• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4593689)   Today's Articles (5392)   Subscriber (49321)
For: Hart P. Preventing Groupthink Revisited: Evaluating and Reforming Groups in Government. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1998;73:306-26. [PMID: 9705806 DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Tsikerdekis M. The effects of perceived anonymity and anonymity states on conformity and groupthink in online communities: A Wikipedia study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1002/asi.22795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
2
Toma C, Vasiljevic D, Oberlé D, Augustinova M, Butera F. Le traitement motivé de l’information dans la prise de décision en groupe : le cas du paradigme des « profils cachés ». ANNEE PSYCHOLOGIQUE 2012. [DOI: 10.3917/anpsy.124.0663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
3
Le traitement motivé de l’information dans la prise de décision en groupe : le cas du paradigme des « profils cachés ». ANNEE PSYCHOLOGIQUE 2012. [DOI: 10.4074/s000350331200406x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
4
Schulz-Hardt S, Jochims M, Frey D. Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES 2002. [DOI: 10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00001-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
5
Paulus PB. Developing Consensus about Groupthink after All These Years. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES 1998;73:362-74. [PMID: 9705809 DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
6
Turner ME, Pratkanis AR. Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a Theory. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES 1998;73:105-15. [PMID: 9705798 DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
7
Raven BH. Groupthink, Bay of Pigs, and Watergate Reconsidered. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES 1998;73:352-61. [PMID: 9705808 DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA