Systematic review and meta-analysis of performance of second-trimester nasal bone assessment in detection of fetuses with Down syndrome

Single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) analysis for fetuses with abnormal nasal bone

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities found on single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array) in pregnancies with either an absent or hypoplastic nasal bone.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 333 fetuses with either nasal bone hypoplasia or absence identified on prenatal ultrasound. SNP array analysis and conventional karyotyping were performed in all the subjects. The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities was adjusted for maternal age and other ultrasound findings. Fetuses with either an isolated nasal bone absence or hypoplasia, those that had additional soft ultrasound markers, and those where structural defects were found on ultrasound were divided into three groups: A, B, and C, respectively.

RESULTS

Among the total cohort of 333 fetuses, 76 (22.8%) had chromosomal abnormalities, including 47 cases of trisomy 21, 4 cases of trisomy 18, 5 cases of sex chromosome aneuploidy, and 20 cases of copy number variations of which 12 were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in group A (n = 164), B (n = 79), and C (n = 90) was 8.5%, 29.1% and 43.3%, respectively. The incremental yields by SNP-array compared with karyotyping in group A, B, and C were 3.0%, 2.5% and 10.7%, respectively (p > 0.05). Compared to karyotype analysis, SNP array detected an additional 2 (1.2%), 1 (1.3%), and 5 (5.6%) pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs in groups A, B, and C, respectively. In the 333 fetuses, the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in women with advanced maternal age (AMA) was significantly higher than that in non-AMA women, (47.8% vs. 16.5%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In addition to Down's syndrome, many other chromosomal abnormalities are present in fetuses with abnormal nasal bone. SNP array can improve the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities associated with nasal bone abnormalities, especially in pregnancies with non-isolated nasal bone abnormalities and advanced maternal age.

Absent or hypoplastic nasal bone: What to tell the prospective parents?

BACKGROUND

Absent or hypoplastic nasal bone (AHNB) on first or second-trimester ultrasonography (USG) is an important soft marker of Down syndrome. However, due to its varied incidence in euploid and aneuploid fetuses, there is always a dilemma of whether to go for invasive fetal testing for isolated AHNB. This study aims to assess outcomes specifically within the context of Indian ethnicity women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study. All patients who reported with AHNB in the first- or second-trimester USG were included. Genetic counseling was done, and noninvasive and invasive testing was offered. Chromosomal anomalies were meticulously recorded, and pregnancy was monitored.

RESULTS

The incidence of AHNB in our study was 1.16% (47/4051). Out of 47 women with AHNB, the isolated condition was seen in 32 (0.78%) cases, while AHNB with structural anomalies was seen in nine cases (0.22%). Thirty-nine women opted for invasive testing. Six out of 47 had aneuploidy (12.7%), while two euploid cases (4.25%) developed nonimmune hydrops. The prevalence of Down syndrome in fetuses with AHNB was 8.5% (4/47) and 0.42% (17/4004) in fetuses with nasal bone present. This difference was statistically significant (p = .001).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that isolated AHNB cases should be followed by a comprehensive anomaly scan rather than immediately recommending invasive testing. However, invasive testing is required when AHNB is associated with other soft markers or abnormalities. As chromosomal microarray is more sensitive than standard karyotype in detecting chromosomal aberrations, it should be chosen over karyotype.

Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with isolated ultrasound soft markers in pregnant women not of advanced maternal age

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic (P) copy number variants (CNVs) may be associated with second-trimester ultrasound soft markers (USMs), and noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) can enable interrogate the entire fetal genome to screening of fetal CNVs. This study evaluated the clinical application of NIPS for detecting CNVs among fetuses with USMs in pregnant women not of advanced maternal age (AMA).

