reproductive decision-making. Moreover, if variants of unknown clinical significance are identified, this adds to the burden and complexity of reproductive decision-making. We suggest a qualified use of microarrays in the prenatal context.

High-resolution chromosomal microarrays in prenatal diagnosis significantly increase diagnostic power

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine for the first time the reliability and the diagnostic power of high-resolution microarray testing in routine prenatal diagnostics.

METHODS

We applied high-resolution chromosomal microarray testing in 464 cytogenetically normal prenatal samples with any indication for invasive testing.

RESULTS

High-resolution testing revealed a diagnostic yield of 6.9% and 1.6% in cases of fetal ultrasound anomalies and cases of advanced maternal age (AMA), respectively, which is similar to previous studies using low-resolution microarrays. In three (0.6%) additional cases with an indication of AMA, an aberration in susceptibility risk loci was detected. Moreover, one case (0.2%) showed an X-linked aberration in a female fetus, a finding relevant for future family planning. We found the rate of cases, in which the parents had to be tested for interpretation of unreported copy number variants (3.7%), and the rate of remaining variants of unknown significance (0.4%) acceptably low. Of note, these findings did not cause termination of pregnancy after expert genetic counseling. The 0.4% rate of confined placental mosaicism was similar to that observed by conventional karyotyping and notably involved a case of placental microdeletion.

CONCLUSION

High-resolution prenatal microarray testing is a reliable technique that increases diagnostic yield by at least 17.3% when compared with conventional karyotyping, without an increase in the frequency of variants of uncertain significance.

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the detection of chromosomal mosaicism in chorionic villus (CVS) and amniotic fluid (AF) samples using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction.

METHODS

All patients undergoing invasive prenatal testing by aCGH at a specialist prenatal screening service were included in the study. A total of 1609 samples (953 CVS and 656 AF) underwent quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and targeted aCGH without concurrent conventional G-banded karyotyping.

RESULTS

Chromosomal mosaicism was detected in 20 of the 1609 cases (1.24%); of which 17 were derived from 953 CVS (1.78%), and three from 656 AF (0.46%). Mosaicism was observed at a level as low as 9%. Four cases were likely confined placental mosaicism, 12 were likely true fetal mosaicism, and four cases were unable to be classified into either group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the use of aCGH as a first line test is able to identify chromosomal mosaicism down to 9%, which is lower than the level reliably detected using standard cytogenetic analysis. aCGH avoids the disadvantages of culturing, which include culture bias, artifact, and culture failure.

Whole-genome array CGH evaluation for replacing prenatal karyotyping in Hong Kong

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of whole-genome array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in prenatal diagnosis in Hong Kong.

Methods

Array CGH was performed on 220 samples recruited prospectively as the first-tier test study. In addition 150 prenatal samples with abnormal fetal ultrasound findings found to have normal karyotypes were analyzed as a ‘further-test’ study using NimbleGen CGX-135K oligonucleotide arrays.

Results

Array CGH findings were concordant with conventional cytogenetic results with the exception of one case of triploidy. It was found in the first-tier test study that aCGH detected 20% (44/220) clinically significant copy number variants (CNV), of which 21 were common aneuploidies and 23 had other chromosomal imbalances. There were 3.2% (7/220) samples with CNVs detected by aCGH but not by conventional cytogenetics. In the ‘further-test’ study, the additional diagnostic yield of detecting chromosome imbalance was 6% (9/150). The overall detection for CNVs of unclear clinical significance was 2.7% (10/370) with 0.9% found to be de novo. Eleven loci of common CNVs were found in the local population.

Conclusion

Whole-genome aCGH offered a higher resolution diagnostic capacity than conventional karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis either as a first-tier test or as a ‘further-test’ for pregnancies with fetal ultrasound anomalies. We propose replacing conventional cytogenetics with aCGH for all pregnancies undergoing invasive diagnostic procedures after excluding common aneuploidies and triploidies by quantitative fluorescent PCR. Conventional cytogenetics can be reserved for visualization of clinically significant CNVs.

Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier clinical diagnostic test: Estonian experience

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is now established as the first-tier cytogenetic diagnostic test for fast and accurate detection of chromosomal abnormalities in patients with developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). We present our experience with using CMA for postnatal and prenatal diagnosis in Estonian patients during 2009-2012. Since 2011, CMA is on the official service list of the Estonian Health Insurance Fund and is performed as the first-tier cytogenetic test for patients with DD/ID, MCA or ASD. A total of 1191 patients were analyzed, including postnatal (1072 [90%] patients and 59 [5%] family members) and prenatal referrals (60 [5%] fetuses). Abnormal results were reported in 298 (25%) patients, with a total of 351 findings (1-3 per individual): 147 (42%) deletions, 106 (30%) duplications, 89 (25%) long contiguous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH) events (>5 Mb), and nine (3%) aneuploidies. Of all findings, 143 (41%) were defined as pathogenic or likely pathogenic; for another 143 findings (41%), most of which were LCSH, the clinical significance remained unknown, while 61 (18%) reported findings can now be reclassified as benign or likely benign. Clinically relevant findings were detected in 126 (11%) patients. However, the proportion of variants of unknown clinical significance was quite high (41% of all findings). It seems that our ability to detect chromosomal abnormalities has far outpaced our ability to understand their role in disease. Thus, the interpretation of CMA findings remains a rather difficult task requiring a close collaboration between clinicians and cytogeneticists.

Chromosomal Microarrays in Prenatal Diagnosis: Time for a Change of Policy?

Microarrays have replaced conventional karyotyping as a first-tier test for unbalanced chromosome anomalies in postnatal cytogenetics mainly due to their unprecedented resolution facilitating the detection of submicroscopic copy number changes at a rate of 10-20% depending on indication for testing. A number of studies have addressed the performance of microarrays for chromosome analyses in high risk pregnancies due to abnormal ultrasound findings and reported an excess detection rate between 5% and 10%. In low risk pregnancies, clear pathogenic copy number changes at the submicroscopic level were encountered in 1% or less. Variants of unclear clinical significance, unsolicited findings, and copy number changes with variable phenotypic consequences are the main issues of concern in the prenatal setting posing difficult management questions. The benefit of microarray testing may be limited in pregnancies with only moderately increased risks (advanced maternal age, positive first trimester test). It is suggested to not change the current policy of microarray application in prenatal diagnosis until more data on the clinical significance of copy number changes are available.

Genomic microarrays in prenatal diagnosis

The application of microarray-based techniques for the diagnosis of genomic rearrangements has been steadily growing in popularity since its introduction in 2004. Given the many advantages of these techniques over conventional cytogenetics, there is increasing pressure towards their application in prenatal diagnosis. However, there remain several important issues that must be addressed. For example, microarray-based techniques (comparative genomic hybridization-based arrays and single nucleotide polymorphism-based arrays) allow detection of even very small genomic imbalances that can determine pathological clinical conditions. In addition, there are other copy number variations which represent normal variation, with no detectable effects on phenotype. Given the still incomplete knowledge of the changes in our genome and the associated phenotypes, microarray-based diagnosis is likely to find variants of uncertain and unknown clinical significance. The interpretation of these variants is now a major challenge for the medical geneticist, who often find it difficult to establish precise correlations between genotype and phenotype. There is sufficient available evidence to justify the use of microarray-based diagnostics for a select number of specific conditions, but there is also an inevitable trend towards ever wider application. It is very important that this drift does not progress in an unchecked and uncontrolled manner under the thrust of commercial interests. Therefore, we recommend that scientific societies be vigilant and take an advisory role in the adopting of these technologies as new scientific knowledge becomes available.

The future of prenatal diagnosis: karyotype, microarray or both? Technical and ethical considerations

Prenatal diagnosis is now offered to high-risk pregnancies, including advanced maternal age, ultrasound anomalies and positive Down's syndrome screening, and karyotype on cultured fetal material is the test of choice to screen these pregnancies. However, microscope analysis can only detect gross chromosome abnormalities, highlighting the need for more sensitive techniques. It has recently been established that the higher resolution of microarray-based platforms can increase the diagnostic yield, offering more information to couples, and it is being discussed as a replacement to the standard karyotype. Conversely, the very high sensitivity of microarray-based analysis allows us to detect small microdeletions/microduplications (copy number variations) with unknown functional role and difficult genotype/phenotype correlation. In addition, the new copy number variation syndromes are often associated with variable outcomes, ranging from normal to severely affected individuals. This means that the microarray-based analysis introduced routinely in prenatal diagnosis needs to answer the question: are laboratory staff, clinical geneticists and counselors really experienced enough to manage these new scenarios?

Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is utilized in prenatal diagnosis to detect chromosomal abnormalities not visible by conventional karyotyping. A prospective cohort of women undergoing fetal CMA and karyotyping following abnormal prenatal ultrasound findings is presented in the context of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature describing detection rates by CMA and karyotyping.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of 243 women undergoing CMA alongside karyotyping when a structural abnormality was detected on prenatal ultrasound. A systematic review of the literature was also performed. MEDLINE (1970-Dec 2012), EMBASE (1980-Dec 2012) and CINAHL (1982-June 2012) databases were searched electronically. Selected studies included > 10 cases and prenatal CMA in addition to karyotyping. The search yielded 560 citations. Full papers were retrieved for 86, and 25 primary studies were included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

Our cohort study found an excess detection rate of abnormalities by CMA of 4.1% over conventional karyotyping when the clinical indication for testing was an abnormal fetal ultrasound finding; this was lower than the detection rate of 10% (95% CI, 8-13%) by meta-analysis. The rate of detection for variants of unknown significance (VOUS) was 2.1% (95% CI, 1.3-3.3%) when the indication for CMA was an abnormal scan finding. The VOUS detection rate was lower (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.5-3.7%) when any indication for prenatal CMA was meta-analyzed.

CONCLUSION

We present evidence for a higher detection rate by CMA than by karyotyping not just in the case of abnormal ultrasound findings but also in cases of other indications for invasive testing. It is likely that CMA will replace karyotyping in high-risk pregnancies.

Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVES

First, to assess the performance of a prenatal diagnostic service using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) as first-line investigations. Second, to determine the incidence of copy number variants (CNVs) by indication for testing, with particular reference to ultrasound and biochemical parameters measured in combined first-trimester screening.

METHODS

All patients undergoing invasive prenatal testing at a specialist prenatal screening service in Sydney, Australia, were included in the study. All samples underwent QF-PCR and targeted aCGH.

RESULTS

Of 1049 cases, CNVs were reported in 156 (14.9%). Preliminary QF-PCR identified abnormalities in 104 of these cases. Of the remaining 52 cases, 20 could have been detected on karyotype testing, leaving 32 cases (3.1%) with CNVs only detectable by aCGH, of which 13 (1.2%) were pathogenic. Variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were seen in only three cases. Fetal structural abnormalities identified in the first trimester were the group most likely to be associated with pathogenic CNVs (11.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining QF-PCR and aCGH is an effective first-tier prenatal testing regime that does not require conventional karyotyping. The incidence of VOUS in this study was very low owing to appropriate aCGH targeting and specific reporting criteria that reduced the number of potentially difficult counseling encounters. Pathogenic CNVs are positively correlated with the presence of fetal structural abnormalities, but not with enlarged nuchal translucency or abnormal first-trimester serology results.

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings: evaluation of chromosomal microarray-based analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the frequency of karyotype abnormalities and chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome among fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings, and to evaluate the clinical value of chromosomal microarray-based analysis (CMA) in the study of such pregnancies.

METHODS

First, we carried out retrospective analysis of karyotype abnormalities and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome cases diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2011 in our center among fetuses with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings (n = 276). Second, CMA was performed in 51 of the fetuses with such findings, normal karyotype and negative or no 22q11.2 deletion syndrome study, and in the only fetus with a heart defect and an apparently balanced de novo chromosomal rearrangement.

RESULTS

Out of the 276 pregnancies with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings, karyotyping revealed a chromosomal abnormality in 44 (15.9%). Of fetuses with normal karyotype in which 22q11.2 deletion syndrome studies were performed, 6.4% (5/78) had this microdeletion syndrome. Among fetuses with abnormal cardiac findings, normal karyotype and negative or no 22q11.2 deletion syndrome study that underwent CMA, the detection rate of pathogenic copy number variants not detected by conventional cytogenetics was 2.0% (1/51), and no variants of uncertain clinical significance were found. In the fetus with a heart defect and an apparently balanced de novo chromosomal rearrangement, CMA revealed that the rearrangement was not truly balanced.

CONCLUSIONS

In the assessment of genetic abnormalities in pregnancies with abnormal cardiac ultrasound findings, the diagnostic yield may be increased by 2% if CMA is used as a complementary tool to conventional cytogenetics. Our results suggest that CMA could be a good alternative to karyotyping in these pregnancies.

Karyotype analysis in large-sample infertile couples living in Central China: a study of 14965 couples

OBJECTIVE

To explore that it is necessary to routinely detect chromosomes in fertile couples, we detected peripheral blood lymphocyte karyotype in 14965 infertile couples living in Central China and analyzed the incidence and type of chromosomal anomaly.

METHODS

G-banding karyotype analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes was performed in 14965 couples who went to the outpatient department of our reproductive medical center for counseling on infertility between January 2004 and December 2011. Semen analysis was performed three times in all the men from the 14965 couples.

RESULTS

The rate of chromosomal anomaly in the 14965 infertile couples was 3.84 % (1150/29930). The rate of chromosomal anomaly in the men from 14965 couples was 6.84 % (1024/14965) and in the women 0.84 % (126/14965). The rates of chromosomal anomaly were 1.69 % in normal semen group, 11.82 % in light oligo-astheno-spermis group, 6.58 % in moderate to severe olig-astheno-spermia group and 17.26 % in azoospermia group.

CONCLUSION

Since the rates of chromosomal anomaly are 1.69 % and 11.82 % even in normal semen group and light oligo-astheno-spermia group, respectively, it is necessary to detect peripheral blood lymphocyte karyotype in all infertile couples.

Prenatal microarray analysis as second-tier diagnostic test: single-center prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of chromosome microarrays as a second-tier test in prenatal genetic testing.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 75 high-risk pregnancies undergoing invasive prenatal genetic testing in which the karyotype either was normal or had findings other than a common non-mosaic autosomal aneuploidy.

RESULTS

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed successfully in all cases. Pathological copy-number variations (CNVs) explaining the phenotypes were found in 11 cases (14.7%). Four cases were detected with an unbalanced translocation. In three of these cases, subsequent genetic analysis demonstrated that a parent was an unknown carrier of a balanced translocation. Among the 67 cases with normal karyo-types, submicroscopic rearrangements with pathological significance were detected in five (7.5%) and CNVs of unclear significance were detected in one (1.5%). CMA was able to discriminate correctly between true mosaicism and confined or pseudomosaicism in all six mosaic cases.

CONCLUSION

CMA is a valuable second-tier test in high-risk pregnancies for which identification or further delineation of genetic aberrations is important. Its higher resolution results in a higher detection rate of aberrant cases, with a clear clinical benefit for estimation of risk of recurrence.

Prenatal diagnosis using array-CGH: a French experience

Array-CGH or Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) is increasingly used in prenatal diagnosis throughout the world. However, routine practices are very different among centers and countries, regarding CMA indications, design and resolution of microarrays, notification and interpretation of Copy Number Alterations (CNA). We present our data and experience from our Fetal Medicine Center on 224 prospective prenatal diagnoses. Our approach is practical, and aims to propose a strategy to offer Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) to selected fetuses and to help to interpret CNA. We hope that this publication could encourage development of CMA in centers that have not started yet this activity in prenatal routine, and could contribute to edict guidelines in this field.

Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma

The purpose of this study was to determine the deep sequencing and analytic conditions needed to detect fetal subchromosome abnormalities across the genome from a maternal blood sample. Cell-free (cf) DNA was isolated from the plasma of 11 pregnant women carrying fetuses with subchromosomal duplications and deletions, translocations, mosaicism, and trisomy 20 diagnosed by metaphase karyotype. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) was performed with 25-mer tags at approximately 10(9) tags per sample and mapped to reference human genome assembly hg19. Tags were counted and normalized to fixed genome bin sizes of 1 Mb or 100 kb to detect statistically distinct copy-number changes compared to the reference. All seven cases of microdeletions, duplications, translocations, and the trisomy 20 were detected blindly by MPS, including a microdeletion as small as 300 kb. In two of these cases in which the metaphase karyotype showed additional material of unknown origin, MPS identified both the translocation breakpoint and the chromosomal origin of the additional material. In the four mosaic cases, the subchromosomal abnormality was not demonstrated by MPS. This work shows that in nonmosaic cases, it is possible to obtain a fetal molecular karyotype by MPS of maternal plasma cfDNA that is equivalent to a chromosome microarray and in some cases is better than a metaphase karyotype. This approach combines the advantage of enhanced fetal genomic resolution with the improved safety of a noninvasive maternal blood test.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosome Abnormalities: A 13-Year Institution Experience

