Linearized colorimetric assay for cremophor EL: application to pharmacokinetics after 1-hour paclitaxel infusions

Stabilization of Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene by Tween-80: Mechanistic Insights from Spectroscopic and Simulation Studies

Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate is commonly used to obtain stable dispersions of nanoparticles (NPs) such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene. However, the mechanism underlying dispersion is poorly understood. The present study aimed at investigating the mechanism of stabilization of carbon NPs (CNPs), namely, single-walled CNTs (SWCNTs), multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs), and graphene, by Tween-80 using attenuated total internal reflection-Fourier transform infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to identify, at the atomic scale, the significant interactions that underlie the adsorption and the stabilizing effect of Tween-80 on CNPs, in this way corroborating the spectroscopy results. Spectroscopic analysis revealed that the alkyl chain tether to SWCNT, MWCNT, and graphene surface, presumably through π-π interactions between the carbon-carbon double bond in the alkyl chain and the aromatic rings of CNPs. The hydrophilic polyethoxylate chains extend into the aqueous environment and stabilize the suspension by steric hindrance. MD simulations also showed that Tween-80 molecules interact with the CNP surface via the alkyl chain, thus corroborating spectroscopy results. MD simulations additionally revealed that Tween-80 aggregates on the CNP surface shifted from planar to micelle-like with increasing Tween-80 ratios, underscoring concentration-dependent changes in the nature of these interactions.

Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for quantitation of cremophor el and its applications

A rapid sensitive and selective MRM based method for the determination of Cremophor EL (CrEL) in rat plasma was developed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). CrEL and polypropylene glycol (internal standard) were extracted from rat plasma with acetonitrile and analysed on C18 column (XBridge, 50 × 4.6 mm, 3.5  μ m). The most abundant molecular ions corresponding to PEG oligomers at m/z 828, 872, 916 and 960 with daughter ion at m/z 89 were selected for multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in electrospray mode of ionisation. Plasma concentrations of CrEL were quantified after administration through oral and intravenous routes in male sprague dawley rats at a dose of 0.26 g/kg. The standard curve was linear (0.9972) over the concentration range of 1.00 to 200  μ g/mL. The lower limit of quantitation for CrEL was 1.00  μ g/mL using 50  μ L plasma. The coefficient of variation and relative error for inter and intra assay at three QC levels were 0.69 to 9.21 and -7.60 to 4.74 respectively. A novel proposal was conveyed to the scientific community, where formulation excipient can be analysed as qualifier in the analysis of NCEs to address the spiky plasma concentration profiles.

Meta-analysis of nanoparticulate paclitaxel delivery system pharmacokinetics and model prediction of associated neutropenia

PURPOSE

Nanoparticulate paclitaxel carriers have entered clinical evaluation as alternatives to the Cremophor-based standard Taxol(®) (Cre-pac). Their pharmacokinetics (PK) is complex, and factors influencing their pharmacodynamics (PD) are poorly understood. We aimed to develop a unified quantitative model for 4 paclitaxel carriers that captures systems-level PK, predicts micro-scale PK processes, and permits correlations between carrier properties and observed PD.

METHODS

Data consisting of 54 PK profiles and 574 observations were extracted from 20 clinical studies investigating Cre-pac, albumin-(A-pac), liposome-(L-pac), and tocopherol-(T-pac) nanocarriers. A population-PK approach was used for data analysis. All datasets were simultaneously fitted to produce a unified model. Model-based simulations explored relationships between predicted PK and myelosuppression for each formulation.

RESULTS

The final model employed nonlinear drug-binding mechanisms to describe Cre-pac and a delayed-release model for A-pac, L-pac, and T-pac. Estimated drug-release rate constants (h(-1)): Cre-pac (5.19), L-pac (1.26), A-pac (0.72), T-pac (0.74). Simulations of equivalent dosing schemes ranked neutropenia severity (highest to lowest): T-pac~Cre-pac>L-pac~A-pac and predicted remarkably well the clinically-observed relationships between neutropenia and free drug exposure relative to a threshold concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel disposition was well-described for all formulations. The derived model predicts toxicodynamics of diverse paclitaxel carriers.

