Maxilla-nasion-mandible angle: a new method to assess profile anomalies in pregnancy

Ultrasound measurements of fetal facial profile markers and their associations with congenital malformations during early pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Fetal facial profile could be measured during the early pregnancy. Its abnormalities might be associated with certain congenital malformations. We aimed to study the associations between fetal facial profile measurements with crown-rump length and congenital malformations (cleft lip and palate, micrognathia, and open spina bifida) during early pregnancy.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cross-sectional study between June 2019 and April 2022. Pregnant women at a gestational age between 11-13+ 6 weeks were enrolled. Two sonographers performed fetal facial profile measurements independently. The associations between these measurements with crown-rump length and congenital malformations were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 406 and 25 fetuses without or with congenital malformations, respectively. Two sonographers showed satisfactory inter- and intra-observer agreements and reproducibility. The maxillary gap was only observed in 7.6% of normal fetuses, whereas all cleft lip and palate fetuses had a maxillary gap ≥ 0.8 mm. The crown-rump length was negatively correlated with frontomaxillary facial angle, inferior facial angle, and profile line distance but positively correlated with maxilla-nasion-mandible angle, facial maxillary angle, frontal space distance, and palatine maxillary diameter. These measurements showed various significant changes with different congenital malformations.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of fetal facial profile in early pregnancy were feasible with satisfactory reproducibility. These measurements correlated with crown-rump length and showed significant differences with certain fetal congenital malformations.

A novel artificial intelligence model for fetal facial profile marker measurement during the first trimester

BACKGROUND

To study the validity of an artificial intelligence (AI) model for measuring fetal facial profile markers, and to evaluate the clinical value of the AI model for identifying fetal abnormalities during the first trimester.

METHODS

This retrospective study used two-dimensional mid-sagittal fetal profile images taken during singleton pregnancies at 11-13+ 6 weeks of gestation. We measured the facial profile markers, including inferior facial angle (IFA), maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle, facial-maxillary angle (FMA), frontal space (FS) distance, and profile line (PL) distance using AI and manual measurements. Semantic segmentation and landmark localization were used to develop an AI model to measure the selected markers and evaluate the diagnostic value for fetal abnormalities. The consistency between AI and manual measurements was compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The diagnostic value of facial markers measured using the AI model during fetal abnormality screening was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

A total of 2372 normal fetuses and 37 with abnormalities were observed, including 18 with trisomy 21, 7 with trisomy 18, and 12 with CLP. Among them, 1872 normal fetuses were used for AI model training and validation, and the remaining 500 normal fetuses and all fetuses with abnormalities were used for clinical testing. The ICCs (95%CI) of the IFA, MNM angle, FMA, FS distance, and PL distance between the AI and manual measurement for the 500 normal fetuses were 0.812 (0.780-0.840), 0.760 (0.720-0.795), 0.766 (0.727-0.800), 0.807 (0.775-0.836), and 0.798 (0.764-0.828), respectively. IFA clinically significantly identified trisomy 21 and trisomy 18, with areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.686 (95%CI, 0.585-0.788) and 0.729 (95%CI, 0.621-0.837), respectively. FMA effectively predicted trisomy 18, with an AUC of 0.904 (95%CI, 0.842-0.966). MNM angle and FS distance exhibited good predictive value in CLP, with AUCs of 0.738 (95%CI, 0.573-0.902) and 0.677 (95%CI, 0.494-0.859), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistency of fetal facial profile marker measurements between the AI and manual measurement was good during the first trimester. The AI model is a convenient and effective tool for the early screen for fetal trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and CLP, which can be generalized to first-trimester scanning (FTS).

Fetal Profile Markers for the Detection of Robin Sequence in Fetuses with Retrognathia

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the prefrontal space ratio (PSFR), inferior facial (IFA) and maxilla-nasion-mandible angle (MNM), and the fetal profile line (FPL) are helpful in identifying fetuses with Robin sequence (RS) in cases with isolated retrognathia, and thus better predict the likelihood of immediate need for postnatal respiratory support.

METHODS

This was a retrospective matched case-control study of fetuses/infants with isolated retrognathia with or without RS receiving pre- and postnatal treatment at the University Hospital of Tübingen, Germany between 2008 and 2020. The PFSR, IFA, MNM, and FPL were measured in affected and normal fetuses according to standardized protocols. Cases were stratified into isolated retrognathia and RS.

