Absent 'superimposed-line' sign: novel marker in early diagnosis of cleft of fetal secondary palate

Diagnostic significance of combined two-dimensional ultrasound and three-dimensional tomographic ultrasound imaging for cleft palate in fetus of 11-13 + 6 weeks: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Clinical screening for cleft palate in fetus currently focuses on weeks 20-24. It has been shown that cleft palate can be detected by ultrasound in first-trimester anatomy scan, but there are no large-scale samples to validate. This study was to confirm the ability of combined two-dimensional(2D)-ultrasound and three-dimensional(3D)-tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) to safely detect an fetal cleft palate at 11-13 + 6 weeks via large-scale samples.

METHODS

A prospective study was designed, involving 6870 pregnant women applying 2D-ultrasound transabdominal sweeps of the fetal face in the median sagittal and coronal views of the retronasal triangle with abnormalities of the palatal line detected, followed by an axial view of the superior alveolar eminence and 3D-TUI evaluation. The endpoints were the results of the fetal facial profile assessment for delivery and induction of labor. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for diagnosing a cleft palate at 11-13 + 6 weeks were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 6870 fetus, a total of 43 different cleft palate types were diagnosed by 2D-ultrasound in three-sections at the 11-13 + 6 weeks, and a total of 6827 cases were diagnosed of negative for cleft palate. Of the 43 cases diagnosed of positive for cleft palate, three cases were false positives compared to endpoint results, with a correct positive predictive value of 93.0%. Of the 6827 cases diagnosed of negative for cleft palate, five cases were false negatives compared to endpoint results, with a correct negative predictive value of 99.0%. The sensitivity and specificity of 2D-ultrasound screening for cleft palate were 84.4%, and 99.9%, respectively. The 43 cases received 3D-TUI scans, and the results showed that 37 cases of cleft palate detected, with a positive predictive value of 86.0%, which was lower than that of 2D ultrasonography (93.0%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It may be feasible and accurate to diagnose cleft palate in fetus at 11-13 + 6 weeks by using combined 2D three sections ultrasound and 3D-TUI scans.

An effective ultrasound fetal palate screening software based on the "sequential sector scan through the oral fissure" and three-dimensional ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Orofacial clefts are one of the most common congenital malformations of the fetal face and ultrasound is mainly responsible for its diagnosis. It is difficult to view the fetal palate, so there is currently no unified standard for fetal palate screening, and the diagnosis of cleft palate is not included in the relevant prenatal ultrasound screening guidelines. Many prenatal diagnoses for cleft palate are missed due to the lack of effective screening methods. Therefore, it is imperative to increase the display rate of the fetal palate, which would improve the detection rate and diagnostic accuracy for cleft palate. We aim to introduce a fetal palate screening software based on the "sequential sector scan though the oral fissure", an effective method for fetal palate screening which was verified by our follow up results and three-dimensional ultrasound and to evaluate its feasibility and clinical practicability.

METHODS

A software was designed and programmed based on "sequential sector scan through the oral fissure" and three-dimensional ultrasound. The three-dimensional ultrasound volume data of the fetal face were imported into the software. Then, the median sagittal plane was taken as the reference interface, the anterior upper margin of the mandibular alveolar bone was selected as the fulcrum, the interval angles, and the number of layers of the sector scan were set, after which the automatic scan was performed. Thus, the sector scan sequential planes of the mandibular alveolar bone, pharynx, soft palate, hard palate, and maxillary alveolar bone were obtained in sequence to display and evaluate the palate. In addition, the feasibility and accuracy of the software in fetal palate displaying and screening was evaluated by actual clinical cases.

RESULTS

Full views of the normal fetal palates and the defective parts of the cleft palates were displayed, and relatively clear sequential tomographic images and continuous dynamic videos were formed after the three-dimensional volume data of 10 normal fetal palates and 10 cleft palates were imported into the software.

CONCLUSIONS

The software can display fetal palates more directly which might allow for a new method of fetal palate screening and cleft palate diagnosis.