RESULTS

Fetal aneuploidies and CNVs were identified in 6647 pregnant women using the Berry Genomics NIPS algorithm.Those with positive NIPS results underwent amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis. The NIPS and prenatal diagnosis results were analyzed and compared among different USMs. A total of 96 pregnancies were scored positive for fetal chromosome anomalies, comprising 37 aneuploidies and 59 CNVs. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies were 66.67%, 80.00%, 0%, and 30.43%, respectively. NIPS sensitivity for aneuploidies was 100%. For CNVs, the PPVs were calculated as 35.59% and false positive rate of 0.57%. There were six P CNVs, two successfully identified by NIPS and four missed, of which three were below the NIPS resolution limit and one false negative. The incidence of aneuploidies was significantly higher in fetuses with absent or hypoplastic nasal bone, while that of P CNVs was significantly higher in fetuses with aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA), compared with other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPS yielded a moderate PPV for CNVs in non-AMA pregnant women with fetal USM. However, NIPS showed limited ability in identifying P CNVs. Positive NIPS results for CNVs emphasize the need for further prenatal diagnosis. We do not recommend the use of NIPS for CNVs screening in non-AMA pregnant women with fetal USM, especially in fetuses with ARSA.

Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic nasal bone

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficiency of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in the prenatal diagnosis of foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic nasal bone (NB) in the first and second trimester.

METHODS

From January 2015 to April 2021, foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic NB who received invasive prenatal diagnosis were enrolled. The results of CMA were analysed.

RESULTS

There were 221 foetuses, including 166 cases with isolated absent NB and 55 cases with isolated hypoplastic NB. Twenty-four foetuses (10.9%, 24/221) had an ultrasonic diagnosis in the first trimester and 197 (89.1%, 197/221) had a ultrasonic diagnosis in the second trimester. The overall diagnostic yield of CMA was 9.0% (20/221). Aneuploidies were detected in 13 (5.9%, 13/221) foetuses, including 10 Down syndrome, 2 Klinefelter's syndrome and 1 trisomy 18. Pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in seven foetuses (3.2%, 7/221). In addition, variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were detected in four foetuses. The foetuses with isolated absent NB had a higher detection rate of chromosome abnormality than the isolated hypoplastic NB, but the difference was not significant in the statistical analysis (10.2% vs. 5.5%, χ² =0.642, p = .423). No significant difference was observed in the detection rate between the first trimester and the second trimester (16.6% vs. 8.1%, χ² = 1.002, p = .317, Chi-square test).

CONCLUSION

CMA can increase the diagnostic yield of chromosome abnormality, especially pathogenic CNVs for foetuses with isolated absent or hypoplastic NB. CMA should be recommended when isolated absent or hypoplastic NB is suspected antenatally.7.

Role of Sonographic Second Trimester Soft Markers in the Era of Cell-Free DNA Screening Options: A Review

Soft markers are sonographic structural, nonspecific signs with little pathological significance, often transient, usually considered as normal variants. However, they may also be associated with chromosomal abnormalities. The most widely examined soft markers include absent or hypoplastic nasal bone (NB), intracardiac echogenic focus (IEF), ventriculomegaly (VM), thickened nuchal fold (NF), choroid plexus cyst (CPC), echogenic bowel, short long bones, and urinary tract dilation (UTD). Although the use of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been spreading quickly in maternal–fetal medicine, it is not a diagnostic test and it still remains unavailable or cost-prohibitive for most of the population in many countries. After normal screening test results in the first trimester, there is no uniform consensus regarding the clinical significance of isolated soft markers for aneuploidy. Nowadays, the search for soft markers in an ultrasound is still part of clinical evaluation, and the interpretation of these findings is often a matter of debate. In the present review, we summarize the recent literature about the role of soft markers in the era of NIPT and propose an overview of the different clinical guidelines.

Utility of fetal facial markers on a second trimester genetic sonogram in screening for Down syndrome in a high-risk Thai population

Background

To establish the reference ranges and evaluate the efficacy of the fetal facial sonomarkers prenasal thickness (PT), nasal bone length (NBL), PT/NBL ratio and NBL/PT ratio for Down syndrome screening in the second trimester of high-risk pregnancies using two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound.

Methods

A prospective study was done in Thai pregnant women at high risk for structural and chromosomal abnormalities between May 2018 and May 2019. The main exclusion criteria were any fetal anatomical anomaly detected on ultrasonography or postpartum examination, abnormal chromosome or syndrome other than Down syndrome. Ultrasounds were performed in 375 pregnant women at 14 to 22 weeks’ gestation and the fetal facial parameters were analyzed. Down syndrome results were confirmed by karyotyping. The reference ranges of these facial ultrasound markers were constructed based on the data of our population. The Down syndrome screening performance using these facial ultrasound markers was evaluated.