RESULTS

21 (n=7 isolated retrognathia, n=14 RS) affected fetuses and 252 normal fetuses were included. Their median gestational age at ultrasound examination was 23.6 and 24.1 weeks, respectively. In fetuses with isolated retrognathia and RS, the PSFR, IFA, and FPL were significantly different from the normal population. At a false-positive rate of 5%, the detection rate was 76.2% for the PFSR, 85.7% for the IFA, and 90.5% for both parameters combined. However, all parameters failed to distinguish between isolated retrognathia and RS.

CONCLUSION

PSFR and IFA are simple markers for identifying retrognathia prenatally. However, they are not helpful for the detection of RS in fetuses with isolated retrognathia. Therefore, delivery should take place in a center experienced with RS and potentially life-threatening airway obstruction immediately after birth.

Understanding the distinction between cleft lip and cleft palate: a critical step for successful prenatal detection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Orofacial clefts (OCs) are among the most common congenital anomalies, however, prenatal detection of cleft palate without cleft lip (CP) remains low. CP is associated with a higher risk of associated structural anomalies, recurrence risk and genetic aberrations. There is opportunity to optimize prenatal diagnosis, counseling and diagnostic genetic testing for OCs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improving prenatal diagnosis of CP requires understanding that embryologically, the secondary palate develops from the 6th to the 10th week and fuses with the primary palate by the 12th week. Multiple first, second and third trimester 2D ultrasonographic markers for OCs have been described including the maxillary gap, frontal space, maxilla-nasion-mandible angle, retronasal triangle, palatino-maxillary diameter, equal sign, nonvisualization or gap in the soft to hard palate interface and loss of the superimposed line. We discuss the technique, evidence and limitations of each.

SUMMARY

Prenatal detection of OC can be optimized by employing 2D sonographic markers. Prenatal detection of CP may be improved by recognizing its high association with retrognathia/micrognathia.

Ultrasound and fetal magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical performance in the prenatal diagnosis of orofacial clefts and mandibular abnormalities

Cleft lip, with or without cleft palate, is the most common congenital craniofacial anomaly and the second most common birth defect worldwide. Micrognathia is a rare facial malformation characterized by small, underdeveloped mandible and frequently associated with retrognathia. Second- and third-trimester prenatal ultrasound is the standard modality for screening and identification of fetal orofacial abnormalities, with a detection rate in the low-risk population ranging from 0% to 73% for all types of cleft. The prenatal ultrasonography detection can also be performed during the first trimester of pregnancy. Given the potential limitations of obstetric ultrasound for examining the fetal face, such as suboptimal fetal position, shadowing from the surrounding bones, reduce amniotic fluid around the face, interposition of fetal limbs, umbilical cord and placenta, and maternal habitus/abdominal scars, the use of adjunct imaging modalities can enhance prenatal diagnosis of craniofacial anomalies in at-risk pregnancies. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a potentially useful second-line investigation for the prenatal diagnosis of orofacial malformations with a pooled sensitivity of 97%. In this review, we discuss the role of ultrasound and fetal MRI in the prenatal assessment of abnormalities of the upper lip, palate, and mandible.

Binder's syndrome: A narrative review

AIM

The classical features of Binder's syndrome (BS) have been widely reported, yet there is a lack of information on diagnostic and treatment challenges. Therefore, we aimed to review the literature on various aspects, including the role of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of BS.

METHODS

A thorough literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Ovid, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar using the keywords"Maxillonasal dysplasia", "Maxillonasal dysostosis", "nasomaxillary hypoplasia", "Binder type", "Binder syndrome", "Binder phenotype", and "OMIM 155050". In addition, the articles published in the English language from the inception of the database until June 2021 were considered.

RESULTS

The search of different databases yielded 958 publications, out of which 145 relevant articles were reviewed. The studies were categorised by year of publication, study design, and theme. Most of the studies were case reports (42%) followed by case series (19%). The most reported topic was based on different surgical techniques (42%). Finally, the results were synthesised into a narrative review.

CONCLUSIONS

The need for a multidisciplinary approach involving clinicians from different specialities is highlighted. Future research is warranted to develop concrete clinical guidelines for the management of this syndrome.

Prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia: a systematic review

Purpose

This systematic review aimed to analyze the characteristics of different diagnostic techniques for micrognathia, summarize the consistent diagnostic criteria of each technique, and provide a simple and convenient prenatal diagnosis strategy for micrognathia.

Methods

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the search was undertaken in three international databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). The three reviewers assessed all papers and extracted the following variables: author's name and year of publication, country, study design, number of participants, gestational age, equipment for prenatal examination, biometric parameters related to micrognathia, main results.