Diagnosis of fetal isolated cleft palate using assessment of the posterior hard palate angle

Objective

The study aims to evaluate the role of the posterior hard palate angle in the prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate.

Study Design

Stored images of the axial transverse view of the fetal secondary palate, obtained at three-level obstetric ultrasounds, were used to evaluate the posterior border of the hard palate. The study population comprised 63 consecutive pregnancies of unaffected cases and 17 pregnancies suspected for a cleft palate without cleft lip, including 7 cases of cleft palate, 4 cases of high-arched palate, and 6 false-positive cases.

Results

The posterior angle of the hard palate was significantly larger in the cleft palate group than in the healthy controls and false-positive cases: 227° (±51°) vs 160° (±16°), p < 0.0001; and 173° ± 18°, p < 0.0001, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that reflex angle remained an independent risk factor for cleft palate (odds ratio, 58.67 (95% confidence interval 10-341)). The sensitivity and specificity of the posterior angle assessment were 73% and 96%, respectively.

Conclusions

The posterior hard palate angle could be an ultrasound marker of cleft palate without a cleft lip.

The Hard Palate Sweep: a multiplanar 2-dimensional sonographic method for the prenatal detection of cleft palate

BACKGROUND

Prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate is challenging. Numerous 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional methods have been proposed to assess the integrity of the fetal palate, yet detection rates remain relatively low. We propose the "Hard Palate Sweep," a novel 2-dimensional method that enables clear demonstration of the entire fetal palate throughout pregnancy, in a single sweep, avoiding acoustic shadows cast by surrounding bones.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of the Hard Palate Sweep, performed throughout pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective cross-sectional study performed between 2018 and 2022 in pregnant patients referred for a routine or targeted anomaly scan between 13 and 40 weeks of gestation. The presence or absence of a cleft palate was determined using the "Hard Palate Sweep." This was compared with the postnatal palate integrity assessment. Test feasibility and performance indices, including sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Offline clips were reviewed by 2 investigators for the assessment of inter- and intraoperator agreement, using Cohen's kappa formula. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee. All participating patients were informed and provided consent.

RESULTS

A total of 676 fetuses were included in the study. The Hard Palate Sweep was successfully performed in all cases, and 19 cases were determined to have a cleft palate. Of these, 13 cases were excluded because postmortem confirmation was not performed, leaving 663 cases available for analysis. Six cases determined to have a cleft palate were confirmed postnatally. In 655 of 657 cases prenatally determined to have an intact palate, this was confirmed postnatally. In the 2 remaining cases, rare forms of cleft palate were diagnosed postnatally, rendering 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 99.7% negative predictive value for the Hard Palate Sweep (P<.001). There was complete intra- and interoperator agreement (kappa=1; P<.0001).

CONCLUSION

The Hard Palate Sweep is a feasible and accurate method for prenatally detecting a cleft palate. It was successfully performed in all attempted cases between 13 and 40 weeks of gestation. This method is reproducible, offering high sensitivity and specificity. Implemented routinely, the Hard Palate Sweep is expected to increase the prenatal detection of cleft palate.

Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate: Time to Include Orofacial Ultrasound Markers Into the First-Trimester Anatomy Scan?

Orofacial clefts are one of the most common congenital malformations. The prenatal diagnosis is often made in the second trimester of pregnancy as result of ultrasound examination of the midface on coronal and axial planes. However, the diagnosis in the first trimester is elusive due to the small size of the facial structures and technical limitations present at this early gestational age. In this Commentary, we suggest the routine systematic ultrasound identification of easy-to-obtain landmarks to improve the detection of cleft lip and cleft palate in the first trimester. These include, but are not limited to, visualization of the primary palate using the coronal plane of the face looking for disruption at the base of the retronasal triangle, and visualization of the palate using the sagittal plane looking for the maxillary gap and loss of the superimposed line. Early prenatal detection of orofacial clefts would allow a more detailed search for associated chromosomal anomalies or genetic syndromes.

Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate: What do we tell prospective parents?

Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/CP) is the most common congenital craniofacial anomaly and parents often ask, "how did this happen?" Patients and families may benefit from access to a multidisciplinary team (MDT) from prenatal diagnosis into early adulthood. Multiple factors can contribute to the development of a cleft. We discuss the epidemiology and risk factors that increase the likelihood of having a newborn with a cleft. The purpose of this article is to review the prenatal investigations involved in the diagnosis and workup of these patients in addition to postpartum treatment, prognostic factors, and counseling families regarding future recurrence risk.

Cleft palate in fetuses: feasibility of early diagnosis by Crystal and Realistic Vue rendering 3D ultrasound technology in the first trimester

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of direct visualization of a normal fetal palate and detect cleft palate in the first trimester with a novel three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) technique, Crystal and Realistic Vue (CRV) rendering technology.

Methods

Two-dimensional (2D) images and 3D volumes of healthy and cleft palate fetuses at 11-13⁺⁶ weeks were obtained prospectively. 2D ultrasound views included the coronal view of the retronasal triangle and the midsagittal view of the face. 3D-CRV views were analyzed by multiplanar mode display. The pregnancy outcomes of all fetuses were determined during the follow-up period.

Results

In our study, 124 fetuses were recruited, including 100 healthy fetuses and 24 cleft palate fetuses. The cleft palate with lip was observed in 23 fetuses (bilateral in 15, unilateral in 6, median in 2), and one cleft palate was only found in the abnormal group. The bilateral (n = 12) and median (n = 2) cleft palates with lips and the cleft palate alone (n = 1) were associated with other anatomical or chromosomal abnormalities, and one unilateral cleft palate with cleft lip had concomitant NT thickening. In the cleft palate fetus group, 16 fetuses suffered intrauterine death, which was associated with other structural or chromosomal abnormalities in 14 fetuses, seven cases were terminated after consultation, and one was delivered at term. The coronal view of the retronasal triangle and the midsagittal view was easily obtained in all fetuses. 3D-CRV images of palatal parts were clearly obtained in all cases. Unilateral, bilateral, and median cleft palates with cleft lips were visually demonstrated and classified by the 3D-CRV technique.

Conclusion

It is feasible to identify the palate by 3D-CRV in the first trimester in both healthy and cleft palate fetuses. Together with 2D ultrasonography as a complementary diagnostic tool, 3D-CRV is helpful in classifying the cleft palate with a reasonable degree of certainty.

The performance of first-trimester ultrasound in diagnosing fetal cleft palate: Meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This system review and meta-analysis was aim to evaluate the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in diagnosing cleft palates (CPs) during first trimester.

DATA SOURCE

We systematically searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for the articles, which assessed the accuracy of CPs diagnosed by ultrasound during first trimester.

REVIEW METHOD

The characteristics of the included studies were recorded. The quality of included studies was assessed by QUADAS-2. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using Meta-Disc software version 1.4. The publication bias was assessed by Stata software version 12.0.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 13 studies with 39 806 fetuses. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR were 0.874, 0.999, 689.84, and 0.161, respectively. The DOR and AUC were 6651.3 and 0.9084, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The overall detection rate was 0.874, which indicated high value of first trimester ultrasound in diagnosing CPs.

Understanding the distinction between cleft lip and cleft palate: a critical step for successful prenatal detection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Orofacial clefts (OCs) are among the most common congenital anomalies, however, prenatal detection of cleft palate without cleft lip (CP) remains low. CP is associated with a higher risk of associated structural anomalies, recurrence risk and genetic aberrations. There is opportunity to optimize prenatal diagnosis, counseling and diagnostic genetic testing for OCs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improving prenatal diagnosis of CP requires understanding that embryologically, the secondary palate develops from the 6th to the 10th week and fuses with the primary palate by the 12th week. Multiple first, second and third trimester 2D ultrasonographic markers for OCs have been described including the maxillary gap, frontal space, maxilla-nasion-mandible angle, retronasal triangle, palatino-maxillary diameter, equal sign, nonvisualization or gap in the soft to hard palate interface and loss of the superimposed line. We discuss the technique, evidence and limitations of each.

