DNA Interstrand Crosslink Formation by Mechlorethamine at a Cytosine–Cytosine Mismatch Pair: Kinetics and Sequence Dependence

HPLC-UV, MALDI-TOF-MS and ESI-MS/MS analysis of the mechlorethamine DNA crosslink at a cytosine-cytosine mismatch pair

Background

Mechlorethamine [ClCH₂CH₂N(CH₃)CH₂CH₂Cl], a nitrogen mustard alkylating agent, has been proven to form a DNA interstrand crosslink at a cytosine-cytosine (C-C) mismatch pair using gel electrophoresis. However, the atomic connectivity of this unusual crosslink is unknown.

Methodology/Principal Findings

HPLC-UV, MALDI-TOF-MS, and ESI-MS/MS were used to determine the atomic connectivity of the DNA C-C crosslink formed by mechlorethamine, MALDI-TOF-MS of the HPLC-purified reaction product of mechlorethamine with the DNA duplex d[CTCACACCGTGGTTC]•d[GAACCACCGTGTGAG] (underlined bases are a C-C mismatch pair) indicated formation of an interstrand crosslink at m/z 9222.088 [M−2H+Na]⁺. Following enzymatic digestion of the crosslinked duplex by snake venom phosphodiesterase and calf intestinal phosphatase, ESI-MS/MS indicated the presence of dC-mech-dC [mech = CH₂CH₂N(CH₃)CH₂CH₂] at m/z 269.2 [M]²⁺ (expected m/z 269.6, exact mass 539.27) and its hydrolytic product dC-mech-OH at m/z 329.6 [M]⁺ (expected m/z 329.2). Fragmentation of dC-mech-dC gave product ions at m/z 294.3 and 236.9 [M]⁺, which are both due to loss of the 4-amino group of cytosine (as ammonia), in addition to dC and dC+HN(CH₃)CH = CH₂, respectively. The presence of m/z 269.2 [M]²⁺ and loss of ammonia exclude crosslink formation at cytosine N⁴ or O² and indicate crosslinking through cytosine N³ with formation of two quaternary ammonium ions.

Conclusions

Our results provide an important addition to the literature, as the first example of the use of HPLC and MS for analysis of a DNA adduct at the N³ position of cytosine.

Anthramycin-DNA binding explored by molecular simulations

The anticancer drug anthramycin inhibits replication and transcription processes by covalently binding to DNA. Here, we use molecular simulations to investigate the interaction between this ligand and the dodecanucleotide d[GCCAACGTTGGC](2). We start from the X-ray structure of the adduct anthramycin-d[CCAACGTTG*G](2), in which the drug binds covalently to guanine.1 We focus on the noncovalent complexes between the oligonucleotide and the anhydro and hydroxy forms of the drug. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that only the hydroxy form lies in front of the reactive center for the whole simulation ( approximately 20 ns), while the anhydro form moves inside the minor groove to the nearest base pair after approximately 10 ns. This sliding process is associated to both energetic and structural relaxations of the complex. The accuracy of our computational setup is established by performing MD simulations of the covalent adduct and of a 14-mer complexed with anhydro-anthramycin. The MD simulations are complemented by hybrid Car-Parrinello quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) simulations. These show that in the noncovalent complexes the electric field due to DNA polarizes the hydroxy and, even more, the anhydro form of the drug as to favor a nucleophilic attack by the alkylating guanine. This suggests that the binding process may be characterized by a multistep pathway, catalyzed by the electric field of DNA.

Mispair-aligned N3T-alkyl-N3T interstrand cross-linked DNA: synthesis and characterization of duplexes with interstrand cross-links of variable lengths

Therapeutic bifunctional alkylating agents generate interstrand cross-links in duplex DNA. As part of our continuing studies on DNA duplexes that contain alkyl interstrand cross-links, we have synthesized a cross-link that bridges the N(3) positions of a mismatched thymidine base pair. This cross-link, which is similar to the N(3)C-alkyl-N(3)C cross-link that has been observed between mismatched cytosine base pairs, was introduced by first incorporating a cross-linked phosphoramidite unit at the 5'-end of an oligonucleotide chain. Fully cross-linked duplexes were then synthesized using an orthogonal approach to selectively remove protecting groups, thus allowing construction of the cross-linked duplex via conventional solid-phase oligonucleotide synthesis. Short DNA duplexes with alkyl cross-links of various lengths (two, four, and seven methylene units) were prepared, and their physical properties were studied via UV thermal denaturation and circular dichroism spectroscopy. These linkers were found to stabilize the duplexes by 37, 31, and 16 degrees C for the two-, four-, and seven-carbon linkers, respectively, relative to a non-cross-linked duplex. Circular dichroism spectra suggested that these lesions induce very little deviation in the global structure relative to the non-cross-linked duplex DNA control. Molecular models show that the two-carbon cross-link spans the distance between the N(3) atoms of the T-T mismatch without perturbing the helix structure, whereas the longer linkers, particularly the seven-carbon linker, tend to push the thymines apart, creating a local distortion. This perturbation may account for the lower thermal stability of the seven-carbon versus two-carbon cross-linked duplex.