Results

A total of 25 articles included in the analysis. Nineteen articles described cross-sectional studies (76 percent), 4 (16 percent) were case-control studies, and 2 (8 percent) were cohort studies. Fifteen studies (60 percent) had a prospective design, 9 (36 percent) had a retrospective design, and one (4 percent) had both prospective and retrospective design. Thirty-two percent of the studies (n = 8) were performed in USA, and the remaining studies were performed in China (n = 4), Israel (n = 3), Netherlands (n = 3), UK (n = 1), France (n = 1), Italy (n = 1), Belgium(n = 1), Germany (n = 1), Spain (n = 1), and Austria (n = 1). The prenatal diagnosis of micrognathia can be performed as early as possible in the first trimester, while the second and third trimester of pregnancy were the main prenatal diagnosis period. The articles that were included in the qualitative synthesis describe 30 biometric parameters related to the mandible.

Conclusion

Of the 30 biometric parameters related to the mandible, 15 can obtain the simple and convenient diagnostic criteria or warning value for micrognathia. Based on these diagnostic criteria or warning value, clinicians can quickly make a preliminary judgment on facial deformities, to carry out cytologic examination to further clarify the diagnosis of micrognathia.

Clinical value of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester

Objectives

To study the correlations between facial profile markers and crown-lump length (CRL) in a Chinese population, and to evaluate the clinical value of these markers for abnormal fetuses during the first trimester (11 to 13⁺⁶ gestational weeks). 

Methods

The facial profile markers were as followings: inferior facial angle (IFA), maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle, facial maxillary angle (FMA), frontal space (FS) distance and profile line (PL) distance. These markers were measured in facial mid-sagittal section through ViewPoint 6 software. The diagnostic value of these markers for abnormal fetuses was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

According to the first-trimester scanning (FTS) and follow-up, 31 fetuses were enrolled in the abnormal group, including 14 cases of trisomy 21, 7 cases of trisomy 18, 10 cases with cleft lip and palate (CLP), and 1000 normal fetuses were selected. Among the normal fetuses, the IFA, FS distance and PL distance had negative correlations with CRL. The MNM angle and FMA had positive correlations with CRL. The mean IFA values for fetuses with trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 were 74.11° (standard deviation (SD) 7.48) and 69.88° (SD 7.08), respectively, which were significantly smaller than the normal fetuses (p = 0.013; p = 0.003). The mean MNM angle of fetuses with trisomy 18 and CLP were 6.98° (SD 2.61) and 9.41° (SD 2.57), respectively, which were significantly greater than the normal fetuses (p = 0.005; p < 0.001). The mean FMA values of trisomy 18 fetuses were 63.95° (SD 4.77), which was significantly smaller than the normal fetuses (p < 0.001). The mean FS distance of CLP fetuses was -0.22 mm (SD 1.38), which was significantly smaller than the normal fetuses (p < 0.001). The mean PL distance of trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and CLP fetuses were 2.89 mm (SD 0.41), 2.91 mm (SD 0.56) and 2.71 mm (SD 0.37), respectively. The difference with the normal fetuses had no statistical significance (p = 0.56; p = 0.607; p = 0.54).

Conclusions

Fetal facial profile markers had excellent correlations with CRL during the first trimester. IFA had certain clinical significance in detecting trisomy 21. FMA, IFA and MNM angle were reliable indicators for screening trisomy 18. The abnormal MNM angle and FS distance could be used as sensitive indicators for CLP. However, PL distance was not the best markers for trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and CLP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05028-9.

Reference standards for facial measurements in early third trimester South African fetuses, and the effect of maternal and fetal characteristics

