Risk-specific follow-up for endometrial carcinoma patients

An overview of uterine cancer and its management

Endometrial cancer is increasingly common in affluent Western countries, largely owing to the growing obesity of those populations. There are two recognized types of endometrial cancer: Type I is more common and is associated with obese postmenopausal women and comprises approximately 80% of all endometrial cancers; Type II describes a woman who is often younger and thinner with a more aggressive histologic type that is nonestrogen dependent, of either serous or clear cell histology, and consists of a more aggressive clinical course and results in poorer prognosis. As the majority of patients with endometrial cancer present with symptoms and have early disease, screening is unlikely to be cost effective or reduce the mortality rate. However, surveillance of high-risk populations is a different proposition. Patients who may benefit from routine surveillance include those with a family history of endometrial cancer, a history of hormone replacement therapy with less than 12-14 days of progestogens, long-term use of tamoxifen, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family syndrome, Cowden's syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, a history of breast cancer and obesity. Most patients with endometrial cancer are offered surgery as first-line therapy. The standard surgical procedure should be an extrafascial total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Adnexal removal is also recommended, even if the adnexa appear normal, as they may contain micrometastases. The safety of a laparoscopic approach in the surgical management of uterine cancer has not yet been demonstrated in prospective randomized trials, therefore, the field awaits the Gynaecologic Oncology Group's prospective Lap-2 study. While post-treatment follow-up guidelines vary between institutions and countries, in general, patients at high risk of recurrence are followed closely every 3-4 months for the first year or two, then every 6 months to complete 5 years of follow-up.

Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications

PURPOSE

Since 2009 the new FIGO Staging System of endometrial cancer, which changed the previous FIGO 1988 Staging System, has been in use. The aim of the study was to compare prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer at stage IB of the 2009 FIGO Staging System and of the 1988 FIGO Staging System.

METHODS

We analyzed 173 patients: 108 patients (group A) at stage IB in FIGO 1988 Staging System, and 68 patients (group B) at stage IB in FIGO 2009 Staging System from 262 consecutive endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

The DFS rate was 96.3 % in group A and it was 87.7 % in group B (p = 0.029). Relapses were observed in 12 patients (6.4 %) from 6 to 57 months (mean 28.1; SD = 14.6) after initial surgery, and occurred in four patients from group A (3.7 %) and eight patients from group B (12.3 %) (p = 0.032). The OS rate was 94.4 % in group A and it was 83.1 % in group B (p = 0.018). During follow-up, 17 patients (9.8 %) died: six patients from group A (5.6 %), and 11 patients from group B (16.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Stage IB in FIGO 2009 Staging System is associated with worse prognosis compared to stage IB according to FIGO 1988 classification. There seems to be a need to use exclusively the new FIGO 2009 classification worldwide to avoid therapeutic mistakes, which can be caused by diverse nomenclature.

Controversies in the management of endometrial carcinoma

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common type of female genital tract malignancy. Although endometrial carcinoma is a low grade curable malignancy, the condition of the disease can range from excellent prognosis with high curability to aggressive disease with poor outcome. During the last 10 years many researches have provided some new valuable data of optimal treatments for endometrial carcinoma. Progression in diagnostic imaging, radiation delivery systems, and systemic therapies potentially can improve outcomes while minimizing morbidity. Firstly, total hysterectomy and bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy is the primary operative procedure. Pelvic lymhadenectomy is performed in most centers on therapeutic and prognostic grounds and to individualize adjuvant treatment. Women with endometrial carcinoma can be readily segregated intraoperatively into “low-risk” and “high-risk” groups to better identify those women who will most likely benefit from thorough lymphadenectomy. Secondly, adjuvant therapies have been proposed for women with endometrial carcinoma postoperatively. Postoperative irradiation is used to reduce pelvic and vaginal recurrences in high risk cases. Chemotherapy is emerging as an important treatment modality in advanced endometrial carcinoma. Meanwhile the availability of new hormonal and biological agents presents new opportunities for therapy.

Follow-up of ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: The value of physical examination in patients with pretreatment elevated CA125 levels

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of routine periodic physical examination in the follow-up of ovarian (OvC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) patients with pretreatment elevated CA125 levels.

