Local validation and calibration of pre-eclampsia screening algorithms

Preterm preeclampsia screening using biomarkers: combining phenotypic classifiers into robust prediction models

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia screening is a critical component of antenatal care worldwide. Currently, the most developed screening test for preeclampsia at 11 to 13 weeks' gestation integrates maternal demographic characteristics and medical history with 3 biomarkers-serum placental growth factor, mean arterial pressure, and uterine artery pulsatility index-to identify approximately 75% of women who develop preterm preeclampsia with delivery before 37 weeks of gestation. It is generally accepted that further improvements to preeclampsia screening require the use of additional biomarkers. We recently reported that the levels of specific metabolites and metabolite ratios are associated with preterm preeclampsia. Notably, for several of these markers, preterm preeclampsia prediction varied according to maternal body mass index class. These findings motivated us to study whether patient classification allowed for combining metabolites with the current biomarkers more effectively to improve prediction of preterm preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether metabolite biomarkers can improve biomarker-based preterm preeclampsia prediction in 3 screening resource scenarios according to the availability of: (1) placental growth factor, (2) placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure, and (3) placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure+uterine artery pulsatility index.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an observational case-control study, drawn from a large prospective screening study at 11 to 13 weeks' gestation on the prediction of pregnancy complications, conducted at King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Maternal blood samples were also collected for subsequent research studies. We used liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to quantify levels of 50 metabolites previously associated with pregnancy complications in plasma samples from singleton pregnancies. Biomarker data, normalized using multiples of medians, on 1635 control and 106 preterm preeclampsia pregnancies were available for model development. Modeling was performed using a methodology that generated a prediction model for preterm preeclampsia in 4 consecutive steps: (1) z-normalization of predictors, (2) combinatorial modeling of so-called (weak) classifiers in the unstratified patient set and in discrete patient strata based on body mass index and/or race, (3) selection of classifiers, and (4) aggregation of the selected classifiers (ie, bagging) into the final prediction model. The prediction performance of models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and detection rate at 10% false-positive rate.

RESULTS

First, the predictor development methodology itself was evaluated. The patient set was split into a training set (2/3) and a test set (1/3) for predictor model development and internal validation. A prediction model was developed for each of the 3 different predictor panels, that is, placental growth factor+metabolites, placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure+metabolites, and placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure+uterine artery pulsatility index+metabolites. For all 3 models, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the test set did not differ significantly from that of the training set. Next, a prediction model was developed using the complete data set for the 3 predictor panels. Among the 50 metabolites available for modeling, 26 were selected across the 3 prediction models; 21 contributed to at least 2 out of the 3 prediction models developed. Each time, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and detection rate were significantly higher with the new prediction model than with the reference model. Markedly, the estimated detection rate with the placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure+metabolites prediction model in all patients was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.70), a 15% increase (P<.001) over the detection rate of 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.55) estimated for the reference placental growth factor+mean arterial pressure. The same prediction model significantly improved detection in Black (14%) and White (19%) patients, and in the normal-weight group (18.5≤body mass index<25) and the obese group (body mass index≥30), with respectively 19% and 20% more cases detected, but not in the overweight group, when compared with the reference model. Similar improvement patterns in detection rates were found in the other 2 scenarios, but with smaller improvement amplitudes.

CONCLUSION

Metabolite biomarkers can be combined with the established biomarkers of placental growth factor, mean arterial pressure, and uterine artery pulsatility index to improve the biomarker component of early-pregnancy preterm preeclampsia prediction tests. Classification of the pregnant women according to the maternal characteristics of body mass index and/or race proved instrumental in achieving improved prediction. This suggests that maternal phenotyping can have a role in improving the prediction of obstetrical syndromes such as preeclampsia.