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a major problem worldwide and dysmorphic facial features may be a prenatal biomarker for FASD. Deviations from normal facial development cannot be explored before establishing the normal variation in a specific population, since ethnic differences may exist.Objectives: Main objective: to establish reference standards for 23 facial measurements on 3D ultrasound volumes obtained between days 196 and 224 of gestation in healthy unexposed South African fetuses from an area with historically high alcohol consumption prevalence and a population group with no existing normative values. Secondary objective: to assess the confounding effect of maternal and fetal characteristics.Design: This study involves 97 women (including 43 smokers) who had been enrolled in the Safe Passage Study (SPS), a large prospective multinational cohort study assessing the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure. They had adequate 3 D ultrasound volumes of the fetal face acquired at 28⁺⁰-31⁺⁶weeks in singleton pregnancies without comorbidities, congenital abnormalities or exposure to alcohol, marijuana, or methamphetamines from 4 weeks before conception.Participants, materials, setting, methods: The participants were recruited from two residential areas of low socioeconomic status in Cape Town. Meticulous information was collected on maternal and pregnancy characteristics, including alcohol use at different time points. Gestational age (GA) was based on ultrasound biometry before 24 weeks, and 3D ultrasound volumes were acquired trans-abdominally from a sagittal and axial plane of the fetal face. Volumes were independently assessed offline by two observers and the image with the best landmark definition was used for 23 facial measurements, representing features previously described in children with FASD. The relation to the exact GA was assessed by regression analysis, the expected mean value and standard error of the estimate (SEE) was determined to transform all raw measurements into z-scores, and the effect of possible confounders on z-scores was assessed by ANOVA.Results: Ten variables changed significantly with advancing GA (extraocular diameter, anteroposterior, medio-lateral and supero-inferior ocular diameter, ocular volume, interlens distance, prenasal thickness, nasal bone length, nose length and nose protrusion) and thirteen did not (interocular distance; interocular: extraocular diameter ratio, prenasal thickness: nasal bone length ratio, pronasal-subnasal distance, subnasal-mouth distance, philtrum length, upper vermillion thickness, nose-philtrum angle, maxillary angle, facial height, facial protrusion, frontomaxillary facial angle and maxilla-nasion-mandible angle). Reference values (expected mean and SEE) for the 23 measurements were established for each day.The z-scores of all facial measurements were not independently affected by maternal age, parity, gravidity, smoking or body mass index, but infant sex and birthweight z-score significantly influenced several z-scores (infant sex for extraocular, medio-lateral, and supero-inferior ocular diameter, ocular volume, prenasal thickness and nose protrusion; birthweight z-score for extraocular diameter, interocular and interlens distance, nose protrusion and maxillary angle).Limitations: GA was not always confirmed by first trimester ultrasound and some measurements could not be obtained in all cases due to suboptimal image quality. The cohort included few heavy smokers so an effect of heavy or continued smoking cannot be ruled out, and the effect of ethnicity was not assessed.Conclusions: These are the first local reference standards for fetal facial measurements and, to our knowledge, the first reference standards for the supero-inferior ocular diameter, face protrusion, upper vermillion thickness, maxillary angle, and nose-philtrum angle. They were broadly in keeping with published references, with small discrepancies explained by minor differences in technique. Even in this narrow GA window, the distribution of many variables changed over time and normal variation was significantly influenced by fetal sex and birthweight z-score. The possible confounding effect of these factors needs to be considered when assessing the impact of harmful exposures like alcohol on facial development.

Study on normal reference value of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

To establish a normal reference value for fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester of pregnancy.

METHODS

We collected the data of 800 pregnant women who were examined during early pregnancy. The range of values of inferior facial angle (IFA), frontal nasal-mental (FNM) angle, frontomaxillary facial (FMF) angle, mandibulomaxillary facial (MMF) angle, fetal profile line (FPL), and maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle in normal fetuses of 11-13⁺⁶ weeks was measured and correlated. For the 1,000 fetuses that were screened in the early pregnancy period (11-13⁺⁶ weeks), follow-up the normal fetus, observe and measure the above parameters to obtain the normal measurement range. These markers were measured through GE Voluson E8 ultrasound machines by two experienced sonographers.

RESULTS

A total of Images of 800 fetuses were included in the study. The results showed that the average value of fetal nasal bone was 11.9 mm at 11-13⁺⁶ weeks, which increased with the increase of crown-rump length (CRL); the average value of IFA angle was 64.91°, which has no obvious correlation with CRL; the average value of FNM angle was 143.79°, and the FNM angle decreased slightly with the increase of CRL. Both the FMF angle and the MMF angle decreased with the increase of CRL, and the ratio of FMF/MMF was fixed at 0.75; the average value of MNM angle was 9.55°, which had no obvious correlation with CRL; FP line value was "0" in 177 cases, The positive value of 623 cases did not change significantly with the growth of the fetus, and the gap of the mandible of the normal fetus was almost visible.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established a range of normal reference values for facial and facial angles during early pregnancy, providing a reference for prenatal early detection, early diagnosis of fetal micrognathia, and other facial abnormalities.

Fetal markers for the detection of infants with craniofacial malformation

Facial clefts and Robin sequence (RS) share the timing of the diagnosis during the course of pregnancy, their association with genetic diseases and the subsequent management following the initial diagnosis. If a suspicion of a facial cleft or RS is made, a detailed anatomical examination of the fetus should be carried out to identify further anomalies. This may also involve genetic testing including a microarray or an exome analysis. Interdisciplinary counseling, including pre- and postnatal experts with sufficient experience in the management of such neonates, should be involved in this counseling. Parents should be informed about disease-specific therapeutic options and postnatal outcome. Delivery should take place in a center with experience in craniofacial malformations where clinicians are prepared for potentially life-threatening airway obstruction immediately after birth.