METHODS

Included were patients who had a pretreatment serum CA125 level above normal limits, had completed initial treatment, were in complete clinical remission on completion of the initial treatment and routinely attended the gynecologic oncology outpatient clinic. Recurrence was diagnosed when at least one of the following criteria was abnormal: symptoms, physical examination or elevated serum CA125 levels.

RESULTS

Of 69 patients, a recurrence was diagnosed in 43. Abnormal physical examination for diagnosis of recurrence yielded a sensitivity rate of only 34.9%. The diagnosis of recurrence was based on an abnormal physical examination alone in 2 (4.6%) patients.

CONCLUSION

In OvC and PPC patients with elevated pretreatment CA125 levels, physical examination has a limited impact on the diagnosis of recurrence.

Adjuvant radiotherapy in women with stage I endometrial cancer: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in women with stage I endometrial cancer in terms of survival and pelvic control.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted for studies evaluating RT (1966 to October 2005).

RESULTS

Five randomized trials were identified that evaluated adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT) including one in which women had undergone complete surgical staging. No survival differences were identified; however, none of the studies were powered enough to show a survival benefit. In three studies reporting subgroup analyses, intermediate-risk subgroups (stages IA and IB, grade 3 or stage IC) who received RT had fewer pelvic recurrences compared to women not receiving RT. Unfortunately, none of the studies reported ultimate pelvic control as an outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

RT is not recommended in low-risk patients (stages IA, IB, grades 1 and 2). It is reasonable to consider EBRT for intermediate-risk subgroup patients (stage IC, grades 1 and 2, or stages IA, IB, grade 3), regardless of surgical staging, to reduce the risk of pelvic recurrence. EBRT is recommended for high-risk patients (stage IC, grade 3). The benefits of EBRT need to be weighed against the toxicity of treatment. Patients should be informed of the benefits and risks of EBRT. Additional analysis including ultimate pelvic control in subgroups would be helpful. More clinical trials are warranted to further define the role of EBRT in subgroups of patients and to clarify the role of ICRT.

Salvage treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy for isolated vaginal endometrial cancer recurrence

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of patients with recurrent vaginal endometrial cancer treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of all patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer who had presented an isolated vaginal recurrence in our institution between January 1, 1997 and December 30, 2003 were reviewed. Twenty-two patients were identified; 18 (82%) received both EBRT and HDRB, and 4 (18%) received HDRB only. The median EBRT dose prescribed was 45 Gy (range: 44-50.4), and median HDRB was 26 Gy (range: 8-48). Recurrence-free intervals as well as disease-specific survival rates were noted. Complications were assessed in terms of early and late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity (grade 3 or worse) of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract and vagina.

RESULTS

Median age at recurrence for the 22 patients was 72 years (range: 54-86). Median recurrence time was 20 months (range: 4-135). A complete response was achieved in 100% of patients. After a median follow-up of 32 months (range: 11-78), no patient had locoregional recurrence; 1 developed distant metastasis and died from the disease. Five-year local control, disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 100%, 96% and 96%, respectively. Four patients (18%) presented grades 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicity, and 11 (50%), grade 3 vaginal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent vaginal endometrial cancer is amenable to salvage therapy with HDRB and EBRT.

Follow-up after primary therapy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimum follow-up of women who are clinically disease-free following potentially curative treatment for endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases (1980 to October 2005) was conducted. Data were pooled across trials to determine overall estimates of recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

Sixteen non-comparative retrospective studies were identified. The overall risk of recurrence was 13% for all patients and 3% or less for patients at low risk. Approximately 70% of all recurrences were symptomatic, and 68% to 100% of recurrences occurred within approximately the first 3 years of follow-up. No reliable differences in survival were detected between patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic recurrences nor were differences in patient outcomes reported by type of follow-up strategy employed. Detection of asymptomatic recurrences ranged from 5% to 33% of patients with physical examination, 0% to 4% with vaginal vault cytology, 0% to 14% with chest X-ray, 4% to 13% with abdominal ultrasound, 5% to 21% with abdominal/pelvic CT scan, and 15% in selected patients with CA 125.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence to inform whether intensive follow-up schedules with multiple routine diagnostic interventions result in survival benefits any more or less than non-intensive follow-up schedules without multiple routine diagnostic interventions. Routine testing seems to be of limited benefit for patients at low risk of disease. Most recurrences tend to occur in high risk patients within 3 years, and most recurrences involve symptoms. The most appropriate follow-up strategy is likely one based upon the risk of recurrence and the natural history of the disease. Counseling on the potential symptoms of recurrence is extremely important because the majority of patients with recurrences were symptomatic. A proposed routine follow-up schedule is offered.