First-trimester preterm preeclampsia prediction with metabolite biomarkers: differential prediction according to maternal body mass index

BACKGROUND

Prediction of preeclampsia risk is key to informing effective maternal care. Current screening for preeclampsia at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation using maternal demographic characteristics and medical history with measurements of mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and serum placental growth factor can identify approximately 75% of women who develop preterm preeclampsia with delivery at <37 weeks of gestation. Further improvements to preeclampsia screening tests will likely require integrating additional biomarkers. Recent research suggests the existence of distinct maternal risk profiles. Therefore, biomarker evaluation should account for the possibility that a biomarker only predicts preeclampsia in a specific maternal phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to verify metabolite biomarkers as preterm preeclampsia predictors early in pregnancy in all women and across body mass index groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational case-control study drawn from a large prospective study on the early prediction of pregnancy complications in women attending their routine first hospital visit at King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom, in 2010 to 2015. Pregnant women underwent a complete first-trimester assessment, including the collection of blood samples for biobanking. In 11- to 13-week plasma samples of 2501 singleton pregnancies, the levels of preselected metabolites implicated in the prediction of pregnancy complications were analyzed using a targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method, yielding high-quality quantification data on 50 metabolites. The ratios of amino acid levels involved in arginine biosynthesis and nitric oxide synthase pathways were added to the list of biomarkers. Placental growth factor and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A were also available for all study subjects, serving as comparator risk predictors. Data on 1635 control and 106 pregnancies complicated by preterm preeclampsia were considered for this analysis, normalized using multiples of medians. Prediction analyses were performed across the following patient strata: all subjects and the body mass index classes of <25, 25 to <30, and ≥30 kg/m². Adjusted median levels were compared between cases and controls and between each body mass index class group. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated at the mean ±1 standard deviation to gauge clinical prediction merits.

RESULTS

The levels of 13 metabolites were associated with preterm preeclampsia in the entire study population (P<.05) with particularly significant (P<.01) associations found for 6 of them, namely, 2-hydroxy-(2/3)-methylbutyric acid, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, 2-hydroxybutyric acid, alanine, dodecanoylcarnitine, and 1-(1Z-octadecenyl)-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine. Fold changes in 7 amino acid ratios, all involving glutamine or ornithine, were also significantly different between cases and controls (P<.01). The predictive performance of some metabolites and ratios differed according to body mass index classification; for example, ornithine (P<.001) and several ornithine-related ratios (P<.0001 to P<.01) were only strongly associated with preterm preeclampsia in the body mass index of <25 kg/m² group, whereas dodecanoylcarnitine and 3 glutamine ratios were particularly predictive in the body mass index of ≥30 kg/m² group (P<.01).

CONCLUSION

Single metabolites and ratios of amino acids related to arginine bioavailability and nitric oxide synthase pathways were associated with preterm preeclampsia risk at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation. Differential prediction was observed according to body mass index classes, supporting the existence of distinct maternal risk profiles. Future studies in preeclampsia prediction should account for the possibility of different maternal risk profiles to improve etiologic and prognostic understanding and, ultimately, clinical utility of screening tests.

Quality assessment of first-trimester screening for preterm pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance and impact of first-trimester preterm pre-eclampsia screening in a single center.

METHODS

This was a single-center study of women with a singleton pregnancy who were screened prospectively for preterm pre-eclampsia (i.e. delivery before 37 weeks' gestation) using maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and placental growth factor. The individual risk for preterm pre-eclampsia was estimated from a published model, and those with a risk above 1 in 200 were recommended to take 150 mg soluble aspirin per day until 34 weeks. Information on the incidence of pre-eclampsia was obtained from the hospital register of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Screening performance indicators, including detection and false-positive rates, were estimated from the distribution of risks. Screening impact was estimated by dividing the observed prevalence by the expected prevalence, which was derived from the distribution of risks.

RESULTS

The distributions of MAP, uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index and serum markers were consistent with the risk model parameters. The estimated detection and false-positive rates were 79.7% and 16.2%, respectively. There were six cases of preterm pre-eclampsia, four of which occurred in women with a positive screening result. The prevalence was 62% of that expected, but the 95% CI of 23-140% indicated that the study was underpowered to assess the impact.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the performance of preterm pre-eclampsia screening can be estimated in a single center with fewer than 2000 women screened. However, in order to assess the impact of screening on the prevalence of the condition, a much larger cohort is needed. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Prenatal screening for pre-eclampsia: Frequently asked questions

The current approach to screening for pre-eclampsia is based on guidelines that rely on medical and obstetric history in early pregnancy to select a high-risk group that might benefit from low-dose aspirin. However, combined screening tests with the addition of biophysical and biochemical measurements have shown significantly better detection rates for preterm pre-eclampsia. Furthermore, the administration of aspirin for the 10% screen-positive group can lead to a significant reduction in severe and preterm forms of pre-eclampsia. This review aims to answer frequently asked questions related to the clinical implementation of screening and the management of screening results.