Results

In total, 340 euploid fetuses and 11 fetuses with Down syndrome met the inclusion criteria. The PT, NBL, and PT/NBL ratios in the euploid fetuses gradually increased with gestation progression while the NBL/PT ratio gradually decreased between 14–22 weeks’ gestation. The NBL, PT/NBL ratio, and NBL/PT ratio all had 100% sensitivity and PT had 91% sensitivity. These facial markers had 100% negative predictive value for Down syndrome screening in the second trimester. The Bland–Altman analysis showed the intra- and inter-observer variations of PT and NBL had high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) in both operators, with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.99 and inter-observer ICCs of 0.99 for both operators.

Conclusion

The facial ultrasound markers are very useful for second trimester Down syndrome screening in our population. These facial ultrasound markers were easily identifiable and highly consistent either intra- or inter-operator by using widely-available 2D ultrasound. However, the reference ranges for these markers need to be constructed based on individual populations.

Trial registration

Registration number: REC 61–029-12–3. Date of registration: 18 May 2018.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #57: Evaluation and management of isolated soft ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in the second trimester: (Replaces Consults #10, Single umbilical artery, October 2010; #16, Isolated echogenic bowel diagnosed on second-trimester ultrasound, August 2011; #17, Evaluation and management of isolated renal pelviectasis on second-trimester ultrasound, December 2011; #25, Isolated fetal choroid plexus cysts, April 2013; #27, Isolated echogenic intracardiac focus, August 2013)

Soft markers were originally introduced to prenatal ultrasonography to improve the detection of trisomy 21 over that achievable with age-based and serum screening strategies. As prenatal genetic screening strategies have greatly evolved in the last 2 decades, the relative importance of soft markers has shifted. The purpose of this document is to discuss the recommended evaluation and management of isolated soft markers in the context of current maternal serum screening and cell-free DNA screening options. In this document, "isolated" is used to describe a soft marker that has been identified in the absence of any fetal structural anomaly, growth restriction, or additional soft marker following a detailed obstetrical ultrasound examination. In this document, "serum screening methods" refers to all maternal screening strategies, including first-trimester screen, integrated screen, sequential screen, contingent screen, or quad screen. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommends the following approach to the evaluation and management of isolated soft markers: (1) we do not recommend diagnostic testing for aneuploidy solely for the evaluation of an isolated soft marker following a negative serum or cell-free DNA screening result (GRADE 1B); (2) for pregnant people with no previous aneuploidy screening and isolated echogenic intracardiac focus, echogenic bowel, urinary tract dilation, or shortened humerus, femur, or both, we recommend counseling to estimate the probability of trisomy 21 and a discussion of options for noninvasive aneuploidy screening with cell-free DNA or quad screen if cell-free DNA is unavailable or cost-prohibitive (GRADE 1B); (3) for pregnant people with no previous aneuploidy screening and isolated thickened nuchal fold or isolated absent or hypoplastic nasal bone, we recommend counseling to estimate the probability of trisomy 21 and a discussion of options for noninvasive aneuploidy screening through cell-free DNA or quad screen if cell-free DNA is unavailable or cost-prohibitive or diagnostic testing via amniocentesis, depending on clinical circumstances and patient preference (GRADE 1B); (4) for pregnant people with no previous aneuploidy screening and isolated choroid plexus cysts, we recommend counseling to estimate the probability of trisomy 18 and a discussion of options for noninvasive aneuploidy screening with cell-free DNA or quad screen if cell-free DNA is unavailable or cost-prohibitive (GRADE 1C); (5) for pregnant people with negative serum or cell-free DNA screening results and an isolated echogenic intracardiac focus, we recommend no further evaluation as this finding is a normal variant of no clinical importance with no indication for fetal echocardiography, follow-up ultrasound imaging, or postnatal evaluation (GRADE 1B); (6) for pregnant people with negative serum or cell-free DNA screening results and isolated fetal echogenic bowel, urinary tract dilation, or shortened humerus, femur, or both, we recommend no further aneuploidy evaluation (GRADE 1B); (7) for pregnant people with negative serum screening results and isolated thickened nuchal fold or absent or hypoplastic nasal bone, we recommend counseling to estimate the probability of trisomy 21 and discussion of options for no further aneuploidy evaluation, noninvasive aneuploidy screening through cell-free DNA, or diagnostic testing via amniocentesis, depending on clinical circumstances and patient preference (GRADE 1B); (8) for pregnant people with negative cell-free DNA screening results and isolated thickened nuchal fold or absent or hypoplastic nasal bone, we recommend no further aneuploidy evaluation (GRADE 1B); (9) for pregnant people with negative serum or cell-free DNA screening results and isolated choroid plexus cysts, we recommend no further aneuploidy evaluation, as this finding is a normal variant of no clinical importance with no indication for follow-up ultrasound imaging or postnatal evaluation (GRADE 1C); (10) for fetuses with isolated echogenic bowel, we recommend an evaluation for cystic fibrosis and fetal cytomegalovirus infection and a third-trimester ultrasound examination for reassessment and evaluation of growth (GRADE 1C); (11) for fetuses with an isolated single umbilical artery, we recommend no additional evaluation for aneuploidy, regardless of whether results of previous aneuploidy screening were low risk or testing was declined. We recommend a third-trimester ultrasound examination to evaluate growth and consideration of weekly antenatal fetal surveillance beginning at 36 0/7 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1C); (12) for fetuses with isolated urinary tract dilation A1, we recommend an ultrasound examination at ≥32 weeks of gestation to determine if postnatal pediatric urology or nephrology follow-up is needed. For fetuses with urinary tract dilation A2-3, we recommend an individualized follow-up ultrasound assessment with planned postnatal follow-up (GRADE 1C); (13) for fetuses with isolated shortened humerus, femur, or both, we recommend a third-trimester ultrasound examination for reassessment and evaluation of growth (GRADE 1C).