Recurrent endometrial cancer: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The value of follow-up after treatment for endometrial cancer will be discussed.

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated our clinical experience, including mode of detection, of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer treated in the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam over a 20-year period. Clinical data and histopathological features from 64 patients were analyzed. Survival was analyzed with a Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients had a local recurrence, 30 had a distant recurrence and 12 had simultaneous local and distant recurrent disease. Ninety-five percent of the local recurrences and 67% of the distant recurrences were detected within three years. Twenty-seven patients had a screen-detected recurrence, 34 had an interval screening recurrence and two had a chance finding recurrence. The overall survival rate at two years was 70% and at five years 53%. Patients with a screen-detected recurrence had a 5-year survival rate of 62%, while patients with interval screening and chance finding recurrences had a 5-year survival rate of 47%.

CONCLUSION

A follow-up program in the first three years after primary treatment of endometrial cancer is useful in detecting recurrent disease. We have no reason to use a different program of follow-up in patients with low risk primary disease.

The role of routine follow-up after gynecological malignancy

The objective of this article was to determine the evidence base for routine follow-up after gynecological malignancy. Only articles with a survival analysis were included. Relevant articles were identified by a comprehensive literature search of the main biomedical databases, hand searching of references of selected articles, and expert spotting of relevant journals and proceedings of international meetings. A two-stage extraction of data was undertaken. No prospective trials were identified. Twenty-nine retrospective case series analyses and one poster presentation met the inclusion criteria. Eight articles and one letter on endometrial cancer, six articles and one poster presentation on cervical cancer, and two articles in vulval cancer were reviewed. Only one article in endometrial cancer showed any survival benefit from routine follow-up, but it was of very poor methodologic quality. Two articles found a survival benefit from routine follow-up after cervical cancer. The two articles on vulval cancer did not find any survival benefit from routine review. There is no prospective research on the benefits of routine follow-up after gynecological cancer. Retrospective evidence calls in to question the benefit of universal follow-up. Prospective research is urgently needed.

The clinical value and the cost-effectiveness of follow-up in endometrial cancer patients

The aim of the present article was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of follow-up in endometrial cancer patients. A literature review was performed regarding the studies that addressed routine follow-up of endometrial cancer. For each published study, the costs of the follow-up program were calculated according to Belgium standards. A mean total of 13% relapsed. Symptomatology and clinical examination detected over 83% of the recurrences. The follow-up cost in euro after 5 and 10 years ranged between 127.68 and 2,028.78 and between 207.48 and 2,353.48, respectively. Based on the available data, there is little evidence of routine follow-up improving survival rates. Multiple protocols are used in practice without an evidence base. There is an urgent need for prospective randomized studies to evaluate the value of the current so-called 'standard medical practice of follow-up.' It is to be expected that the cost of follow-up could be reduced considerably, for instance, by tailoring to low- and high-risk groups, or by abandoning routine follow-up. Symptomatic patients, however, should be evaluated immediately. A reduction in the number of visits and examinations would mean an enormous reduction in costs. This economic benefit would be warmly welcomed in the times of increased health costs and decreased budgets.

Cancer of the endometrium: current aspects of diagnostics and treatment

Background

Endometrial cancer represents a tumor entity with a great variation in its incidence throughout the world (range 1 to 25). This suggests enormous possibilities of cancer prevention due to the fact that the incidence is very much endocrine-related, chiefly with obesity, and thus most frequent in the developed world. As far as treatment is concerned, it is generally accepted that surgery represents the first choice of treatment. However, several recommendations seem reasonable especially with lymphadenectomy, even though they are not based on evidence. All high-risk cases are generally recommended for radiotherapy.

Methods

A literature search of the Medline was carried out for all articles on endometrial carcinoma related to diagnosis and treatment. The articles were systematically reviewed and were categorized into incidence, etiology, precancerosis, early diagnosis, classification, staging, prevention, and treatment. The article is organized into several similar subheadings.

