Limited value of sonohysterography for endometrial screening in asymptomatic, postmenopausal patients treated with tamoxifen

Endometrial Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/034-OL, September 2022). Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis and Hereditary Factors of Endometrial Cancer, Geriatric Assessment and Supply Structures

Summary The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer, first published in April 2018, was reviewed in its entirety between April 2020 and January 2022 and updated. The review was carried out at the request of German Cancer Aid as part of the Oncology Guidelines Program and the lead coordinators were the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Gynecology Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG) and the German Cancer Aid (DKH). The guideline update was based on a systematic search and assessment of the literature published between 2016 and 2020. All statements, recommendations and background texts were reviewed and either confirmed or amended. New statements and recommendations were included where necessary. Aim The use of evidence-based risk-adapted therapies to treat women with endometrial cancer of low risk prevents unnecessarily radical surgery and avoids non-beneficial adjuvant radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. For women with endometrial cancer and a high risk of recurrence, the guideline defines the optimum level of radical surgery and indicates whether chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiation therapy is necessary. This should improve the survival rates and quality of life of these patients. The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer and the quality indicators based on the guideline aim to provide the basis for the work of certified gynecological cancer centers. Methods The guideline was first compiled in 2018 in accordance with the requirements for S3-level guidelines and was updated in 2022. The update included an adaptation of the source guidelines identified using the German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal (DELBI). The update also used evidence reviews which were created based on selected literature obtained from systematic searches in selected literature databases using the PICO process. The Clinical Guidelines Service Group was tasked with carrying out a systematic search and assessment of the literature. Their results were used by interdisciplinary working groups as a basis for developing suggestions for recommendations and statements which were then modified during structured online consensus conferences and/or additionally amended online using the DELPHI process to achieve a consensus. Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline provides recommendations on epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and hereditary factors. The epidemiology of endometrial cancer and the risk factors for developing endometrial cancer are presented. The options for screening and the methods used to diagnose endometrial cancer are outlined. Recommendations are given for the prevention, diagnosis, and therapy of hereditary forms of endometrial cancer. The use of geriatric assessment is considered and existing structures of care are presented.

Breast Cancer Patients at Increased Risk of Developing Type II Endometrial Cancer: Relative and Absolute Risk Estimation and Implications for Counseling

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is a recognized risk factor for endometrial cancer (EC). Emerging literature indicates that it confers a higher risk of type II EC (T2EC) than type I EC (T1EC). Although some surgeons offer a prophylactic hysterectomy to BC patients referred for risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, insufficient evidence prevents this from being the standard practice. We aimed to quantify their absolute risk and relative risk (RR) of developing both EC subtypes and identify a higher-risk group that could be considered for prophylactic hysterectomy.

Methodology

This retrospective service evaluation compared patients diagnosed with BC between 2008 and 2014, who subsequently developed EC within 10 years to those who did not. Absolute risk and RR were calculated using the numbers of regional BC and EC cases within this group, alongside 2009 UK female population and EC incidence statistics. Binary logistic regression generated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for patient- and disease-specific variables.

Results

A total of 45 BC patients developed EC, 24 had T1EC and 21 had T2EC. Their RR of developing EC was greater than that of the general population (RR: 12.44, p < 0.0001). Notably, this was higher for T2EC (RR: 33.96, p < 0.001) than T1EC (RR: 8.63, p < 0.0001). Nonetheless, the absolute risk remained low. Tamoxifen exposure was significantly more prevalent among T2EC patients (adjusted OR: 79.61, p = 0.003). Increased age at BC diagnosis was associated with T1EC (adjusted OR: 1.10, p = 0.043) and T2EC (adjusted OR: 1.13, p = 0.03). Neither smoking status nor family history of BC was significantly associated with any outcome.

Conclusion

Women with BC were more likely to develop T2EC than T1EC, and although the absolute risk was low, the cumulative risk was substantial enough to warrant vigilance. Tamoxifen exposure was significantly predictive of EC, particularly T2EC, and might facilitate risk estimation. Older women at BC diagnosis who receive tamoxifen treatment should be screened and closely monitored for EC. However, given the limitations of normal screening methods for the detection of T2EC, counseling for a prophylactic hysterectomy should also be considered. Clarification of the menopausal status will help make more meaningful recommendations.

