Cisplatin (P), bleomycin (B), and methotrexate (M) preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced vulvar carcinoma

Pelvic exenteration for vulvar cancer: Postoperative morbidity and oncologic outcome - A single center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Pelvic exenteration may be the only curative treatment for some patients with primary advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer but is associated with high morbidity. This study evaluated the clinical outcome of patients treated at a centralized service in Norway.

METHODOLOGY

This retrospective study included patients treated with pelvic exenteration for primary locally advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer between 1996 and 2019 at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Complications were coded according to the contracted Accordion classification. Relapse free survival (RFS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

The 30 patients were followed for a median of 4.94 years (95%CI: 3.37-NR). Exenteration due to primary vulvar cancer was carried out in 16 (53%) patients, 14 (47%) had recurrent vulvar cancer. Free histopathological margins were achieved in 28 (93%) patients. The 90 days morbidity for grade 3 complications was 63%, predominantly wound/surgical flap infections, 7% had no complications. 90 days mortality was 3%. Five-year RFS was 26% (95% CI 8-48%), OS was 50% (95%CI: 29-69%) and CSS was 64% (95% CI 43-79%). There was no significant difference in survival between patients with primary vs recurrent disease. The 3-year CSS for patients with negative lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes was 70% (95% CI 47-84%) and 30% (95% CI 1-72%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable oncologic outcomes after pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent vulvar cancer can be achieved if surgery is centralized. Careful patient selection is imperative due to significant postoperative morbidity and considerable risk of relapse.

An update on current pharmacotherapy for vulvar cancer

INTRODUCTION

Limited data on the role of pharmacotherapy for patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic vulvar cancer are available.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to provide an overview of the current treatment options for patients with vulvar cancer. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to review the current evidence as well as future perspectives on the role of pharmacotherapy in patients with vulvar carcinoma.

EXPERT OPINION

There has been no consensus on the pharmacotherapy for patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic vulvar cancer. Concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation is the most widely used treatment modality for primary treatment or for neoadjuvant settings. Chemotherapy in metastatic disease is considered a palliative treatment. Anti-EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors seem to show promising anti-tumor activity in patients harboring EGFR alteration. Similarly, growing evidence supports the adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors in both neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. Molecular and genomic profiling is advocated to identify target mutations. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR and HER/ErbB pathways might represent two intriguing treatment options. Treatments directed against HPV are discussed as well. Further evidence is warranted to identify the best treatment modalities for patients with locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease.

Role of Chemotherapy in Vulvar Cancers: Time to Rethink Standard of Care?

Simple Summary

Vulvar cancer is a difficult clinical condition to treat. Although it is not one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers, its incidence is not negligible. Treatment depends on the extent of the disease and is currently based on surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The combination of these possible treatments, in the context of multidisciplinary discussions, is crucial. In this paper we present a review of the data available in the literature on the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of vulvar cancer, with a look at future perspectives.

Abstract

The actual role of chemotherapy in vulvar cancer is undeniably a niche topic. The low incidence of the disease limits the feasibility of randomized trials. Decision making is thus oriented by clinical and pathological features, whose relevance is generally weighted against evidence from observational studies and clinical practice. The therapeutic management of vulvar cancer is increasingly codified and refined at an individual patient level. It is of note that the attitude towards evidence sharing and discussion within a multidisciplinary frame is progressively consolidating. Viable options included in the therapeutic armamentarium available for vulvar cancer patients are frequently an adaption from standards used for cervical or anal carcinoma. Chemotherapy is more frequently combined with radiotherapy as neo-/adjuvant or definitive treatment. Drugs commonly used are platinum derivative, 5-fluorouracil and mitomicin C, mostly in combination with radiotherapy for radiosensitization. Exclusive chemotherapy in the neo-/adjuvant setting comprises platinum-derivative, combined with bleomicin and methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, ifosfamide or taxanes. In advanced disease, current regimens include cisplatin-based chemoradiation, with or without 5-fluorouracil, or doublets with platinum in combination with a taxane. Our work is also enriched by a concise excursus on the biologic pathways underlying vulvar cancer. Introductory hints are also provided on targeted agents, a rapidly evolving research field.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in locally advanced vulvar carcinoma: a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare malignancy that affects elderly women. About one-third of vulvar cancers are diagnosed in an advanced stage, requiring extensive surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been introduced to reduce local tumor burden. In this retrospective study, we analyze the efficacy and toxicity of NACT followed by radical surgery.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer (LAVC) treated at our institution with neoadjuvant platinum and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy ± ifosfamide followed by surgery at our institution were retrospectively identified.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (93%) completed NACT with tolerable toxicities (G3-G4 toxicity: 30%). Thirteen patients (87%) underwent surgery. The overall clinical response rate on vulvar disease was 66% (20% complete response, 46% partial response), confirmed by histopathologic analysis, while on inguinal lymph nodes it was 69% (23% complete response, 46% partial response). At the pathologic examination, all patients had negative surgical margins. Three out of 9 patients (33%) with lesions infiltrating the urethral meatus and 4 patients out of 7 (57%) with anal involvement did not require urethral amputation or colostomy, respectively, after NACT. No severe postoperative complications were described. Overall survival at 5 years was 60%, and median overall survival was 76 months.

