Umbilicocerebral ratio: potential implications of inversing the cerebroplacental ratio

Evaluation of Conventional and Combined Doppler Parameters in Preeclampsia: Diagnostic and Prognostic Insights

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between conventional and novel Doppler parameters, including cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), cerebral-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR), umbilical-to-cerebral ratio (UCR), and amniotic-to-umbilical-cerebral ratio (AUCR), with the diagnosis of preeclampsia (PE) and adverse neonatal outcomes in PE cases. Methods: This prospective case-control study was conducted at the Ankara Etlik City Hospital Perinatology Clinic between November 2023 and May 2024. The study population was divided into two groups: Group 1, consisting of 74 patients diagnosed with preeclampsia, and Group 2, consisting of 80 healthy control patients. Composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CANOs) include presence of at least one adverse outcome: 5th-minute APGAR score < 7, transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), need for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), need for mechanical ventilation, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal hypoglycemia, need for phototherapy, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and neonatal sepsis. Results: The CPR, CPUR, and AUCR were significantly lower in the PE group compared to the control group, while the UCR was notably higher in the PE group. Among the combined ratios, the CPUR exhibited the highest diagnostic performance for both PE diagnosis and the prediction of CANOs. Additionally, while the UCR, CPR, and AUCR were significant for PE diagnosis, only AUCR demonstrated a significant association with the prediction of CANOs. Conclusions: Combined Doppler parameters, especially CPUR and AUCR, offer valuable insights into diagnosing PE and predicting CANOs. CPUR demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, underscoring its potential utility in clinical settings.

Amniotic-umbilical-to-cerebral ratio, a Doppler index for estimating adverse perinatal outcomes in fetal growth restriction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate amniotic fluid volume with Doppler parameters and its association with composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPOs) in fetal growth restriction (FGR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted prospectively in a tertiary referral center between 2023 and 2024 on pregnant women diagnosed with early- and late-onset FGR. Fetal ultrasonographic measurements, including deepest vertical pocket (DVP) for amniotic fluid, and Doppler parameters including uterine artery (UtA) systolic/diastolic (S/D) and pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) S/D and PI, and umbilical artery (UA) S/D and PI, were conducted following fetal biometry. The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), cerebral ratio, cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR), and amniotic-umbilical-to-cerebral ratio (AUCR) were all calculated. Pregnant women diagnosed with FGR were planned to give birth after 37 weeks' gestation, unless a pregnancy complication requiring earlier delivery occurred. We assessed perinatal outcomes subsequent to delivery, with CAPOs defined as the presence of at least one adverse outcome: 5th minute APGAR score <7, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), umbilical cord blood pH <7.2, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

RESULTS

The study included 132 participants, divided into early- (n = 32) and late-onset FGR (n = 100) groups. AUCR was significantly lower in fetuses with late-onset FGR who experienced CAPOs. Multivariate analysis showed gestational age at birth and birth weight were significant predictors of CAPOs in early-onset FGR, while gestational age, birth weight, and AUCR were significant predictors in late-onset FGR. CPR, UCR, and CPUR did not show significance in predicting CAPOs in both early- and late-onset FGR on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

AUCR is a potential reliable marker for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in late-onset FGR.

Combination of Doppler measurements with amniotic fluid volume for the prediction of perinatal outcomes in fetal growth restriction

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate a new ratio of amniotic fluid volume (AFV) to Doppler measurements, and compare its association with adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs) in fetal growth restriction (FGR).

METHODS

This prospective study included pregnant women with singleton fetal growth-restricted fetuses. Each participant underwent a detailed ultrasonographic examination. Uterine artery pulsatility index, umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA PI), cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), and umbilical-to-cerebral ratio (UCR) were calculated, and the single deepest pocket (SDP) technique was used to estimate AFV. Amniotic-umbilical-to-cerebral ratio (AUCR) was calculated as the ratio of SDP to UCR: AUCR = SDP / (UA PI/MCA PI). APO was defined as umbilical venous cord blood pH <7.10, 5-minute APGAR score <7, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

RESULTS

We compared the fetal ultrasonographic and demographic features between the APO and the non-APO groups. The mean UA PI and UCR were significantly higher in the APO group. The mean SDP, CPR, and AUCR were significantly lower in the APO group. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated the highest area under the curve value (0.882; P < 0.001) for AUCR to APOs.

