Hydroxyurea, 5-fluorouracil infusion, and cisplatin adjunct to radiation therapy in cervical carcinoma: a phase I-II trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

Randomized Phase II Trial of Triapine-Cisplatin-Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Stage Uterine Cervix or Vaginal Cancers

Uterine cervix or vaginal cancers have inherent overactivity of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), making these cancers rational targets for therapy based on interruption of cisplatin-radiotherapy-induced DNA damage repair. We conducted a pilot, open-label randomized phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin-radiotherapy with or without triapine, a small molecule with RNR-inhibitory activity, in patients with advanced-stage uterine cervix or vaginal cancers (NCT01835171), as a lead in to a randomized phase III study (NCT02466971). A total of 26 women were randomly assigned to receive 6 weeks of daily radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy (80 Gy) and once-weekly cisplatin (40 mg m⁻²)—with or without three-times weekly intravenous triapine (25 mg m⁻²)—in one 56-days cycle. Primary end points were metabolic complete response by positron emission tomography and safety. Additional end points included the rate of clinical response, rate of methemoglobinemia, and progression-free survival. The addition of triapine to cisplatin-radiotherapy improved the rate of metabolic complete response from 69 to 92% (P = 0.32) and raised the 3-year progression-free survival estimate from 77 to 92% (hazard ratio for progression, 0.30; P = 0.27). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events in either treatment group included reversible leukopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, or electrolyte abnormalities. No significant differences were seen between the two groups in the rate of adverse events. Symptomatic methemoglobinemia was not encountered after triapine infusion. In conclusion, the addition of triapine to cisplatin-radiotherapy improved the rate of metabolic complete response in patients with advanced-stage uterine cervix or vaginal cancers without significant toxicity. A phase III trial adequately powered to evaluate progression-free and overall survival is underway (NCT02466971).

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Radiation and Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Review of the Recent Literature

Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer; nevertheless it fails to control disease progression within the irradiation fields in more than 40% of cases, particularly in patients with bulky tumor. Distant metastases are not infrequent in more advanced cases. Chemotherapy has been integrated with radiotherapy to improve local control and treat distant subclinical metastases. Schedules of combined treatment more frequently represented by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation (NACT) and by concomitant chemotherapy and radiation (CT-RT). A review of the recent literature is presented. The role of NACT is controversial: high response rates are reported but doubtful advantages in terms of survival or local control have been shown. In randomized trials, hydroxyurea concomitant to radiation improves local control and survival, particularly in stage IIIB and IVA. Several randomized trials of concurrent chemoradiation with 5FU, cisplatin and mitomycin C are underway, but few have been published: no significative differences are reported in term of local control or survival. Acute toxicity is higher than in radiation alone, but usually manageable. For the analysis of late morbidity a longer follow-up is required. Large randomized trials of adequate radiotherapy versus concomitant chemoradiation are necessary to refine our understanding of the benefits of this integrated treatment.

Clinical pharmacology and clinical trials of ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors: is it a viable cancer therapy?

PURPOSE

Ribonucleotide reductase (RR) enzymes (RR1 and RR2) play an important role in the reduction of ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides which is involved in DNA replication and repair. Augmented RR activity has been ascribed to uncontrolled cell growth and tumorigenic transformation.

METHODS

This review mainly focuses on several biological and chemical RR inhibitors (e.g., siRNA, GTI-2040, GTI-2501, triapine, gemcitabine, and clofarabine) that have been evaluated in clinical trials with promising anticancer activity from 1960's till 2016. A summary on whether their monotherapy or combination is still effective for further use is discussed.

RESULTS

Among the RR2 inhibitors evaluated, GTI-2040, siRNA, gallium nitrate and didox were more efficacious as a monotherapy, whereas triapine was found to be more efficacious as combination agent. Hydroxyurea is currently used more in combination therapy, even though it is efficacious as a monotherapy. Gallium nitrate showed mixed results in combination therapy, while the combination activity of didox is yet to be evaluated. RR1 inhibitors that have long been used in chemotherapy such as gemcitabine, cladribine, fludarabine and clofarabine are currently used mostly as a combination therapy, but are equally efficacious as a monotherapy, except tezacitabine which did not progress beyond phase I trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of clinical trials, we conclude that RR inhibitors are viable treatment options, either as a monotherapy or as a combination in cancer chemotherapy. With the recent advances made in cancer biology, further development of RR inhibitors with improved efficacy and reduced toxicity is possible for treatment of variety of cancers.

