Replication of oriJ-based plasmid DNA during the stringent and relaxed responses of Escherichia coli

Lethal perturbation of an Escherichia coli regulatory network is triggered by a restriction-modification system's regulator and can be mitigated by excision of the cryptic prophage Rac

Bacterial gene regulatory networks orchestrate responses to environmental challenges. Horizontal gene transfer can bring in genes with regulatory potential, such as new transcription factors (TFs), and this can disrupt existing networks. Serious regulatory perturbations may even result in cell death. Here, we show the impact on Escherichia coli of importing a promiscuous TF that has adventitious transcriptional effects within the cryptic Rac prophage. A cascade of regulatory network perturbations occurred on a global level. The TF, a C regulatory protein, normally controls a Type II restriction-modification system, but in E. coli K-12 interferes with expression of the RacR repressor gene, resulting in de-repression of the normally-silent Rac ydaT gene. YdaT is a prophage-encoded TF with pleiotropic effects on E. coli physiology. In turn, YdaT alters expression of a variety of bacterial regulons normally controlled by the RcsA TF, resulting in deficient lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis and cell division. At the same time, insufficient RacR repressor results in Rac DNA excision, halting Rac gene expression due to loss of the replication-defective Rac prophage. Overall, Rac induction appears to counteract the lethal toxicity of YdaT. We show here that E. coli rewires its regulatory network, so as to minimize the adverse regulatory effects of the imported C TF. This complex set of interactions may reflect the ability of bacteria to protect themselves by having robust mechanisms to maintain their regulatory networks, and/or suggest that regulatory C proteins from mobile operons are under selection to manipulate their host's regulatory networks for their own benefit.

Patterns of chromosomal fragmentation due to uracil-DNA incorporation reveal a novel mechanism of replication-dependent double-stranded breaks

There is growing evidence that spontaneous chromosomal fragmentation, one of the main contributors to genetic instability, is intimately linked to DNA replication. In particular, we proposed before that uracil incorporation in DNA triggers chromosomal fragmentation due to replication fork collapse at uracil-excision intermediates. We tested predictions of this model at the chromosomal level in the dut mutants of Escherichia coli, by determining the relationship between DNA replication and patterns of fragmentation in defined chromosomal segments. Here we show that the uracil-DNA-triggered chromosomal fragmentation: (i) has a gradient that parallels the replication gradient, (ii) shows polarity within defined segments pointing towards replication origins and (iii) reorganizes to match induced replication gradients, confirming its dynamic pattern. Unexpectedly, these fragmentation patterns not only support the replication fork collapse model, but also reveal another mechanism of the replication-dependent chromosomal fragmentation triggered by uracil excision.

Plasmids derived from Gifsy-1/Gifsy-2, lambdoid prophages contributing to the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium: implications for the evolution of replication initiation proteins of lambdoid phages and enterobacteria

Gifsy-1 and Gifsy-2 are lambdoid prophages which contribute to the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. The nucleotide sequence of the replication region of both prophages is identical, and similar in organization to the replication region of bacteriophage lambda. To investigate the replication of the Gifsy phages and the relationship between Gifsy and host chromosome replication, a plasmid which contained all the genes and regulatory sequences required for autonomous replication in bacterial cells was constructed. This plasmid, pGifsy, was stably maintained in Escherichia coli cells. The helicase loader of the Gifsy phages is very similar to the DnaC protein of the host, a feature characteristic of a large group of prophages common in the sequenced genomes of pathogenic enterobacteria. This DnaC-like protein showed no similarity to the helicase loader of bacteriophage lambda and closely related phages. Interestingly, unlike plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda (lambda plasmids), pGifsy did not require a gene encoding the putative helicase loader for replication, although deletion of this gene resulted in a decrease in plasmid copy number. Under these conditions, it was shown that the plasmid utilized the helicase loader coded by the host. On the other hand, the viral protein could not substitute for DnaC in bacterial chromosome replication. The results of the current study support the hypothesis that the enterobacterial helicase loader is of viral origin. This hypothesis explains why the gene for DnaC, the protein central to both replication initiation and replication restart in E. coli, is present in the genomes of Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella and Buchnera, but not in the genomes of related enterobacteria.

Interplay between DnaA and SeqA proteins during regulation of bacteriophage lambda pR promoter activity

DnaA and SeqA proteins are main regulators (positive and negative, respectively) of the chromosome replication in Escherichia coli. Nevertheless, both these replication regulators were found recently to be also transcription factors. Interestingly, both DnaA and SeqA control activity of the bacteriophage lambdap(R) promoter by binding downstream of the transcription start site, which is unusual among prokaryotic systems. Here we asked what are functional relationships between these two transcription regulators at one promoter region. Both in vivo and in vitro studies revealed that DnaA and SeqA can activate the p(R) promoter independently and separately rather than in co-operation, however, increased concentrations of one of these proteins negatively influenced the transcription stimulation mediated by the second regulator. This may suggest a competition between DnaA and SeqA for binding to the p(R) regulatory region. The physiological significance of this DnaA and SeqA-mediated regulation of p(R) is demonstrated by studies on lambda plasmid DNA replication in vivo.

