Polymerization, three-dimensional structure and mechanical properties of Ddictyostelium versus rabbit muscle actin filaments

The role of structural dynamics of actin in class-specific myosin motility

The structural dynamics of actin, including the tilting motion between the small and large domains, are essential for proper interactions with actin-binding proteins. Gly146 is situated at the hinge between the two domains, and we previously showed that a G146V mutation leads to severe motility defects in skeletal myosin but has no effect on motility of myosin V. The present study tested the hypothesis that G146V mutation impaired rotation between the two domains, leading to such functional defects. First, our study showed that depolymerization of G146V filaments was slower than that of wild-type filaments. This result is consistent with the distinction of structural states of G146V filaments from those of the wild type, considering the recent report that stabilization of actin filaments involves rotation of the two domains. Next, we measured intramolecular FRET efficiencies between two fluorophores in the two domains with or without skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin or the heavy meromyosin equivalent of myosin V in the presence of ATP. Single-molecule FRET measurements showed that the conformations of actin subunits of control and G146V actin filaments were different in the presence of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin. This altered conformation of G146V subunits may lead to motility defects in myosin II. In contrast, distributions of FRET efficiencies of control and G146V subunits were similar in the presence of myosin V, consistent with the lack of motility defects in G146V actin with myosin V. The distribution of FRET efficiencies in the presence of myosin V was different from that in the presence of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin, implying that the roles of actin conformation in myosin motility depend on the type of myosin.

Looking back at a quarter-century of research at the Maurice E. Müller Institute for Structural Biology

The Maurice E. Müller Institute, embedded in the infrastructure of the Biozentrum, University of Basel, was founded in 1985 and financed by the Maurice E. Müller Foundation of Switzerland. For 26 years its two founders, Ueli Aebi and Andreas Engel, pursued the vision of integrated structural biology. This paper reviews selected publications issuing from the Maurice E. Müller Institute for Structural Biology and marks the end of this era.

Conformational dynamics of actin: effectors and implications for biological function

Actin is a protein abundant in many cell types. Decades of investigations have provided evidence that it has many functions in living cells. The diverse morphology and dynamics of actin structures adapted to versatile cellular functions is established by a large repertoire of actin-binding proteins. The proper interactions with these proteins assume effective molecular adaptations from actin, in which its conformational transitions play essential role. This review attempts to summarise our current knowledge regarding the coupling between the conformational states of actin and its biological function.

Ion-dependent polymerization differences between mammalian beta- and gamma-nonmuscle actin isoforms

beta- and gamma-nonmuscle actins differ by 4 amino acids at or near the N terminus and distant from polymerization interfaces. beta-Actin contains an Asp(1)-Asp(2)-Asp(3) and Val(10) whereas gamma-actin has a Glu(1)-Glu(2)-Glu(3) and Ile(10). Despite these small changes, conserved across mammals, fish, and birds, their differential localization in the same cell suggests they may play different roles reflecting differences in their biochemical properties. To test this hypothesis, we established a baculovirus-driven expression system for producing these actins in isoform-pure populations although contaminated with 20-25% insect actin. Surprisingly, Ca-gamma-actin exhibits a slower monomeric nucleotide exchange rate, a much longer nucleation phase, and a somewhat slower elongation rate than beta-actin. In the Mg-form, this difference between the two is much smaller. Ca-gamma-actin depolymerizes half as fast as does beta-actin. Mixing experiments with Ca-actins reveal the two will readily co-polymerize. In the Ca-form, phosphate release from polymerizing beta-actin occurs much more rapidly and extensively than polymerization, whereas phosphate release lags behind polymerization with gamma-actin. Phosphate release during treadmilling is twice as fast with beta- as with gamma-actin. With Mg-actin in the initial stages, phosphate release for both actins correlates much more closely with polymerization. Calcium bound in the high affinity binding site of gamma-actin may cause a selective energy barrier relative to beta-actin that retards the equilibration between G- and F-monomer conformations resulting in a slower polymerizing actin with greater filament stability. This difference may be particularly important in sites such as the gamma-actin-rich cochlear hair cell stereocilium where local mm calcium concentrations may exist.

A simple model for the cooperative stabilisation of actin filaments by phalloidin and jasplakinolide

The stabilisation of magnesium actin filaments by phalloidin and jasplakinolide was studied using the method of differential scanning calorimetry. The results showed that actin could adapt three conformations in the presence of drugs. One conformation was adapted in direct interaction with the drug, while another conformation was identical to that observed in the absence of drugs. A third conformation was induced through allosteric inter-protomer interactions. The effect of both drugs propagated cooperatively along the actin filaments. The number of the cooperative units determined by using a quantitative model was larger for jasplakinolide (15 actin protomers) than for phalloidin (7 protomers).

Actin's propensity for dynamic filament patterning

Actin, through its various forms of assembly, provides the basic framework for cell motility, cell shape and intracellular organization in all eukaryotic cells. Many other cellular processes, for example endocytosis and cytokinesis, are also associated with dynamic changes of the actin cytoskeleton. Important prerequisites for actin's functional diversity are its intrinsic ability to rapidly assemble and disassemble filaments and its spatially and temporally well-controlled supramolecular organization. A large number of proteins that interact with actin, collectively referred to as actin-binding proteins (ABPs), carefully orchestrate different scenarios. Since its isolation in 1994 [Machesky, L.M. et al. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 127, 107-115], the Arp2/3 complex containing the actin-related proteins Arp2 and Arp3 has evolved to be one of the main players in the assembly and maintenance of many actin-based structures in the cell (for review see [Borths, E.L. and Welch, M.D. (2002) Structure 10, 131-135; May, R.C. (2001) Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58, 1607-1626; Pollard, T.D. et al. (2000) Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 545-576; Welch, M.D. (1999) Trends Cell Biol. 11, 423-427]). In particular, when it comes to the assembly of the intricate branched actin network at the leading edge of lamellipodia, the Arp2/3 complex seems to have received all the attention in recent years. In parallel, but not so much in the spotlight, several reports showed that actin on its own can assume different conformations [Bubb, M.R. et al. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 20999-21006; Schoenenberger, C.-A. et al. (1999) Microsc. Res. Tech. 47, 38-50; Steinmetz, M.O. et al. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 278, 793-811; Steinmetz, M.O. et al. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 559-574; Millonig, R., Salvo, H. and Aebi, U. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 106, 785-796] through which it drives its supramolecular patterning, and which ultimately generate its functional diversity.