Is age a prognostic biomarker for survival among women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of age on completion of and toxicities following treatment of local regionally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Phase I-III trials.

METHODS

An ancillary data analysis of GOG protocols 113, 120, 165, 219 data was performed. Wilcoxon, Pearson, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for univariate and multivariate analysis. Log rank tests were used to compare survival lengths.

RESULTS

One-thousand-three-hundred-nineteen women were included; 60.7% were Caucasian, 15% were age 60-70years and an additional 5% were >70; 87% had squamous histology, 55% had stage IIB disease and 34% had IIIB disease. Performance status declined with age (p=0.006). Histology and tumor stage did not significantly differ. Number of cycles of chemotherapy received, radiation treatment time, nor dose modifications varied with age. Notably, radiation protocol deviations and failure to complete brachytherapy (BT) did increase with age (p=0.022 and p<0.001 respectively). Only all grade lymphatic (p=0.006) and grade≥3 cardiovascular toxicities (p=0.019) were found to vary with age. A 2% increase in the risk of death for every year increase >50 for all-cause mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) was found, but no association between age and disease specific mortality was found.

CONCLUSION

This represents a large analysis of patients treated for LACC with chemo/radiation, approximately 20% of whom were >60years of age. Older patients, had higher rates of incomplete brachytherapy which is not explained by collected toxicity data. Age did not adversely impact completion of chemotherapy and radiation or toxicities.

Comparative analysis of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in head and neck cancer and carcinoma cervix during concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Background:

Cisplatin is widely used as radio sensitizer in head and neck cancer (HNC) and carcinoma cervix (CaCx). This study aims to see comparative nephrotoxicity of cisplatin in HNC and in CaCx without obstructive uropathy treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

Materials and Methods:

Fifty patients of HNC and 50 patients of CaCx stage II/III without obstructive uropathy were included in this study. Cisplatin 50 mg intravenous weekly was given before EBRT with adequate hydration and premedication in both groups. Before chemotherapy; blood urea, serum creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured. GFR was measured using ^99mTc diethylene triamine pentacaetic acid (DTPA) renogram study.

Results:

At the end of 4^th week, blood urea level 41-45 mg% was in 40 and 4% in HNC and CaCx, respectively (P = 0.018). At the end of 3^rd and 4^th week, blood urea level >45 mg% was 10 and 6% in HNC cases, respectively. At the end of 4^th week, serum creatinine level 1.1-1.5 mg% was 50 and 8% in HNC and CaCx, respectively (P = 0.047). Serum creatinine level >1.5 mg% was 6, 8, and 22% in HNC at the end of 2^nd, 3^rd, and 4^th week, respectively. GFR <80 ml/min at the end of 4^th week was 14% in HNC and only 2% in CaCx. GFR <100ml/min was significant at the end of 4^th week (P = 0.04). Univariate analysis showed significant relation between reduced oral fluid intake and reduced GFR (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

In HNC, during concurrent chemoradiation, as the 3^rd-4^th week is reached, oral mucosal reactions increase and affect oral intake which further add to the cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. In CaCx without obstructive uropathy, renal function impairment is less severe as oral intake of water and liquid is not much impaired.

DNA-PK/Chk2 induces centrosome amplification during prolonged replication stress

The antineoplastic drug hydroxyurea (HU), when used at subtoxic doses, induces prolonged replication stress and centrosome amplification. This causes genomic instability and increases the malignancy of the recurring tumor. The mechanism of centrosome amplification induced by prolonged replication stress, however, is still unclear. Here, we examined the involvement of ataxia telangiectasia, mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia, mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and found that HU-induced centrosome amplification was inhibited by the depletion of DNA-PKcs, but not ATM and ATR. Inactivation of ATM/ATR in U2OS cells instead caused aneuploidy and cell death. We found DNA-PKcs depletion also abrogated ATM phosphorylation, indicating that ATM activation during prolonged replication stress depends on DNA-PK. Depletion of DNA-PK abrogated checkpoint kinase (Chk)2 activation and partially reduced Chk1 activation. Chk2 depletion blocked HU-induced centrosome amplification, indicating a function of Chk2 in centrosome amplification. We further found that Chk2 was phosphorylated at Thr68 on the mother centriole at late G2 and mitosis when unstressed and on all amplified centrioles induced by HU. In summary, we have elucidated that DNA-PK/Chk2 signaling induces centrosome amplification upon long-term HU treatment, therefore increasing our insight into tumor recurrence after initial chemotherapy.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP, NSC #663249) in the treatment of advanced-stage solid cancers: a California Cancer Consortium Study

BACKGROUND

3-Aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP) is a novel small-molecule ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor. This study was designed to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and oral bioavailability of 3-AP in patients with advanced-stage solid tumors.