CONCLUSION

NACT followed by surgery in locally advanced vulvar cancer is well tolerated and allows surgical modulation.

Electrochemotherapy in Vulvar Cancer and Cisplatin Combined with Electroporation. Systematic Review and In Vitro Studies

Simple Summary

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is an emerging treatment for solid tumors and an attracting research field due to its clinical results. ECT in association with bleomycin is an effective and safe treatment option in the vulvar cancer palliative setting. With regard to cisplatin (CSP)-based ECT, considering the clear evidence on its efficacy in gynecological tumors, the possibility to improve local control with CSP-based ECT is intriguing and a well-designed randomized clinical trial should be addressed to this issue.

Abstract

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is an emerging treatment for solid tumors and an attractive research field due to its clinical results. This therapy represents an alternative local treatment to the standard ones and is based on the tumor-directed delivery of non-ablative electrical pulses to maximize the action of specific cytotoxic drugs such as cisplatin (CSP) and bleomycin (BLM) and to promote cancer cell death. Nowadays, ECT is mainly recommended as palliative treatment. However, it can be applied to a wide range of superficial cancers, having an impact in preventing or delaying tumor progression and therefore in improving quality of life. In addition, during the natural history of the tumor, early ECT may improve patient outcomes. Our group has extensive clinical and research experience on ECT in vulvar tumors in the palliative setting, with 70% overall response rate. So far, in most studies, ECT was based on BLM. However, the potential of CSP in this setting seems interesting due to some theoretical advantages. The purpose of this report is to: (i) compare the efficacy of CSP and BLM-based ECT through a systematic literature review; (ii) report the results of our studies on CSP-resistant squamous cell tumors cell lines and the possibility to overcome chemoresistance using ECT; (iii) discuss the future ECT role in gynecological tumors and in particular in vulvar carcinoma.

No. 370-Management of Squamous Cell Cancer of the Vulva

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews the clinical evaluation and management of squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the vulva with respect to diagnosis, primary surgical, radiation, or chemotherapy management and need for adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Other vulvar cancer pathologic diagnoses are not included in the guideline.

INTENDED USERS

The first part of this document which includes recommendations 1 through 3 is for general gynaecologists, obstetricians, family doctors, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, residents, and health care providers with a focus on the presentation, diagnosis, and updated information about surgical procedures performed by subspecialists. The surgical management and treatment of advanced vulvar cancer are intended for gynaecologic oncologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists who treat these complex patients. This guideline is intended to provide information for interested parties who may follow these patients once treatment is complete.

TARGET POPULATION

Adult women (18 years and older) with SCC of the vulva. Excluded from these guidelines are women with preinvasive disease.

OPTIONS

Women diagnosed with SCC of the vulva should be referred to a gynaecologic oncologist for initial evaluation, consideration for primary surgery and inguinal lymph node assessment, and potentially adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy. All cases of vulvar cancer should have access to discussion at a multidisciplinary cancer case conference. Women who would otherwise require radical surgery such as abdominal-perineal resection or exenterative procedures may be considered for primary treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy.

EVIDENCE

For this guideline, relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Systematic Reviews using the following terms, either alone or in combination, with the search limited to English language materials: vulva, vulvar cancer, inguinofemoral lymph node dissection, sentinel nodes, systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, neoadjuvant, adjuvant, primary, exenteration, survival, follow up. The initial search was performed in September 2016 with a final literature search in May 2017. Relevant evidence was selected for inclusion in the following order: meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, observational studies, non-systematic reviews, case series, and reports. Additional significant articles were identified through cross-referencing the identified reviews. The total number of studies identified was 286, and 78 studies were included in this review.

VALIDATION METHODS

The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors. The Executive and Board of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada reviewed the content and submitted comments for consideration, and the Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework (Table 1). The interpretation of strong and weak recommendations is described in Table 2. The Summary of Findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

These guidelines are to encourage physicians in the appropriate use of sentinel inguinal lymph node assessment for SCC of the vulva. The committee also promotes the centralization of treatment of vulvar cancer in specialized treatment centres.

GUIDELINE UPDATE

Evidence will be reviewed 5 years after publication to decide whether all or part of the guideline should be updated. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations.

SPONSORS

This guideline was developed with resources funded by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) vulval cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice

The purpose of this guideline is to collate evidence and propose evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult patients with vulva carcinoma treated in the UK. Malignant melanoma may present via similar routes and will be discussed. The reader is referred to the Ano-uro-genital Mucosal Melanoma Full Guideline [1] for more detailed recommendations. The management of vulval sarcoma is outside of the scope of this guideline. For further information, including details of guideline development and GRADE of recommendations, please see BGCS website for details (https://www.bgcs.org.uk/professionals/guidelines-for-recent-publications/).

Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: A challenging question for gynecologic oncologists

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare female malignancy, with an incidence increasing with age. Unfortunately, one third of the patients are diagnosed with locally advanced disease, which constitutes a clinical challenge for the clinicians who treat these patients. The main challenges are represented by: 1. The primary site of the disease, which can be proximal to anatomical structures like the anal canal posteriorly, or the urethra and the bladder anteriorly, that in some circumstances cannot be spared without a bowel and/or urinary stoma; 2. The locoregional nodes that can be involved by the tumor, and they can be bulky, fixed or ulcerated; 3. The clinical condition of the patient, who may carry several comorbidities. Treatment modalities include radiation with or without chemotherapy, and surgery. In order to preserve the bowel and the urinary function without a permanent stoma, a personalized management with a multimodality approach is warranted. In this systematic review, we first clarify the different definitions of "locally advanced vulvar carcinoma". Secondly, we evaluated the different treatment modalities described in the literature, and the impact of the different treatment strategies on prognosis and on preservation of bowel/urinary function. Finally, we offer a possible algorithm that may help the clinicians in treating patients with these uncommon and challenging situations with a multidisciplinary approach.

Cerebral metastasis in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Distant metastases from squamous cell cancer of the vulva (VSCC) are encountered rarely and are associated with a poor prognosis. Cerebral metastases have only been described anecdotally.

CASE HISTORY

A 51-year old woman was diagnosed with hepatic metastases due to VSCC. Initial therapy comprised wide local excision of the primary tumor with inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy (LAE) followed by stereotactic radiation of the singular hepatic metastasis while adjuvant chemoradiation of the vulva and lymphatics was declined. 3 years later, she subsequently developed lung and cerebral metastases.

CONCLUSION

The course of metastatic disease in VSCC is poorly understood. Further knowledge of the metastatic patterns in vulvar cancer is required for guidance of future therapeutic interventions.

Clinical analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced vulvar cancer: A STROBE-compliant article

To investigate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced vulvar cancer and to provide references for clinical treatment.Clinical and pathological data of 12 patients with advanced vulvar carcinoma were collected. The response and operability rates, adverse effects, and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed.The mean patient age was 45.8 (range 26-69) years. Among 12 patients, 9 underwent treatment with bleomycin and cisplatin with or without vincristine. The overall response rate was 67%. Five patients (56%) experienced grade 1 or 2 bone marrow suppression or gastrointestinal reactions. Seven patients (78%) underwent radical surgery. The mean overall survival time was 34.1 (range 3-69) months, the mean progression free survival time was 26 (range 3-69) months, and the 1-year survival rate was 83%. The other 3 patients received combined paclitaxel and cisplatin treatment. The overall response rate was 67%. All 3 patients (100%) experienced grade 2 hair loss or anemia and 2 of them (67%) underwent radical vulvectomy. The mean overall survival time was 11.7 (range 5-15) months, the mean progression free survival time was 7.7 (range 3-15) months and the 1-year survival rate was 100%. Time to overall survival and progression free survival were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .46 and P = .39).Owing to their high overall response rate and tolerable adverse effects, either bleomycin-cisplatin-based or paclitaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen can be considered a therapeutic option for advanced vulvar cancer.

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines 2015 for the treatment of vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer

BACKGROUND

Vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer are relatively rare tumors, and there had been no established treatment principles or guidelines to treat these rare tumors in Japan. The first version of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guidelines for the treatment of vulvar cancer and vaginal cancer was published in 2015 in Japanese.

OBJECTIVE

The JSGO committee decided to publish the English version of the JSGO guidelines worldwide, and hope it will be a useful guide to physicians in a similar situation as in Japan.

METHODS

The guideline was created according to the basic principles in creating the guidelines of JSGO.

RESULTS

The guidelines consist of five chapters and five algorithms. Prior to the first chapter, basic items are described including staging classification and history, classification of histology, and definition of the methods of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy to give the reader a better understanding of the contents of the guidelines for these rare tumors. The first chapter gives an overview of the guidelines, including the basic policy of the guidelines. The second chapter discusses vulvar cancer, the third chapter discusses vaginal cancer, and the fourth chapter discusses vulvar Paget's disease and malignant melanoma. Each chapter includes clinical questions, recommendations, backgrounds, objectives, explanations, and references. The fifth chapter provides supplemental data for the drugs that are mentioned in the explanation of clinical questions.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the objective of these guidelines is to clearly delineate the standard of care for vulvar and vaginal cancer with the goal of ensuring a high standard of care for all women diagnosed with these rare diseases.

Locally advanced vulva cancer: A single centre review of anovulvectomy and a systematic review of surgical, chemotherapy and radiotherapy alternatives. Is an international collaborative RCT destined for the "too difficult to do" box?

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of locally advanced vulva cancer (LAVC) remains challenging. Due to the lack of randomised trials many questions regarding the indications for different treatment options and their efficacy remain unanswered.

METHODS

In this retrospective study we provide the largest published series of LAVC patients treated with anovulvectomy, reporting oncological outcomes and morbidity. Additionally, a systematic literature review was performed for all treatment options 1946-2015.

