1
|
Mustafa HJ, Sambatur EV, Shamshirsaz AA, Johnson S, Moise KJ, Baschat AA, Joanne Verweij EJT, Javinani A, Kilby MD, Lopriore E, Rose R, Devlieger R, Snowise S, Sachs UJ, Khalil A. Monitoring and management of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn based on an international expert Delphi consensus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025; 232:280-300. [PMID: 39547350 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2024] [Revised: 11/06/2024] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
The study aimed to develop structured, expert-based clinical guidance on the prenatal and postnatal management of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. A Delphi procedure was conducted among an international panel of experts in fetal medicine, neonatology, and hematology. Experts were selected based on their expertise, relevant publications, and affiliations. The domains were (i) prenatal workup, (ii) prenatal monitoring and management, (iii) intrauterine transfusion (IUT), (iv) delivery, and (v) postnatal management. The predefined cut-off for consensus was ≥70% agreement. One hundred-seven experts representing 25 countries across 6 continents completed the first round, and 100 (93.5%) completed the subsequent rounds. 75.3% agreed on using cfDNA to determine fetal antigen status, particularly for RhD, Kell, and Rhc antigens. The critical titer, requiring fetal monitoring via ultrasound, is considered when the threshold of ≥16 is for non-Kell antigens. 70.0% agreed on the use of maternal IVIg in pregnancies with prior IUT <24 weeks or fetal/neonatal death due to HDFN. The minimum GA for IUT is 16 to 18 weeks, and the maximum is 350/7 to 356/7 weeks. Postnatal management consensus was reached for the following: anemia labs should be investigated in the affected neonates before hospital discharge (92.0% agreement), and if they received IUT, the labs should be repeated within 1 week of discharge (84.0% agreement). 96.0% agreed that exchange transfusions should be centralized in hospitals with sufficient exposure and experience, and 92.0% agreed that the hemoglobin cut-off level to consider transfusion following hospital discharge is 7 g/dL, and the newborns need to be monitored until 2 to 3 months of age (96.0% agreement).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba J Mustafa
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Fetal Center at Riley Children's and Indiana University Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Riley Children's Hospital, Indianapolis, IN.
| | - Enaja V Sambatur
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Fetal Care and Surgery Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alireza A Shamshirsaz
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Fetal Care and Surgery Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Liverpool Women's Hospital, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Kenneth J Moise
- Dell Medical School - University of Texas at Austin and the Comprehensive Fetal Care Center, Dell Children's Hospital, Austin, TX
| | - Ahmet A Baschat
- The Johns Hopkins Center for Fetal Therapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - E J T Joanne Verweij
- Division of Fetal Therapy, Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ali Javinani
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Fetal Care and Surgery Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mark D Kilby
- Fetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's & Children's Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK, and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Enrico Lopriore
- Neonatology and Fetal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca Rose
- Division of Neonatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Riley Children's Hospital, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Roland Devlieger
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Mother and Child Unit, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Saul Snowise
- Midwest Fetal Care Center, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Ulrich J Sachs
- Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Asma Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's Hospital, St George's University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moise E, Moise KJ, Nwokocha M, Lowry K, Hutson E, de Winter DP. Critical procedural steps in intrauterine transfusion: Delphi survey of international experts. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2025; 65:78-84. [PMID: 39743652 DOI: 10.1002/uog.29151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2024] [Revised: 11/06/2024] [Accepted: 11/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine consensus, using Delphi methodology, on the critical procedural steps for intravascular intrauterine transfusion (IUT) for the treatment of fetal anemia. METHODS We conducted a two-part Delphi survey of international experts in fetal intervention. The first round of the survey proposed 32 potentially critical steps for the IUT procedure. Participants were asked to rate all steps on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not important) to 5 (absolutely essential). We calculated the mean Likert score and 95% CI for all steps. Procedural steps were determined to be critical if the lower bound of the 95% CI was ≥ 3.0 and were excluded if the upper bound of the 95% CI was ≤ 3.5. In the second round of the survey, participants were asked specific questions regarding parameters associated with the procedural steps determined to be critical in the first round. RESULTS Overall, 49 individuals from 24 different countries (six