Is Prenatal Diagnosis Necessary for Fetal Isolated Nasal Bone Absence or Hypoplasia?

Purpose

This study aimed to explore the value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES) in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal isolated nasal bone absence (INBA) or isolated nasal bone hypoplasia (INBH). We hope to provide additional relevant information for clinical counseling.

Patients and Methods

From November 1, 2018, to March 1, 2020, 55 pregnant women with isolated nasal bone dysplasia were admitted to the Changzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital. Based on the degree of abnormality, the patients were divided into two groups: INBA and INBH. CMA was performed on all patients. The clinical data and prenatal genetic diagnoses of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed. According to the requirements of WES for samples, 12 cases with negative CMA results were selected for the WES test.

Results

A total of 55 cases with INBA or INBH met the inclusion criteria. In 35INBA fetuses, there was one case of trisomy 21 and one case of 10q11.22 deletion (5.7Mb), and the abnormality rate was 5.71% (2/35). Compared with INBA fetuses, the abnormality rate was increased in the fetuses with INBH [15.00% (3/20)] (15.00% vs 5.71%); there was one case of 1q21.1 duplication (1.3Mb), one case of Xp22.31 duplication (1.67Mb), and one case of 4p deletion (7.6Mb). In a later retrospective study, two pathogenic variants were identified in two cases after the WES test; the abnormality rate was 16.67% (2/12), which involved RUNX2 and CDH4 genes, respectively.

Conclusion

A preliminary study confirmed that molecular prenatal diagnosis should be performed in fetuses with INBA or INBH. CMA followed by WES is an effective method.

Revisiting absent nasal bone in the second trimester

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of fetuses diagnosed with absent nasal bone in the second trimester.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study included all fetuses who were diagnosed at or referred to our fetal medicine center with an absent nasal bone from 16 weeks onwards from November 2017 to December 2019. Amniocentesis for fetal karyotype and microarray was offered to all women. Women who opted not to undergo invasive testing were also followed up and neonatal outcome noted.

RESULTS

26 fetuses were eligible for inclusion in the study. 8 (30.8%) out of these were diagnosed with aneuploidy: 7 with trisomy 21 and one with trisomy 18. All fetuses with aneuploidy had additional ultrasound abnormality and/or high risk on biochemical screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated absent nasal bone in the second trimester with prior low risk on combined screening performed by certified sonographers is unlikely to be associated with Down syndrome.

