Effect of change in posture on maternal functional hemodynamics at 35-37 weeks' gestation

Posture-related changes in sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity during normal pregnancy

Normal pregnancy is associated with vast adjustments in cardiovascular autonomic control. Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity has been reported to be attenuated during pregnancy in animal models, but most studies in humans are cross-sectional and findings from longitudinal case studies are inconclusive. It remains unclear how sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity is altered longitudinally during pregnancy within an individual in different body postures. Therefore, this study examined the impact of posture on sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity in 24 normal-weight normotensive pregnant women. Spontaneous sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was assessed during early (6-11 weeks) and late (32-36 weeks) pregnancy and 6-10 weeks postpartum in the supine posture and graded head-up tilt (30° and 60°). In addition, data from the postpartum period were compared with (and no different to) 18 age-matched non-pregnant women to confirm that the postpartum period was reflective of a non-pregnant condition (online supplement). When compared with postpartum (-3.8 ± 0.4 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg), supine sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was augmented during early pregnancy (-5.9 ± 0.4 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg, P < 0.001). However, sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity at 30° or 60° head-up tilt was not different between any phase of gestation (P > 0.05). When compared to supine, sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity at 60° head-up tilt was significantly blunted during early (Δ2.0 ± 0.7 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg, P = 0.024) and late (Δ1.5 ± 0.6 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg, P = 0.049) pregnancy but did not change postpartum (Δ0.4 ± 0.6 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg, P = 1.0). These data show that time-course changes in sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity are dependent on the posture it is examined in and provides a foundation of normal blood pressure regulation during pregnancy for future studies in women at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review

Sinus tachycardia (ST) is ubiquitous, but its presence outside of normal physiological triggers in otherwise healthy individuals remains a commonly encountered phenomenon in medical practice. In many cases, ST can be readily explained by a current medical condition that precipitates an increase in the sinus rate, but ST at rest without physiological triggers may also represent a spectrum of normal. In other cases, ST may not have an easily explainable cause but may represent serious underlying pathology and can be associated with intolerable symptoms. The classification of ST, consideration of possible etiologies, as well as the decisions of when and how to intervene can be difficult. ST can be classified as secondary to a specific, usually treatable, medical condition (eg, pulmonary embolism, anemia, infection, or hyperthyroidism) or be related to several incompletely defined conditions (eg, inappropriate ST, postural tachycardia syndrome, mast cell disorder, or post-COVID syndrome). While cardiologists and cardiac electrophysiologists often evaluate patients with symptoms associated with persistent or paroxysmal ST, an optimal approach remains uncertain. Due to the many possible conditions associated with ST, and an overlap in medical specialists who see these patients, the inclusion of experts in different fields is essential for a more comprehensive understanding. This article is unique in that it was composed by international experts in Neurology, Psychology, Autonomic Medicine, Allergy and Immunology, Exercise Physiology, Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Endocrinology, Cardiology, and Cardiac Electrophysiology in the hope that it will facilitate a more complete understanding and thereby result in the better care of patients with ST.

Trends of blood pressure and heart rate in normal pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current reference ranges for blood pressure and heart rate throughout pregnancy have a poor evidence base.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. We included studies measuring blood pressure or heart rate from healthy pregnant women within defined gestational periods of 16 weeks or less. We analysed systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate by gestational age. We assessed effects of measurement year and method.

