Sonographic finding of postpartum levator ani muscle injury correlates with pelvic floor clinical examination

Association between birth weight and head circumference and obstetric anal sphincter injury severity

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for increasing severity of OASI and evaluate its possible correlation with two known risk factors-birth weight (BW) and neonatal head circumference (HC).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at a university affiliated hospital between 2003 and 2019. We compared five groups of patients - according to presence and degree of perineal laceration - 3a, 3b, 3c and 4 and patients without OASI. Additionally, four parameters were defined to assess their relation to the severity of OASI: (1) BW ≥ 90th and HC < 90th percentiles; (2) BW < 90th and HC ≥ 90th percentile; (3) BW and HC ≥ 90th percentile and (4) BW and HC < 90th percentiles.

RESULTS

During the study period, 150,221 deliveries were evaluated. Parturients were allocated according to OASI severity - 455 patients had a 3rd (3a, 3b or 3c) or 4th degree perineal tear, while 110,966 patients had no OASI. Allocation to subgroups according to offspring anthropomorphic measures showed that as fetal size parameters increased, the rate of more severe tears increased, particularly in women delivering neonates with HC ≥ 90th percentile. Multinomial regression analysis was performed for each 3rd degree OASI subgroup. This analysis demonstrated the odds for OASI gradually increase with tear severity for BW ≥ 90th percentile and the combined BW and HC ≥ 90th percentile parameters, as compared with neonates with HC and BW < 90th percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

Birth weight and head circumference above the 90th percentile are correlated with increased degree of OASI severity.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury in adolescent mothers

Background

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a debilitating complication of vaginal delivery which has yet to receive ample attention in adolescents. The aim of this study was to describe risk for OASI in adolescent mothers compared to adults. We further attempted to compare risk factors for OASI between these two age groups.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study between 2003 and 2019. Primiparous women who delivered vaginally, 21 years and younger were compared to women ages 26–35. Excluded were preterm, multifetal, non-vertex, cesarean deliveries as well as intrauterine fetal death. Rate of OASI as well as obstetric and labor characteristics of women with OASI, were compared between groups. Finally, risk factors were assessed for each group separately. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression model were performed.

Results

Final analysis was performed on 5113 nulliparous adolescents and 13,845 nulliparous in the 26–35 age group. Allocation to study groups was according to OASI – Sixty-seven adolescents (1.3%) had a 3rd or 4th degree perineal tear and were defined as the OASI group, while 5046 patients (98.7%) did not have such a tear. In the adult group, 199 out of 13,845 patients (1.4%) were diagnosed with OASI. Occurrence of OASI did not differ between groups (p = 0.510). Comparison of women with OASI in the adolescent group vs. adult group found differences with regard to operative vaginal delivery, (20.9% vs. 36.2%, respectively; p = 0.023) and meconium stained amniotic fluid (9.1% vs. 21.3%, respectively; p = 0.027).

Following multivariate analysis the only parameter independently associated with OASI in the adolescent age group was head circumference ≥ 90th percentile with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.08 (CI 1.48–6.38, p = 0.003). In the adult group the similar analysis revealed operative vaginal delivery (OR = 2.44, CI 1.72–3.47, p < 0.001) and a birthweight≥90th percentile (OR = 2.23, CI 1.19–4.18, p = 0.012) to be independent risk factors for OASI.

Conclusion

Adolescents have similar risk for OASI compared to adults but differ in risk factors leading to OASI. Head circumference ≥ 90th percentile was found to be associated with OASI in this age group.

Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, a large number of studies have been published on the clinical relevance of pelvic floor three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound. Several studies compare sonography with other imaging modalities or clinical examination. The quality of reporting in these studies is not known. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the compliance of diagnostic accuracy studies investigating pelvic floor 3D ultrasound with the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) guidelines.

METHODS

Published articles on pelvic floor 3D ultrasound were identified by a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus databases. Prospective and retrospective studies that compared pelvic floor 3D ultrasound with other clinical and imaging diagnostics were included in the analysis. STARD compliance was assessed and quantified by two independent investigators, using 22 of the original 25 STARD checklist items. Items with the qualifier 'if done' (Items 13, 23 and 24) were excluded because they were not applicable to all papers. Each item was scored as reported (score = 1) or not reported (score = 0). Observer variability, the total number of reported STARD items per article and summary scores for each item were calculated. The difference in total score between STARD-adopting and non-adopting journals was tested statistically, as was the effect of year of publication.

RESULTS

Forty studies published in 13 scientific journals were included in the analysis. Mean ± SD STARD checklist score of the included articles was 16.0 ± 2.5 out of a maximum of 22 points. The lowest scores (< 50%) were found for reporting of handling of indeterminate results or missing responses, adverse events and the time interval between tests. Interobserver agreement for rating the STARD items was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.77). An independent t-test showed no significant mean difference ± SD in total STARD checklist score between STARD-adopting and non-adopting journals (16.4 ± 2.2 vs 15.9 ± 2.6, respectively). Mean ± SD STARD checklist score for articles published in 2003-2009 was lower, but not statistically different, compared with those published in 2010-2015 (15.2 ± 2.5 vs 16.6 ± 2.4, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The overall compliance with reporting guidelines of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor 3D transperineal ultrasound is relatively good compared with other fields of medicine. However, specific checklist items require more attention when reported. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.