A transient product of DNA alkylation can be stabilized by binding localization

A 9-aminoacridine conjugate of a silyl-protected bis(acetoxymethyl)phenol (bisQMP) was synthesized and evaluated as an inducible cross-linking agent of DNA to test our ability to harness the chemistry of reactive quinone methide intermediates (QM). The acridine component was chosen for its ability to delivery an appendage to the major groove of DNA, and the silyl-protected component was chosen for its ability to generate two quinone methide equivalents in tandem upon addition of fluoride. This design created competition between reaction of (1) the 2-amino group of guanine that reacts irreversibly to form a stable QM adduct and (2) the more nucleophilic N7 group of guanine that reacts more efficiently but reversibly to form a labile QM adduct. This lability was apparently compensated by co-localization of the N7 group and QM in the major groove since the N7 adduct appeared to dominate the profile of products formed by duplex DNA. The controlling influence of acridine was also expressed in the sensitivity of the conjugate to ionic strength. High salt concentration inhibited covalent reaction just as it inhibits intercalation of the cationic acridine. As expected for QM formation, the presence of fluoride was indeed necessary for initiating reaction, and no direct benzylic substitution was observed. The conjugate also cross-linked DNA with high efficiency, forming one cross-link for every four alkylation events. Both alkylation and cross-linking products formed by duplex DNA were labile to hot piperidine treatment which led to approximately 40% strand scission and approximately 50% reversion to a material with an electrophoretic mobility equivalent to the parent DNA. All guanines exhibited at least some reactivity including those which were recalcitrant to cross-linking by an oligonucleotide-bisQMP conjugate designed for triplex formation [Zhou, G.; Pande, P.; Johnson, A. E.; Rokita, S. E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 2347-2354].

Molecular dynamics and mechanics calculations on a DNA duplex with A(+)-C, G-T and T-C mispairs

Despite major advances in characterizing purine(R)-purine(R), purine(R)-pyrimidine(Y) and pyrimidine(Y)-pyrimidine(Y) mismatches in DNA, there have not been any structural studies on a synthetic DNA duplex containing several different mispairs. Here, using NMR restrained molecular mechanics and dynamics simulations we have structurally characterized a 12 nucleotide long antiparallel DNA duplex with three different mispairs, namely A+-C, G-T and T-C. Our results show that the overall conformation of the antiparallel DNA duplex is B-DNA-like with slight structural distortions at or near the mispairs' sites. All these mispairs are properly stacked with their flanking base pairs. Each mispair is stabilized by two hydrogen bonds and the decreasing order of the hydrogen-bonding interactions is G-T>T-C>A+-C. G-T mispair has smaller configurational space while the structure is slightly bent at A+-C mispair's site. Overall, this study is the first ever structural characterization of a DNA duplex with three different mismatched base pairs and throws light upon the local conformations of the three mispairs present in the DNA duplex.

Extrahelical cytosine bases in DNA duplexes containing d[GCC](n).d[GCC](n) repeats: detection by a mechlorethamine crosslinking reaction

The cytosine-cytosine (C-C) pair is one of the least stable DNA mismatch pairs. The bases of the C-C mismatch are only weakly hydrogen bonded, and previous work has shown that, in certain sequence contexts, they can become unstacked from the core helix, and adopt an 'extrahelical' location. Here, using DNA duplexes with d[GCC](n).d[GCC](n) fragments containing C-C mismatches in a 1,4 bp relationship, we show that cytosine bases of different formal mismatch pairs can be crosslinked by mechlorethamine. For example, in the duplex d[CTCTCGCCGCCGCCGTATC].d[GATACGCCGCCGCCGAGAG], where underlined cytosine bases are present as the formal C-C mismatch pairs C(7)-C(32), C(10)-C(29) and C(13)-C(26), we show that two mechlorethamine crosslinks form between C(13) and C(29) and between C(10) and C(32), in addition to crosslinks at C(7)-C(32), C(10)-C(29) and C(13)-C(26) (we have reported previously the crosslinking of formal C-C pairs by mechlorethamine). We interpret the formation of the C(13)-C(29) and C(10)-C(32) crosslinks as evidence of an extrahelical location of the crosslinkable cytosines. Such extrahelical cytosine bases have been observed previously for a single C-C mismatch pair (in the so-called E-motif conformation). In the E-motif, the extrahelical cytosines are folded back towards the 5'-end of the duplex, consistent with our crosslinking data, and also consistent with the absence of C(7)-C(29) and C(10)-C(26) crosslinks in the current work. Hence, our data provide evidence for an extended E-motif DNA (eE-DNA) conformation in short d[GCC](n).d[GCC](n) repeat fragments, and raise the possibility that such structures might occur in much longer d[GCC](n).d[GCC](n) repeat tracts.