High sensitivity assays for docetaxel and paclitaxel in plasma using solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection

Background

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel have traditionally been used in high doses every third week in the treatment of cancer. Lately there has been a trend towards giving weekly low doses to improve the therapeutic index. This article describes the development of high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) methods suitable for monitoring taxane levels in patients, focusing on patients receiving low-dose therapy.

Methods

Paclitaxel and docetaxel were extracted from human plasma by solid phase extraction, and detected by absorbance at 227 nm after separation by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography. The methods were validated and their performance were tested using samples from patients receiving paclitaxel or docetaxel.

Results

The limits of quantitation were 1 nM for docetaxel and 1.2 nM for paclitaxel. For both compounds linearity was confirmed from the limit of quantitation up to 1000 nM in plasma. The recoveries ranged between 92% and 118% for docetaxel and between 76% and 104% for paclitaxel. Accuracy and precision were within international acceptance criteria, that is within ± 15%, except at the limit of quantitation where values within ± 20% are acceptable. Low-dose patients included in an on going clinical trial had a median docetaxel concentration of 2.8 nM at 72 hours post infusion. Patients receiving 100 mg/m² of paclitaxel had a mean paclitaxel concentration of 21 nM 48 hours after the end of infusion.

Conclusion

We have developed an HPLC method using UV detection capable of quantifying 1 nM of docetaxel in plasma samples. The method should be useful for pharmacokinetic determinations at all relevant doses of docetaxel. Using a similar methodology paclitaxel can be quantified down to a concentration of 1.2 nM in plasma with acceptable accuracy and precision. We further demonstrate that the previously reported negative influence of Cremophor EL on assay performance may be overcome by degradation of the detergent by incubation with lipase.

Effect of valspodar on the pharmacokinetics of unbound paclitaxel

The aim of this multicenter study was to determine whether valspodar (Amdray; code designation, SDZ PSC 833), a potent P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor, affects the pharmacokinetics of unbound paclitaxel (Cu). Data were obtained from 31 patients with advanced breast cancer. Thirteen patients were treated with paclitaxel alone (3-h infusion at 175 mg/m2) and another 18 received paclitaxel (3-h infusion at 70 mg/m2) in combination with a 21-day cycle of oral valspodar (5 mg/kg given four times a day) starting 1 day before administration of paclitaxel. Serial blood samples were taken in the first course and Cu in plasma determined using equilibrium dialysis with a [G-3H]paclitaxel tracer. The apparent clearance of Cu was not significantly different between the two groups, with mean +/- standard deviation (+/- SD) values of 230 +/- 56.0 and 202 +/- 49.9 L/h/m2 in the absence and presence of valspodar, respectively (P = 0.17). The volume of Cu distribution was slightly larger in the presence of valspodar (1160 +/- 474 vs. 1620 +/- 552 L/m2; P = 0.025), which contributed to a minor difference in the terminal disposition half-life (6.12 +/- 3.42 vs. 8.50 +/- 2.06 h; P = 0.028). These data indicate that (i) valspodar lacks the significant interaction with paclitaxel observed previously with other P-gp modulators, (ii) the majority of the increased toxicity of the combination does not appear to be attributable to increased levels of Cu, and (iii) provide further evidence of the conjecture that the plasma concentration of paclitaxel may not be an appropriate measure to monitor the impact of P-gp inhibition.

A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of a fixed dose of paclitaxel followed by increasing doses of carboplatin, given weekly to patients with advanced esophageal or gastric junction cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Paclitaxel was administered on day 1 as a 1-h infusion at a fixed dose of 100 mg/m(2) followed by a 1-h infusion of carboplatin targeting an area under the curve (AUC) of 2-5 mg x min/ml, with cycles repeated on days 8, 15, 29, 36, and 43.