No. 348-Joint SOGC-CCMG Guideline: Update on Prenatal Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy, Fetal Anomalies, and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To review the available prenatal screening options in light of the recent technical advances and to provide an update of previous guidelines in the field of prenatal screening.

INTENDED USERS

Health care providers involved in prenatal screening, including general practitioners, obstetricians, midwives, maternal fetal medicine specialists, geneticists, and radiologists.

TARGET POPULATION

All pregnant women receiving counselling and providing informed consent for prenatal screening.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library in and prior to March 2016 using an appropriate controlled vocabulary (prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis, chorionic villi sampling, non-invasive prenatal screening) and key words (prenatal screening, prenatal genetic counselling). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies written in English and published from January 1985 to May 2016. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical speciality societies.

GUIDELINE UPDATE

Evidence will be reviewed 5 years after publication to determine whether all or part of the guideline should be updated. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations.

[Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with absent nasal bone]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical application of single nucleotide polymorphism microarray (SNP array) in prenatal genetic diagnosis for fetuses with absent nasal bone.

METHODS

Seventy four fetuses with absent nasal bone detected by prenatal ultrasound scanning were recruited from Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine during June 2015 and October 2018. The chromosome karyotypes analysis and SNP array were performed. The correlation between absent fetal nasal bone and chromosome copy number variants was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 74 fetuses, 19 were detected to have chromosomal abnormalities, including 16 cases of trisomy-21, 1 case of trisomy-18 and two cases of micro-deletion/duplication. Among 46 cases with isolated absence of nasal bone, 3 had trisomy-21, and 1 had a micro-duplication. Absence of nasal bone in association with nuchal translucency thickening had a higher rate of abnormal karyotypes compared with isolated absence of nasal bone (χ²=32.27,P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Fetuses with absent nasal bone and nuchal translucency thickening are likely to have chromosome abnormalities, and SNP array testing is recommended to exclude the chromosome abnormalities.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Recurrent Distal 1q21.1 Duplication in Three Fetuses With Ultrasound Anomalies

Background: The phenotype of duplication of 1q21.1 region is variable, ranging from macrocephaly, autism spectrum disorder, congenital anomalies, to a normal phenotype. Few cases have been reported in the literature regarding prenatal diagnosis of 1q21.1 duplication syndrome. The current study presents prenatal diagnosis of 1q21.1 duplication syndrome in three fetuses with ultrasound anomalies. Case presentation: Three fetuses from three unrelated families were included in the study. The prenatal routine ultrasound examination showed nasal bone loss in Fetus 1 and Fetus 3, as well as duodenal atresia in Fetus 2. Chromosomal microarray analysis was performed to provide genetic analysis of amniotic fluid and parental blood samples. The CMA results revealed two de novo duplications of 1.34 and 2.69 Mb at distal 1q21.1 region in two fetuses with absent nasal bone, as well as a maternal inherited 1.35-Mb duplication at distal 1q21.1 in one fetus with duodenal atresia. Conclusions: The phenotype of 1q21.1 duplication syndrome in prenatal diagnosis is variable. The fetuses with nasal bone loss or duodenal atresia may be related to 1q21.1 duplication and chromosomal microarray analysis should be performed.

Absent fetal nasal bone in the second trimester and risk of abnormal karyotype in a prescreened population of Chinese women

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of absent fetal nasal bone in the prediction of fetal chromosomal abnormalities, according to whether it was associated with other soft markers or structural abnormalities in a prescreened population of Chinese pregnant women.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, women whose fetuses had absent nasal bone detected during the second trimester ultrasound scan were followed. Fetal karyotyping was performed and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. The association between absent fetal nasal bone with abnormal karyotype was evaluated according to whether soft markers or structural abnormalities were also observed.

RESULTS

Fetal nasal bone was assessed in 56 707 singleton pregnancies. After exclusion of unqualified cases, 71 (71/56 707, 0.13%) fetuses were included in the final analyses, of which 16 (16/71, 22.54%) were detected to have chromosomal abnormalities, including 12 cases of trisomy-21, three of trisomy-18, and one of micro-deletion (in 7q). Among the 42 cases with isolated absence of nasal bone, two had trisomy-21 and one had a micro-deletion. Absence of nasal bone in association with other structural abnormalities had a higher rate of abnormal karyotypes compared with isolated absence of nasal bone [83.33% (10/12) vs. 7.14% (3/42), Fisher's exact test χ²  = 25.620, p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Absent fetal nasal bone is a highly specific ultrasonographic soft marker that should be included in the routine second trimester ultrasound scan.