RESULTS

In our case series, 57/70 (81%) patients were treated in the primary setting with anovulvectomy and 13 patients underwent anovulvectomy for recurrent disease. The median overall survival (OS) was 69months (1-336) with disease specific survival of 159months (1-336). Following anovulvectomy for primary disease, time to progression and OS were significantly higher in node negative disease (10 vs. 96months; 19 vs. 121months, p<0.0001). Post-surgical complications were observed in 36 (51.4%), the majority of which were Grade I/II infections. There was one peri-operative death. Review of the literature showed that chemotherapy, radiotherapy or combination treatments are alternatives to surgery. Evidence relating to all of these consisted mostly of small retrospective series, which varied considerably in terms of patient characteristics and treatment schedules. Significant patient and treatment heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis with significant biases in these studies. It was unclear if survival or morbidity was better in any one group with a lack of data reporting complications, quality of life, and long term follow-up. However, results for chemoradiation are encouraging enough to warrant further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains inadequate evidence to identify an optimal treatment for LAVC. However, there is sufficient evidence to support a trial of anovulvectomy versus chemoradiation. Discussions and consensus would be needed to determine trial criteria including the primary outcome measure. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone may be best reserved for the palliative setting or metastatic disease.

Treatment of Inoperable Vulvar Cancer: Where We Come From and Where Are We Going

Abstract

Vulvar cancer is a rare disease affecting elderly women that is commonly treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. When tumors compromise the urethra and the anus, or when it is in the groin lymph nodes, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or both are necessary after surgery.

The treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer has suffered significant changes though the recent decades. So far, the best sequence of treatment is not known: surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. The radical surgeries usually need a long recovery term both in the region of the vulva and in the area of the groin lymph nodes. When it is performed, convalescence can delay other treatments, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. On the other hand, the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy as a first step treatment can result in a complete elimination of the disease in at least 30% of the cases or substantial reduction of its size, allowing less extensive surgery. Therefore, the historical evolution of locally advanced vulvar cancer is reviewed.

"Unresectable" vulval cancers: is neoadjuvant chemotherapy the way forward?

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is an uncommon gynaecological malignancy, but the incidence is increasing. A significant proportion of patients present with locally advanced disease, and management can prove challenging because of the size and/or location of the tumour. Surgery forms the mainstay of treatment, but the role of neoadjuvant therapy in minimizing morbidity is under investigation. Although chemotherapy alone has been largely neglected in favour of chemoradiotherapy, concerns about the toxicity of trimodality therapy and suboptimal results, particularly in node-positive patients, have led to renewed interest in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). A review of the available literature illustrates that NACT can produce dramatic responses, but operability rates and overall survival differ widely. The effect is dependent on as yet unidentified factors, although we speculate that age and tumour biology are important. Further work is required to delineate the optimal NACT regimen and the patient population(s) most likely to benefit from this practice.

Therapy for Primary Vulvar Carcinoma

The rather rare vulvar cancer is almost always a squamous cell carcinoma that mostly develops from an underlying VIN or HPV infection. In addition, lichen sclerosus et atrophicans, immune deficiency, nicotine abuse or anogenital intraepithelial neoplasias may play a role in the pathogenesis. Surgical therapy aims at an R0 resection in the sense of a complete vulvectomy or a radical local excision with, if necessary, plastic reconstruction. Also, the vulvar field resection with consideration of the compartment model has been discussed. Besides the classic inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, in selected cases of vulvar cancer sentinel biopsies are performed by experienced surgeons in the larger centres. In contrast, systemic therapy plays only a subordinate role; in isolated cases down-staging by means of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be useful. However, there is at present no indication for adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is also not to be recommended on account of its unfavourable ratio of efficacy to side effects. On the other hand adjuvant radiotherapy is indicated in cases of positive inguinal lymph nodes. According to the current data the indication should be made generously in such cases.

Role of paclitaxel and cisplatin as the neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

Objective

The therapeutic outcomes of patients with advanced vulvar cancer are poor. Multi-modality treatments including concurrent chemoradiation or different regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and surgery have been explored to reduce the extent of surgery and morbidity. The present single-institution trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and cisplatin in locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Methods

From 2002 to 2009, 10 patients with stage III-IV locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were prospectively treated with 3 courses of paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin or paclitaxel-cisplatin. Nine of them subsequently underwent radical local excision or radical partial vulvectomy and bilateral inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy.

Results

The clinical response rate of all enrolled patients was 80%, whereas the pathological responses included 1 case with complete remission, 2 with persistent carcinoma in situ, and 6 invasive cancer cases with tumor shrinkage of more than 50%. Four patients had positive nodes. Forty percent of patients experienced grade 3-4 bone marrow toxicity, which was successfully managed with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, even in cases of elderly patients. Median progression-free survival after surgery was 14 months (range, 5 to 44 months). Six of the 7 recurrent cases were local, and 3 of them were treated with salvage surgery while the other 3 received radiation with or without chemotherapy. After a median follow-up period of 40 months (range, 5 to 112 months), 55.5% of patients remained alive with no evidence of disease, including 2 long-term survivors after recurrence at 5 and 9 years.