Hysteroscopic Evaluation of Endometrial Changes in Breast Cancer Women with or without Hormone Therapies: Results from a Large Multicenter Cohort Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of our study was to investigate the incidence of endometrial pathologies, especially endometrial cancer, in women with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen (TAM), aromatase inhibitors (AIs), or receiving no treatment (NT). The secondary aim was to identify, in this cohort, ultrasonographic findings that represent robust indications for hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy, to avoid unnecessary second-level diagnostic procedures.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study (Clinical Trial ID: NCT03898947).

SETTING

Data were collected from different Italian centers: Regina Elena National Cancer Institute of Rome, Arbor Vitae Centre of Rome, Gaetano Martino University Hospital of Messina, and Villa Sofia-Cervello Hospital of Palermo.

PATIENTS

We selected and consecutively included patients with a history of breast cancer who had undergone hysteroscopy for ultrasonographic or clinical indications between January 2007 and December 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Diagnostic hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy or operative hysteroscopy, when clinically indicated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A higher percentage of patients in the TAM and AI groups had a normal endometrium compared with those in the NT group, whereas the incidence of endometrial polyps was higher in the NT group than in the others; no significant differences were observed among the 3 groups for other benign conditions or for premalignant and malignant uterine diseases, such as endometrial atypical hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

TAM treatment does not seem to be associated with a higher rate of endometrial cancer in women with breast cancer compared with women treated with AIs or NT.

Interdisciplinary Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Cancer. Guideline (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Nummer 032/034-OL, April 2018) - Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis and Hereditary Factors of Endometrial Cancer

Summary The first German interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer was published in April 2018. Funded by German Cancer Aid as part of an Oncology Guidelines Program, the lead coordinators of the guideline were the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG).

Purpose The use of evidence-based, risk-adapted therapy to treat low-risk women with endometrial cancer avoids unnecessarily radical surgery and non-useful adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. This can significantly reduce therapy-induced morbidity and improve the patientʼs quality of life as well as avoiding unnecessary costs. For women with endometrial cancer and a high risk of recurrence, the guideline defines the optimal surgical radicality together with the appropriate chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiotherapy where required. The evidence-based optimal use of different therapeutic modalities should improve survival rates and the quality of life of these patients. The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer is intended as a basis for certified gynecological cancer centers. The aim is that the quality indicators established in this guideline will be incorporated in the certification processes of these centers.

Methods The guideline was compiled in accordance with the requirements for S3-level guidelines. This includes, in the first instance, the adaptation of source guidelines selected using the DELBI instrument for appraising guidelines. Other consulted sources include reviews of evidence which were compiled from literature selected during systematic searches of literature databases using the PICO scheme. In addition, an external biostatistics institute was commissioned to carry out a systematic search and assessment of the literature for one area of the guideline. The identified materials were used by the interdisciplinary working groups to develop suggestions for Recommendations and Statements, which were then modified during structured consensus conferences and/or additionally amended online using the DELPHI method with consent being reached online. The guideline report is freely available online.

Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations on epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and hereditary factors, The epidemiology of endometrial cancer and the risk factors for developing endomentrial cancer are presented. The options for screening and the methods used to diagnose endometrial cancer including the pathology of the cancer are outlined. Recommendations are given for the prevention, diagnosis, and therapy of hereditary forms of endometrial cancer.