RESULTS

Forty patients [36 males; median (range) age, 57 (40-74) years] were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at a carboplatin AUC of 5 mg x min/ml and consisted of treatment delay attributable to myelosuppression. No grade 3/4 treatment-related nonhematological toxicity was observed. The highest dose intensity (>95% of the planned dose over time) was achieved with a carboplatin AUC of 4 mg x min/ml. The mean (+/-SD) AUCs of unbound (Cu) and total paclitaxel were 0.662 +/- 0.186 and 7.37 +/- 1.33 micro M x h, respectively. Clearance of Cu was 188 +/- 44.6 liter/h/m(2), which is not significantly different from historical data (P = 0.52). Cremophor EL clearance was 123 +/- 23 ml/h/m(2), similar to previous findings. Of 37 patients evaluable for response, 1 had complete response, 19 had partial response, and 10 had stable disease, accounting for an overall response rate of 54%.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen is very tolerable and effective, and the recommended doses for additional studies are paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)), with carboplatin targeting an AUC of 4 mg x min/ml.

Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles : implications for cancer chemotherapy

The non-ionic surfactants Cremophor EL (CrEL; polyoxyethyleneglycerol triricinoleate 35) and polysorbate 80 (Tween) 80; polyoxyethylene-sorbitan-20-monooleate) are widely used as drug formulation vehicles, including for the taxane anticancer agents paclitaxel and docetaxel. A wealth of recent experimental data has indicated that both solubilisers are biologically and pharmacologically active compounds, and their use as drug formulation vehicles has been implicated in clinically important adverse effects, including acute hypersensitivity reactions and peripheral neuropathy.CrEL and Tween 80 have also been demonstrated to influence the disposition of solubilised drugs that are administered intravenously. The overall resulting effect is a highly increased systemic drug exposure and a simultaneously decreased clearance, leading to alteration in the pharmacodynamic characteristics of the solubilised drug. Kinetic experiments revealed that this effect is primarily caused by reduced cellular uptake of the drug from large spherical micellar-like structures with a highly hydrophobic interior, which act as the principal carrier of circulating drug. Within the central blood compartment, this results in a profound alteration of drug accumulation in erythrocytes, thereby reducing the free drug fraction available for cellular partitioning and influencing drug distribution as well as elimination routes. The existence of CrEL and Tween 80 in blood as large polar micelles has also raised additional complexities in the case of combination chemotherapy regimens with taxanes, such that the disposition of several coadministered drugs, including anthracyclines and epipodophyllotoxins, is significantly altered. In contrast to the enhancing effects of Tween 80, addition of CrEL to the formulation of oral drug preparations seems to result in significantly diminished drug uptake and reduced circulating concentrations. The drawbacks presented by the presence of CrEL or Tween 80 in drug formulations have instigated extensive research to develop alternative delivery forms. Currently, several strategies are in progress to develop Tween 80- and CrEL-free formulations of docetaxel and paclitaxel, which are based on pharmaceutical (e.g. albumin nanoparticles, emulsions and liposomes), chemical (e.g. polyglutamates, analogues and prodrugs), or biological (e.g. oral drug administration) strategies. These continued investigations should eventually lead to more rational and selective chemotherapeutic treatment.

Distribution of paclitaxel in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid

Our objective was to assess the distribution of paclitaxel in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a cancer patient, and evaluate the role of the formulation vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) in drug distribution. Analysis of paclitaxel concentrations in CSF was performed using a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometric assay with electrospray ionization. Total and unbound paclitaxel levels in plasma were measured by liquid chromatography and equilibrium dialysis, respectively, and CrEL concentrations were determined by a colorimetric dye-binding microassay. Clinical samples were obtained from a 54-year-old female with breast cancer receiving a weekly regimen of paclitaxel (dose 60 mg/m2). The disposition of total paclitaxel in plasma was characterized by a bi-exponential elimination (terminal half-life 9.17 h) and a total clearance of 19.4 l/h/m2. The fraction of unbound paclitaxel in plasma ranged from 7.6 to 12.4% (unbound drug CL 176 l/h/m2). The plasma clearance of CrEL was 0.332 l/h/m2, whereas CrEL levels were undetectable in CSF (below 0.5 microl/ml). Concentrations of paclitaxel in CSF (range 45.5-162 pg/ml) and unbound CSF:unbound plasma concentration ratios (range 0.093-9.53%) progressively increased up to 24 h, with a mean unbound drug fraction in CSF of 84+/-3.6% (range 81-88%). These findings indicate that there is substantial distribution of paclitaxel to CSF. Since the fraction of unbound paclitaxel is different between plasma and CSF, measurement of unbound paclitaxel is required to accurately assess the extent of drug penetration.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling of unbound and total plasma concentrations of paclitaxel in cancer patients