Conclusions

In spite of the overall good prognosis during the early stages of the disease, the survival is poor in advanced stages or recurrences. Diagnostic measures are very well able to detect asymptomatic recurrences. These only seem justified if patients' chances are likely to improve, otherwise such measures increases costs as well as decrease the patients' quality of life. To date neither current nor improved concepts of endocrine treatment or chemotherapy have been able to substantially increase patients' chances of survival. Therefore, newer concepts into the use of antibodies e.g. trastuzumab in HER2-overexpressing tumors and the newer endocrine compounds will need to be investigated. Furthermore, it would seem highly desirable if future studies were to identify valid criteria for an individualized management, thereby maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risks.

Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the rates of local control and survival after relapse in patients with stage I endometrial cancer treated in the multicenter randomized PORTEC trial.

METHODS

The PORTEC trial included 715 patients with stage 1 endometrial cancer, either grade 1 or 2 with deep (>50%) myometrial invasion or grade 2 or 3 with <50% invasion. In all cases an abdominal hysterectomy was performed, without lymphadenectomy. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive pelvic RT (46 Gy) or no further treatment.

RESULTS

The analysis was done by intention-to-treat. A total of 714 patients were evaluated. At a median follow-up of 73 months, 8-year actuarial locoregional recurrence rates were 4% in the RT group and 15% in the control group (P < 0.0001). The 8-year actuarial overall survival rates were 71 (RT group) and 77% (control group, P = 0.18). Eight-year rates of distant metastases were 10 and 6% (P = 0.20). The majority of the locoregional relapses were located in the vagina, mainly in the vaginal vault. Of the 39 patients with isolated vaginal relapse, 35 (87%) were treated with curative intent, usually with external RT and brachytherapy, and surgery in some. A complete remission (CR) was obtained in 31 of the 35 patients (89%), and 24 patients (77%) were still in CR after further follow-up. Five patients subsequently developed distant metastases, and 2 had a second vaginal recurrence. The 3-year survival after first relapse was 51% for patients in the control group and 19% in the RT group (P = 0.004). The 3-year survival after vaginal relapse was 73%, in contrast to 8 and 14% after pelvic and distant relapse (P < 0.001). At 5 years, the survival after vaginal relapse was 65% in the control group compared to 43% in the RT group.

CONCLUSION

Survival after relapse was significantly better in the patient group without previous RT. Treatment for vaginal relapse was effective, with 89% CR and 65% 5-year survival in the control group, while there was no difference in survival between patients with pelvic relapse and those with distant metastases. As pelvic RT was shown to improve locoregional control significantly, but without a survival benefit, its use should be limited to those patients at sufficiently high risk (15% or over) for recurrence in order to maximize local control and relapse-free survival.

[Brachytherapy of endometrial cancers]

Endometrial adenocarcinomas rank third as tumoral sites en France. The tumors are confined to the uterus in 80% of the cases. Brachytherapy has a large place in the therapeutic strategy. The gold standard treatment remains extrafascial hysterectomy with bilateral annexiectomy and bilateral internal iliac lymph node dissection. However, after surgery alone, the rate of locoregional relapses reaches 4-20%, which is reduced to 0-5% after postoperative brachytherapy of the vaginal cuff. This postoperative brachytherapy is delivered as outpatients treatment, by 3 or 4 fractions, at high dose rate. The uterovaginal preoperative brachytherapy remains well adapted to the tumors which involve the uterine cervix. Patients presenting a localized tumor but not operable for general reasons (< 10%) can be treated with success by exclusive irradiation, which associates a pelvic irradiation followed by an uterovaginal brachytherapy. A high local control of about 80-90% is obtained, a little lower than surgery, with a higher risk of late complications. Last but not least, local relapses in the vaginal cuff, or in the perimeatic area, can be treated by interstitial salvage brachytherapy, associated if possible with external beam irradiation. The local control is reached in half of the patients, but metastatic dissemination is frequent. We conclude that brachytherapy has a major role in the treatment of endometrial adenocarcinomas, in combination with surgery, or with external beam irradiation for not operable patients or in case of local relapses. It should use new technologies now available including computerized afterloaders and 3D dose calculation.

Postsurgical pelvis: treatment follow-up

Imaging for recurrence and complications of gynecologic malignancies following treatment with radical hysterectomy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy has become an important determinant for treatment options available to patients. MR imaging and computed tomography can be used to provide evidence of limited local disease recurrence and thereby identify disease that is still potentially curable with adjuvant treatments. This article examines the imaging modalities currently used to detect recurrence and assist in making treatment changes for gynecologic malignancies and presents specific patient findings following definitive primary treatment of uterine cancer and ovarian cancer with radical hysterectomy, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy.

