Key messages for obstetricians and fetal medicine specialists from the confidential enquiry into stillbirth and neonatal death in twins

Perinatal deaths in twin and singleton infants in Ireland: A comparison of characteristics and causes

INTRODUCTION

Twin pregnancies are associated with significantly higher perinatal mortality (PM) rates compared to singletons, primarily due to complications like fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, and congenital anomalies. This study aimed to compare the characteristics associated with PM in twin pregnancies and compare maternal and obstetric factors and cause of death among twins and singletons in the Republic of Ireland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data spanning 2011 to 2022 from the National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre's annual perinatal mortality clinical audit included 4494 perinatal deaths. Maternal characteristics, antenatal care factors and cause of death were analysed with relative risk calculated using national Hospital In-Patient Enquiry data. Pearson's chi-squared tests studied the difference between mortality in twins and singletons.

RESULTS

Twins accounted for 10.4% of all perinatal deaths, despite representing only 3.6% of total births. The PM rate for twins was 17.3 per 1000 births, 3.1 times higher than for singletons. Early neonatal deaths (ENNDs) were more frequent in twins (54.2%), while stillbirths predominated among singletons (68.6%). Younger maternal age and lower BMI were associated with higher PM risks in twins. A considerable proportion of twin deaths with major congenital anomalies or birth before 28 weeks gestation occurred in non-tertiary hospitals, suggesting limitations in referral pathways to centres with appropriate neonatal expertise.

CONCLUSION

Twin pregnancies pose a higher risk of perinatal mortality, particularly among younger mothers and preterm births. The findings highlight the need for updated guidelines that prioritise early risk assessment, targeted interventions, and improved referral systems.

Risk factors for adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies: a narrative review

PURPOSE

Globally, the incidence of twin pregnancies is rising owing to the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), emigration and deferment of pregnancy until advanced maternal age (AMA). While twin pregnancies have higher absolute risks of adverse outcomes, including miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death and preterm delivery, the impact of specific exposures and risk factors related to these outcomes may differ between twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies. Regarding modifiable factors, data are sometimes based on evidence extrapolated from singleton or whole obstetric populations. Therefore, targeted evidence is required to provide care tailored to twin pregnancies to prevent adverse outcomes. We aimed to comprehensively review the association between different risk factors and adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies, including data on chorionicity, and to compare these to singletons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review examines the risks associated with chorionicity, AMA, body mass index (BMI), socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities, maternal smoking, use of ART, maternal perception of fetal movement, and maternal comorbidities, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Adverse outcomes reported were preterm birth, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), stillbirth and neonatal mortality. As such, fetal mortality and morbidity will be under-represented, as pregnancy loss before 22-24 weeks is omitted.

RESULTS

Monochorionicity increases the risk of stillbirth, NICU admission, and preterm delivery in twin pregnancy. AMA predisposes twin pregnancies to higher risks of mortality, admission to the NICU, and preterm birth than singleton pregnancies do. Conversely, the impact of BMI, socioeconomic inequalities, smoking, ART, and HDP on adverse outcomes appears to be lower in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies. This attenuation might be explained by the higher baseline risk of adverse outcomes such as preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Some exposures, such as ART use and GDM, appear to be "protective" against perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies, despite being established risk factors for adverse outcomes in singleton pregnancies, potentially related to access to specialist care. There is a paucity of evidence available to counsel mothers of twin pregnancies regarding reduced fetal movement.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes differ between twin and singleton pregnancies. This highlights the need for further studies to examine the association between risk factors and adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies. The resulting data would facilitate tailored guidance for twin pregnancies, contribute to improved antenatal care, and inform wider public health strategies.

Twin charts should be the standard reference to assess growth in twin pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Twin pregnancies are characterized by slower growth velocity compared with singletons, especially during the third trimester and, therefore, tend to be smaller than singletons. Growth surveillance is instrumental in the identification of twin pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes. Whether the phenomenon of slow growth is an adaptive physiological response or represents pathological growth lag, is controversial. In this review, we focus on the evidence related to the types of growth charts employed for twin pregnancies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consistent evidence has emerged over the past few years from large independent cohorts in different countries suggesting that twin-specific standards perform better in identifying growth-restricted twin pregnancies at risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, without resulting in an increase in interventions or iatrogenic prematurity.

SUMMARY

The current evidence supports the use of twin-specific reference charts. Concerted efforts should be made to derive prospective evidence from large multicentre studies on various aspects of the implementation of twin-specific standards.

Controversies in the management of twin pregnancy

Despite many advances in antenatal care, twin pregnancies still experience more adverse outcomes, in particular perinatal morbidity and mortality. They also pose a multitude of challenges and controversies, as outlined in this Review. Moreover, they are less likely to be included in clinical trials. Many issues on classification and management remain under debate. Efforts at standardizing diagnostic criteria, monitoring protocols, management and outcome reporting are likely to reduce their perinatal risks. The top 10 most important research uncertainties related to multiple pregnancies have been identified by both clinicians and patients. More robust research in the form of randomized trials and large well-conducted prospective cohort studies is needed to address these controversies. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.