continents) participated in both rounds of the Delphi survey. The median length of experience in fetal medicine was 21 (range, 4-38) years. The median number of IUT procedures performed annually per respondent was 20 (range, 2-80). Of the 32 proposed procedural steps, 20 were determined to be critical and 12 non-critical procedural steps were excluded. Respondents indicated that an individual should perform a median of 20 (range, 10-50) IUT procedures during training to attain competency, and that the median number of IUT procedures required annually to maintain competency was 10 (range, 5-20). There was marked variation between respondents in how they performed the following critical IUT procedural steps: preparation of donor blood, preoperative medication, maternal anesthesia, site chosen for cordocentesis, use of fetal paralysis, method for determining fetal hematocrit, postoperative care and decision to schedule a subsequent IUT. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this international Delphi survey can be used to standardize the approach to performing IUT. An experienced fetal interventionist should perform the procedure, and in centers in which IUT is performed infrequently, referral to a more experienced center should be considered. Calculating the specific volume of blood to transfuse at the start of the procedure and undertaking continuous fetal heart-rate monitoring once the gestational-age threshold for viability is reached were ranked highest in the intra- and postoperative phases of the procedure, respectively. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Moise
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
- Comprehensive Fetal Care Center, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
| | - K J Moise
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
- Comprehensive Fetal Care Center, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
| | - M Nwokocha
- Comprehensive Fetal Care Center, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
| | - K Lowry
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
- Comprehensive Fetal Care Center, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
| | - E Hutson
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
- Comprehensive Fetal Care Center, Dell Children's Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
| | - D P de Winter
- Division of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Immunohematology Diagnostic Services, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oyelese Y, Javinani A, Gudanowski B, Krispin E, Rebarber A, Akolekar R, Catanzarite V, D'Souza R, Bronsteen R, Odibo A, Scheier MA, Hasegawa J, Jauniaux E, Lees C, Srinivasan D, Daly-Jones E, Duncombe G, Melcer Y, Maymon R, Silver R, Prefumo F, Tachibana D, Henrich W, Cincotta R, Shainker SA, Ranzini AC, Roman AS, Chmait R, Hernandez-Andrade EA, Rolnik DL, Sepulveda W, Shamshirsaz AA. Vasa previa in singleton pregnancies: diagnosis and clinical management based on an international expert consensus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 231:638.e1-638.e24. [PMID: 38494071 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data to guide the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Currently, what is known is largely based on case reports or series and cohort studies. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to systematically collect and classify expert opinions and achieve consensus on the diagnosis and clinical management of vasa previa using focus group discussions and a Delphi technique. STUDY DESIGN A 4-round focus group discussion and a 3-round Delphi survey of an international panel of experts on vasa previa were conducted. Experts were selected on the basis of their publication record on vasa previa. First, we convened a focus group discussion panel of 20 experts and agreed on which issues were unresolved in the diagnosis and management of vasa previa. A 3-round anonymous electronic survey was then sent to the full expert panel. Survey questions were presented on the diagnosis and management of vasa previa, which the experts were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale (from "strongly disagree"=1 to "strongly agree"=5). Consensus was defined as a median score of 5. Following responses to each round, any statements that had median scores of ≤3 were deemed to have had no consensus and were excluded. Statements with a median score of 4 were revised and re-presented to the experts in the next round. Consensus and nonconsensus statements were then aggregated. RESULTS A total of 68 international experts were invited to participate in the study, of which 57 participated. Experts were from 13 countries on 5 continents and have contributed to >80% of published cohort studies on vasa previa, as well as national and international society guidelines. Completion rates were 84%, 93%, and 91% for the first, second, and third rounds, respectively, and 71% completed all 3 rounds. The panel reached a consensus on 26 statements regarding the diagnosis and key points of management of vasa previa, including the following: (1) although there is no agreement on the distance between the fetal vessels and the cervical internal os to define vasa previa, the definition should not be limited to a 2-cm distance; (2) all pregnancies should be screened for vasa previa with routine examination for placental cord insertion and a color Doppler sweep of the region over the cervix at the second-trimester anatomy scan; (3) when a low-lying placenta or placenta previa is found in the second trimester, a transvaginal ultrasound with Doppler should be performed at approximately 32 weeks to rule out vasa previa; (4) outpatient management of asymptomatic patients without risk factors for preterm birth is reasonable; (5) asymptomatic patients with vasa previa should be delivered by scheduled cesarean delivery between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation; and (6) there was no agreement on routine hospitalization, avoidance of intercourse, or use of 3-dimensional ultrasound for diagnosis of vasa previa. CONCLUSION Through focus group discussion and a Delphi process, an international expert panel reached consensus on the definition, screening, clinical management, and timing of delivery in vasa previa, which could inform the development of new clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinka Oyelese
