Troubling heroes: Reframing the environmental justice contributions of the Flint water crisis

Youth Perspectives on the Flint Water Crisis and Its Health Effects

Background

While the youth of Flint are at risk from the effects of the water crisis, little is known about their perspective of the impact of the water on their health.

Objective

To explore adolescents' perceptions of living in Flint during the water crisis, its impact on their health, and ways to address the crisis and rebuild trust.

Methods

In summer 2018, four focus groups were conducted with adolescents in Flint (ages 13 to 17 years). Group sessions were conducted by trained facilitators who were Flint residents along with members of the community-academic research team. Group sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were reviewed and themes identified by the research team and youth from the focus groups.

Results

Of the 53 participants, most identified as Black (66%) and male (64%). Participants expressed concern about the impact of the water on their health. They knew people who developed rashes, experienced cognitive changes, and who died, they believed, owing to the water. The crisis also led to psychological consequences for youth. They expressed ongoing mistrust of the water and of institutions that should protect them, as well as concern that exposure may have long-term effects on their health and their children's health. Despite these concerns, participants expressed resilience and a desire to share that they had the potential to live successful lives.

Conclusion

Youth expressed concern about current and long-term health sequelae of the water crisis. Further work is needed to monitor the consequences of the crisis and to identify resident-informed approaches to mitigate its effects and rebuild trust.

Conceptualizing Trust and Distrust as Alternative Stable States: Lessons from the Flint Water Crisis

Despite the universally recognized importance of fostering trust and avoiding distrust in governance relationships, there remains considerable debate on core questions like the relation between (dis)trust and the evaluations of the characteristics that make a governance agent appear (un)worthy of trust. In particular, it remains unclear whether levels of (dis)trust simply follow levels of (dis)trustworthiness-such that building trust is primarily a question of increasing evidence of trustworthiness and avoiding evidence of distrustworthiness, or if their dynamics are more complicated. The current paper adds novel theory for thinking about the management of trust and distrust in the governance context through the application of principles borrowed from resilience theory. Specifically, we argue that trust and distrust exist as distinct, self-reinforcing (i.e., stable) states separated by a threshold. We then theorize as to the nature of the self-reinforcing processes and use qualitative data collected from and inductively coded in collaboration with Flint residents as part of a participatory process to look for evidence of our argument in a well-documented governance failure. We conclude by explaining how this novel perspective allows for clearer insight into the experience of this and other communities and speculate as to how it may help to better position governance actors to respond to future crises.

Advancing Du Bois's Legacy Through Emancipatory Environmental Sociology

Environmental sociology, while dedicating significant scholarship to issues of environmental racism and environmental justice, remains a predominately white subdiscipline that has not enjoyed general relevance across sociology. One of the drivers of the dominance of white perspectives in the subdiscipline is the lack of a core theoretical pillar that anchors the importance of racism to structuring inequitable environments. W.E.B. Du Bois not only offered a foundational approach to sociological inquiry, but also a deeply material perspective on the maintenance of racial inequities. Du Bois's approach to sociology lays the path for a liberatory approach that documents the scope of a problem, interrogates its drivers, and works with affected communities and allied resources to develop alternative models with transformative outcomes. This paper argues that an environmental understanding was original to Du Bois's methodology as demonstrated through his concept of the total environment. He connected inequitable environments to the legacy of racial capitalism, which he saw as driven by anti-Blackness. His solution was to advance Black solidarity and community cooperatives through Pan-Africanism. Du Bois' framework establishes an approach to conducting emancipatory environmental sociology that provides theoretical and methodological legitimacy for engaging in partnership with marginalized communities to advance their goals towards liberation.