Conclusion

Based on the high response rate and manageable toxicity, NACT with paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without ifosfamide followed by surgery could be considered as a therapeutic option for locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Chemotherapy of vulvar cancer: a review

Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva is a rare disease with good prognosis if diagnosed early. The standard primary therapy is surgery. Neoadjuvant radiation or chemotherapy has been used to achieve resectability of the tumor and to decrease the radicality of the surgery. Chemotherapy with platinum compounds, paclitaxel and targeted therapy (erlotinib) has shown activity. International collaborative trials are needed to identify the best therapeutic strategy for patients with squamous cell cancer of the vulva who are not candidates for primary surgery or concomitant chemoradiation. We review the various treatment options available to patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the vulva.

Tailoring the Treatment of Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery

Objective

To determine the feasibility of performing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCH) followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

Methods

Prospective and multicenter trial. Thirty-five patients with a diagnosis of previously untreated locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were given 4 schemes of cisplatin-based NCH and 1 NCH regimen with single bleomycin. Then, they underwent radical surgery of the vulva if clinical response was 50% or more. Age, NCH schemes used, toxicity, response to treatment, type of radical surgery performed, and clinical outcome were evaluated.

Results

Thirty-three patients completed the proposed schemes, and 30 were assessed for radical surgery. Finally, 27 patients underwent radical surgery (radical vulvectomy or radical local excision plus bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy). In 2 cases of persistent rectal involvement, posterior pelvic exenteration was performed. Moreover, 24 of 27 patients remain with no evidence of disease to date. Toxicity was acceptable. Median age was 62 years (range, 54–72 years). Median follow-up was 49 months (range, 4–155 months).

Conclusions

The use of NCH in selected groups may increase surgical feasibility in initially inoperable patients, thus favoring organ preservation and less extensive resections. Adverse reactions were acceptable, and vulvoperineal deleterious effects that may occur after radiotherapy were consequently avoided.

Weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin in the treatment of locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic vulvar cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.

METHOD

A prospective, single-arm, single-center pilot study was initiated to study response rate of 9 weekly courses of paclitaxel (60 mg/m) and carboplatin (area under the curve, 2.7). We used this regimen in the neoadjuvant or metastatic setting when surgery would cause serious morbidity or was not an option owing to distant metastases. Primary outcome was response rate, measured according to Response Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Treatment toxicity, surgical morbidity, and type of surgery were also evaluated.

RESULTS

We treated 6 patients in the period between May 2009 and May 2011, of which 4 patients had a diagnosis of locally advanced disease and 2 patients had a diagnosis of recurrent disease. A median number of 7.5 cycles of paclitaxel/carboplatin weekly was administered (range, 3-9). No objective response was observed. Paclitaxel/carboplatin weekly was discontinued after a mean of 4.3 weekly cycles in 3 patients owing to local disease progression. After a median follow-up of 4.2 months (range, 1-29 months), 3 patients died owing to progressive disease and 1 patient died owing to intercurrent disease. The 2 remaining patients underwent radical vulvectomy + bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The main chemotherapy-related toxicity was anemia and could be managed conservatively with erythropoietin and intravenous iron therapy.

CONCLUSION

Weekly administration of paclitaxel-carboplatin has limited clinical benefit in the treatment of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.

Chemoradiation for advanced primary vulval cancer

BACKGROUND

Vulval cancer is a rare gynaecological cancer. There is no standard approach for treating locally advanced primary vulval cancer (FIGO stage III and IV). Combined treatment modalities have been developed using radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery. The advantages and disadvantages of such treatment is not well evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant and primary chemoradiation for women with locally advanced primary vulval cancer compared to other primary modalities of treatment such as primary surgery or primary radiation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3), Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE (to July 2009). We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or non-randomised studies that included multivariate analyses of chemoradiation in women with locally advanced, primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. An adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was calculated for one non-randomised study and risk ratios (RRs) were used in an RCT to compare five-year death rates and adverse events in women who received neoadjuvant, primary chemoradiation or primary surgery. Adverse events were also reported more extensively in a further non-randomised study. All results were displayed in single study analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

One RCT and two non-randomised studies that allowed for multivariate analyses met the inclusion criteria and included a total of 141 women.One RCT found that neoadjuvant chemoradiation did not appear to offer longer survival compared to primary surgery in advanced vulval tumours (RR = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.91). There was also no statistically significant difference in survival between primary chemoradiation and primary surgery in a study that included 63 women (pooled adjusted HR= 1.09, 95% CI 0.37 to 3.17) and in another study that only included 12 eligible women and compared the same interventions (HR was non-informative when statistical adjustment was made).Adverse events were extensively reported in only one study, which found no statistically significant difference in risk of adverse events between primary chemoradiation and primary surgery due to the very small numbers in each group. In the RCT there was no observed statistically significant difference between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and primary surgery. Adverse events were not reported in the largest study of 63 women. Quality of life (QoL) was not reported in any of the included studies. All studies were at high risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Women with advanced vulval tumours showed no significant difference in overall survival or treatment-related adverse events when chemoradiation (primary or neoadjuvant) was compared with primary surgery.The retrospective studies had a high risk of bias as the entry criteria for primary chemoradiation was based on inoperability or tumour requiring exenteration.The radiochemotherapy regimens varied widely. There was no data on QoL.There is no standard terminology for 'operable and inoperable vulval cancer', and for 'primary and neoadjuvant chemoradiation'. Stratification according to unresectability of the primary tumour and/or lymph nodes is needed, for good quality comparison.

