Assessing breast self-examination

Breast self-examination in long-term breast cancer survivors

INTRODUCTION

For many breast cancer survivors, continued surveillance will be necessary to increase the possibility of finding a new diagnosis in an early stage. One such surveillance approach, breast self-examination, has not been studied specifically in breast cancer survivors. The current study was designed to assess the practice of BSE in a sample of long-term breast cancer survivors, and to examine the personal, emotional, cognitive, and health-care provider factors that may contribute to its performance.

METHODS

Three hundred forty-five breast cancer survivors (34% response rate, 345/1,001) diagnosed with in situ-stage II breast cancer between 1997-2004 at a community hospital provided answers to a mailed, self-report questionnaire.

RESULTS

Seventy-six percent of respondents reported that they had performed a BSE in the last 30-days. Forty percent reported performing BSE once/month, 39% more than once/month, and 21% less than once/month since their diagnosis. Most of the women (90%) reported that a doctor or nurse told them to perform a BSE once/month since their diagnosis, although only 69% had actually been shown how to perform a BSE. Consistently, the perception of increased barriers to BSE performance was associated with performance of BSE less than once/month (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.2, 1.6; OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.8, 0.9). In addition, depending on the model, age (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.0, 1.2), perceived effectiveness of cancer treatments (OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5, 0.9), and perceived benefits of BSE (OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.7, 0.9) also was associated with differences in BSE performance.

CONCLUSION

The current study suggests that breast cancer survivors between 4 and 11 years from diagnosis practice BSE, although their perception of the barriers to conducting BSE influences the frequency of this behavior. Further examination is needed to understand why some survivors perceive greater barriers to BSE performance than others. Also needed is a prospective examination of BSE performance using behavioral measures in relation to self-report.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Increased attention should be paid to this particular screening behavior performed by a majority of breast cancer survivors by both researchers and health-care providers alike. Whether survivors perform the behavior correctly and the impact it has on their emotional and cognitive well-being should be further explored.

Augmented, pulsating tactile feedback facilitates simulator training of clinical breast examinations

Haptic training devices can facilitate tactile skill development by providing repeatable exposures to rare stimuli. Extant haptic training simulator research primarily emphasizes realistic stimuli representation; however, the experiments reported herein suggest that providing augmented feedback can improve training effectiveness, even when the feedback is not natural. A novel clinical breast examination training device uses inflated balloons embedded in silicone to simulate breast lumps. Oscillating the balloon water pressure makes the lumps pulsate. The pulsating lumps are easier to detect than the static lumps used in current simulators, and this manipulation seems to effectively introduce trainees to small, deep lumps that are initially difficult to perceive. A study of 48 medical students indicates that training with the dynamic breast model increased the number of lumps detected, F(1, 47) = 9.34, p = .004, decreased the number of false positives, F(1, 47) = 5.78, p = .020, and improved intersimulator skill transfer, F(1, 47) = 26.56, p < .001. The results suggest that at least in this case, augmented, tactile feedback increases training effectiveness, despite the fact that the feedback does not attempt to mimic any physical phenomenon present in the natural stimulus. Applications of this research include training techniques and tools for improved detection of palpable cancers.

Psychosocial factors associated with the use of breast cancer screening by women age 60 years or over

This study examined psychosocial factors related to breast cancer screening among older women. Data for the study were obtained from interviews with 719 women age 60 years or over attending rural and urban primary care clinics in North Carolina. The results indicated that 50% of the women had mammograms in the past year, 65% reported clinical breast examinations in the past year, and 31% said they practiced breast self-examinations once a month. Several psychosocial factors were significant predictors of a lower likelihood of being screened. Multivariate analysis confirmed the importance of psychosocial factors as predictors of breast cancer screening. Educational intervention to increase screening for breast cancer in this population is needed, and the results provide specific suggestions regarding the content of effective educational materials and approaches for older women.

Breast self-examination training: a brief review

A review of the literature on breast self-examination training indicated that any training in breast self-examination improves compliance, confidence, and proficiency; the evidence is unclear about the relative effectiveness of group or individual training; practice on breast models and on the woman's own breasts should be included in breast self-examination training; additional training sessions improve compliance and proficiency; reminders increase compliance, but the effect ceases when the reminders cease; and it is particularly important for older women to search their breasts slowly and thoroughly. Several other new approaches to breast self-examination training are discussed.