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Ali Javinani
- Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Brittany Gudanowski
- Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Eyal Krispin
- Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Andrei Rebarber
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Mount Sinai West, New York, NY; Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Carnegie Imaging for Women, PLLC, New York, NY
| | - Ranjit Akolekar
- Medway Fetal and Maternal Medicine Centre, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Medical Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Chatham, United Kingdom
| | - Val Catanzarite
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Rady Children's Specialists of San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Rohan D'Souza
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Richard Bronsteen
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI
| | - Anthony Odibo
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Junichi Hasegawa
- Department of Perinatal Development Pathophysiology, St. Marianna University Graduate School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Eric Jauniaux
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christoph Lees
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Deepa Srinivasan
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Daly-Jones
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gregory Duncombe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Logan Hospital, Metro South Health, Meadowbrook, Australia
| | - Yaakov Melcer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shamir Medical Center, Tzrifin, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ron Maymon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shamir Medical Center, Tzrifin, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Robert Silver
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Federico Prefumo
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daisuke Tachibana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Wolfgang Henrich
- Department of Obstetrics, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Campus Charité Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Obstetrics, Charité - University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Cincotta
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Mater Mothers' Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia
| | - Scott A Shainker
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Angela C Ranzini
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ashley S Roman
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Ramen Chmait
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Edgar A Hernandez-Andrade
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel L Rolnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Waldo Sepulveda
- Fetal Imaging Unit, FETALMED Maternal-Fetal Diagnostic Center, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alireza A Shamshirsaz
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Division of Fetal Medicine and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miller RS, Miller JL, Monson MA, Porter TF, Običan SG, Simpson LL. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #72: Twin-twin transfusion syndrome and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 231:B16-B37. [PMID: 39029545 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Abstract
Thirty percent of spontaneously occurring twins are monozygotic, of which two-thirds are monochorionic, possessing a single placenta. A common placental mass with shared intertwin placental circulation is key to the development and management of complications unique to monochorionic gestations. In this Consult, we review general considerations and a contemporary approach to twin-twin transfusion syndrome and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence, providing management recommendations based on the available evidence. The following are the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations: (1) we recommend routine first-trimester sonographic determination of chorionicity and amnionicity (GRADE 1B); (2) we recommend that ultrasound surveillance for twin-twin transfusion syndrome begin at 16 weeks of gestation for all monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies and continue at least every 2 weeks until delivery, with more frequent monitoring indicated with clinical concern (GRADE 1C); (3) we recommend that routine sonographic surveillance for twin-twin transfusion syndrome minimally include assessment of amniotic fluid volumes on both sides of the intertwin membrane and evaluation for the presence or absence of urine-filled fetal bladders, and ideally incorporate Doppler study of the umbilical arteries (GRADE 1C); (4) we recommend fetoscopic laser surgery as the standard treatment for stage II through stage IV twin-twin transfusion syndrome presenting