Phase II study on paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, metastatic or locally advanced vulvar cancer not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy: a study of the EORTC-GCG (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Gynaecological Cancer Group)

BACKGROUND

No standard treatment options are available for patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic vulvar carcinoma not amenable for locoregional treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase II study, patients with advanced vulvar cancer received paclitaxel (Taxol) every 3 weeks for up to 10 cycles. Primary objective was response rate. Secondary objectives were response duration and toxicity. Response evaluation was assessed by World Health Organisation criteria, toxicity according to Common Toxicity Criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-one women from 10 institutions were included, with a median age of 64 (range 47-84), of which 29 were assessable for response. On study patients received a median of four cycles (range 1-10).

SAFETY

Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was seen in eight patients (8/29 = 27.6%), which in one patient resulted in neutropenic fever and treatment-related death. Further treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicity includes fatigue in three patients (10.3%) and neuropathy in one patient (3.4%).

EFFICACY

Overall response was 13.8% (n = 4; two complete responses + two partial responses). With a median follow-up of 24 months, median PFS was 2.6 months (95%confidence interval 2.04-4.21).

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel shows moderate activity for local control in advanced vulvar cancer.

Old and new perspectives in the management of high-risk, locally advanced or recurrent, and metastatic vulvar cancer

During the last decades there has been a continuing evolution in the surgical approach of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva that has been traditionally treated with radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy. Patients with T1 tumour are usually treated with radical local excision, if the lesion is unifocal and the remainder of the vulva is normal. Patients with T1a disease have no risk of groin metastases and do not need lymphadenectomy, whereas those with T1b disease need ipsilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy if the lesion is lateral, and bilateral lymphadenectomy if the lesion is midline. Modifications of the surgical technique of deep femoral lymphadenectomy and the mapping of sentinel node can offer new interesting therapeutic perspectives. Postoperative adjuvant pelvic and groin irradiation is warranted for patients with two or more or macroscopically involved groin nodes. Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva has been long surgically treated with en-block radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy plus partial resection of urethra, vagina or anum, or by exenteration, with severe postsurgical complications, poor quality of life, and unsatisfactory survival rates. 5-Fluorouracil [5-FU] or 5-FU- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent with irradiation followed by tailored surgery represents an attractive therapeutic option for advanced disease, planned to avoid such ultra-radical surgical procedures and, hopefully, to improve patient outcome. Chemotherapy has also been used in neoadjuvant setting, with contrasting and generally unsatisfactory results, and in palliative treatment of patients with distant metastases. Surgery is the primary treatment also for vulvar malignancies other than squamous cell carcinoma, whereas the clinical usefulness of adjuvant irradiation or chemotherapy is still to be defined. Primary chemoradiation can be also used for advanced carcinoma of the Bartholin gland or for advanced adenocarcinoma associated with extramammary Paget's disease. The drugs used for chemotherapy of metastatic melanomas or sarcomas of the vulva are the same employed for the melanomas or sarcomas developed in other sites.

Gynecological cancers in developing countries: the challenge of chemotherapy in low-resources setting

The epidemiologic pattern of cancers in developing countries differs in many aspects from that of industrialized nations. Cancer natural history, microbiologic environment, patient's immune system, and drug availability may differ as well. Four of five new cases of cervical cancer and most of cervical cancer deaths occur in developing countries. Where chemoradiation and supportive care facilities are unavailable, it would be logical to consider an inexpensive effective drug. In locally advanced cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery should be considered the treatment of choice. For ovarian cancer, it may be reasonable to maintain a secure supply of platinum and/or taxanes. For endometrial cancer, platinum compounds are proved active chemotherapic single agents. Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) may represent a good chance for treating an advanced or recurrent disease. For vulvar/vaginal cancer, the role of chemotherapy alone is currently considered limited, and it is mostly used as palliative treatment in advanced or recurrent cases. Whenever possible, standard western chemotherapic regimens should be applied in developing countries as well. When standard therapies are unavailable, drugs of choice should be easily accessible, inexpensive, and effective. The most commonly used drugs are cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and MPA.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in vulvar cancer: Avoiding primary exenteration

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy can be used to preserve the anal sphincter and/or urethra in patients with advanced vulvar cancer involving these sites.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with advanced vulvar cancer (1997-2003) involving the anal sphincter and/or urethra were given 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to attempt preservation of these pelvic structures rather than undergoing a primary pelvic exenteration. Following 3 cycles, a radical vulvectomy and groin lymph node dissection were planned. All patients had lesion size documented by measurement and photograph prior to and following chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age was 63 years (range 39-88). Thirteen patients received a median of 3 cycles (range 2-4) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ten patients received cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, while three received cisplatin alone. The median time from diagnosis to surgery was 77 days (range 54-143). All patients with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy underwent surgery except one patient who had a synchronous renal cell carcinoma and died prior to surgery. Patients receiving cisplatin alone showed no measurable response, while all patients receiving cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil demonstrated at least a partial response. Two patients had no residual invasive carcinoma on final pathology. All patients receiving cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by surgery are disease-free, while two of three receiving cisplatin have progressive disease. The anal sphincter and urethra were conserved in all patients receiving cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced vulvar cancer demonstrated a response rate of 100%. The anal sphincter and urethra were conserved in all patients receiving cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Responders are disease-free at this time. This response rate demonstrates superior activity of 5-fluorouracil in vulvar cancer and spares these patients the morbidity of exenteration or radiation.

