Efficacy of levonorgestrel when administered as an irradiated, slow-release injectable matrix for feline contraception

Reversible Control of Reproduction In Queens: Mastering the use of reproductive drugs to manipulate cyclicity

BACKGROUND

The literature is full of papers reporting side effects of progestogens in cats; however, they are, in fact, safe drugs, as discussed in this article. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and melatonin are additionally a practical solution for controlling cyclicity in queens, but they also have some contraindications and need to be used carefully.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Mastering the use of reproductive drugs allows feline practitioners to handle many more clinical situations than can be solved using surgery. It is not necessary to be a specialist in reproduction to be able to halt cyclicity in a valuable breeding queen using hormones.

EQUIPMENT AND TECHNICAL SKILLS

A sound knowledge of appropriate dosages and criteria for patient selection for all reproductive drugs currently used in feline reproduction is the best guarantee of owner satisfaction and of ensuring the queen's health. Availability of a serum progesterone assay, either in-house or via an external laboratory, is also important, in order to confirm a queen is at an appropriate stage of the reproductive cycle for treatment.

AUDIENCE

This article is aimed principally (but not exclusively) at veterinarians working with cat breeders and whose clientele is increasingly interested in alternative methods of controlling reproduction in pet queens. Surgery is no longer the only choice, and practitioners who manage to keep abreast of new developments will be able to address clients' needs in a modern, professional way.

EVIDENCE BASE

This review draws on a vast body of scientific evidence-based literature. Previously, personal (and sometimes misinformed) opinions, such as the proposed dangerous side effects of progestogens, have been perpetuated in the scientific literature. The papers cited in this review have therefore been carefully scrutinised to distinguish reliable information based on controlled studies from non-evidence-based information.

Long-acting injectable hormonal dosage forms for contraception

Although great efforts have been made to develop long-acting injectable hormonal contraceptives for more than four decades, few long-acting injectable contraceptives have reached the pharmaceutical market or even entered clinical trials. On the other hand, in clinical practice there is an urgent need for injectable long-acting reversible contraceptives which can provide contraceptive protection for more than 3 months after one single injection. Availability of such products will offer great flexibility to women and resolve certain continuation issues currently occurring in clinics. Herein, we reviewed the strategies exploited in the past to develop injectable hormonal contraceptive dosages including drug microcrystal suspensions, drug-loaded microsphere suspensions and in situ forming depot systems for long-term contraception and discussed the potential solutions for remaining issues met in the previous development.

Priming with progestin, but not GnRH antagonist, induces a consistent endocrine response to exogenous gonadotropins in induced and spontaneously ovulating cats

Ovarian sensitivity to exogenous gonadotropin stimulation (equine chorionic gonadotropin [eCG] and human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG]) following pre-treatment with a progestin (levonorgestrel) versus GnRH antagonist (antide) was studied in cats known to be induced versus spontaneous ovulators. Queens were assigned to one of three treatments: (1) levonorgestrel implants+eCG/hCG (n=7 cats); (2) antide injections+eCG/hCG (n=7) or (3) eCG/hCG alone (control; n=7). Hormonal metabolites were assessed in fecal samples collected daily for 60 days before and during the 37 days inhibitory pre-treatment and for more than 60 days after eCG/hCG. Fecal metabolites of estradiol and progesterone were measured by radioimmunoassay. Females that maintained baseline progesterone were considered induced ovulators, whereas cats that exhibited a luteal phase before inhibition treatment were classified as spontaneous ovulators. Based on fecal hormone profiles, levonorgestrel thoroughly inhibited ovarian activity, whereas antide synchronized follicular phases but did not induce complete ovarian down-regulation. Both treatments prevented ovulation in spontaneous ovulators, but neither caused regression of existing corpora lutea (CL). Levonorgestrel, but not antide, pre-treatment resulted in a quiescent ovary at the time of eCG injection, yet endocrine responses to eCG/hCG were not different among treatments. Interestingly, spontaneously ovulating females exhibited a prolonged estradiol response to gonadotropin stimulation compared to induced ovulators, and this prolonged estradiol surge was replicated by levonorgestrel pre-treatment. Thus, the progestin levonorgestrel effectively suppresses follicular and luteal activity in the cat, resulting in a more consistent response to gonadotropin stimulation, even in females prone to spontaneous ovulation.

Short term suppression of follicular recruitment and spontaneous ovulation in the cat using levonorgestrel versus a GnRH antagonist

Suppression and subsequent rebound of ovarian activity using a progestin (levonorgestrel; Norplant) versus a GnRH antagonist (antide) was assessed in the domestic cat via fecal estradiol and progesterone metabolite analyses. Following an initial dose-response trial, queens were assigned to one of four treatments: (1) antide, two 6 mg/kg injections 15 days apart (n = 8 cats); (2) levonorgestrel, six silastic rods (36 mg levonorgestrel/rod) implanted for 30 days (n = 8); (3) control injections (n = 5); and (4) control implants (n = 5). Steroid metabolites were quantified from daily fecal samples for 90 days before, 30 days during, and 90 days after treatment. Antide and levonorgestrel inhibited estrous cyclicity in contrast to continued cyclicity in controls. Cats already at estradiol baseline in antide (n = 7) and levonorgestrel (n = 4) groups remained inhibited during treatment. In females with elevated estradiol levels at treatment onset (Day 0), a normal estradiol surge was completed before concentrations declined to baseline (approximately Days 5-7) and remained suppressed throughout the remaining treatment period. Additionally, 56% of treatment animals exhibited at least one spontaneous ovulation during the pre-treatment period, but no female ovulated during treatment with levonorgestrel or antide. Antide-treated cats exhibited lower (P < 0.05) baseline estradiol concentrations during treatment compared to pre- and post-treatment. In contrast, levonorgestrel induced elevations in baseline estradiol following treatment compared to pre- and during treatment intervals. Control females showed no change (P > 0.05) in baseline estradiol throughout the study period. All levonorgestrel and antide cats returned to estrus after treatment withdrawal. Results demonstrate that: (1) both antide and levonorgestrel are effective for inducing short-term suppression of follicular recruitment and ovulation in the cat; (2) inhibition is reversible; and (3) GnRH antagonists and progestins differentially regulate basal estradiol secretion. This study also confirmed a relatively high incidence of spontaneous ovulation in the cat, a species generally considered to be an induced ovulator.