Sphenofrontal distance in euploid and aneuploid fetuses

OBJECTIVE

To examine the sphenofrontal distance (SFD) in a large series of aneuploid fetuses in the second and third trimesters and compare findings with those of a euploid population.

METHODS

The database at our unit was searched to identify pregnancies with a diagnosis of trisomy 21, 18 or 13, triploidy or Turner syndrome after 15 weeks' gestation. Stored ultrasound images obtained between 19 and 22 weeks were reviewed. For the normal population, two euploid fetuses matched for gestational age were selected randomly for each aneuploid case. The SFD was measured from the anterior edge of the sphenoid bone to the lowest posterior edge of the frontal bone using on-screen calipers. The SFD measurement was parallel to the long axis of the maxilla. If the sphenoid bone did not extend superiorly enough for direct measurement of the SFD, a tangential line was drawn at the anterior wall of the sphenoid bone and extended cranially. In these cases, the distance between the extended line and the frontal bone was measured. One operator measured the SFD twice and was blinded to the results and karyotype.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 591 pregnancies: 394 euploid fetuses, 122 fetuses with trisomy 21, 45 with trisomy 18, 16 with trisomy 13, eight with Turner syndrome and six with triploidy. For both euploid and aneuploid groups, mean gestational age at examination was 22.8 (range: euploid, 15.0-40.7; aneuploid, 15.0-40.3) weeks. For euploid fetuses, mean SFD was 1.27 cm and measurements ranged from 0.53 cm to 2.56 cm. SFD was significantly dependent on gestational age (SFD = 0.138 + 0.005 × gestational age, P < 0.001, r = 0.802). Mean SFD was significantly smaller in each aneuploid group compared with the euploid population (trisomies 21, 18 and 13: all P < 0.001; triploidy: P = 0.026; Turner syndrome: P = 0.047). For 32 (26.2%), nine (20.0%) and six (37.5%) fetuses with trisomy 21, 18 and 13, respectively, SFD was < 5^th percentile. Only one (12.5%) fetus with Turner syndrome and none with triploidy had SFD < 5^th percentile.

CONCLUSION

In aneuploid fetuses, the SFD is smaller than in their euploid counterparts. However, for a false-positive rate of 5%, the detection rate of trisomy 21 is only 26%. Therefore, using the method we have proposed, it is unlikely that this marker will play a major role in second- and third-trimester screening for aneuploidy. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Screening performance of different methods defining fetal nasal bone hypoplasia as a single and combined marker for the detection of trisomy 21 in the second trimester

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate different methods of defining fetal nasal bone hypoplasia in the second trimester for the detection of trisomy 21.

METHODS

Prospective study in Greek women undergoing anomaly scan between 18 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks. The following methods of defining nasal bone hypoplasia were evaluated, either as a single marker or in combination with others: (1) BPD to nasal bone length (NBL) ratio; (2) multiples of the median (MoM) of NBL, according to normal curves from a Greek population; (3-4) NBL < 2.5 percentile according to normal curves (3) commonly used internationally curves and (4) curves from a Greek population.

RESULTS

In total, 1301 singleton fetuses were evaluated - 10 with trisomy 21. The best detection rate of trisomy 21 was achieved when the applied method was nasal bone percentiles adjusted to maternal ethnicity, in combination with other markers (<2.5 percentile according to normal curves from a Greek population; p < 0.001; sensitivity 50%; specificity 94.8%; false-positive rate 5.2%; positive likelihood ratio 9.6).

CONCLUSION

Screening performance of fetal nasal bone hypoplasia in detecting trisomy 21 varies according to the method applied. The best screening performance is achieved by using percentiles adjusted to maternal ethnicity in combination with other markers of aneuploidy.

