Differential melting of the transcription start site associated with changes in RNA polymerase-promoter contacts in initiating transcription complexes

Single-stranded DNA drives σ subunit loading onto mycobacterial RNA polymerase to unlock initiation-competent conformations

Initiation of transcription requires the formation of the "open" promoter complex (RPo). For this, the σ subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) binds to the nontemplate strand of the -10 element sequence of promoters and nucleates DNA unwinding. This is accompanied by a cascade of conformational changes on RNAP, the exact mechanics of which remains elusive. Here, using single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer and cryo-electron microscopy, we explored the conformational landscape of RNAP from the human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis upon binding to a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) fragment that includes the -10 element sequence (-10 ssDNA). We found that like the transcription activator RNAP-binding protein A, -10 ssDNA induced σ subunit loading onto the DNA/RNA channels of RNAP. This triggered RNAP clamp closure and unswiveling that are required for RPo formation and RNA synthesis initiation. Our results reveal a mechanism of ssDNA-guided RNAP maturation and identify the σ subunit as a regulator of RNAP conformational dynamics.

DNA bubble formation in transcription initiation

The properties of the DNA bubble in the transcription open complex have been characterized by topological analysis of DNA circles containing the lac UV5 promoter or the PR promoter from bacteriophage lambda. Topological analysis is particularly well suited to this purpose since it quantifies the changes in DNA duplex geometry caused by bubble formation as well as by superhelical DNA wrapping. The duplex unwinding that results from bubble formation is detected as a reduction in topological linking number of the DNA circle, and the precision of this measurement has been enhanced in the current study through the use of 8 or 10 promoter copies per circle. Several lines of evidence indicate that the linking number change induced by open complex formation is essentially all due to bubble generation, with very little derived from superhelical wrapping. Accordingly, the linking number change of -1.17 measured for the lac UV5 promoter indicates that the size of the lac UV5 bubble is about 12.3 base pairs, while the change of -0.98 measured for the lambda PR promoter indicates that the lambda PR bubble is 10.3 base pairs. It was also found that the presence or absence of magnesium ion had little effect on the value of the linking number change, a result that resolves the uncertainty associated with use of chemical probes to study the effect of magnesium on bubble size. Finally, the magnitude of linking number change increases progressively when the 3' end of a transcript is extended to +2 and +3 in an abortive initiation complex. This indicates that the transcription bubble expands at its leading edge in the abortive complex, results that confirm and extend the proposal of a DNA "scrunching" mechanism at the onset of transcription. These results are relevant to several models for the structure of DNA in the functional open complex in solution, and provide an important complement to the structural information available from recent crystal structures.

Late steps in the formation of E. coli RNA polymerase-lambda P R promoter open complexes: characterization of conformational changes by rapid [perturbant] upshift experiments

The formation of the transcriptionally competent open complex (RP(o)) by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the lambda P(R) promoter involves at least three steps and two kinetically significant intermediates (I(1) and I(2)). Understanding the sequence of conformational changes (rearrangements in the jaws of RNA polymerase, DNA opening) that occur in the conversion of I(1) to RP(o) requires: (1) dissecting the rate constant k(d) for the dissociation of RP(o) into contributions from individual steps and (2) isolating and characterizing I(2). To deconvolute k(d), we develop experiments involving rapid upshifts to elevated concentrations of RP(o)-destabilizing solutes ("perturbants": urea and KCl) to create a burst in the population of I(2). At high concentrations of either perturbant, k(d) approaches the same [perturbant]-independent value, interpreted as the elementary rate constant k(-2) for I(2)-->I(1). The large effects of [urea] and [salt] on K(3) (the equilibrium constant for I(2) is in equilibrium with RP(o)) indicate that a large-scale folding transition in polymerase occurs and a new interface with the DNA forms late in the mechanism. We deduce that I(2) at the lambda P(R) promoter is always unstable relative to RP(o), even at 0 degrees C, explaining previous difficulties in detecting it by using temperature downshifts. The division of the large positive enthalpy change between the late steps of the mechanism suggests that an additional unstable intermediate (I(3)) may exist between I(2) and RP(o).

