Neutrophil function and opioid receptor expression on leucocytes during chronic naltrexone treatment in humans

Expression of Opioid Receptors in Cells of the Immune System

The observation of the immunomodulatory effects of opioid drugs opened the discussion about possible mechanisms of action and led researchers to consider the presence of opioid receptors (OR) in cells of the immune system. To date, numerous studies analyzing the expression of OR subtypes in animal and human immune cells have been performed. Some of them confirmed the expression of OR at both the mRNA and protein level, while others did not detect the receptor mRNA either. Although this topic remains controversial, further studies are constantly being published. The most recent articles suggested that the expression level of OR in human peripheral blood lymphocytes could help to evaluate the success of methadone maintenance therapy in former opioid addicts, or could serve as a biomarker for chronic pain diagnosis. However, the applicability of these findings to clinical practice needs to be verified by further investigations.

Single cell transcriptomics reveals opioid usage evokes widespread suppression of antiviral gene program

Chronic opioid usage not only causes addiction behavior through the central nervous system, but also modulates the peripheral immune system. However, how opioid impacts the immune system is still barely characterized systematically. In order to understand the immune modulatory effect of opioids in an unbiased way, here we perform single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from opioid-dependent individuals and controls to show that chronic opioid usage evokes widespread suppression of antiviral gene program in naive monocytes, as well as in multiple immune cell types upon stimulation with the pathogen component lipopolysaccharide. Furthermore, scRNA-seq reveals the same phenomenon after a short in vitro morphine treatment. These findings indicate that both acute and chronic opioid exposure may be harmful to our immune system by suppressing the antiviral gene program. Our results suggest that further characterization of the immune modulatory effects of opioid is critical to ensure the safety of clinical opioids.

Over 100 million of opioid prescriptions are issued yearly in the USA alone, but the impact of opioid use on the immune system is barely characterized. Here the authors report antiviral immune response is blunted in several types of blood cells from opioid-dependent individuals, and when healthy donor cells are exposed to morphine in a dish.

N/OFQ-NOP System in Peripheral and Central Immunomodulation

Classical opioids (μ: mu, MOP; δ: delta, DOP and κ: kappa, KOP) variably affect immune function; they are immune depressants and there is good clinical evidence in the periphery. In addition, there is evidence for a central role in the control of a number of neuropathologies, e.g., neuropathic pain. Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is the endogenous ligand for the N/OFQ peptide receptor, NOP; peripheral and central activation can modulate immune function. In the periphery, NOP activation generally depresses immune function, but unlike classical opioids this is in part driven by NOP located on circulating immune cells. Peripheral activation has important implications in pathologies like asthma and sepsis. NOP is expressed on central neurones and glia where activation can modulate glial function. Microglia, as resident central 'macrophages', increase/infiltrate in pain and following trauma; these changes can be reduced by N/OFQ. Moreover, the interaction with other glial cell types such as the ubiquitous astrocytes and their known cross talk with microglia open a wealth of possibilities for central immunomodulation. At the whole animal level, clinical ligands with wide central and peripheral distribution have the potential to modulate immune function, and defining the precise nature of that interaction is important in mitigating or even harnessing the adverse effect profile of these important drugs.

Opioids, gliosis and central immunomodulation

Neuropathic pain is a common health problem that affects millions of people worldwide. Despite being studied extensively, the cellular and molecular events underlying the central immunomodulation and the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain is still controversial. The idea that 'glial cells are merely housekeepers' is incorrect and with respect to initiation and maintenance of neuropathic pain, microglia and astrocytes have important roles to play. Glial cells differentially express opioid receptors and are thought to be functionally modulated by the activation of these receptors. In this review, we discuss evidence for glia-opioid modulation of pain by focusing on the pattern of astrocyte and microglial activation throughout the progress of nerve injury/neuropathic pain. Activation of astrocytes and microglia is a key step in central immunomodulation in terms of releasing pro-inflammatory markers and propagation of a 'central immune response'. Inhibition of astrocytes before and after induction of neuropathic pain has been found to prevent and reverse neuropathic pain, respectively. Moreover, microglial inhibitors have been found to prevent (but not to reverse) neuropathic pain. As they are expressed by glia, opioid receptors are expected to have a role to play in neuropathic pain.