Objective: To analyze trends in screening and invasive prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities (CA) over a 13-year period and correlate them to changes in the national prenatal screening policy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed Down syndrome (DS) screening tests and fetal karyotypes obtained by prenatal invasive testing (IT) in our fetal medicine unit between January 1999 and December 2011. Results: A total of 24,226 prenatal screening tests for DS and 11,045 invasive procedures have been analyzed. Over a 13-year period, utilization of non-invasive screening methods has significantly increased from 57% to 89%. The percentage of invasive procedures has declined from 49% to 12%, although the percentage of IT performed for maternal anxiety has increased from 22% to 55%. The percentage of detected CA increased from 2.5% to 5.9%. Overall, 31 invasive procedures are needed to diagnose 1 abnormal case, being 23 procedures in medical indications and 241 procedures in non-medical indications. Conclusions: Our experience on screening and invasive prenatal diagnostic practice shows a decrease of the number of IT, with a parallel decline in medical indications. There is an increasing efficiency of prenatal screening program to detect CA. Despite the increasing screening policies, our population shows a growing request for prenatal IT. The a priori low risk population shows a not negligible residual risk for relevant CA. This observation challenges the current prenatal screening strategy focused on DS; showing that the residual risk is higher than the current cut-off used to indicate an invasive technique.

Recent advances in the prenatal interrogation of the human fetal genome

The amount of genetic and genomic information obtainable from the human fetus during pregnancy is accelerating at an unprecedented rate. Two themes have dominated recent technological advances in prenatal diagnosis: interrogation of the fetal genome in increasingly high resolution and the development of non-invasive methods of fetal testing using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. These two areas of advancement have now converged with several recent reports of non-invasive assessment of the entire fetal genome from maternal blood. However, technological progress is outpacing the ability of the healthcare providers and patients to incorporate these new tests into existing clinical care, and further complicates many of the economic and ethical dilemmas in prenatal diagnosis. This review summarizes recent work in this field and discusses the integration of these new technologies into the clinic and society.

Microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: a review

G-band chromosomal karyotyping of fetal cells obtained by invasive prenatal testing has been used since the 1960s to identify structural chromosomal anomalies. Prenatal testing is usually performed in response to parental request, increased risk of fetal chromosomal abnormality associated with advanced maternal age, a high-risk screening test and/or the presence of a congenital malformation identified by ultrasonography. The results of karyotyping may inform the long-term prognosis (e.g. aneuploidy being associated with a poor outcome or microscopic chromosomal anomalies predicting global neurodevelopmental morbidity). Relatively recent advances in microarray technology are now enabling high-resolution genome-wide evaluation for DNA copy number abnormalities (e.g. deletions or duplications). While such technological advances promise increased sensitivity and specificity they can also pose difficult challenges of interpretation and clinical management. This review aims to give interested clinicians without an extensive prior knowledge of microarray technology, an overview of its use in prenatal diagnosis, the literature to date, advantages, potential pitfalls and experience from our own tertiary center.

Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results

PURPOSE

Genomic microarrays can detect copy-number variants not detectable by conventional cytogenetics. This technology is diffusing rapidly into prenatal settings even though the clinical implications of many copy-number variants are currently unknown. We conducted a qualitative pilot study to explore the experiences of women receiving abnormal results from prenatal microarray testing performed in a research setting.

METHODS

Participants were a subset of women participating in a multicenter prospective study "Prenatal Cytogenetic Diagnosis by Array-based Copy Number Analysis." Telephone interviews were conducted with 23 women receiving abnormal prenatal microarray results.

RESULTS

We found that five key elements dominated the experiences of women who had received abnormal prenatal microarray results: an offer too good to pass up, blindsided by the results, uncertainty and unquantifiable risks, need for support, and toxic knowledge.

CONCLUSION

As prenatal microarray testing is increasingly used, uncertain findings will be common, resulting in greater need for careful pre- and posttest counseling, and more education of and resources for providers so they can adequately support the women who are undergoing testing.