SUMMARY

Prenatal detection of OC can be optimized by employing 2D sonographic markers. Prenatal detection of CP may be improved by recognizing its high association with retrognathia/micrognathia.

A feasible method to evaluate fetal palate: sequential sector-scan through oral fissure

BACKGROUND

Prenatal diagnosis of cleft palate is still challenging. To describe a practical and efficient method, sequential sector-scan through oral fissure (SSTOF), to evaluate palate.

METHODS

According to the characteristics of the fetal oral anatomy and ultrasonic directivity, we designed a practical method, sequential sector-scan through oral fissure, to evaluate the fetal palate, and the approach was verified efficiently by following up results of those fetuses with orofacial cleft who were induced because of their accompanied lethal malformations. Then, the 7098 fetuses were evaluated using sequential sector-scan through oral fissure. Fetuses were followed up after birth or induction to validate and analyze prenatal diagnosis.

RESULT

According to the scanning design, sequential sector-scan through oral fissure was performed successfully from the soft palate to the upper alveolar ridge in induced labor fetuses, and the structures were displayed clearly. Among 7098 fetuses, satisfactory images were obtained for 6885 fetuses and the remaining 213 fetuses' images were unsatisfactory because of fetuses' positions and pregnant women with high BMI. Among 6885 fetuses, 31cases were diagnosed CLP or CP, which were confirmed after delivery or termination. There were no missing cases.

CONCLUSIONS

SSTOF is a practical and efficient method to diagnose cleft palate, which might be applied to evaluate the fetal palate in prenatal diagnosis.

Comparison of prenatal ultrasound with MRI in the evaluation and prediction of fetal orofacial clefts

BACKGROUND

Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are common craniofacial abnormalities. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic and predictive values of prenatal ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

We reviewed the newborn physical examinations or fetal autopsy data with OFCs. Between January 2013 and December 2018, the diagnoses resulting from prenatal US and MRI examination were compared retrospectively with the postpartum diagnoses. The diagnostic prediction of prenatal imaging was then determined.

RESULTS

334 infants were identified with OFCs by either newborn physical exam or stillborn autopsy. For detection of OFCs by US, the total accuracy (ACC), true positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 99.9% (111,178/110,286), 81.9% (230/281), 99.9% (109,948/110,005), 80.1% (230/287), and 99.9% (109,948/109,999), respectively. For MRI, the ACC, TPR, TNR, PPV, and NPV were 99.8% (4,125/4,132), 89.8% (44/49), 99.9% (4,081/4,083), 95.7% (44/46), and 99.9% (4,081/4,086), respectively. When we compared the predictive values between prenatal US and MRI, there were significant differences in the PPV of OFCs (P < 0.05), NPV of OFCs (P < 0.05), TPR of CLO (P < 0.001), PPV of CLP (P < 0.05), and TPR of CPO (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that prenatal US could be effective for diagnosing and ruling out fetal OFCs. Diagnostic confidence is significantly improved when fetal MRI is used to assess fetal OFCs as an adjunct to US examination.

[Ultrasound scan of a fetus with facial cleft must be done from the lip to the uvula: What's new?]

Facial cleft are the most frequent craniofacial anomalies with an incidence of one for 1000 births, all births combined, and require specialized multidisciplinary care. Since 2005, the systematic realization of two ultrasound views (nose-lip and profile) is recommended for the exploration of the fetal face in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy. Application of these recommendations should allow screening of the majority of cleft lip and palate. However, cleft palates, without labiomaxillary involvement, are currently largely underdiagnosed at prenatal ultrasound, although they can be associated with a syndromic diagnosis in up to 30% of cases. The aim of this work is to describe, from embryology to surgical consultation, the complete ultrasound examination of a fetus with a classic facial cleft.