Evidence for nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) but not µ (MOP), δ (DOP) or κ (KOP) opioid receptor mRNA in whole human blood

BACKGROUND

While it is well known that opioids depress the immune system, the site(s) of action for this depression is highly controversial. Immune modulation could occur directly at the immune cell or centrally via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. In a number of studies using individual enriched immune cell populations we have failed to detect classical µ (MOP), δ (DOP) and κ (KOP) receptors. The non-classical nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) receptor (NOP) is expressed on all cells examined thus far. Our hypothesis was that immune cells do not express classical opioid receptors and that using whole blood would definitively answer this question.

METHODS

Whole blood (containing all immune cell types) was incubated with opioids (morphine and fentanyl) commonly encountered in anaesthesia and with agents mimicking sepsis [lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and peptidoglycan G (PepG)]. Opioid receptor mRNA expression was assessed by endpoint polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with gel visualisation and quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

Classical MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors were not detected in any of the samples tested either at rest or when challenged with opioids, LPS or PepG. Commercial primers for DOP did not perform well in quantitative PCR, so the absence of expression was confirmed using a traditional gel-based approach. NOP receptors were detected in all samples; expression was unaffected by opioids and reduced by LPS/PepG combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Classical opioid receptors are not expressed on circulating immune cells.

Opioids and immune modulation: more questions than answers

Opioid addicts are more likely to present with infections suggesting opioids are immune modulators. The potential sites/mechanism(s) for this modulation are controversial and on close inspection not well supported by the current literature. It has long been assumed that opioid-induced immune modulation occurs via a combination of direct actions on the immune cell itself, via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, or both. Opioid receptors are classified as MOP (μ, mu), DOP (δ, delta), and KOP (κ, kappa)--classical naloxone sensitive receptors--or NOP (the receptor for nociceptin/orphanin FQ), which is naloxone insensitive. Opioids currently used in clinical practice predominantly target the MOP receptor. There do not appear to be classical opioid receptors present on immune cells. The evidence for HPA activation is also poor and shows some species dependence. Most opioids used clinically or as drugs of abuse do not target the NOP receptor. Other possible target sites for immune modulation include the sympathetic nervous system and central sites. We are currently unable to accurately define the cellular target for immune modulation and suggest further investigation is required. Based on the differences observed when comparing studies in laboratory animals and those performed in humans we suggest that further studies in the clinical setting are needed.

Naloxone inhibits immune cell function by suppressing superoxide production through a direct interaction with gp91phox subunit of NADPH oxidase

BACKGROUND

Both (-) and (+)-naloxone attenuate inflammation-mediated neurodegeneration by inhibition of microglial activation through superoxide reduction in an opioid receptor-independent manner. Multiple lines of evidence have documented a pivotal role of overactivated NADPH oxidase (NOX2) in inflammation-mediated neurodegeneration. We hypothesized that NOX2 might be a novel action site of naloxone to mediate its anti-inflammatory actions.

METHODS

Inhibition of NOX-2-derived superoxide by (-) and (+)-naloxone was measured in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated midbrain neuron-glia cultures and phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-stimulated neutrophil membranes by measuring the superoxide dismutase (SOD)-inhibitable reduction of tetrazolium salt (WST-1) or ferricytochrome c. Further, various ligand (3H-naloxone) binding assays were performed in wild type and gp91phox-/- neutrophils and transfected COS-7 and HEK293 cells. The translocation of cytosolic subunit p47phox to plasma membrane was assessed by western blot.