METHODS

Twenty patients received one dose of intravenous and subsequent cycles of oral 3-AP following a 3 + 3 patient dose escalation. Intravenous 3-AP was administered to every patient at a fixed dose of 100 mg over a 2-h infusion 1 week prior to the first oral cycle. Oral 3-AP was administered every 12 h for 5 consecutive doses on days 1-3, days 8-10, and days 15-17 of every 28-day cycle. 3-AP was started at 50 mg with a planned dose escalation to 100, 150, and 200 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and bioavailability were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled. For dose level 1 (50 mg), the second of three treated patients had a DLT of grade 3 hypertension. In the dose level 1 expansion cohort, three patients had no DLTs. No further DLTs were encountered during escalation until the 200-mg dose was reached. At the 200 mg 3-AP dose level, two treated patients had DLTs of grade 3 hypoxia. One additional DLT of grade 4 febrile neutropenia was subsequently observed at the de-escalated 150 mg dose. One DLT in 6 evaluable patients established the MTD as 150 mg per dose on this dosing schedule. Responses in the form of stable disease occurred in 5 (25%) of 20 patients. The oral bioavailability of 3-AP was 67 ± 29% and was consistent with the finding that the MTD by the oral route was 33% higher than by the intravenous route.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral 3-AP is well tolerated and has an MTD similar to its intravenous form after accounting for the oral bioavailability. Oral 3-AP is associated with a modest clinical benefit rate of 25% in our treated patient population with advanced solid tumors.

The efficacy of concurrent cisplatin and 5-flurouracil chemotherapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) using 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin for locally advanced cervical cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 57 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IIB-IVA and bulky IB2-IIA tumor) who underwent the CCRT at Dong-A University Hospital from January 1997 to June 2007. The CCRT consisted of 5-FU, cisplatin and pelvic radiation. Every three weeks, 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin was administered on the first day of each cycle and 5-FU was infused at the dose of 1,000 mg/m(2)/d from the second day to the fifth day of each cycle. Radiation was administered to the pelvis at a daily dose of 1.8 Gy for five days per week until a medium accumulated dose reached to 50.4 Gy. If necessary, the radiation field was extended to include paraaortic lymph nodes. Consolidation chemotherapy was performed using 5-FU and cisplatin.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were enrolled and the median follow-up duration was 53 months (range 7-120 months). The overall response rate was 91.5% (74% complete response and 17.5% partial response). The 5-year overall survival and 3-year progression free survival rates were 69.4% and 74.9%, respectively. During the follow-up period (median 23 months, range 7-60 months), fourteen patients were diagnosed as recurrent disease.

CONCLUSION

CCRT with 5-FU and cisplatin which is the primary treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer was effective and well tolerated.

Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix

BACKGROUND

The National Cancer Institute (USA) alert in February 1999 stated that concomitant chemoradiotherapy should be considered for all patients with cervical cancer, based on evidence from five randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES

To review all known RCTs comparing concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy with radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched electronic databases, trials registers and reference lists of published trial reports and review articles were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review includes RCTs in cervical cancer comparing concomitant chemoradiation with radiotherapy in the experimental arm. Trials allowing further adjuvant chemotherapy or hydroxyurea were included. Trials using radiosensitisers or radioprotectors in the experimental arm were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors reviewed trials for inclusion and extracted data. For meta-analyses of time-to-event outcomes (survival, progression-free survival), a hazard ratio (HR) was extracted or estimated from trial reports, where possible. Only overall rates of local and distant recurrence were presented in many reports so only odds ratios (OR) of recurrence rates could be calculated, which takes no account of time to recurrence or censoring. Few trials reported acute toxicity adequately, but where possible ORs were calculated for the main types and severities of acute toxicity. The HRs and ORs for individual trials were combined across all trials, using the fixed effect model. Late toxicity was rarely described in sufficient detail so could only be reviewed qualitatively.