RESULTS

We included 39 studies undertaken in 1967-2017, containing 124,349 systolic measurements from 36,239 women, 124,291 diastolic measurements from 36,181 women and 10,948 heart rate measurements from 8317 women. Mean (95% CI) systolic blood pressure was lowest at 10 weeks gestation, 110.4 (108.5, 112.3) mmHg, rising to 116.0 (113.6, 118.4) mmHg at 40 weeks, mean (95% CI) change 5.6 (4.0, 7.2) mmHg. Mean (95% CI) diastolic blood pressure was lowest at 21 weeks gestation, 65.9 (64.2, 67.7) mmHg; rising to 72.8 (71.0, 74.6) mmHg at 40 weeks, mean (95% CI) change 6.9 (6.2, 7.5) mmHg. Mean (95% CI) heart rate rose from 79.3 (75.5, 83.1) beats/min at 10 weeks to 86.9 (82.2, 91.6) beats/min at 40 weeks gestation, mean (95% CI) change 7.6 (1.8, 13.4) beats/min. Studies using manual measurement reported higher diastolic blood pressures than studies using automated measurement, mean (95 CI) difference 4.9 (0.8, 8.9) mmHg. Diastolic blood pressure increased by 0.26 (95% CI 0.10-0.43) mmHg/year. Including only higher-quality studies had little effect on findings, with heterogeneity remaining high (I2 statistic > 50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant gestational blood pressure and heart rate changes occur that should be taken into account when assessing pregnant women. Commonly taught substantial decreases in blood pressure mid-pregnancy were not seen and heart rate increases were lower than previously thought. Manual and automated blood pressure measurement cannot be used interchangeably. Increases in diastolic blood pressure over the last half-century and differences between published studies show contemporary data are required to define current normal ranges.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42014009673.

Maternal functional hemodynamics in uncomplicated twin pregnancies: A longitudinal study using impedance cardiography

INTRODUCTION

Longitudinal studies of maternal hemodynamics in twin pregnancy are scarce and preload reserve in twin pregnancies has not been studied. Thus, we aimed to investigate serial changes in maternal systemic hemodynamics from the first to third trimester, and cardiovascular response to passive leg raising to evaluate preload reserve using impedance cardiography in a cohort of uncomplicated twin pregnancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective longitudinal study of 50 twin pregnancies. Maternal hemodynamics was assessed at baseline and 120 seconds after passive leg raising using impedance cardiography, at five time points during gestation. Women were excluded from the analysis if there were pregnancy complications or fewer than three of five planned assessments were available.

RESULTS

Data from 37 uncomplicated twin pregnancies were available for analysis. Mean arterial pressure slightly decreased until 17 weeks' gestation, then increased. Systemic vascular resistance was constant in the first half of pregnancy before rising steadily thereafter, whereas the cardiac output increased from the first trimester, peaked by the end of the second trimester and then decreased in the third trimester. The change in stroke volume and cardiac output following passive leg raising during pregnancy ranged from -2.2% to 1.6% and from -3.7% to 3.2%, respectively. Although passive leg raising caused no significant changes in systemic vascular resistance, cardiac output or heart rate, mean arterial pressure decreased in the first and second trimesters.

CONCLUSIONS

In uncomplicated twin pregnancies, maternal cardiovascular adaptation is evident from the first trimester. Twin pregnancies show a reduced preload reserve in the second half of gestation.

Agreement between preload reserve measured by impedance cardiography and echocardiography during pregnancy

Purpose

Accurate assessment of cardiac function is important during pregnancy. Echocardiography and impedance cardiography (ICG) are commonly used noninvasive methods to measure stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO). The difference in stroke volume (ΔSV) or cardiac output (ΔCO) measured at baseline and after passive leg raising (PLR) is a measure of preload reserve that predicts volume responsiveness. However, the agreement between these two methods in measuring preload reserve during pregnancy is unclear. The aim of our study was to investigate the correlation and the agreement between Doppler echocardiography and ICG in assessing preload reserve in pregnant women.

Methods

In this prospective observational cross-sectional study, preload reserve was assessed by measuring the SV and CO during baseline and 90 s after PLR simultaneously by Doppler echocardiography and ICG in healthy pregnant women during the second and third trimesters. Bland–Altman analysis was used to determine the agreement between the two methods. Bias was calculated as the mean difference between two methods and precision as 1.96 SD of the difference.

Results

A total of 53 pregnant women were included. We found a statistically significant correlation between ΔSV (R = 0.56, p < 0.0001) and ΔCO (R = 0.39, p = 0.004) measured by ICG and Doppler echocardiography. The mean bias for ΔSV was 2.52 ml, with a precision of 18.19 ml. The mean bias for ΔCO was 0.21 l/min, with a precision of 1.51 l/min.

Conclusion

There was a good agreement and a statistically significant correlation between ICG and Doppler echocardiography for measuring preload reserve.