RESULTS

Both (-) and (+)-naloxone equally inhibited LPS- and PMA-induced superoxide production with an IC50 of 1.96 and 2.52 μM, respectively. Competitive binding of 3H-naloxone with cold (-) and (+)-naloxone in microglia showed equal potency with an IC50 of 2.73 and 1.57 μM, respectively. 3H-Naloxone binding was elevated in COS-7 and HEK293 cells transfected with gp91phox; in contrast, reduced 3H-naloxone binding was found in neutrophils deficient in gp91phox or in the presence of a NOX2 inhibitor. The specificity and an increase in binding capacity of 3H-naloxone were further demonstrated by 1) an immunoprecipitation study using gp91phox antibody, and 2) activation of NOX2 by PMA. Finally, western blot studies showed that naloxone suppressed translocation of the cytosolic subunit p47phox to the membrane, leading to NOX2 inactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong evidence is provided indicating that NOX2 is a non-opioid novel binding site for naloxone, which is critical in mediating its inhibitory effect on microglia overactivation and superoxide production.

Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells express nociceptin/orphanin FQ, but not mu, delta, or kappa opioid receptors

BACKGROUND

Expression of opioid receptors on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) is controversial. These receptors are currently classified as classical (MOP/mu/mu, DOP/delta/delta and KOP/kappa/kappa) and nonclassical NOP (nociceptin/orphanin FQ; N/OFQ).

METHODS

In this volunteer study we probed for the expression of both classical and nonclassical opioid receptors using 1) radioligand binding, 2) specific antibody binding, and 3) polymerase chain reaction-based experimental paradigms.

RESULTS

Membranes prepared from PBMC from healthy volunteers did not bind either [3H]diprenorphine (a nonselective radioligand for classical opioid receptors) or [3H]N/OFQ. There was significant concentration-dependent binding of each radioligand to control tissues expressing recombinant MOP and NOP. In addition, using fluorescence-activated cell sorting paradigms, there was no binding of fluorescent naloxone or either of two MOP antibodies to whole PBMC, though fluorescent naloxone did bind to recombinant MOP (as a positive control). Using primers specific for classical and nonclassical opioid receptors, and RNA extracted from the PBMC of 10 healthy volunteers, we were also unable to detect MOP, DOP, and KOP transcripts. In contrast, NOP was detected in all samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite using several complementary experimental strategies, we failed to demonstrate protein for classical or nonclassical opioid receptors on PBMC from healthy volunteers. We detected NOP mRNA, suggesting low-density NOP expression on these immunocytes. It is possible that N/OFQ, produced by the PBMC itself, may be involved in the control of immune function.

Opioid receptors on white blood cells: effect of HIV infection and methadone treatment

Opioid receptors (OR) are involved in many physiological and pathological immune functions. During recent years, the treatment of opiate addiction with methadone in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients has become widely accepted. However, little is known on the occurrence and course of OR on lymphocytes of these individuals. The objective of the study was to detect and quantify OR on peripheral white blood cells (WBC) by fluorescence-activated cell sorting using polyclonal antibodies and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and to assess the influence of HIV infection and methadone treatment. We compared OR levels in 80 HIV-positive homosexuals, 18 HIV-positive intravenous drug users (IVDU) treated with methadone, 18 HIV-negative IVDU receiving methadone and 25 healthy controls. HIV infection was shown to decrease the amount of OR on WBC, especially of the delta-subtype on lymphocytes and granulocytes. The decrease correlated with the duration of HIV-infection (P<0.01), and inversely with the HIV viral load (P<0.01). In contrast, chronic methadone administration led to a significant increase of OR exclusively in HIV-negative IVDU. In particular the delta-OR was increased by 31-, 62- and 42-fold on lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes of HIV-negative patients (each P<0.005), respectively, which was not observed in HIV-positive IVDU. Therefore, HIV seems to reduce OR particularly on lymphocytes and granulocytes regardless of the mode of HIV transmission. The quantification of OR on immune cells may help to elucidate the effects of opioid analogues in health and drug addiction.