Differences in contacts of RNA polymerases from Escherichia coli and Thermus aquaticus with lacUV5 promoter are determined by core-enzyme of RNA polymerase

The interaction of RNA polymerases from Escherichia coli and Thermus aquaticus with lacUV5 promoter was studied at various temperatures. Using DNA-protein cross-linking induced by formaldehyde, it was demonstrated that each RNA polymerase formed a unique pattern of contacts with DNA in the open promoter complex. In the case of E. coli RNA polymerase, beta and sigma subunits were involved into formation of cross-links with the promoter, whereas in the case of T. aquaticus RNA polymerase its beta subunit formed the cross-links with the promoter. A cross-linking pattern in promoter complexes of a hybrid holoenzyme comprised of the core-enzyme of E. coli and sigma subunit of T. aquaticus was similar to that of the E. coli holoenzyme. This suggests that DNA-protein contacts in the promoter complex are primarily determined by the core-enzyme of RNA polymerase. However, temperature-dependent behavior of contact formation is determined by the sigma subunit. Results of the present study indicate that the method of formaldehyde cross-linking can be employed for elucidation of differences in the structure of promoter complexes of RNA polymerases from various bacteria.

Remodeling of the sigma70 subunit non-template DNA strand contacts during the final step of transcription initiation

Transcription initiation in bacteria requires melting of approximately 13 bp of promoter DNA. The mechanism of the melting process is not fully understood. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase bearing a deletion of the beta subunit lobe I (amino acid residues 186-433) initiates melting of the -10 promoter element but cannot propagate the melting downstream, towards the transcription initiation start site (+1). However, in the presence of nucleotides, stable downstream melting is induced. Here, we studied lacUV5 promoter complexes formed by the mutant enzyme by cross-linking RNA polymerase subunits to single-stranded DNA in the transcription bubble. In the absence of NTPs, a contact between the sigma70 subunit and the non-template strand of the -10 promoter element was detected. This contact disappeared in the presence of NTPs. Instead, a new sigma70-DNA contact as well as stable beta' and beta subunit contacts with the non-template DNA downstream of the -10 promoter element were established. In terms of the two-step (upstream initiation/downstream propagation) model of promoter melting, our data suggest that beta lobe I induces the propagation of promoter melting by directing downstream promoter DNA duplex towards the downstream DNA-binding channel (beta' clamp). Establishment of downstream contacts leads to remodeling of upstream interactions between sigma70 and the -10 promoter element that might facilitate promoter escape and sigma release.

The sigma 70 subunit of RNA polymerase induces lacUV5 promoter-proximal pausing of transcription

The sigma(70) subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) is a transcription initiation factor that can also be associated with RNAP during elongation. We provide biochemical evidence that sigma(70) induces a transcription pause at the lacUV5 promoter after RNAP has synthesized a 17-nucleotide transcript. The sigma(70)-dependent pausing requires an interaction between sigma(70) and a part of the lac repressor operator sequence resembling a promoter -10 consensus. The polysaccharide heparin triggers the release of sigma(70) from the paused complexes, supporting the view that during the transition from initiation to elongation the interactions between sigma(70) and core RNAP are weakened. We propose that the binding and retention of sigma(70) in elongation complexes are stabilized by its ability to form contacts with DNA of the transcription bubble. In addition, we suggest that the sigma(70) subunit in the elongation complex may provide a target for regulation of gene expression.

Thermoirreversible and thermoreversible promoter opening by two Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzymes

Promoter opening, in which the complementary DNA strands separate around the transcriptional start site, is generally thermoreversible. An exceptional case of thermoirreversible opening of the T4 late promoter has been analyzed by KMnO4 footprinting and transcription. T4 late promoters, which consist of an 8-base pair (bp) TATA box "-10" element, are recognized by the small, phage-encoded, highly diverged sigma-family initiation subunit gp55. The T4 late promoter only opens above 15-20 degrees C, but once it has been formed remains open and transcriptionally active for days at -0.5 degrees C. The low temperature-trapped open complex and its isothermally formed state are shown to be structurally distinctive. Two "extended -10" sigma 70 promoters, which, like the T4 late promoter, lack "-35" sites, have been subjected to a comparative analysis: the T4 middle promoter PrIIB2 opens and closes thermoreversibly under conditions of basal and MotA- and AsiA-activated transcription. The open galP1 promoter complex, whose transcription bubble is very AT-rich, also closes reversibly upon shift to -0.5 degrees C, but more slowly than does the rIIB2 promoter. Formation of a trapped-open low temperature state of the promoter complex appears to be a singular property of gp55-RNA polymerase holoenzyme.