The aim of this study was to validate and further develop a mechanism-based population pharmacokinetic model for paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ, USA) based on the knowledge of Cremophor EL (CrEL) micelle entrapment and to evaluate the exposure/toxicity relationships. Paclitaxel (total and unbound) and CrEL concentrations were obtained according to a sparse sampling scheme with on average only 3.5 samples per course from 45 patients with solid tumours who received 3-hour infusions of paclitaxel (final dose range 112-233 mg/m(2)). The present data were predicted well by the mechanism-based model. In addition, bilirubin and body size were found to be significant as covariates. A change in body surface area (BSA) of 0.1 m(2) typically caused a change in clearance (CL) of 22.3 l/h and an increase in bilirubin of 10 microM typically caused a decrease in CL of 41 l/h. Toxicity was best described by a threshold model. In conclusion, even with a sparse sampling scheme, the same mechanism-based binding components as in the previously developed model could be identified. Once the CrEL and total paclitaxel plasma concentrations are known, the unbound concentrations, which are more closely related to the haematological toxicity, can be predicted.

Preclinical evaluation of alternative pharmaceutical delivery vehicles for paclitaxel

New solubilizers, including Sorporol 230, Sorporol 120Ex, Aceporol 345-T, Aceporol 460 and Riciporol 335, as potential new delivery vehicles for paclitaxel were investigated, since recent studies have shown that the paclitaxel delivery vehicle Cremophor EL significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. Cremophor EL and Tween 80 were used as a reference. As in the case of Cremophor EL, alteration of blood distribution of paclitaxel occurred in the presence of all tested vehicles. Also, no differences in the affinity of paclitaxel for the tested solubilizers was found during equilibrium dialysis experiments. The different vehicles could be distinguished by a different rate of esterase-mediated breakdown, which was correlated with the fatty acid content of the solubilizers. The activation of the complement cascade was less pronounced for all solubilizers, except Riciporol 335, compared to Cremophor EL. The strategies presented here provide the possibility to rapidly screen future candidate delivery vehicles with optimal characteristics for use as a solubilizer in clinical formulations of paclitaxel or other poorly water-soluble drugs.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of unbound paclitaxel during 1- and 3-hour infusions

PURPOSE

The paclitaxel vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) profoundly influences the cellular distribution of paclitaxel in human blood in vitro by a concentration-dependent decrease of the unbound drug fraction. Because CrEL clearance increases by extending the infusion duration from 3 to 24 hours, we hypothesized that exposure to unbound paclitaxel might also be schedule-dependent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CrEL and unbound paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were prospectively analyzed in 29 patients with advanced solid tumors treated with paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) given as a 1-hour (n = 15) or 3-hour (n = 14) intravenous infusion.

RESULTS

The systemic exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) to CrEL was significantly higher with the 1-hour as compared with the 3-hour schedule (80.2 +/- 24.2 v. 48.5 +/- 24.1 microL x h/mL; P =.002). In contrast, the AUC of unbound paclitaxel was substantially reduced after the 1-hour infusion (0.50 +/- 0.10 v. 0.62 +/- 0.12 micromol/L x h; P =.009). Similarly, clearance and volume of distribution were significantly dependent on infusion duration (P <.005). A trend was observed toward more severe hematologic toxicity with the 3-hour schedule (P =.053), consistent with increased exposure to unbound drug.