Multidisciplinary approach to understand the pathogenesis of gastric cancer

Gastric carcinoma remains a common disease worldwide with a dismal prognosis. Therefore, it represents a very important health problem. It occurs with a high incidence in Asia and is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the world. Although the incidence and mortality of gastric carcinoma are decreasing in many countries, gastric cancer still represents the second most frequent malignancies in the world and the fourth in Europe. The 5-year survival rate of gastric carcinoma is low. The etiology and pathogenesis are not yet fully known. The study of gastric cancer is important in clinical medicine as well as in public health. Over the past 15 years, integrated research in molecular pathology has clarified the details of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities of cancer-related genes in the course of the development and progression of gastric cancer. Gastric cancer, as all cancers, is the end result of the interplay of many risk factors as well as protective factors. Although epidemiological evidence indicates that environmental factors play a major role in gastric carcinogenesis, the role of immunological, genetic, and immunogenetic factors are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of gastric carcinoma. Among the environmental factors, diet and Helicobacter pylori are more amenable to intervention aimed at the prevention of gastric cancer. The aim of the present paper is to review and include the most recent published evidence to demonstrate that only a multidisciplinary approach will lead to the advancement of the pathogenesis and prevention of gastric cancer. On the immunogenetic research it is clear that evidence is accumulating to suggest that a genetic profile favoring the proinflammatory response increases the risk of gastric carcinoma.

Single agent cisplatin chemotherapy in surgically resected vulvar cancer patients with multiple inguinal lymph node metastases

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate acute and long-term morbidity, recurrence rate, and overall survival in patients with multiple groin lymph node metastases treated with postoperative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients affected by FIGO stages III, IVA, and IVB (pelvic lymph nodes only) submitted to surgery were then treated with four cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) given 21 days apart. Toxicity, overall, and disease-free survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were evaluated. Median patients age was 58 (range 48-82). Median performance status was 0 (0-2). All patients completed the treatment. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Only two patients suffered from grade 4 neutropenia during chemotherapy. Three patients suffered from long-term severe lymphedema. Four patients suffered a disease recurrence. Three of these patients were subjected to surgery with no severe postoperative complications. Two of the latter patients are still alive. At a median follow-up of 57.5 months (range 23-79 months) actuarial 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival are 86% and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients affected by vulvar cancer with multiple lymph node metastases, radical surgery followed by chemotherapy is a feasible strategy, with an acceptable short- and long-term complication rate. Results in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival are promising. Furthermore, due to absence of local long-term tissue toxicity, this strategy allows physicians to surgically treat regional lymph node recurrence safely.

Changes in the management of vulval cancer

Vulval carcinoma is relatively rare. The disease spreads from the vulva through embolization to the locoregional lymphatic station, the inguinofemoral nodes. Prior to this event cure can be achieved, but rarely predicted with certainty. This chapter reviews current therapeutic knowledge and recognizes the increasing importance of individualization of a treatment plan. The adoption of these principles will hopefully evolve a pattern of care that leads to a decrease in morbidity for those women with early tumours and less morbid but more effective strategies for those with advanced disease.

Squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva: locally advanced disease

About 30-40% of vulvar cancers present with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) (clinical) stage III or IV disease. Although surgical staging was introduced by FIGO in 1988 and hard data on this system are still relatively few, a review of our own patients suggests that this percentage of patients with advanced stage vulvar cancer probably still holds. We have considered carcinoma of the vulva to be locally advanced when the primary or recurring tumour cannot be locally managed by a radical vulvar resection. Current approaches to the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer include ultraradical surgery, radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and a combination of treatment modalities. This chapter reviews the current approaches to the treatment of locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Supra-additive effect with concurrent paclitaxel and cisplatin in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in vitro

The effect of concurrent paclitaxel and cisplatin was tested in vitro in 5 vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines (UM-SCV-1A, -2, -4 and -7 and UT-SCV-3). Chemosensitivity was tested using the 96-well plate clonogenic assay. Paclitaxel concentrations used varied between 0.4 and 1.6 nM, and cisplatin concentrations varied between 0.1 and 0.9 microg/ml. These drug concentrations are clinically achievable. Survival data were fitted to the LQ model, and the area under the curve (AUC) value was obtained with numerical integration. The type of interaction was determined by comparing the AUC ratio of the 2 drugs with the survival fraction (SF) of paclitaxel alone. With all cell lines tested the growth-inhibitory effect of simultaneous paclitaxel and cisplatin was at least additive. The effect of the tested combination on the UM-SCV-1A and UT-SCV-3 cell lines was clearly supra-additive with all paclitaxel concentrations tested, and the UM-SCV-4 and UM-SCV-7 cell lines exhibited a supra-additive effect with increasing paclitaxel concentrations. The degree of supra-additivity was dose-dependent in the UM-SCV-7 cell line with increasing synergy at higher paclitaxel doses. In the current study the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin had a clear additive or supra-additive cytotoxic effect on the vulvar SCC cell lines, and it has been successfully used in other gynecologic malignancies; therefore concurrent paclitaxel and cisplatin also deserves further testing in clinical settings in advanced-stage vulvar carcinoma, which has a poor prognosis.