Application of an individualized nomogram in first-trimester screening for trisomy 21

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a nomogram based on fetal nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and ultrasonographic facial markers for screening for trisomy 21 in the first trimester of pregnancy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study using stored two-dimensional midsagittal fetal profile images captured at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation in singleton pregnancies. We included images from 302 trisomy-21 pregnancies and 322 euploid pregnancies. Cases were divided into a training set (200 euploid + 200 with trisomy 21) and a validation set (122 euploid + 102 with trisomy 21) at a ratio of approximately 2:1. For each, the maternal age, gestational age, fetal NT and karyotype were noted, and 12 ultrasonographic fetal facial markers were measured. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method and multivariable analysis were used to select automatically the discriminative markers. Logistic regression was used to develop a LASSO model, based on the selected markers, to screen for trisomy 21 in the first trimester of pregnancy. Furthermore, 60 of the 624 images were selected randomly as a retest set to evaluate the model's robustness. The predictive performance of screening for trisomy 21 of a model based on fetal NT and maternal age and of the LASSO model was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC). A nomogram was developed as an individualized tool to predict patient-specific probability for trisomy 21, which is a more visual presentation of the LASSO model. The performance of the nomogram was assessed using the C-index and calibration curve.

RESULTS

Into the LASSO model were incorporated eight markers, including fetal NT, prenasal-thickness-to-nasal-bone-length ratio, facial profile line, frontomaxillary facial angle, frontonasal facial angle, mandibulomaxillary facial angle, maxilla-nasion-mandible angle and d2 (distance between the anterior edge of the prefrontal skin and the mandibulomaxillary line) (all P < 0.05). The AUCs of the LASSO model for screening for trisomy 21 were 0.983 (95% CI, 0.971-0.994) in the training set and 0.979 (95% CI, 0.966-0.993) in the validation set, and these were higher than the AUCs of all eight individual ultrasonographic markers included in the model. The AUC of the LASSO model in the retest set was 0.997 (95% CI, 0.990-1.000), indicating good robustness of the LASSO model. The AUC of the LASSO model was significantly higher than that of the model based on fetal NT and maternal age in both training and validation sets (P < 0.001 for both). The nomogram of the LASSO model showed good discrimination of trisomy 21, with C-indices of 0.983 in the training set and 0.981 in the validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

We present an individualized nomogram which incorporates fetal NT and a series of ultrasonographic facial profile markers selected by the LASSO method and multivariable analysis. This nomogram can potentially be utilized as a convenient and effective tool in screening for trisomy 21 in the first trimester of pregnancy. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ultrasonographic study of fetal facial profile markers during the first trimester

Background

To establish reference ranges of fetal facial profile markers and study their correlations with crown-rump length (CRL) during the first trimester (11 ~ 13^+ 6 weeks’ gestation) in a Chinese population.

Methods

Ultrasonographic images of measuring fetal nuchal translucency (NT) were retrospectively selected randomly in normal fetuses whose parents were both Chinese. The facial markers included inferior facial angle (IFA), maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle, facial maxillary angle (FMA) and profile line (PL) distance. These markers were measured through ViewPoint 6 software by two experienced sonographers.

Results

Three hundred and eighty fetuses were selected. The ICCs (95 % CI) of intra-operator 1 reproducibility of IFA, MNM angle, FMA, PL distance were 0.944 (0.886 ~ 0.973), 0.804 (0.629 ~ 0.902), 0.834 (0.68 ~ 0.918) and 0.935 (0.868 ~ 0.969), respectively. The ICCs (95 % CI) of intra-operator 2 reproducibility of IFA, MNM angle, FMA, PL distance were 0.931 (0.857 ~ 0.967), 0.809 (0.637 ~ 0.904), 0.786 (0.600 ~ 0.892) and 0.906 (0.813 ~ 0.954), respectively. The ICCs (95 % CI) of inter-operator reproducibility of IFA, MNM angle, FMA, PL distance were 0.885 (0.663 ~ 0.953), 0.829 (0.672 ~ 0.915), 0.77 (0.511 ~ 0.891) and 0.844 (0.68 ~ 0.925), respectively. The average ± SD of IFA, MNM angle, FMA and PL distance were 80.2°±7.25°, 4.17°±1.19°, 75.36°±5.31°, 2.78 ± 0.54 mm, respectively. IFA and PL distance significantly decreased with CRL, while MNM angle and FMA significantly increased with CRL.

Conclusions

It was feasible to measure fetal facial markers during the first trimester. In Chinese population, the reference ranges of IFA, MNM angle, FMA and PL distance were 80.2°±7.25°, 4.17°±1.19°, 75.36°±5.31°, 2.78 ± 0.54 mm, respectively, and the measurements were found to correlate with CRL.