CONCLUSION

Overall, these findings explain, at least in part, previous observations that short-infusion schedules of paclitaxel lack significant myelotoxicity, whereas potentially CrEL-related side effects, including peripheral neuropathy, are augmented.

Modulation of cisplatin pharmacodynamics by Cremophor EL: experimental and clinical studies

The paclitaxel vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) has been shown to selectively inhibit the accumulation of cisplatin in peripheral blood leucocytes, but not in tumour cells in vitro, and we hypothesised that this phenomenon is responsible for the improvement of the therapeutic index of cisplatin observed in combination studies with paclitaxel. Here, we report on studies assessing the interaction between CrEL and cisplatin in a murine model, and involving the potential clinical applicability of CrEL as a protector for cisplatin-associated haematological side-effects. In mice, CrEL (0.17 ml/kg, intravenous (i.v.)) given in combination with cisplatin (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.)) did not change the pharmacokinetics of cisplatin. Cisplatin-induced haematological toxicity, expressed as white blood cells (WBC) at nadir, was significantly reduced by CrEL from 5.05+/-0.95 to 6.50+/-1.31 x 10(9)/l (P=0.0009). Data obtained from cancer patients treated with cisplatin (70 mg/m(2), 3-h i.v.) and topotecan (0.45 or 0.60 mg/m(2)/day x 2) preceded by CrEL (12 ml, 3-h i.v.) (n=6) or without CrEL (n=10) similarly indicated significant differences in the percent decrease in WBC between the groups (46.5+/-18.7 versus 67.2+/-15.0%; P=0.029). Likewise, the percent decrease in platelet count was significantly greater in the absence of CrEL (23.9+/-5.38 versus 73.3+/-15.5%; P=0.0003). Pharmacokinetic parameters of unbound and total cisplatin and of topotecan lactone and total drug were not significantly different from historic control values (P>or=0.245). Overall, this study provides further evidence on the important role of CrEL in the pharmacological and toxicological profile of cisplatin, and implies that reformulation of cisplatin with CrEL for systemic treatment might achieve an improvement of its therapeutic index, particularly in the setting of a weekly dose-dense concept.

Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic model for paclitaxel

PURPOSE

To create a model based on known mechanisms of paclitaxel distribution that could describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of total and unbound plasma concentrations, as well as blood concentrations. In addition, to investigate the relationship between exposure, based on unbound and total concentrations, and neutropenia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Paclitaxel and Cremophor EL (CrEL) concentrations were obtained from 23 female and three male patients (50 courses in total) with different cancer types that received paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ) (135 to 225 mg/m(2)) as 3- or 24-hour intravenous infusions. Seven of the patients received combination therapy with doxorubicin or cisplatin. The population PK model was built to fit three types of data simultaneously: unbound, total plasma, and blood concentrations. The area under the curve, threshold, and general models were used to relate neutrophil survival fraction from 19 patients (29 courses in total) to exposure based on unbound and total plasma concentration, respectively.

RESULTS

The PK model included a linear three-compartment model for unbound concentration, binding directly proportional to CrEL, linear and nonlinear binding to plasma proteins, and linear and nonlinear binding to blood cells. The threshold model best described the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship for total concentration. No distinction could be made between the models for unbound drug.

CONCLUSION

Earlier PK models for paclitaxel have been empirical. This study shows that a mechanistic model can be used to describe the nonlinear PK of paclitaxel. There is an indication that the PK/PD relationship is not the same for unbound and total plasma concentrations.