Effects of DNA strand breaks on transcription by RNA polymerase III: insights into the role of TFIIIB and the polarity of promoter opening

Certain deletion mutants of the Brf1 and Bdp1 subunits of transcription factor (TF) IIIB retain the ability to recruit RNA polymerase (pol) III to its promoters, but fail to support promoter opening: deletions within an internal Bdp1 segment interfere with initiation of DNA strand separation, and an N-terminal Brf1 deletion blocks propagation of promoter opening past the transcriptional start site. The ability of DNA strand breaks to restore pol III transcription activity to these defective TFIIIB assemblies has been analyzed using U6 snRNA gene constructs. Breaks in a 21 bp segment spanning the transcriptional start rescue transcription in DNA strand-specific and subunit/mutation-specific patterns. A cluster of Bdp1 internal deletions also reverses the inactivation of transcription with wild-type TFIIIB generated by certain transcribed (template) strand breaks near the transcriptional start site. A structure-based model and topological considerations interpret these observations, explain how Bdp1 and Brf1 help to enforce the general upstream--> downstream polarity of promoter opening and specify requirements for polarity reversal.

The mechanism of transcriptional activation by the topologically DNA-linked sliding clamp of bacteriophage T4

Three viral proteins participate directly in transcription of bacteriophage T4 late genes: the sigma-family protein gp55 provides promoter recognition, gp33 is the co-activator, and gp45 is the activator of transcription; gp33 also represses transcription in the absence of gp45. Transcriptional activation by gp45, the toroidal sliding clamp of the T4 DNA polymerase holoenzyme, requires assembly at primer-template junctions by its clamp loader. The mechanism of transcriptional activation has been analyzed by examining rates of formation of open promoter complexes. The basal gp55-RNA polymerase holoenzyme is only weakly held in its initially formed closed promoter complex, which subsequently opens very slowly. Activation ( approximately 320-fold in this work) increases affinity in the closed complex and accelerates promoter opening. Promoter opening by gp55 is also thermo-irreversible: the T4 late promoter does not open at 0 degrees C, but once opened at 30 degrees C remains open upon shift to the lower temperature. At a hybrid promoter for sigma(70) and gp55-holoenzymes, only gp55 confers thermo-irreversibility of promoter opening. Interaction of gp45 with a C-terminal epitope of gp33 is essential for the co-activator function of gp33.

Kinetic studies and structural models of the association of E. coli sigma(70) RNA polymerase with the lambdaP(R) promoter: large scale conformational changes in forming the kinetically significant intermediates

The kinetics of interaction of Esigma(70) RNA polymerase (R) with the lambdaP(R) promoter (P) were investigated by filter binding over a broad range of temperatures (7.3-42 degrees C) and concentrations of RNA polymerase (1-123 nM) in large excess over promoter DNA. Under all conditions examined, the kinetics of formation of competitor-resistant complexes (I(2), RP(o)) are single-exponential with first order rate constant beta(CR). Interpretation of the polymerase concentration dependence of beta(CR) in terms of the three step mechanism of open complex formation yields the equilibrium constant K(1) for formation of the first kinetically significant intermediate (I(1)) and the forward rate constant (k(2)) for the conformational change converting I(1) to the second kinetically significant intermediate I(2): R + P-->(K(1))<--I(1)(k(2))-->I(2). Use of rapid quench mixing allows K(1) and k(2) to be individually determined over the entire temperature range investigated, previously not possible at this promoter using manual mixing. Given the large (>60 bp) interface formed in I(1), its relatively small binding constant K(1) at 37 degrees C at this [salt] (approximately 6 x 10(6) M(-1)) strongly argues that binding free energy is used to drive large-scale structural changes in polymerase and/or promoter DNA or other coupled processes. Evidence for coupling of protein folding is provided by the large and negative activation heat capacity of k(a)[DeltaC(o,++)(a)= -1.5(+/-0.2)kcal K(-1)], now shown to originate directly from formation of I(1) [DeltaC(o)(1)= -1.4(+/-0.3)kcal K(-1)] rather than from the formation of I(2) as previously proposed. The isomerization I(1)-->I(2) exhibits relatively slow kinetics and has a very large temperature-independent Arrhenius activation energy [E(act)(2)= 34(+/-2)kcal]. This kinetic signature suggests that formation of the transition state (I(1)-I(2)++ involves large conformational changes dominated by changes in the exposure of polar and/or charged surface to water. Structural and biochemical data lead to the following hypotheses to interpret these results. We propose that formation of I(1) involves coupled folding of unstructured regions of polymerase (beta, beta' and sigma(70)) and bending of promoter DNA (in the -10 region). We propose that interactions with region 2 of sigma(70) and possibly domain 1 of beta induce a kink at the -11/-12 base pairs of the lambdaP(R) promoter which places the downstream DNA (-5 to +20) in the jaws of the beta and beta' subunits of polymerase in I(1). These early interactions of beta and beta' with the DNA downstream of position -5 trigger jaw closing (with coupled folding) and subsequent steps of DNA opening.