CONCLUSION

The current study suggests that AUCR is the best predictor for APOs in FGR.

The sonopartogram

The assessment of labor progress from digital vaginal examination has remained largely unchanged for at least a century, despite the current major advances in maternal and perinatal care. Although inconsistently reproducible, the findings from digital vaginal examination are customarily plotted manually on a partogram, which is composed of a graphical representation of labor, together with maternal and fetal observations. The partogram has been developed to aid recognition of failure to labor progress and guide management-specific obstetrical intervention. In the last decade, the use of ultrasound in the delivery room has increased with the advent of more powerful, portable ultrasound machines that have become more readily available for use. Although ultrasound in intrapartum practice is predominantly used for acute management, an ultrasound-based partogram, a sonopartogram, might represent an objective tool for the graphical representation of labor. Demonstrating greater accuracy for fetal head position and more objectivity in the assessment of fetal head station, it could be considered complementary to traditional clinical assessment. The development of the sonopartogram concept would require further undertaking of serial measurements. Advocates of ultrasound will concede that its use has yet to demonstrate a difference in obstetrical and neonatal morbidity in the context of the management of labor and delivery. Taking a step beyond the descriptive graphical representation of labor progress is the question of whether a specific combination of clinical and demographic parameters might be used to inform knowledge of labor outcomes. Intrapartum cesarean deliveries and deliveries assisted by forceps and vacuum are all associated with a heightened risk of maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. Although these outcomes cannot be precisely predicted, many known risk factors exist. Malposition and high station of the fetal head, short maternal stature, and other factors, such as caput succedaneum, are all implicated in operative delivery; however, the contribution of individual parameters based on clinical and ultrasound assessments has not been quantified. Individualized risk prediction models, including maternal characteristics and ultrasound findings, are increasingly used in women's health-for example, in preeclampsia or trisomy screening. Similarly, intrapartum cesarean delivery models have been developed with good prognostic ability in specifically selected populations. For intrapartum ultrasound to be of prognostic value, robust, externally validated prediction models for labor outcome would inform delivery management and allow shared decision-making with parents.

Longitudinal Doppler Assessments in Late Preterm Fetal Growth Restriction

PURPOSE

 To assess the longitudinal variation of the ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility index (UCR) in late preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A prospective European multicenter observational study included women with a singleton pregnancy, 32^+ 0-36^+ 6, at risk of FGR (estimated fetal weight [EFW] or abdominal circumference [AC] < 10^th percentile, abnormal arterial Doppler or fall in AC from 20-week scan of > 40 percentile points). The primary outcome was a composite of abnormal condition at birth or major neonatal morbidity. UCR was categorized as normal (< 0.9) or abnormal (≥ 0.9). UCR was assessed by gestational age at measurement interval to delivery, and by individual linear regression coefficient in women with two or more measurements.

RESULTS

 856 women had 2770 measurements; 696 (81 %) had more than one measurement (median 3 (IQR 2-4). At inclusion, 63 (7 %) a UCR ≥ 0.9. These delivered earlier and had a lower birth weight and higher incidence of adverse outcome (30 % vs. 9 %, relative risk 3.2; 95 %CI 2.1-5.0) than women with a normal UCR at inclusion. Repeated measurements after an abnormal UCR at inclusion were abnormal again in 67 % (95 %CI 55-80), but after a normal UCR the chance of finding an abnormal UCR was 6 % (95 %CI 5-7 %). The risk of composite adverse outcome was similar using the first or subsequent UCR values.

CONCLUSION

 An abnormal UCR is likely to be abnormal again at a later measurement, while after a normal UCR the chance of an abnormal UCR is 5-7 % when repeated weekly. Repeated measurements do not predict outcome better than the first measurement, most likely due to the most compromised fetuses being delivered after an abnormal UCR.

Modeling gestational age centiles for fetal umbilicocerebral ratio by quantile regression analysis: a secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of evidence on whether to favor cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) or umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) when assessing pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction. The Recent evidences highlight a significant heterogeneity in the methodology of previously published studies reporting reference ranges for Doppler indices, which may affect the clinical applicability of these charts. The aim of this study was to develop charts of UCR based upon a recently proposed standardized methodology and using quantile regression.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study including low-risk singleton pregnancies between 24 and 40 weeks of gestation undergoing Doppler recordings. The UCR centile values were established by quantile regression at different gestational age intervals. Quantile regression analysis was used to build the UCR chart.