Assessment of the maxilla-mandible-nasion angle in normal and aneuploid foetuses in the first trimester of pregnancy

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aims to determine whether the maxilla-mandible-nasion (MMN) angle can be reliably measured in the first trimester, to describe normal ranges, and to determine if significant changes occur in foetuses with aneuploidies.

METHODS

The MMN angle was measured in stored 2D-ultrasound images of 200 normal fetal profiles between 11⁺⁰ and 13⁺⁶ weeks of gestation. Each image was analyzed by two observers at two independent time points. Bland-Altmann analysis was performed to evaluate the reliability of the measurements. Additionally, the MMN angle was measured on sonograms from 140 aneuploid foetuses.

RESULTS

The mean MMN angle in normal foetuses from 11 to 14 weeks of gestation was 15.4°. Reliability of the measurement was high when repeatedly measured by the same observer (ICC = 0.92 and 0.82) and between two observers (ICC = 0.77 and 0.63). Average MMN values in foetuses with trisomy 21, 13, and Turner syndrome were significantly higher than those measured in normal foetuses. The highest differences were observed in foetuses with trisomy 13. Among those, 62% had an MMN angle above the 95th percentile and 92% above the normal mean.

CONCLUSION

The MMN angle can be reliably measured in early pregnancy and is abnormal in about 60% of foetuses with trisomy 13.

Objective assessment of the fetal facial profile at second and third trimester of pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of a novel sonographic parameter named facial maxillary angle (FMA) and to establish nomograms of FMA, inferior facial angle (IFA), frontal nasal-mental angle (FNMA), maxilla-nasion-mandible angle (MNMA), and fetal profile line (FPL) in Chinese fetuses.

METHODS

In this prospective cross-sectional study, FMA, IFA, FNMA, MNMA, and FPL were measured in 592 normal fetuses between 16 and 36 gestational weeks. FMA was measured twice by the same and another operator with a blinded method on the first 50 cases. The reference interval was defined as ±2SD. The efficacy of five sonographic markers was tested in 10 fetuses with micrognathia retrieved from the database of our unit.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient (95% CI) of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of FMA was 0.937 (0.890-0.964) and 0.891 (0.809-0.938), respectively. FMA, FNMA, and IFA increased slightly from 16 weeks till 28-31 weeks and decreased minimally thereafter. FMA and FNMA made correct diagnosis in all affected fetuses; MNMA and IFA identified nine and eight cases respectively, and FPL only detected five cases.

CONCLUSION

A fixed cutoff of 66° for FMA and 136° for FNMA may be adopted as simple screening criteria of micrognathia.

Assessment of Midfacial Hypoplasia in Down Syndrome Fetuses - Validity of a Two-Line Approach and Introduction of a Novel Angle (Maxilla-Mandible-Nasion Angle)

PURPOSE

To scrutinize the validity of a novel angle (maxilla-mandible-nasion angle, MMN) as objective proof of midfacial hypoplasia in trisomy 21 fetuses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Volume data sets of 2(nd) trimester fetuses were reviewed in this retrospective study. After achievement of the correct midsagittal position, the fetal profile line (FP line) and the mandibulo-maxillary line (MML) were applied and the resulting angle was calculated. Additionally, the prefrontal space ratio (PFSR) was assessed. Both measurements were obtained from 401 euploid fetuses and 42 fetuses with trisomy 21. Values for MMN and PFSR<5(th) percentile were considered abnormal.

RESULTS

The study included 443 fetuses with a mean gestational age of 21.3 weeks (range: 14.0-26.3). The MMN angle sufficiently identified hypoplasia of the midface in trisomy 21 fetuses (mean: 14.6°; range: 10.1°- 22.0°) compared to controls (mean: 20.5°; range: 17.3°-23.7°; p<0.0001). Concomitantly, the PFSR of Down syndrome fetuses was significantly lower (mean: 0.53; range: 0.21-1.22) than in euploid individuals (1.38; range: 0.54-2.23; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Calculation of the novel MMN angle in 2(nd) trimester fetuses reliably allows rapid assessment of craniofacial anatomy in order to rule out the midfacial hypoplasia frequently found in trisomy 21.

Maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle: an indicator to assess fetal facial profile in first-trimester of pregnancy

Objective

The aim of this study was to observe whether there existed significant differences in the maxilla–nasion–mandible angle (MNM) between the first- and second-trimester of pregnancy, and to observe its predictive values for trisomy 18.

Methods

Two experienced ultrasonologists used 2D and 3D ultrasound imaging techniques to obtain the facial sagittal sections of fetuses in the first-trimester of pregnancy (crown-rump length 45–84 mm), respectively, so as to measure MNM.