Cremophor EL: the drawbacks and advantages of vehicle selection for drug formulation

Cremophor EL (CrEL) is a formulation vehicle used for various poorly-water soluble drugs, including the anticancer agent paclitaxel (Taxol). In contrast to earlier reports, CrEL is not an inert vehicle, but exerts a range of biological effects, some of which have important clinical implications. Its use has been associated with severe anaphylactoid hypersensitivity reactions, hyperlipidaemia, abnormal lipoprotein patterns, aggregation of erythrocytes and peripheral neuropathy. The pharmacokinetic behaviour of CrEL is dose-independent, although its clearance is highly influenced by duration of the infusion. This is particularly important since CrEL can affect the disposition of various drugs by changing the unbound drug concentration through micellar encapsulation. In addition, it has been shown that CrEL, as an integral component of paclitaxel chemotherapy, modifies the toxicity profile of certain anticancer agents given concomitantly, by mechanisms other than kinetic interference. A clear understanding of the biological and pharmacological role of CrEL is essential to help oncologists avoid side-effects associated with the use of paclitaxel or other agents using this vehicle. With the present development of various new anticancer agents, it is recommended that alternative formulation approaches should be pursued to allow a better control of the toxicity of the treatment and the pharmacological interactions related to the use of CrEL.

Role of formulation vehicles in taxane pharmacology

The non-ionic surfactants Cremophor EL (CrEL) and Tween 80, both used as formulation vehicles of many (anticancer) agents including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are not physiological inert compounds. We describe their biological properties, especially the toxic side effects, and their pharmacological properties, such as modulation of P-glycoprotein activity. In detail, we discuss their influence on the disposition of the solubilized drugs, with focus on CrEL and paclitaxel, and of concomitantly administered drugs. The ability of the surfactants to form micelles in aqueous solution as well as biological fluids (e.g. plasma) appears to be of great importance with respect to the pharmacokinetic behavior of the formulated drugs. Due to drug entrapment in the micelles, plasma concentrations and clearance of free drug change significant leading to alteration in pharmacodynamic characteristics. We conclude with some perspectives related to further investigation and development of alternative methods of administration.

Inter-relationships of paclitaxel disposition, infusion duration and cremophor EL kinetics in cancer patients

Cremophor EL (CrEL) is a castor oil surfactant used as a vehicle for formulation of a variety of poorly water-soluble agents, including paclitaxel. Recently, we found that CrEL can influence the in vitro blood distribution of paclitaxel by reducing the free drug fraction, thereby altering drug accumulation in erythrocytes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical pharmacokinetics of CrEL, and to examine inter-relationships of paclitaxel disposition, infusion duration and CrEL kinetics. The CrEL plasma clearance, studied in 17 patients for a total of 28 courses, was time dependent and increased significantly with prolongation of the infusion duration from 1 to 3 to 24 h (p<0.03). An indirect response model, applied based on use of a Hill function for CrEL concentration-dependent alteration of in vivo blood distribution of paclitaxel, was used to fit experimental data of the 3 h infusion (r2=0.733; p=0.00001). Simulations for 1 and 24 h infusions using predicted parameters and CrEL kinetic data revealed that both short and prolonged administration schedules induce a low relative net change in paclitaxel blood distribution. Our pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model demonstrates that CrEL causes disproportional accumulation of paclitaxel in plasma in a 3 h schedule, but is unlikely to affect drug pharmacokinetics in this manner with alternative infusion durations.

Possible drug-associated pancreatitis after paclitaxel-cremophor administration

Paclitaxel, a relatively new antineoplastic agent, is associated with numerous side effects, including two reported cases of pancreatitis. Our patient also developed paclitaxel-associated pancreatitis. Several companion drugs, including steroids, diphenhydramine, histamine2 blockers, serotonin type 3 antagonists, and other chemotherapeutic agents administered with paclitaxel, must be considered as possible causes of pancreatitis. In addition, paclitaxel is a hydrophobic agent that requires a vehicle, cremophor (CrEL), for solubility. Intravenous cyclosporine also requires CrEL and has been associated with pancreatitis. In the cerulein-induced pancreatitis rat model, paclitaxel with dimethyl sulfoxide as a vehicle prevents pancreatitis, suggesting that another causal agent is responsible. Animal studies of CrEL as a single agent may be required to settle this question, but for now, awareness that paclitaxel may be associated with pancreatitis may lead to earlier treatment of this potentially fatal complication.