Two kinds of common prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

As the chromosomal examination of foetal cells for the prenatal diagnosis of Down's syndrome (DS) carries a risk of inducing miscarriage, serum screening tests are commonly used before invasive procedures. In this study, a total of 374 records from PubMed, EMBASE, and the ISI Science Citation Index databases were reviewed. As a result of duplication, insufficient data, and inappropriate article types, 18 independent articles containing 183,998 samples were used in the final systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of the serum triple screening test (STS) and the integrated screening test (INS). Data extracted from the selected studies were statistically analysed, and the presence of heterogeneity and publication bias was assessed using specific software. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and the area under the curve for the STS were 0.77 (95% confidence interval = 0.73-0.81), 0.94 (0.94-0.94), 9.78 (6.87-13.93), 0.26 (0.22-0.31), 44.72 (30.77-65.01), and 0.9064, respectively. For the INS, these values were 0.93 (0.90-0.95), 0.93 (0.93-0.93), 22.38 (12.47-40.14), 0.08 (0.05-0.11), 289.81 (169.08-496.76), and 0.9781, respectively. These results indicate that the INS exhibits better diagnostic value for DS. However, further research is needed to identify other biomarkers to improve prenatal screening tests.

Prenasal thickness to nasal bone length ratio in normal and trisomy 21 fetuses at 11-14 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVE

To show the feasibility and to create a reference range for prenasal thickness (PT) and for the PT to nasal bone length (NBL) ratio in normal fetuses at 11-14 gestational weeks and to compare the findings to fetuses with trisomy 21.

METHOD

PT, NBL and PT/NBL ratio were measured retrospectively in stored two-dimensional images of 1155 normal fetuses and 44 fetuses with trisomy 21. Mid-sagittal images were acquired at first trimester ultrasound examinations and were selected from our digital database.

RESULTS

The PT increased with CRL from 1.0 mm at 45-mm CRL to 1.6 mm at 84-mm CRL. The mean PT/NBL ratio was 0.6 and was not altered by CRL. The mean PT/NBL ratio in fetuses with trisomy 21 was significantly higher than in normal fetuses (p < 0.0001). For a cut-off value of 0.8 the PT/NBL yielded a sensitivity of 86.4% and a specificity of 98.4% for trisomy 21.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of PT between 11 and 14 gestational weeks is feasible with high intraclass correlation. The PT to NBL ratio seems to be a promising marker for trisomy 21 in the first trimester and was superior to the isolated contribution of NBL and PT measurements.

Second-trimester fetal aberrant right subclavian artery: original study, systematic review and meta-analysis of performance in detection of Down syndrome

OBJECTIVES

First, to estimate the prevalence of fetal aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) in our population and its association with Down syndrome. Second, to determine the feasibility of ultrasound to visualize ARSA in the three planes. Finally, to carry out a systematic review of the literature on the performance of second-trimester ARSA to identify fetuses with Down syndrome.

METHODS

ARSA was assessed by ultrasound in the axial plane and confirmed in the longitudinal and coronal planes during the second half of pregnancy in women attending our unit (from February 2011 to December 2012). A search of diagnostic tests for the assessment of ARSA was carried out in international databases. Relevant studies were subjected to a critical reading, and meta-analysis was performed with Meta-DiSc.

RESULTS

Of the 8781 fetuses in our population (mean gestational age: 24 ± 5.4 weeks), 22 had Down syndrome. ARSA was detected in the axial view in 60 cases (0.7%) and confirmed in the coronal view in 96.7% and in the longitudinal view in 6.7% (P < 0.001). Seven cases with ARSA had Down syndrome and all were in the non-isolated-ARSA group. The estimates of positive likelihood ratio (LR) were 0 for isolated ARSA and 199 (95% CI, 88.9-445.2) for non-isolated ARSA. In the systematic review, six studies were selected for quantitative synthesis. The pooled estimates of positive and negative LRs for global ARSA were, respectively, 35.3 (95% CI, 24.4-51.1) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.64-0.87). For isolated ARSA, the positive and negative LRs were 0 (95% CI, 0.0-14.7) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.02), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ARSA seems close to 1%. The coronal plane is the most suitable for its confirmation after detection in the axial plane. Detection of isolated or non-isolated ARSA should guide decisions about karyotyping given that isolated ARSA shows a weak association with Down syndrome.