Results

MNM could be measured in 91 % of normal fetuses, and the measurement differences by different operators in different groups were <1.1°; average MNM was 11.0°, and no significant change was observed in different gestational ages (P = 0.15). The average of MNMs in fetuses with trisomy 18 was 16.6°, which were all higher than the 95th percentile of normal measurement data. The sensitivity and specificity of increased MNM on the abnormal detection of trisomy 18 were 54.7 and 97.4 %, respectively.

Conclusions

The feasibility and reproducibility of measuring MNM in early pregnancy were good. MNM had certain suggestive roles for aneusomic chromosomal abnormalities, especially for fetuses with trisomy 18.

Fetal and neonatal maxillary ontogeny in extant humans and the utility of prenatal maxillary morphology in predicting ancestral affiliation

OBJECTIVES

The midface of extant Homo sapiens is known to undergo shape changes through fetal and neo-natal ontogeny; however, little work has been done to quantify these shape changes. Further, while midfacial traits which vary in frequency between populations of extant humans are presumed to develop prenatally, patterns of population-specific variation maxillary shape across ontogeny are not well documented. Only one study of fetal ontogeny which included specific discussion of the midface has taken a three-dimensional geometric morphometric approach, and that study was limited to one population (Japanese). The present research project seeks to augment our understanding of fetal maxillary growth patterns, most especially in terms of intraspecific variation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional coordinate landmark data were collected on the right maxillae of 102 fetal and neo-natal individuals from three groups (Euro-American, African-American, "Mixed Ancestry").

RESULTS

Shape changes were seen mainly in the lateral wall of the piriform aperture, the anterior nasal spine, and the subnasal alveolar region. The greatest difference across age groups (second trimester, third trimester, neonates) was between the second and third trimester. Euro-Americans and African-Americans clustered by population and differences in midfacial morphology related to ancestry could be discerned as early as the second trimester (p = .002), indicating that population variation in maxillary morphology appears very early in ontogeny.

DISCUSSION

The midface is a critical region of the skull for assessing ancestry and these results indicate that maxillary morphology may be useful for estimating ancestry for prenatal individuals as young as the second trimester.

Fetal facial profile markers of Down syndrome in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the use of the maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle and fetal profile (FP) line to assess the degree of midfacial hypoplasia in Down-syndrome fetuses in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

METHODS

The MNM angle and FP line were measured retrospectively in stored two-dimensional images or three-dimensional volumes of fetuses with Down syndrome. Data collected from January 2006 to July 2013 were retrieved from the digital databases of participating units. The MNM angle was expressed as a continuous variable (degrees) and the FP line as positive, negative or zero. Measurements were obtained from stored images in the midsagittal plane by two experienced examiners and compared with our previously reported normal ranges for euploid fetuses. A MNM angle below the 5(th) centile of the reference range and a positive or negative FP line were considered as abnormal.

RESULTS

A total of 133 fetuses with Down syndrome were available for analysis, eight of which were subsequently excluded because of inadequate images. The MNM angle was not influenced by gestational age (P = 0.48) and was significantly smaller in Down-syndrome fetuses than in euploid fetuses (mean, 12.90° vs 13.53°, respectively; P = 0.015). The MNM angle was below the 5th centile for euploid fetuses in 16.8% of fetuses with Down syndrome (P < 0.01). In the cohort of Down-syndrome fetuses, a positive FP line was present in 41.6% of cases (with a false-positive rate (FPR) of 6.3%) and was positively correlated with Down syndrome and gestational age (P < 0.01). There was no case with a negative FP line. In cases of Down syndrome, a positive FP line was correlated with a small MNM angle (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A small MNM angle and a positive FP line can be regarded as novel markers for Down syndrome. The FP line is an easy marker to measure, has a low FPR, does not require knowledge of normal reference values and has the potential to differentiate between Down syndrome and trisomy 18, as, in the latter, the FP line is often negative.

Facial profile markers in second- and third-trimester fetuses with trisomy 18

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate nasal bone length (NBL), maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle, fetal profile (FP) line, prenasal thickness (PT), prenasal thickness to nasal bone length (PT:NBL) ratio and prefrontal space ratio (PFSR) as markers of trisomy 18 in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

METHODS

The NBL, MNM angle, FP line, PT, PT:NBL ratio and PFSR were measured retrospectively from stored two-dimensional images or three-dimensional volumes of trisomy-18 fetuses, and were compared with our previously reported normal ranges for euploid fetuses. Additional ultrasound findings were noted at initial routine second-trimester scan and at subsequent advanced ultrasound examination performed after referral for karyotyping.