MAIN RESULTS

The original review was based on nineteen trials (17 published and two unpublished) including 4580 patients. This update includes twenty four trials (21 published, 3 unpublished) and 4921 patients, although due to patient exclusion and differential reporting 61% to 75% were available for the analyses. The review strongly suggests chemoradiation improves overall survival and progression free survival, whether or not platinum was used with absolute benefits of 10% and 13% respectively. There was, however, statistical heterogeneity for these outcomes. There was some evidence that the effect was greater in trials including a high proportion of stage I and II patients. Chemoradiation also showed significant benefit for local recurrence and a suggestion of a benefit for distant recurrence. Acute haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity was significantly greater in the concomitant chemoradiation group. Late effects of treatment were not well reported and so the impact of chemoradiation on these effects could not be determined adequately. Treatment-related deaths were rare.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant chemoradiation appears to improve overall survival and progression-free survival in locally advanced cervical cancer. It also appears to reduce local and distant recurrence suggesting concomitant chemotherapy may afford radiosensitisation and systemic cytotoxic effects. Some acute toxicity is increased, but the long-term side effects are still not clear.

The role of chemotherapy in locally advanced, metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is among the major health problems world-wide although advances in screening programs. Surgery and radiotherapy are the treatment modalities of choice for early and locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the role of chemotherapy in this setting has been better investigated in the latest years. To improve loco-regional control in locally advanced disease, authors have tested both neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From 1999 NCI clinical announcement, concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation is considered the treatment of choice for cervical cancer patients requiring radiation therapy. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is reaching encouraging results in IB bulky-IIA cervical cancer, but further investigation are ongoing in locally advanced cervical setting. The optimal treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer is still undefined and chemotherapy is used with palliation intent. Cisplatin remains the most active cytotoxic agents, although combinations of cisplatin with paclitaxel, topotecan, vinorelbine, have shown encouraging results in phase II and in early phase III studies. This paper reviews the role of chemotherapy in the management of patients with locally advanced, metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer. Studies discussed in this paper were selected trough a search in the med-line database performed in October 2003.

Update on the treatment of advanced cervical cancer

In this review we discuss the most important issues concerning the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Advances in the treatment of cervical cancer are made slowly, but recently the data from five important randomised studies gave rise to an important change in the standard treatment of this disease. For the new standard in advanced cervical cancer, it is clear that chemotherapy should be added to the radiation regimen for an optimal treatment. However, firm conclusions to which drugs or regimens cannot be drawn at this moment.

[Chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancers of the uterine neck. Retrospective study of 92 patients treated at the Institute Curie between 1986 and 1998]]

PURPOSE

The prognosis of locally advanced cervix cancers is poor with metastatic and local recurrence risks. Recent publications reported that concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation increased local control compared to radiotherapy alone. Chemotherapy could also decrease metastatic recurrences. We report 92 cases of patients with locally advanced cervix cancer treated between 1986 and 1998 at the Institut Curie.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Concurrent chemoradiation was exclusive in 51 cases and added to surgery in 41 cases. Chemotherapy with 5FU-Cisplatin-Mitomycin C-Vindesin (protocol A) was performed for 43% of patients and 57% of them received 5FU-Cisplatin alone (protocol B).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 64 months (6-149 months). Five-year disease-free survival rate was 47% and local control rate was 70%. Disease-free survival was correlated with therapeutic response. After exclusive chemoradiation, the good responsive patients had a better DFS (54% vs 26%, p = 0.018). In the surgery group, those patients with sterilized lymph nodes and tumours had also a higher DFS (76% vs 47%, p = 0.036). Toxicity was higher with protocol A.

CONCLUSION

From our study, it appears that local control of advanced cervix cancers is better with combined chemoradiotherapy but disease-free survival stays low according to the metastatic evolution. Metastasis without local recurrence remained frequent in our study. 5FU-CDDP chemotherapy has a lower toxicity and is as effective as 5FU-CDDP-Mitomycin C-Vindesin protocol, in association with radiotherapy.

Chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer

Cervical cancer remains a major health problem worldwide, despite advances in screening. For patients with locally advanced stage disease, failure to obtain local-regional control usually results in death. In an effort to improve local-regional tumour control, neoadjuvant and concurrent chemoradiation has been tested. Recently, five randomised trials performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the SouthWest Oncology Group (SWOG) studying cisplatin-based chemoradiation have demonstrated a significant survival advantage. Three of the trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation alone and two trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation with hydroxyurea. In all of the trials, cisplatin-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiation therapy was more effective at reducing the risk of death by 30-50%. Acute toxicities, principally neutropenia and gastrointestinal, were more common with chemoradiation, but were transient and the rates of late complications (complications that persisted or occurred for more than 60 days after the treatment) were similar. Based on the results of these five randomised trials, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) released a Clinical Announcement stating that cisplatin-based chemotherapy, as used in these trials (i.e. concurrently with radiation therapy), as the new standard of therapy for cervical cancer.