Endometrial pathology in breast cancer patients: Effect of different treatments on ultrasonographic, hysteroscopic and histological findings

Breast cancer patients have an increased risk of endometrial pathology. To investigate whether the incidence of endometrial abnormalities and their clinicopathological features were affected by receiving tamoxifen (TAM), non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) or no treatment (NT), 333 peri/postmenopausal breast cancer patients, who were referred to the Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical Sciences and Reproductive Medicine for gynecological assessment, were reviewed retrospectively. Transvaginal ultrasonographic (TVUS), hysteroscopic and histological findings were investigated. Endometrial histological findings included: atrophy in 61, 94.3 and 55.6% of cases in the TAM, AIs and NT groups, respectively; polyps in 30.9, 31.4 and 42.2% of cases in the TAM, AIs and NT groups, respectively; hyperplasia in 3% of patients in the TAM group and 11.1% of patients in the NT group; and cancer in 3.8% of cases in the TAM group and 11.1% of cases in the NT group. There was a significant correlation between the duration of TAM treatment and the severity of endometrial pathology. In all groups, there was a significant correlation between hysteroscopic and histological findings with regard to the diagnosis of endometrial atrophy, polyps, hyperplasia and cancer (P<0.001). In conclusion, these data revealed that there was a higher incidence of endometrial pathology in the NT group compared with the TAM group, which was significant for endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. The chance of developing high-risk histological subtypes of endometrial cancer was independent of TAM use. Lastly, although there was no significant difference in recurrent vaginal bleeding and mean endometrial thickness between the TAM and AIs groups, patients receiving AIs did not exhibit hyperplastic, dysplastic or neoplastic changes in the endometrium. This study indicates that breast cancer patients require screening for endometrial pathology; TVUS alone is useful in asymptomatic patients, however, in patients where the endometrial line is irregular or its thickness is >3 mm, hysteroscopy with directed biopsy is the appropriate diagnostic method.

Evaluation of endometrial thickness in hormone receptor positive early stage breast cancer postmenopausal women switching from adjuvant tamoxifen treatment to anastrozole

Evaluation of endometrial thickness by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) in postmenopausal estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients treated with anastrozole after tamoxifen therapy. This study included 70 postmenopausal estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients who switched to anastrozole after tamoxifen; patients had endometrial thickness >4mm and no endometrial malignancy. Endometrial thickness was measured after anastrozole treatment. Endometrial thickness during anastrozole therapy was lower than after tamoxifen therapy (p<0.001); the mean reduction in endometrial thickness was 4.5mm (+/-3.0). Cystic endometrial appearance was more frequent in patients under tamoxifen than in those under anastrozole (p<0.001). Duration of tamoxifen therapy was not correlated to the endometrial thickness at the time of its suspension. Duration of tamoxifen therapy and endometrial thickness at the time of tamoxifen suspension was correlated to the relative reduction of endometrial thickness during anastrozole therapy. Anastrozole reverses tamoxifen-induced increased endometrial thickness and sonographic endometrial cystic appearance.

Prospective endometrial assessment of breast cancer patients treated with third generation aromatase inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

A prospective evaluation of the effects on endometrium of third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), administered as adjuvant up-front therapy or switched therapy in menopausal patients suffering from breast cancer.

METHODS

Forty-five patients suffering from estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer were treated with AIs as adjuvant endocrine therapy; 27 patients switched from tamoxifen to AIs (group 1) due to adverse medical events related to tamoxifen intake (22 patients) or to an extended endocrine treatment after 60 months of tamoxifen therapy (5 patients); whereas 18 patients received AIs as up-front adjuvant therapy (group 2). All patients underwent endometrial investigation before the start of AIs therapy and, thereafter, at 12 month intervals. Endometrial assessment was based on Transvaginal Ultrasonography (TU), followed by hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy when a double layered endometrial stripe above 4 mm was measured on the longitudinal plane of uterine scanning. Six patients, showing endometrial hyperplasia before the start of AIs therapy, underwent hysteroscopy on a yearly basis, disregarding the endometrial thickness measured by TU. Histopathologic results on endometrial biopsies represented the reference test in order to estimate the prevalence of endometrial morbidity.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical variables evaluated (age, parity, age at menarche and menopause, Body Mass Index, previous chemotherapy and radiotherapy) did not differ in groups 1 and 2. The average period of endometrial surveillance after the start of AIs therapy was 24.8 +/-10.8 months for group 1 and 21.4 +/- 11.5 months for group 2. A progressive decrease of endometrial thickness, from 8.2 +/- 5.0 to 3.0 +/- 1.2 in group 1 and from 4.7 +/- 4.3 to 1.9 +/- 0.3 in group 2, was found before the start and after 36-48 months of AIs therapy. The second line endometrial investigations' rate dropped from 70.3% to 12.5% in group 1 and from 27.7% to 0.0% in group 2, at baseline and after 36-48 months of AIs therapy, respectively. We found baseline endometrial abnormalities in 25.9% and in 22.2% of patients in groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.4), respectively. During AIs administration, an endometrial pathology was found in 1 patient of group 1 and in 3 patients of group 2. In 3 patients, the abnormality consisted of simple hyperplasias and in all these patients an abnormal endometrium (1 complex atypical hyperplasia and 2 simple hyperplasias) was already detected at baseline assessment. Only in 1 patient (2.2%) of group 2 did we find an emerging pathology, consisting of adenosarcoma harbored within an endometrial polyp, detected after 12 months of therapy with letrozole. In 3 out of 5 patients showing simple hyperplasia and in 1 patient showing atypical hyperplasia before the start of AIs therapy, we observed a reversal to normal endometrium and to simple hyperplasia, respectively, after 12 months of therapy with anastrozole.

