Identification of the third major genotype of hepatitis C virus in France

Genotyping of HCV RNA reveals that 3a is the most prevalent genotype in mardan, pakistan

The clinical outcomes of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) range from acute resolving hepatitis to chronic liver diseases such as liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Identification of the infecting virus genotype is indispensable for the exploration of many aspects of HCV infection, including epidemiology, pathogenesis, and response to antiviral therapy. 1419 individuals were screened for anti-HCV in this study, of which 166 (11.7%) were found reactive by ICT (Immunochromatographic test). These 166 anti-HCV positive and 26 normal individuals were further analyzed. RNA was extracted from serum and reverse-transcribed to cDNA and the core region of HCV genome was targeted and amplified by multiplex PCR. HCV RNA was detected in 121 individuals, of which 87 were male and 34 were female. Genotype 3a was the most prevalent among all the genotypes observed followed by 3b. Genotypes 1a, 2a, and 2b were found in 10.89%, 13.22%, and 6.61% patients, respectively. 25.41% of the HCV RNA positive samples were not typed. 6.05% of patients were found having mixed genotypes. These findings will not only help the physicians to prescribe more appropriate treatment for the HCV infection but will also draw the attention of health-related policy makers to devise strategies to curb the disease more effectively.

Hepatitis Viruses, Alcohol, and Tobacco in the Etiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Italy

Mortality rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are high in Italy compared with other Western countries. To elucidate further the role of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcohol drinking, and tobacco smoking in the etiology of HCC, we carried out a hospital-based case-control study in two areas of Italy: the province of Pordenone in the Northeast and the town of Naples in the South. A total of 229 HCC cases (median age, 66 years) and 431 controls (median age, 65 years) answered a questionnaire and provided blood samples between 1999 and 2002. Odds ratios (OR), percent attributable risks, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were computed using unconditional multiple logistic regression. ORs for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive versus HBsAg negative and for anti-HCV antibody positive versus anti-HCV antibody negative were 20.2 and 15.6, respectively. Positivity for both markers was associated with an OR of 51.6. Sensitive molecular techniques applied to sera in a subset of HCC cases disclosed a very small number of occult hepatites. Maximal lifetime alcohol intake of > or =35 versus <7 drinks/wk was associated with an HBV/HCV adjusted OR of 5.9. Tobacco smoking was unrelated to HCC risk overall but seemed to enhance HCC risk among virus carriers. Overall, 61% of HCC were attributable to HCV, 13% to HBV, and 18% to heavy alcohol drinking. In conclusion, our study confirms the importance of HCV in HCC etiology in Italy where the widespread dissemination of the virus dates back four or five decades.

Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis C and their clinical implications

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis C and their clinical implications

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

High incidence of hepatitis B infections among chronic hepatitis cases of unknown aetiology

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In approximately 5% of chronic liver disease cases, no aetiology can be identified. We selected sera from 50 patients with chronic hepatitis of unknown aetiology who were enrolled in this follow-up study whose aim is to gain insight into the possible role of viruses and to define potential clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Patients' sera were screened with highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction assays for hepatitis B (HBV), C, D, and G viruses and TT virus. Sera were also retested for antibodies against the core antigen of HBV.

RESULTS

Surprisingly, HBV DNA was detected in both serum and liver in 15/50 (30%) patients. Immunostaining for HBV antigens on biopsies from patients positive for HBV DNA showed HBcAg and/or HBsAg expression at low levels in 9/15 samples. Eleven of the fifteen patients were anti-HBc positive. With one exception, all patients carried HBV genomes at low levels (10(4) copies/ml or less). Histological signs of chronic liver disease were observed in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Unrecognised HBV infections may account for a high proportion of chronic hepatitis cases of unknown aetiology. Improved HBV detection tests, which appear mandatory for the diagnosis and management of non-A non-E hepatitis as well as for improved safety of transfusions and transplantations are needed.

Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus genotypes

On the basis of phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences, multiple genotypes and subtypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been identified. Characterization of these genetic groups is likely to facilitate and contribute to the development of an effective vaccine against infection with HCV. Differences among HCV genotypes in geographic distributions have provided investigators with an epidemiologic marker that can be used to trace the source of HCV infection in a given population. HCV genotype 1 may represent a more aggressive strain and one that is less likely to respond to interferon treatment than HCV genotype 2 or 3. However, these observations require confirmation before HCV genotyping can be used in clinical settings.

Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus genotypes

On the basis of phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences, multiple genotypes and subtypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been identified. Characterization of these genetic groups is likely to facilitate and contribute to the development of an effective vaccine against infection with HCV. Differences among HCV genotypes in geographic distributions have provided investigators with an epidemiologic marker that can be used to trace the source of HCV infection in a given population. HCV genotype 1 may represent a more aggressive strain and one that is less likely to respond to interferon treatment than HCV genotype 2 or 3. However, these observations require confirmation before HCV genotyping can be used in clinical settings.

Single-step nested polymerase chain reaction for detection of different genotypes of hepatitis C virus

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) exhibits considerable sequence variability and circulates in the blood at extremely low levels. Current methods for detecting HCV RNA are based mostly on nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), in which part of the first amplification product is reamplified in the second tube by an internal primer pair. A novel nested PCR method was developed in which the two successive amplification processes are carried out in the same tube with a single step of physical manipulation. Careful selection of highly conserved sequences of the 5' noncoding region as primers enabled successful detection of all three major genotypes circulating in France, including the one with variation in this region. Retaining high sensitivity of the conventional nested PCR, the novel method reduced greatly the risk of carry-over contaminations. It was also cost- and time-saving. The one-step nested PCR method is especially suitable for routine diagnosis of HCV infection in clinical laboratories.