Impact of hemoglobin levels before and during concurrent chemoradiotherapy on the response of treatment in patients with cervical carcinoma: preliminary results

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing radiation for cervical carcinoma, there is evidence that anemia is associated with an impaired outcome. For patients undergoing chemoradiation, there are no data available. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the impact of anemia before and during chemoradiation in patients with cervical carcinoma.

METHODS

The authors collected data on hemoglobin (Hb) levels before and during treatment from 57 patients with cervical carcinoma. The stage of disease ranged between Stage IB and Stage IVA. All patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation. Response to chemoradiation was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The mean Hb level at the time of presentation was 12.9 +/- 1.6 g/dL in patients with a complete clinical response (CCR) and 12.1 +/- 1.4 g/dL in those with persistent disease (P = 0.126). In patients with a CCR, the mean nadir Hb level was 11.1 +/- 1.3 g/dL, and in patients with treatment failure, it was 9.8 +/- 1.8 g/dL (P = 0.008). A univariate logistic regression model demonstrated that the nadir Hb level was the most predictive factor for treatment failure (relative risk, 1.92; P = 0.015) followed by disease stage (relative risk, 0.51; P = 0.074). In a multivariate model, the nadir Hb level remained the only prognostically relevant factor predicting the response to chemoradiation. Only patients with nadir Hb values > 11 g/dL throughout chemoradiation had a more than 90% chance of achieving a CCR.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing chemoradiation for cervical carcinoma, the nadir Hb level is highly predictive of response to treatment, whereas the Hb level at the time of presentation is prognostically not significant.

Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix

BACKGROUND

The National Cancer Institute (USA) alert in February 1999 stated that concomitant chemoradiotherapy should be considered for all patients with cervical cancer, based on evidence from five randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES

To review all known randomised clinical controlled trials (RCTs) comparing concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy with radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched electronic databases, trials registers and reference lists of published trial reports and review articles were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review includes RCTs in cervical cancer comparing concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy with radiotherapy. In the experimental arm, further adjuvant chemotherapy was allowable. Hydroxyurea was considered inactive and allowable. Trials using radiosensitisers or radioprotectors in the experimental arm were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors reviewed trials for inclusion and extracted data. For meta-analyses of time-to-event outcomes (survival, progression-free survival), a hazard ratio (HR) was extracted or estimated from trial reports, where possible. Only overall rates of local and distant recurrence were presented in many reports so only an odds ratios (OR) of recurrence rates could be calculated, which takes no account of time to recurrence or censoring. The HRs and ORs for individual trials were combined across all trials, using the fixed effect model. Few trials reported acute toxicity adequately. Data were therefore grouped and the number of toxic events was used to calculate a single OR for each site and grade. Late toxicity was rarely described so could only be reviewed qualitatively.

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen trials (17 published, two unpublished) were identified including 4580 patients, although due to patient exclusion and differential reporting 62-78% were available for the various analyses. The review strongly suggests chemoradiation improves overall survival and progression free survival, whether platinum was used or not with absolute benefits of 12% and 16% respectively. There was, however, statistical heterogeneity for these outcomes There was some evidence that the effect was greater in trials including a high proportion of stage I and II patients. Chemoradiation also showed significant benefit for both local and distant recurrence. Haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity was significantly greater in the concomitant chemoradiation group. Details of late morbidity were sparse.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy appears to improve overall survival and progression-free survival in locally advanced cervical cancer. It also reduces local and distant recurrence suggesting concomitant chemotherapy may afford cytotoxic and sensitisation effects. Some acute toxicity is increased, but data on long term side effects were sparse.