CONCLUSIONS

AIs delivered as up-front therapy for breast cancer have no effects on unspecific endometrial thickening. When administered as switched therapy after tamoxifen withdrawal, AIs may reverse tamoxifen-associated endometrial thickening. As a consequence, we reduced unnecessary second-line endometrial investigations. A low rate of emerging endometrial pathology was found during AIs therapy.

The value of sonohysterography in the prediction of endometrial pathologies in asymptomatic postmenopausal breast cancer tamoxifen-treated patients

BACKGROUND

The study evaluated the efficacy of sonohysterography in identifying endometrial pathologies in asymptomatic postmenopausal tamoxifen (TAM)-treated patients by evaluating its performance characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple assessments of sonohysterography evaluations of intrauterine mass diameter were evaluated by logistic regression analysis based on overall 85 patients (who had transvaginal ultrasonographic endometrial thickness of >/=8 mm) followed by hysteroscopy and endometrial histological findings. Performance characteristics were calculated with correlation to the endometrial histological findings.

RESULTS

The mean endometrial thickness was 14.6 +/- 6.2 mm, and the mean intrauterine mass diameter detected by SIS was 11.6 +/- 10.4 mm. There was a gradual decrease in sensitivity and gradual increase in specificity of the SIS studies with the increase in intrauterine mass diameter. False-negative and false-positive of SIS were 2.4% and 8.2%, respectively. ROC curve analysis of intrauterine mass revealed 5 mm as the best accurate cutoff value for the diagnosis of endometrial pathologies, with a sensitivity of 74.1%, specificity of 93.0%, and positive predictive value of 88.3% and negative predictive value of 84.2%. The risk of endometrial pathology was elevated by 1.37-fold, with any additional millimeter of diameter of the intrauterine mass. The mean diameter of the intrauterine mass gradually increased the greater the severity of the histological findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonohysterography improves the accuracy of diagnosis of intrauterine mass in asymptomatic postmenopausal tamoxifen-treated patients. The size of the intrauterine mass correlates with the severity of the endometrial pathology.

Sonohysterography: a valuable tool in evaluating the female pelvis

A number of medical conditions, including abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial cancer, monitoring tamoxifen therapy, infertility, and recurrent abortion, warrant investigation of the female genital tract. Diagnostic studies including hysterosalpingogram, ultrasound, and sonohysterography have proved useful in the investigation of these gynecologic conditions. This article discusses each of these tests with particular emphasis on sonohysterography and their current and potential contributions in both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. The utility of each as well as their comparative value to each other and existing gold standards is reviewed.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to outline the current screening methods for uterine cavity and pelvic abnormalities, to list the advantages of sonohysterography, and to describe the clinical situations where sonohysterography can be used.