Recurrent endometrial cancer after surgery alone: results of salvage radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Postoperative irradiation of endometrial cancer patients decreases the risk of local recurrence but is associated with a number of long-term sequelae. In a proportion of patients, no immediate postoperative radiotherapy is applied and this treatment is introduced only at relapse. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term results of salvage radiotherapy in previously nonirradiated endometrial cancer patients who developed local recurrence, and to evaluate the impact of patient- and treatment-related factors on treatment efficacy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a detailed retrospective analysis of 73 endometrial cancer patients given radiotherapy for local recurrence after the initial surgery only. The mean age at diagnosis of the recurrence was 63 years (range, 39-78 years). Median time to recurrence was 11 months (range, 1-19 months). All recurrences were staged with the use of Perez modification of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for primary vaginal carcinoma. There were five (7%) Stage I patients, 43 (59%) Stage II patients, and 25 (34%) Stage III patients. Forty-four patients (60%) received both external beam irradiation (EBRT) and endovaginal brachytherapy (BRT), 17 (23%) received only BRT, and 12 (17%) received only EBRT. The mean total physical radiation dose was 75.9 Gy (range, 8-130 Gy), and the mean normalized total dose (NTD) calculated on the base of the linear-quadratic model was 86.6 Gy (range, 8.5-171.9 Gy). Median follow-up for alive patients was 8.8 years (range, 3-21 years). The impact of patient-, tumor-, and therapy-related factors on the treatment outcome was evaluated with the use of uni- and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Three- and 5-year overall survival rates were 33% and 25%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, lower stage of recurrent disease (p < 0.0005), combined EBRT and BRT (p = 0.027), higher total radiation dose (p = 0.031), and higher NTD (p = 0.006) were significantly correlated with better survival. In the multivariate analysis, only stage of recurrent disease (p < 0.005) and high total dose (p = 0.047) were independently correlated with better survival. Lower FIGO stage of recurrence (p = 0.023) and higher total dose (p = 0.005) were also independently correlated with longer time to progression, whereas higher radiotherapy dose was the only factor correlated with better local control (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of salvage radiotherapy in endometrial cancer patients with local failure after previous surgery is limited. Factors determining treatment outcome include advancement of the tumor at relapse and radiotherapy dose.

Importance of high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of serum N-acylneuraminic acids in evaluating surgical treatment in patients with early endometrial cancer

The objectives of this study were the quantification of the two major sialic acid (Sia) forms - N-acetylneuraminic (Neu5Ac) and N-glycolylneuraminic acids (Neu5Gc) - in serum before and after surgical treatment of early endometrial cancer and the relation of their levels with the progress of surgical therapy. The major Sia forms were liberated from sera glycoconjugates by mild acid hydrolysis, separated as per-O-benzoylated derivatives by a highly sensitive reversed-phase HPLC method and detected at 231 nm. Total Sia content in sera of healthy women was not related to age and body weight. Neu5Ac was identified as the major Sia in sera from both cancer patients, healthy individuals as well as in tissue specimens (> or = 94% of total Sia). In patients with endometrial cancer the total Sia level before surgical treatment (709.5 +/- 306.5 mg/l) was significantly higher (p < or = 0.0001) than that of the control group (213.5 +/- 88.7 mg/l). The elevation in Sia level was exclusively due to Neu5Ac. Following surgical therapy, serum Neu5Ac levels (699.4 +/- 305.6 mg/l) were significantly decreased (305.9 +/- 114.5 mg/l). In one case, where Neu5Ac level was increased 15 days and eight months after surgery (1.8 and 2.5 times as compared to control, respectively), a metastasis not detected during surgery was recorded. The obtained results suggest that Neu5Ac level in serum may be used as a tumor marker in evaluating the suitability of surgical treatment in early endometrial cancer.

Clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic malignancies

The need for guidelines in managing gynecologic cancer is addressed in the first part of this article. Second, the guideline development process that enables the practitioner to judge the validity and usefulness of proffered guidelines is detailed. An important element in this discussion is an exploration of the shortcomings, either real or perceived, of the process. The last section focuses on issues relating to the implementation of guidelines and some of the obstacles that one may encounter as the programs evolve.