RESULTS

A total of 43 trisomy-18 fetuses were included in the analysis. At initial examination, median gestational age was 21 + 2 weeks. NBL and PT were correlated with gestational age (P < 0.001), but the other markers were not. Mean NBL, MNM angle, PT, PT:NBL ratio and PFSR were 3.76 mm, 16.67°, 4.25 mm, 1.39 and 0.87, respectively. The FP line was zero (normal) in 53.7% of cases and negative (abnormal) in 46.3%. All markers were significantly associated with trisomy 18, with the PT:NBL ratio yielding the highest detection rate (88.4%) followed by NBL (83.7%), MNM angle (56.4%), FP line (46.3%), PT (27.9%) and the PFSR (20.5%) (for a 5% false-positive rate for the continuous variables). Various combinations of the four best markers (NBL, FP line, MNM angle and PT:NBL ratio) yielded detection rates of between 72% and 95%. Structural anomalies were not detected in 22% of fetuses at the initial scan and in 2% at the advanced scan.

CONCLUSIONS

The PT:NBL ratio and NBL are robust second- and third-trimester markers for trisomy 18. A negative FP line has a 0% false-positive rate and the potential to differentiate between trisomy 18 and Down syndrome, as in the latter the FP line is often positive. No major anomaly was observed at the initial scan in about a quarter of trisomy-18 fetuses, underlining the role of second-trimester facial marker evaluation.

Prenatal Identification of Pierre Robin Sequence: A Review of the Literature and Look towards the Future

Fetal ultrasonography is an important tool used to prenatally diagnose many craniofacial conditions. Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a rare congenital deformation characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. PRS can present as a perinatal emergency when the retropositioned tongue obstructs the airway leading to respiratory compromise. More predictable and reliable diagnostic studies could help the treating medical team as well as families prepare for these early airway emergencies. The medical literature was reviewed for different techniques used to prenatally diagnose PRS radiologically. We have reviewed these techniques and suggested a possible diagnostic pathway to consistently identify patients with PRS prenatally.

Premaxillary protrusion assessment by the maxilla-nasion-mandible angle in fetuses with facial clefts

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to measure the degree of premaxillary protrusion in fetuses with orofacial clefts of various severities.

METHODS

The maxilla-nasion-mandible (MNM) angle was measured retrospectively on by multiplanar corrected volumes. Sixty-two fetuses with orofacial clefts and known outcome volumes of the fetal head were available.

RESULTS

In 48 of the 62 cases, the MNM angle could be measured [mean gestational age 23 (range, 18-30) weeks]. The mean MNM angle was normal in all nine cases with cleft lip and intact alveolar ridge (15.2°; range, 12.5°- 16.9°). In 24 cases with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate (UCL/P), the mean MNM angle was 20.0° (range, 13.3-26.2°), being above the 95th percentile in 79% (n = 19) and normal in 21% (n = 5). In 14 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCL/P) cases, the mean MNM angle was 26.5° (range, 19.2°-33.7°) and above the 95th percentile in all cases. There was no difference in MNM angle between isolated clefts and clefts associated with other anomalies. In one case with a Tessier 4 cleft, the MNM angle was above the 95th percentile (25.2°).

CONCLUSION

The premaxilla tends to protrude in both BCL/P as UCL/P cases. The degree of protrusion varies greatly, especially in the BCL/P group.

The fetal profile line: a proposal for a sonographic reference line to classify forehead and mandible anomalies in the second and third trimester

OBJECTIVES

To test the fetal profile (FP) line, defined as the line that passes through the anterior border of the mandible and the nasion, as a reference line for forehead and mandible anomalies.

METHODS

Volumes of 248 normal and 24 pathological fetuses (16-36 and 19-37 weeks' gestation, respectively) were analysed retrospectively. When the FP line passes anteriorly, across or posteriorly to the frontal bone, this was defined as 'negative', 'zero' or 'positive', respectively. When the FP line was positive the distance (F distance) between the FP line and the frontal bone was measured.

RESULTS

No cases with a negative FP line were found in the normal fetuses. Before 27 weeks' gestation the FP line was always 'zero' except in one case. After 27 weeks' gestation the FP line was 'positive' in up to 25% (F distance (mean, range): 2.8, 2.1-3.6 mm). The FP line correctly identified 13 cases with retrognathia, 5 cases with frontal bossing and 3 cases with a sloping forehead.

CONCLUSION

Although large prospective studies are needed, the FP line may be a useful tool to detect second trimester profile anomalies such as retrognathia, sloping forehead and frontal bossing with the possibility of quantifying the latter.