between 16 and 26 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1A); (5) we recommend expectant management with at least weekly fetal surveillance for asymptomatic patients continuing pregnancies complicated by stage I twin-twin transfusion syndrome, and consideration for fetoscopic laser surgery for stage I twin-twin transfusion syndrome presentations between 16 and 26 weeks of gestation complicated by additional factors such as maternal polyhydramnios-associated symptomatology (GRADE 1B); (6) we recommend an individualized approach to laser surgery for early- and late-presenting twin-twin transfusion syndrome (GRADE 1C); (7) we recommend that all patients with twin-twin transfusion syndrome qualifying for laser therapy be referred to a fetal intervention center for further evaluation, consultation, and care (Best Practice); (8) after laser therapy, we suggest weekly surveillance for 6 weeks followed by resumption of every-other-week surveillance thereafter, unless concern exists for post-laser twin-twin transfusion syndrome, post-laser twin anemia-polycythemia sequence, or fetal growth restriction (GRADE 2C); (9) following the resolution of twin-twin transfusion syndrome after fetoscopic laser surgery, and without other indications for earlier delivery, we recommend delivery of dual-surviving monochorionic-diamniotic twins at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1C); (10) in twin-twin transfusion syndrome pregnancies complicated by posttreatment single fetal demise, we recommend full-term delivery (39 weeks) of the surviving co-twin to avoid complications of prematurity unless indications for earlier delivery exist (GRADE 1C); (11) we recommend that fetoscopic laser surgery not influence the mode of delivery (Best Practice); (12) we recommend that prenatal diagnosis of twin anemia-polycythemia sequence minimally require either middle cerebral artery Doppler peak systolic velocity values >1.5 and <1.0 multiples of the median in donor and recipient twins, respectively, or an intertwin Δ middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity >0.5 multiples of the median (GRADE 1C); (13) we recommend that providers consider incorporating middle cerebral artery Doppler peak systolic velocity determinations into all monochorionic twin ultrasound surveillance beginning at 16 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1C); and (14) consultation with a specialized fetal care center is recommended when twin anemia-polycythemia sequence progresses to a more advanced disease stage (stage ≥II) before 32 weeks of gestation or when concern arises for coexisting complications such as twin-twin transfusion syndrome (Best Practice).
Collapse
|
5
|
Mustafa HJ, Aghajani F, Patrick E, Baerz MM, Arias‐Sánchez P, Khalil A. Perinatal outcomes following fetoscopic laser surgery for early twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:824-831. [PMID: 38415823 PMCID: PMC11019523 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Our objective was to investigate outcomes in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) treated with fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) at <18 weeks vs ≥18 weeks, and to conduct subgroup analysis of TTTS with FLS at <16 weeks vs 16-18 weeks. MATERIAL AND METHODS PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched systematically from inception until May 2023. Primary outcome was survival, and secondary outcomes included preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), preterm birth and gestational age (GA) at delivery. RESULTS Nine studies encompassing 1691 TTTS pregnancies were included. TTTS stage III was significantly more common in TTTS pregnancies treated with FLS at <18 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-6.54), and procedure duration was shorter at <18 weeks (MD -5.27 minutes, 95% CI -9.19 to -1.34). GA at delivery was significantly earlier in TTTS pregnancies treated with FLS at <18 weeks (MD -3.12 weeks, 95% CI -6.11 to -0.13). There were no significant differences in outcomes, including PPROM, PPROM at <7 days post-FLS, preterm birth at <28 and <32 weeks, delivery at <7 days post-FLS, and survival outcomes, including fetal demise, live birth and neonatal survival. Similarly, TTTS stage III was more common in TTTS with FLS at <16 weeks than at 16-18 weeks (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.62-5.35), with no significant differences in the aforementioned outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In early TTTS treated with FLS, outcomes were comparable between those treated at <18 weeks compared with ≥18 weeks except for GA at delivery, which was 3 weeks earlier. In the subset treated at <16 weeks vs 16-18 weeks, the procedure was feasible without an increased risk of very early preterm birth or perinatal mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba J. Mustafa
- Division of Maternal‐Fetal MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
- The Fetal Center at Riley Children's and Indiana University HealthIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Faezeh Aghajani
- BCNatal Fetal Medicine Research Center, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de DéuUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Elise Patrick
- Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Maryam M. Baerz
- School of MedicineIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | | | - Asma Khalil
- Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's HospitalSt George's University of LondonLondonUK
- Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research InstituteSt George's University of LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|