Prenatal screening for atypical chromosomal abnormalities: past or future?

The role of ultrasound in first-trimester screening after the introduction of NIPT as a service of public health insurance - a consensus statement of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany

Combined first-trimester screening (FTS) and noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) have been proven to be reliable noninvasive procedures to detect the most common chromosomal abnormalities (trisomies 21, 18, 13) in the first trimester. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the strengths and limitations of these two procedures and to give a consensus statement of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) Germany on how to use the two techniques in the first trimester after the introduction of NIPT as a service of the statutory health insurance companies in Germany.

Increased nuchal translucency can be ascertained using transverse planes

BACKGROUND

The detection of increased nuchal translucency is crucial for the assessment risk of aneuploidies and other fetal anomalies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the ability of a transverse view of the fetal head to detect increased fetal nuchal translucency at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective study enrolling a nonconsecutive series of women who attended our outpatient clinic from January 2020 to April 2021 for combined screening and were examined by operators certified by the Fetal Medicine Foundation. In each patient, nuchal translucency measurements were obtained both from a median sagittal view and from a transverse view. A second sonologist blinded to the results of the first examination obtained another measurement to assess intermethod and interobsever reproducibility.

RESULTS

A total of 1023 women were enrolled. An excellent correlation was found between sagittal and transverse nuchal translucency measurements, with a mean difference of 0.01 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.01 to 0.02). No systematic difference was found between the 2 techniques. The inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.957; 95% confidence interval, 0.892-0.983) and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.976; 95% confidence interval, 0.941-0.990) of axial measurements were almost perfect. Transverse measurements of 3.0 mm identified all cases with sagittal measurements of ≥3.0 with a specificity of 99.7%; transverse measurements of >3.2 mm identified all cases with sagittal measurements of 3.5 mm with a specificity of 99.7%. The time required to obtain transverse nuchal translucency measurements was considerably shorter than for sagittal measurements, particularly when the fetus had an unfavorable position.

CONCLUSION

When the sonogram is performed by an expert sonologist, the difference in nuchal translucency measurement obtained with a transverse or sagittal plane is minimal. Increased nuchal translucency can be reliably identified by using transverse views, and in some cases, this may technically be advantageous.

Application values of prenatal screening and non-invasive gene sequencing in fetal birth defects

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effects of prenatal screening and non-invasive gene sequencing on the clinical diagnosis of fetal birth defects and the outcome of pregnancy.

METHODS

Totally 2520 pregnant women who received prenatal screening in our hospital were selected as the research subjects. The high-risk pregnant women were further tested by the non-invasive gene sequencing technology. Pregnant women with positive results were diagnosed by amniocentesis and fetal chromosome karyotype analysis, and the pregnancy outcome was followed up for one year.

RESULTS

870 out of the 2520 pregnant women was tested by non-invasive gene sequencing technology; 26 of the 870 women was 13-trisomy-positive and was diagnosed by amniocentesis and fetal chromosome karyotype analysis, 22 of which was diagnosed as 47, XN, +13 and four of which was normal; the diagnosis accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was 84.6%. 18 out of the 22 confirmed cases underwent abortion, three cases had termination of embryonic development, and one case had postnatal anomaly. Thirty four out of the 2520 pregnant women was 18-trisomy-positive and was diagnosed by amniocentesis and fetal chromosome karyotype analysis, 31 of which was diagnosed as 47, XN, +18 and three cases were normal; the diagnosis accuracy of NIPT was 91.2%. 29 out of the 31 confirmed cases underwent abortion and two cases had termination of embryonic development. Forty out of the 2520 pregnant women was 21-trisomy-positive and was diagnosed by amniocentesis and fetal chromosome karyotype analysis, 39 of which was diagnosed as 47, XN, +21 and one case was normal; the diagnosis accuracy of NIPT was 97.5%. Thirty four out of the 39 confirmed cases underwent abortion, three cases had termination of embryonic development, and two cases had postnatal anomaly. Twenty eight cases were tested as sex chromosome-positive and were diagnosed by amniocentesis and fetal chromosome karyotype analysis, 25 out of which was diagnosed as abnormal and three cases were normal; the diagnosis accuracy of NIPT was 89.3%. 24 out of the 25 confirmed cases underwent abortion, and one case had termination of embryonic development.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal screening and non-invasive gene sequencing technology have a high accuracy in the diagnosis of fetal birth defects, which can reduce the maternal abortion injury as much as possible and relieve the psychological pressure. The promotion of the mode can be strengthened in clinics.

State-wide utilization and performance of traditional and cell-free DNA-based prenatal testing pathways: the Victorian Perinatal Record Linkage (PeRL) study

OBJECTIVES

To perform individual record linkage of women undergoing screening with cell-free DNA (cfDNA), combined first-trimester screening (CFTS), second-trimester serum screening (STSS), and/or prenatal and postnatal cytogenetic testing with the aim to (1) obtain population-based estimates of utilization of prenatal screening and invasive diagnosis, (2) analyze the performance of different prenatal screening strategies, and (3) report the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality following a low-risk aneuploidy screening result.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of women residing in the state of Victoria, Australia, who underwent prenatal screening or invasive prenatal diagnosis in 2015. Patient-funded cfDNA referrals from multiple providers were merged with state-wide results for government-subsidized CFTS, STSS and invasive diagnostic procedures. Postnatal cytogenetic results from products of conception and infants up to 12 months of age were obtained to ascertain cases of false-negative screening results and atypical chromosomal abnormalities. Individual record linkage was performed using LinkageWiz^TM .

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 79 140 births and 66 166 (83.6%) women underwent at least one form of aneuploidy screening. Linkage data were complete for 93.5% (n = 61 877) of women who underwent screening, and of these, 73.2% (n = 45 275) had CFTS alone, 20.2% (n = 12 486) had cfDNA alone; 5.3% (n = 3268) had STSS alone, 1.3% (n = 813) had both CFTS and cfDNA, and < 0.1% (n = 35) had both STSS and cfDNA. CFTS had a combined sensitivity for trisomies 21 (T21), 18 (T18) and 13 (T13) of 89.57% (95% CI, 82.64-93.93%) for a screen-positive rate (SPR) of 2.94%. There were 12 false-negative results in the CFTS pathway, comprising 10 cases of T21, one of T18 and one of T13. cfDNA had a combined sensitivity for T21, T18 and T13 of 100% (95% CI, 95.00-100%) for a SPR of 1.21%. When high-risk cfDNA results for any chromosome (including the sex chromosomes) and failed cfDNA tests were treated as screen positives, the SPR for cfDNA increased to 2.42%. The risk of any major chromosomal abnormality (including atypical abnormalities) detected on prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing after a low-risk screening result was 1 in 1188 for CFTS (n = 37) and 1 in 762 for cfDNA (n = 16) (P = 0.13). The range of chromosomal abnormalities detected after a low-risk cfDNA result included pathogenic copy-number variants (n = 6), triploidy (n = 3), rare autosomal trisomies (n = 3) and monosomy X (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Our state-wide record-linkage analysis delineated the utilization and clinical performance of the multitude of prenatal screening pathways available to pregnant women. The sensitivity of cfDNA for T21, T18 and T13 was clearly superior to that of CFTS. While there was no statistically significant difference in the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality after a low-risk CFTS or cfDNA result, there were fewer live infants diagnosed with a major chromosomal abnormality in the cfDNA cohort. These data provide valuable population-based evidence to inform practice recommendations and health policies. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.