Chemoradiotherapy: the new standard care for invasive cervical cancer

Cervical cancer remains a major health problem worldwide, despite advances in screening. For patients with locally advanced stage disease, failure to obtain local-regional control usually results in death. In an effort to improve local-regional tumour control, neoadjuvant and concurrent chemoradiation have been tested. Recently, 5 randomised trials performed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the Southwest Oncology Group studying cisplatin-based chemoradiation have demonstrated a significant survival advantage. Three of the trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation alone and 2 trials compared cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy and radiation to radiation with hydroxyurea. In all trials, cisplatin-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiation therapy was the more effective therapy, reducing the risk of death by 30 to 50%. Acute toxicities, principally neutropenia and gastrointestinal, were more common with chemoradiation but were transient and rates of late complications were similar between treatment groups. Based on the results of these 5 randomised trials, the National Cancer Institute released a Clinical Announcement stating that cisplatin-based chemotherapy as used in these trials concurrently with radiation therapy should be the new standard of therapy for high risk early stage and locally advanced stage cervical cancer.

[Radiochemotherapy of uterine cervix cancers. Recent data]

Low-stage uterine cervix carcinoma can be treated by either surgery, radiation therapy or combined treatments with high cure rates ranging from 90 to 95% for stage IB1 tumors. However, the standard treatment, combining external beam plus intracavitary radiation, fails to control the progression of the disease in 35 to 90% of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. No substantial improvements have been made in the treatment of these tumors in the past two decades. The addition of concurrent 5-FU in a phase III study failed to improve the results in the overall patient population, but the five-year DFS was significantly better in a subset of patients (tumor > 5 cm and IB/IIA or medial parametrial IIB disease). Concurrent chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin showed, in a phase III study, a significantly longer DFS in patients treated with chemotherapy despite the same long-term local tumor control. After many phase II studies, five phase III studies have recently demonstrated a 40 to 60% reduction in the relative risk of recurrence with cisplatin-containing chemoradiation. Across these studies, the risk of death was reduced by 30 to 50%. The benefit was less clear in patients with stages III-IV tumors than in patients with lower stages associated with poor prognostic factors. Haematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity of chemoradiation was greater than that of radiotherapy alone. However, late side effects were similar in the different treatment groups. These results must be confirmed with a longer follow-up. The importance of concurrent chemotherapy during the brachytherapy procedure should be analyzed. It has yet to be determined which chemotherapy regimen achieves the most favorable therapeutic ratio.

[Concomitant radiochemotherapy for cancer of the cervix: critical analysis based on the Standards, Options and Recommendations methodology]

INTRODUCTION

The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the National Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres (CRLCC) and specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery.

OBJECTIVES

To update, according to the methodology of SOR, the Standards, Options and Recommendations for the management of patients with cancer of the cervix, and in particular, the place of concomitant radiochemotherapy.

METHODS

Data have been identified by a literature search using Medline (to April 1999) and the personal reference lists of experts. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to independent national and international reviewers and to the medical committees of the CRCC.

RESULTS

The principle recommendations concerning the place of radiochemotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the cervix are 1/ the available data shows a significant increase in local control (level of evidence A) and of overall survival (level of evidence B1) following concomitant radiochemotherapy as compared to radiotherapy alone or the combination of radiotherapy-hydroxyurea. For stages IB, IIA, proximal IIB with bad prognostic factors (tumour size greater than 4 cm and/or invasion of pelvic nodes and/or microscopic invasion of the parametrium) and without lumbo-aortic nodal invasion, concomitant radiochemotherapy can be considered as standard treatment. This benefit is less clear for stages distal IIB, III and IVA without para-aortic nodal invasion (level of evidence C) and must be confirmed (expert agreement). 2/ the toxicity of radiochemotherapy is essentially haematologic and gastrointestinal (level of evidence B1) and is greater than that of radiotherapy alone (level of evidence B1). 3/ these results have been obtained by the combination of chemotherapy based oncisplatin alone, or in combination with 5-FU. Although of equal benefit, the toxicity of the cisplatin/5-FU/ hydroxyurea combination was greater than that of cisplatin alone in a trial comparing the two protocols. A significantly longer survival have also been obtained by the combination of chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin (level of evidence C). These results must be confirmed. 4/ the exact means of delivering the chemotherapy has not been clearly established. In fact, in these trials, some protocols use cisplatin weekly at a dose of 40 mg/m2 and others every three or four weeks at doses ranging from 50 to 75 mg/m2. Subsequent randomised studies are likely to establish optimal schema for the delivery of chemotherapy when combined with external radiotherapy and brachytherapy.