RESULT

2516 low- risk singleton pregnancies were included in the analysis. UCR decreased with advancing gestational age. The 3rd, 5th 10th, 50th, 90th, 95th, and 97th centiles according to gestational age are provided, as well as equations to allow calculation of any other percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

We have established gestational age-specific normative centiles reference limits for UCR.

Cerebro-placental and umbilico-cerebral ratios in uncomplicated monochorionic twins: Longitudinal references and comparison with singletons

OBJECTIVES

Monochorionic twins (MC) are at high risk of adverse outcomes and Doppler investigation of umbilical and cerebral flows is mandatory for their surveillance. The cerebro-placental (CPR) and umbilico-cerebral (UCR) ratios are considered non-invasive measures of fetal adaptation to hypoxemia. We aimed to provide longitudinal references for CPR and UCR from 16 to 37 weeks of gestation that are specific for MC twins, and compare these with singleton charts.

METHODS

Longitudinal study of a cohort of consecutive uncomplicated MC twin pregnancies monitored at our unit from 2010 to 2018. The estimated centile curves were obtained estimating the median with fractional polynomials by a multilevel model and the external centiles through the residuals. The comparison with singletons references was made through graphic evaluation.

RESULTS

One-hundred-fifty-two MC pregnancies were included with a median of 10 longitudinal ultrasounds each. References for CPR and UCR in function of gestational age are presented. Compared to singletons, MC twins showed an earlier and greater circulatory redistribution with lower CPR and higher UCR median values.

CONCLUSIONS

MC twin-specific references for CPR and UCR suitable for serial monitoring are presented. The comparison with singleton references demonstrates substantial differences in the hemodynamic balance that must be considered when interpreting findings in MC twins. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

New Markers for Placental Dysfunction at Term - Potential for More

The remaining placental reserve capacity at term plays a decisive role in the perinatal morbidity of mother and child. Considering advances made in the field of fetal monitoring, the routine examination methods currently used at term or late term may be insufficient to detect subclinical placental dysfunction (PD). The aim of this study is to offer an up-to-date, narrative review of the literature in the context of detecting PD at term using complementary ultrasound markers and biomarkers. Parameters of fetomaternal Doppler ultrasound and fetal cardiac function, as well as (anti-)angiogenic factors in maternal serum are potential PD markers. These may help identify patients that may benefit from an elective, early induction of labor at term, thereby potentially reducing morbidity and mortality. However, their value in terms of the optimal date of delivery must first be determined in randomized controlled trials on a large number of cases.

Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of Doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome

OBJECTIVES

First, to compare published Doppler reference charts of the ratios of flow in the fetal middle cerebral and umbilical arteries (i.e. the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR)). Second, to assess the association of thresholds of CPR and UCR based on these charts with short-term composite adverse perinatal outcome in a cohort of pregnancies considered to be at risk of late preterm fetal growth restriction.

METHODS

Studies presenting reference charts for CPR or UCR were searched for in PubMed. Formulae for plotting the median and the 10^th percentile (for CPR) or the 90^th percentile (for UCR) against gestational age were extracted from the publication or calculated from the published tables. Data from a prospective European multicenter observational cohort study of singleton pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation, in which fetal arterial Doppler measurements were collected longitudinally, were used to compare the different charts. Specifically, the association of UCR and CPR thresholds (CPR < 10^th percentile or UCR ≥ 90^th percentile and multiples of the median (MoM) values) with composite adverse perinatal outcome was analyzed. The association was also compared between chart-based thresholds and absolute thresholds. Composite adverse perinatal outcome comprised both abnormal condition at birth and major neonatal morbidity.

RESULTS

Ten studies presenting reference charts for CPR or UCR were retrieved. There were large differences between the charts in the 10^th and 90^th percentile values of CPR and UCR, respectively, while median values were more similar. In the gestational-age range of 28-36 weeks, there was no relationship between UCR or CPR and gestational age. From the prospective observational study, 856 pregnancies at risk of late-onset preterm fetal growth restriction were included in the analysis. The association of abnormal UCR or CPR with composite adverse perinatal outcome was similar for percentile thresholds or MoM values, as calculated from the charts, and for absolute thresholds, both on univariable analysis and after adjustment for gestational age at measurement, estimated fetal weight MoM and pre-eclampsia. The adjusted odds ratio for composite adverse perinatal outcome was 3.3 (95% CI, 1.7-6.4) for an absolute UCR threshold of ≥ 0.9 or an absolute CPR threshold of < 1.11 (corresponding to ≥ 1.75 MoM), and 1.6 (95% CI, 0.9-2.9) for an absolute UCR threshold of ≥ 0.7 to < 0.9 or an absolute CPR threshold of ≥ 1.11 to < 1.43 (corresponding to ≥ 1.25 to < 1.75 MoM).