Prospective longitudinal study of ultrasound screening for endometrial abnormalities in women with breast cancer receiving tamoxifen

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this work was to study the role of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) together with colorflow Doppler imaging (CFDI) in the detection of significant endometrial abnormalities induced by tamoxifen.

METHODS

Over a 6-year period, 304 women on tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer were recruited into the current study. Standard demographic data as well as duration of tamoxifen use were collected. Patients were assessed at study entry and at yearly intervals with TVUS together with CFDI. All patients had an endometrial biopsy at the time of study entry, and repeat endometrial evaluations were done subsequently only if there were abnormal ultrasound findings or the presence of irregular vaginal bleeding. All ultrasonic characteristics and Doppler flow measurements were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study group. Logistic regression was used to identify significant treatment- and ultrasound-related factors associated with the presence of significant uterine pathology.

RESULTS

One thousand and sixty-one ultrasound assessments were performed on 304 patients over a 6-year period. The mean age was 52.33 (range, 29-79). Seventy-two percent of the patients were postmenopausal at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. The median concentrations of estrogen and progesterone receptor were 75 and 73 fmol/L, respectively. Fifty-eight percent of the patients had received cytotoxic chemotherapy. The mean duration of tamoxifen use was 48.2 months. Thirty-two percent of the ultrasound examinations had associated significant uterine pathology defined as conditions that required further medical or surgical investigation and treatment. However, 80% of the abnormalities represented benign polyps. Six cases of primary endometrial cancer were detected. All cases presented with irregular bleeding. No recurrence of disease was detected at a median follow-up of 48 months. One case of metastatic breast cancer to the uterus was encountered. By setting the endometrial thickness cutoff at more than 9 mm to represent significant abnormality in this patient population, the sensitivity was 63.3%, specificity was 60.4%, positive predictive value was 43.3%, and negative predictive value was 77.5%. To detect endometrial cancer, the endometrial thickness cutoff at 9 mm had a positive predictive value of only 1.4%. Logistic regression analysis showed only endometrial thickness greater than 9 mm (OR 3.99, CI = 1.26-12.65, P = 0.018) and spiral artery pulsatility index measurement (OR 4.18, CI = 1.25-13.92, P = 0.02) to be associated with significant uterine abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine sequential ultrasound surveillance in asymptomatic women on tamoxifen is not useful because of its low specificity and positive predictive value. A significant portion of screened asymptomatic women would need to undergo needless surgical evaluations of their endometrium if widespread use of ultrasound is implemented in this patient population.

Saline infusion sonography and office hysteroscopy to assess endometrial morbidity associated with tamoxifen intake

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare office feasibility, patient acceptance, and diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy (HYS) and saline infusion sonography (SIS) in breast cancer patients taking tamoxifen.

METHODS

Sixty-six asymptomatic postmenopausal women on tamoxifen for breast cancer underwent SIS, followed by outpatient HYS with endometrial biopsy. In all women an endometrial stripe over 4 mm was previously measured by transvaginal ultrasonography (TU). Histologic reports were matched with sonographic and hysteroscopic findings. After SIS and HYS, patients were asked to rate pelvic pain experienced during the two procedures on a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

SIS and HYS were not accomplished in 26 (39.3%) and 4 (6.0%) patients, respectively, due to cervical stenosis or patient intolerance. No adverse event was recorded after 40 SIS and 62 hysteroscopic procedures. Pathologic assessment reported 15 polyps (22.7%), 7 hyperplasias (10.5%), and 2 submucous myomas (3.0%). Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of SIS in distinguishing between normal and abnormal endometrium were 85.7, 83.3, 93.7, and 66.0%, respectively, whereas HYS provided corresponding values of 100, 94.1, 97.8, and 100%, respectively. No significant difference was found between SIS and HYS in the subjective perception of pelvic pain (VAS scores 3.02 +/- 2.8 and 3.82 +/- 2.7, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Office hysteroscopy is a safe and conclusive diagnostic tool for endometrial investigation in menopausal women on tamoxifen. It exposes the patients to the same pelvic discomfort as SIS, but has a better feasibility rate and diagnostic accuracy.