Differential effects of Kid toxin on two modes of replication of lambdoid plasmids suggest that this toxin acts before, but not after, the assembly of the replication complex

Kid is a small protein that is encoded by plasmid R1. It is a toxin that belongs to a killer system that ensures the stability of the plasmid in host cells. The results of previous studies have suggested that Kid is an inhibitor of DNA replication, possibly acting at the onset of initiation. Here, the authors tested the effects of Kid on orilambda-intitiated and oriJ-initiated replication, which may be driven by both the newly assembled replication complex and the heritable complex. It was found that Kid inhibits only replication that is driven by the newly assembled replication complex. The authors also report that Kid inhibits ColE1-like plasmid replication in vivo, in agreement with the previously reported inhibition of ColE1 during in vitro replication. It is proposed that the Kid toxin acts at the level of replication either by preventing de novo assembly of the replication complex or by impairing the functional interactions of the replication complex at the initiation stage.

Composition of the lambda plasmid heritable replication complex

Previous studies indicated during replication of plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda (the so-called lambda plasmids), that, once assembled, replication complex can be inherited by one of the two daughter plasmid copies after each replication round, and may function in subsequent replication rounds. It seems that similar processes occur during replication of other DNA molecules, including chromosomes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, apart from some suggestions based on genetic experiments, composition of the lambda heritable replication complex remains unknown. In amino acid-starved Escherichia coli relA mutants, replication of lambda plasmid DNA is carried out exclusively by the heritable replication complex as assembly of new complexes is impaired due to inhibition of protein synthesis. Here, using a procedure based on in vivo cross-linking, cell lysis, immunoprecipitation with specific sera, de-cross-linking and PCR analysis, we demonstrate that the lambda heritable replication complex consists of O, P, DnaB and, perhaps surprisingly, DnaK proteins.

Lambdap(o), a promoter for oop RNA synthesis, has a role in replication of plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda

Transcription initiated at the bacteriophage lambdap(o) promoter gives a short RNA, called oop RNA. Early studies led to a proposal that this transcript plays a role in the initiation of lambda DNA replication. In fact, the p(o) promoter is located in the lambda replication region and it was suggested that oop RNA may be a primer for replication proceeding leftward from orilambda. However, since in vitro experiments demonstrated that primers for lambda DNA replication are produced by the dnaG gene product (DnaG primase) and subsequent in vivo studies indicated that oop RNA is an antisense RNA for the lambda cII gene expression, the above-mentioned hypothesis has fallen into oblivion. Nevertheless, here we demonstrate that the p(o) promoter plays a role in lambda DNA replication, indeed. We found that lambda plasmids bearing a mutation that inactivates p(o) occur in Escherichia coli cells in a copy number significantly lower than wild-type lambda plasmids. Amplification of lambdap(o)(-) plasmids during the relaxed response was less efficient relative to lambdap(o)(+) plasmids suggesting less frequent initiation of replication from orilambda in the absence of transcription from p(o). This suggestion was confirmed by measurement of incorporation of [(3)H]thymidine into lambda plasmid DNA during pulse-labeling experiments. Therefore, we propose that transcription from the p(o) promoter stimulates replication initiation at orilambda as suggested a long time ago, however, contrary to that suggestion, we assume that the process of p(o)-initiated transcription per se but not the transcription product (oop RNA) might play a role at early steps of lambda DNA replication.

Directionality of lambda plasmid DNA replication carried out by the heritable replication complex

There are two 'pathways' of replication of lambda plasmids in Escherichia coli. One pathway requires the assembly of a new replication complex before replication and the second pathway is based on the activity of the replication complex inherited by one of two daughter plasmid copies after a preceding replication round. Such a phenomenon was postulated to occur also in other replicons, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae autonomously replicating sequences. Here we investigated directionality of lambda plasmid replication carried out by the heritable and newly assembled replication complexes. Using two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis and electron microscopy we demonstrated that in both normal growth conditions and during the relaxed response to amino acid starvation (when only replication carried out by the heritable complex is possible), bidirectionally and undirectionally replicating plasmid molecules occurred in host cells in roughly equal proportions. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that both complexes (heritable and newly assembled) are equivalent.

Evolution of lambdoid replication modules

Comparison of the putative iteron-binding proteins of lambdoid phages allows us to propose that in the case of lambdoid replication modules, the units on which natural selection acts do not coincide with the open reading frames. Rather, the first replication gene is split into two segments, and its 3' part (corresponding to the C-terminal domain of the iteron-binding protein) forms one unit with the second gene. We also propose from the phylogenetic analysis of phage-encoded homologs of E. coli DnaB and DnaC, that the recombination with the host sequences is not frequent. Accessory ATP-ases for helicase loading (E. coli DnaC homologs) may not be universal replication proteins. Our analysis may suggest that the bacterial helicase loaders might be of phage origin. The comparison of DnaC homologs of enterobacteria and enterobacterial phages supports the experimental data on residues important in interaction with DnaB. We propose that construction of plasmids carrying the replication origins of lambdoid prophages could be useful not only in further research on DNA replication but also on the role of these prophages in shuttling genes for bacterial virulence. The phage replication sequences could be also useful for identification of clinical enterobacterial isolates.