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer: the new standard of care

Radical pelvic irradiation has constituted the definitive therapy for patients with large cervical cancers. No substantial improvements have been made in treatment outcomes. In the past year, however, a series of large, well-conducted randomized trials has evaluated the role of concurrent chemotherapy with pelvic irradiation in cervical cancer. These trials include definitive treatment of patients with stage IB2 to IVA disease and adjuvant treatment after radical surgery in stage IB2-IIA disease. Five trials have shown a consistent 30% to 50% reduction in the risk of death from disease when concurrent chemotherapy is used. Questions still remain as to what constitutes the best chemotherapy dose and schedule. In all of the positive trials, cisplatin was used, but three also used 5-fluorouracil. The level of survival improvement that occurs when chemotherapy is added to optimal irradiation and whether patients with stage IIIB and IVA benefit are also unclear. Improvements in survival rates for patients with solid tumors occur slowly. Based on the evidence, it is likely that concurrent chemotherapy with radiation will become the new standard of care for bulky and advanced cervix cancer.

Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

On behalf of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, we performed a randomized trial of radiotherapy in combination with three concurrent chemotherapy regimens -- cisplatin alone; cisplatin, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea; and hydroxyurea alone -- in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Women with primary untreated invasive squamous-cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix of stage IIB, III, or IVA, without involvement of the para-aortic lymph nodes, were enrolled. The patients had to have a leukocyte count of at least 3000 per cubic millimeter, a platelet count of at least 100,000 per cubic millimeter, a serum creatinine level no higher than 2 mg per deciliter (177 micromol per liter), and adequate hepatic function. All patients received external-beam radiotherapy according to a strict protocol. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three chemotherapy regimens: 40 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area per week for six weeks (group 1); 50 mg of cisplatin per square meter on days 1 and 29, followed by 4 g of fluorouracil per square meter given as a 96-hour infusion on days 1 and 29, and 2 g of oral hydroxyurea per square meter twice weekly for six weeks (group 2); or 3 g of oral hydroxyurea per square meter twice weekly for six weeks (group 3).

RESULTS

The analysis included 526 women. The median duration of follow-up was 35 months. Both groups that received cisplatin had a higher rate of progression-free survival than the group that received hydroxyurea alone (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The relative risks of progression of disease or death were 0.57 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.78) in group 1 and 0.55 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.75) in group 2, as compared with group 3. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3, with relative risks of death of 0.61 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.85) and 0.58 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.81), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Regimens of radiotherapy and chemotherapy that contain cisplatin improve the rates of survival and progression-free survival among women with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Phase I trial of concomitant chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer and other advanced pelvic malignancies

Purpose. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and toxicity of concomitant hydroxyurea (HU) and escalating doses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in locally advanced cervical cancer and other pelvic malignancies undergoing radiation therapy (RT). Methods. Treatment consisted of 5-FU, HU, and pelvic RT delivered in an alternate-week fashion. 5-FU was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion at a starting dose of 600 mg/m2/day and was escalated to 1000 mg/m2/day in cohorts of three patients. The HU dose was 500 mg twice daily. Chemoradiotherapy was administered on a 5-day cycle. Following a 9-day rest, the cycle was repeated until the completion of the pelvic RT. Results. Twenty-one patients (18 cervix, 1 bladder, 1 vagina, 1 ovary) were enrolled. 5-FU escalation to 1000 mg/m2/day was well tolerated. No patients developed grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity. Grade 2 leukopenia was noted in 3 patients (14.3%). Grade 3 mucositis, diarrhea, and dermatitis occurred in 10, 10, and 5% of patients, respectively. None of the 99 treatment cycles were delayed secondary to acute toxicity. The overall response rate in the 18 cervical cancer patients was 89% (78% complete, 11% partial). Conclusions. Concomitant continuous infusion 5-FU, twice daily HU, and pelvic RT delivered in an alternate-week fashion is well tolerated. Further study is necessary to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of this regimen in patients with advanced cervical and other pelvic malignancies.

[Chemoradiotherapy in cancers of the uterine cervix]

Treatment of uterine cervix carcinomas is based on radiotherapy and surgery. Prognosis of advanced carcinoma leads to the proposal of many combinations. Only concurrent radio-chemotherapy demonstrated some interests. Combination of radiotherapy and radiosensitisers failed to demonstrate any advantage and in some instances was associated with an adverse effect. Hydroxyurea and mitomycin C alone or associated were extensively tested without benefit. From modern combinations and recent studies, we could conclude that only cisplatin (and probably its derivates) can be included in future trials.