CONCLUSIONS

In the gestational-age range of 32 to 36 weeks, adjustment of CPR or UCR for gestational age is not necessary when assessing the risk of adverse outcome in pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction. The adoption of absolute CPR or UCR thresholds, independent of reference charts, is feasible and makes clinical assessment simpler than if using percentiles or other gestational-age normalized units. The high variability in percentile threshold values among the commonly used UCR and CPR reference charts hinders reliable diagnosis and clinical management of late preterm fetal growth restriction. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Role of umbilicocerebral and cerebroplacental ratios in prediction of perinatal outcome in FGR pregnancies

Purpose

Aim of our study was to compare the prognostic value of the Umbilical-to-Cerebral ratio (UCR) directly to the Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in the prediction of poor perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR).

Methods

A retrospective study was carried out on pregnant women with either a small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetus or that were diagnosed with FGR. Doppler measurements of the two subgroups were assessed and the correlation between CPR, UCR and relevant outcome parameters was evaluated by performing linear regression analysis, binary logistic analysis and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Outcomes of interest were mode of delivery, acidosis, preterm delivery, gestational age at birth as well as birthweight and centiles.

Results

Boxplots and Scatterplots illustrated the different distribution of CPR and UCR leading to deviant correlational relationships with adverse outcome parameters. In almost all parameters examined, UCR showed a higher independent association with preterm delivery (OR: 5.85, CI 2.23–15.34), APGAR score < 7 (OR: 3.52; CI 1.58–7.85) as well as weight under 10th centile (OR: 2.04; CI 0.97–4.28) in binary logistic regression compared to CPR which was only associated with preterm delivery (OR: 0.38; CI 0.22–0.66) and APGAR score < 7 (OR: 0.27; CI 0.06–1.13). When combined with different ultrasound parameters in order to differentiate between SGA and FGR during pregnancy, odds ratios for UCR were highly significant compared to odds ratios for CPR (OR: 0.065, 0.168–0.901; p = 0.027; OR: 0.810, 0.369–1.781; p = 0.601). ROC curves plotted for CPR and UCR showed almost identical moderate prediction performance.

Conclusion

Since UCR is a better discriminator of Doppler values in abnormal range it presents a viable option to Doppler parameters and ratios that are used in clinical practice. UCR and CPR showed equal prognostic accuracy conserning sensitivity and specificity for adverse perinatal outcome, while adding UA PI and GA_scan increased prognostic accuracy regarding negative outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-021-06268-4.

Second trimester cerebroplacental ratio versus umbilicocerebral ratio for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes

INTRODUCTION

An abnormal third trimester cerebroplacental ratio has been previously associated with adverse perinatal outcome. The less studied inverse of the cerebroplacental ratio, the umbilicocerebral ratio, has been proposed as a better predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. However, little is known about the implication of either an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio or umbilicocerebral ratio in the second trimester. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between an abnormal second trimester cerebroplacental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome and provide comparison to an abnormal second trimester umbilicocerebral ratio.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary referral center utilized data from all non-anomalous singleton pregnancies that underwent Doppler assessment of the cerebroplacental ratio between 20 and 28 weeks gestation. The study period was 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2018. Abnormal cerebroplacental ratio was defined as less than the 5th percentile for gestational age. If patients had more than one ultrasound during the study period (i.e. for serial assessment of fetal growth), the lowest value of the cerebroplacental ratio was recorded. The primary outcome was a composite of clinically relevant adverse perinatal outcomes including preterm delivery, small for gestational age, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Secondary outcomes included urgent delivery for fetal distress (operative vaginal delivery or cesarean section) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. An abnormal umbilicocerebral ratio was defined as greater than 95th percentile for gestational age. Areas under the curve were calculated and compared for cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio.