Bleomycin, methotrexate, and CCNU in locally advanced or recurrent, inoperable, squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group Study. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate tumor response rate and treatment toxicity of a modified combination chemotherapy consisting of bleomycin (B), methotrexate (M), and CCNU (C) for patients with locally advanced, squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva (not amenable to resection by standard radical vulvectomy) or recurrent disease (after incomplete resection). Tumor resectability was reassessed in patients who had responded to chemotherapy.

METHODS

The regimen consisted of bleomycin 5 mg intramuscular (im) days 1-5, CCNU 40 mg per os (po) days 5-7, and methotrexate 15 mg po days 1 and 4 during the first week. During weeks 2-6 the patient was administered bleomycin 5 mg im days 1 and 4, and methotrexate 15 mg po on day 1 of the week. This 6-week cycle was repeated at 49-day intervals.

RESULTS

Twenty-five eligible patients with a median age of 66 years (range, 39-82 years) were entered in this phase II trial. Twelve patients had primary locally advanced disease, 13 patients had a locoregional recurrence, and all received up to three BMC cycles. Two complete and twelve partial responses were observed (response rate, 56%; 95% confidence limits, 35-76%). The BMC regimen was associated with major hematological side effects and mild signs of bleomycin-related pulmonary toxicity. At a median follow-up of 8 months, 3 patients were alive, 18 had died due to malignant disease, 2 had died due to toxicity, and 2 had died due to intercurrent disease and unknown cause. The median progression-free survival was 4.8 months and the median survival was 7.8 months. The 1-year survival was 32% (95% confidence limits, 13-51%).

CONCLUSION

The present data confirm the therapeutic activity of the BMC regimen in locoregionally advanced or recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the vulva. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the overall response rate was 56%. BMC is an outpatient treatment that may play a role in the palliative therapy of advanced or recurrent vulva cancer.

Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women

A substantial proportion of all women dying from gynaecological malignancies are aged >75 years. Many reports have indicated that the survival of these patients is decreased compared with younger patients. Differences in biological behaviour, stage of the disease at presentation, and reluctance to undergo aggressive treatment with its associated morbidity are among the factors thought to be responsible for this difference in outcomes. However, investigations also indicate that elderly patients may receive less surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment without obvious clinical rationale. This overview is aimed at providing a guideline of chemotherapy appropriate for patients with epithelial ovarian, uterine (corpus and cervix), and vulvar cancer, aged 70 to 75 years and over. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of drug treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Patients aged between 70 and 75 years with a good performance status can be treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Carboplatin, either in combination or as a single-agent, may offer advantages in patients aged >75 years and in those with a poor performance status. For patients with early recurrence there is no standard treatment, but several cytostatic and hormonal agents can be used with palliative intent. Patients with a late recurrence are probably best retreated with a platinum-based regimen. In metastatic endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy is the first choice in tumours expressing a progesterone receptor. Poorly differentiated tumours infrequently respond to endocrine therapy. In this situation, and for patients with tumours that have become resistant to hormonal manipulation, platinum-based chemotherapy may be used. The use of carboplatin-based regimens seems preferable in elderly patients, particularly in those with a decreased performance status. The usefulness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with cervical cancer is limited. In case of recurrent or metastatic disease, the use of single agent (low-dose) cisplatin should be balanced against best supportive care. Although overall chemoradiation seems superior than radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, the feasibility of this approach in elderly patients needs further investigation. Chemoradiation might also be considered in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer. However, treatment-related morbidity can be considerable and randomised studies are lacking to prove a survival benefit. Our understanding of the tolerance and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients is still incomplete due to a paucity of trials that specifically focus on this subset of patients. However, there appears no argument to withhold chemotherapy based purely on age.

Perioperative management of the patient with cancer

There are a number of conditions that present commonly in patients with cancer that may have a significant effect on the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative treatment of these patients. These effects can be broadly categorized into anatomic and physiologic effects and may be examined as direct effects of the tumor or as effects of therapy administered for the tumors. Tumors that cause anatomic effects of importance to perioperative management include head and neck tumors with airway obstruction, mediastinal masses with respiratory compromise, pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, and superior vena cava syndrome. Some tumors that cause physiologic effects include pheochromocytomas and carcinoid tumors. Anatomic effects of tumor therapy are important after radiation therapy to the head and neck and after radiation therapy to the abdomen. Tumor therapy has important physiologic effects in such areas as the cardiopulmonary complications of chemotherapy, hematologic effects of chemotherapy, steroid administration, and wound healing. While the list of topics is not exhaustive, this is a useful framework for discussing the effects of tumors and their therapy on the cancer patient, especially in regard to perioperative management. Most importantly, these examples demonstrate the importance of close cooperation among surgeon, anesthesiologist, and referring physician to assure the conduct of surgical procedures on the patient with cancer with maximal safety.