RESULTS

2326 pregnancies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 91 (3.9%) had an abnormal second trimester cerebroplacental ratio. Fetuses with an abnormal second trimester cerebroplacental ratio had a 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.5-3.6, p < .05) increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome after adjusting for potential confounders such as chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and smoking during pregnancy. Significantly increased risks of preterm delivery (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-38, p < .05) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.6, p < .05) were also seen in a subgroup analysis of abnormal cerebroplacental ratio in appropriate for gestational age infants. 132 (5.7%) fetuses had an abnormal second trimester umbilicocerebral ratio, and these fetuses had a 2.0-fold (95% CI 1.4-3.0, p < .05) increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The area under the curve for CPR and UCR for prediction of the primary outcome was 0.6 for both (95% CI 0.57-0.61 and 0.57-0.62, respectively, both p < .05).

CONCLUSION

An abnormal second trimester cerebroplacental ratio or umbilicocerebral ratio is associated with adverse perinatal outcome. However, the predictive ability of either ratio remains suboptimal.

Comparison between Cerebroplacental Ratio and Umbilicocerebral Ratio in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcome in Pregnancies Complicated by Late Fetal Growth Restriction: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

The role of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) or umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) to predict adverse intrapartum and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by late fetal growth restriction (FGR) remains controversial.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study involving 5 referral centers in Italy and Spain, including singleton pregnancies complicated by late FGR, as defined by Delphi consensus criteria, with a scan 1 week prior to delivery. The primary objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the CPR and UCR for the prediction of a composite adverse outcome, defined as the presence of either an adverse intrapartum outcome (need for operative delivery/cesarean section for suspected fetal distress) or an adverse perinatal outcome (intrauterine death, Apgar score <7 at 5 min, arterial pH <7.1, base excess of >-11 mEq/mL, or neonatal intensive care unit admission).

RESULTS

Median CPR absolute values (1.11 vs. 1.22, p = 0.018) and centiles (3 vs. 4, p = 0.028) were lower in pregnancies with a composite adverse outcome than in those without it. Median UCR absolute values (0.89 vs. 0.82, p = 0.018) and centiles (97 vs. 96, p = 0.028) were higher. However, the area under the curve, 95% confidence interval for predicting the composite adverse outcome showed a poor predictive value: 0.580 (0.512-0.646) for the raw absolute values of CPR and UCR, and 0.575 (0.507-0.642) for CPR and UCR centiles adjusted for gestational age. The use of dichotomized values (CPR <1, UCR >1 or CPR <5th centile, UCR >95th centile) did not improve the diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The CPR and UCR measured in the week prior delivery are of low predictive value to assess adverse intrapartum and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with late FGR.

Comparing the cerebro-placental to umbilico-cerebral Doppler ratios for the prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction

OBJECTIVE

The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) has shown utility as a surrogate marker for fetal growth restriction and can be used to stratify the risk for adverse perinatal outcomes in affected pregnancies. However, recent studies suggest that its inverse, the umbilico-cerebral ratio (UCR), may be a better predictor of such outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic accuracy of CPR to that of UCR Doppler in predicting short-term adverse perinatal outcomes in growth-restricted fetuses.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis using data from a prospective study on women referred for fetal growth ultrasounds between 26 and 36 weeks of gestation and with an EFW < 10th percentile by Hadlock standard. The CPR and UCR were converted into Z-scores adjusted for gestational age at ultrasound. Abnormal CPR was defined as Z-score below the 10th percentile for the gestational age and abnormal UCR as Z-score above the 90th percentile. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the two Doppler parameters for predicting composite adverse perinatal outcome (APO) defined as the presence of any one of the following: umbilical cord arterial pH <7.10, Apgars at 5 min <7, NICU admission,grade III/IV intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), neonatal seizure and death. Logistic regression analysis was performed, ROC curves plotted and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were compared between CPR and UCR.

RESULTS

Over the study period, there were 197 women meeting inclusion criteria, of which 27 (13.7%) had a composite adverse neonatal outcome. The sensitivity using CPR Z-score for predicting the composite APO was higher thanwas similar to using UCR Z-score (39.3% compared with 37%) for a similar specificity (94.7 versus 94.1), respectively. However, the positive predictive value (PPV) was higher for CPR (55% vs UCR 50%) and the negative predictive values (NPV) were similar. For a fixed false positive rate of 10%, the detection rates for adverse neonatal outcomes were 40% using either CPR or UCR. The AUC for CPR and UCR were 0.70 and 0.68, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find any advantage in utilizing the UCR over the CPR.