1
|
Galdi P, Cabez MB, Farrugia C, Vaher K, Williams LZJ, Sullivan G, Stoye DQ, Quigley AJ, Makropoulos A, Thrippleton MJ, Bastin ME, Richardson H, Whalley H, Edwards AD, Bajada CJ, Robinson EC, Boardman JP. Feature similarity gradients detect alterations in the neonatal cortex associated with preterm birth. Hum Brain Mapp 2024; 45:e26660. [PMID: 38488444 PMCID: PMC10941526 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The early life environment programmes cortical architecture and cognition across the life course. A measure of cortical organisation that integrates information from multimodal MRI and is unbound by arbitrary parcellations has proven elusive, which hampers efforts to uncover the perinatal origins of cortical health. Here, we use the Vogt-Bailey index to provide a fine-grained description of regional homogeneities and sharp variations in cortical microstructure based on feature gradients, and we investigate the impact of being born preterm on cortical development at term-equivalent age. Compared with term-born controls, preterm infants have a homogeneous microstructure in temporal and occipital lobes, and the medial parietal, cingulate, and frontal cortices, compared with term infants. These observations replicated across two independent datasets and were robust to differences that remain in the data after matching samples and alignment of processing and quality control strategies. We conclude that cortical microstructural architecture is altered in preterm infants in a spatially distributed rather than localised fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Galdi
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- School of InformaticsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | - Christine Farrugia
- Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of MaltaVallettaMalta
- University of Malta Magnetic Resonance Imaging Platform (UMRI)VallettaMalta
| | - Kadi Vaher
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Logan Z. J. Williams
- Centre for the Developing BrainKing's College LondonLondonUK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging ScienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Gemma Sullivan
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - David Q. Stoye
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | | | | | - Mark E. Bastin
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Hilary Richardson
- School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Heather Whalley
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental MedicineUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - A. David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing BrainKing's College LondonLondonUK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental DisordersKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Claude J. Bajada
- University of Malta Magnetic Resonance Imaging Platform (UMRI)VallettaMalta
- Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MaltaVallettaMalta
| | - Emma C. Robinson
- Centre for the Developing BrainKing's College LondonLondonUK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging ScienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - James P. Boardman
- MRC Centre for Reproductive HealthUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Makropoulos A, Robinson EC, Schuh A, Wright R, Fitzgibbon S, Bozek J, Counsell SJ, Steinweg J, Vecchiato K, Passerat-Palmbach J, Lenz G, Mortari F, Tenev T, Duff EP, Bastiani M, Cordero-Grande L, Hughes E, Tusor N, Tournier JD, Hutter J, Price AN, Teixeira RPAG, Murgasova M, Victor S, Kelly C, Rutherford MA, Smith SM, Edwards AD, Hajnal JV, Jenkinson M, Rueckert D. The developing human connectome project: A minimal processing pipeline for neonatal cortical surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 2018. [PMID: 29409960 DOI: 10.1101/125526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) seeks to create the first 4-dimensional connectome of early life. Understanding this connectome in detail may provide insights into normal as well as abnormal patterns of brain development. Following established best practices adopted by the WU-MINN Human Connectome Project (HCP), and pioneered by FreeSurfer, the project utilises cortical surface-based processing pipelines. In this paper, we propose a fully automated processing pipeline for the structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the developing neonatal brain. This proposed pipeline consists of a refined framework for cortical and sub-cortical volume segmentation, cortical surface extraction, and cortical surface inflation, which has been specifically designed to address considerable differences between adult and neonatal brains, as imaged using MRI. Using the proposed pipeline our results demonstrate that images collected from 465 subjects ranging from 28 to 45 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) can be processed fully automatically; generating cortical surface models that are topologically correct, and correspond well with manual evaluations of tissue boundaries in 85% of cases. Results improve on state-of-the-art neonatal tissue segmentation models and significant errors were found in only 2% of cases, where these corresponded to subjects with high motion. Downstream, these surfaces will enhance comparisons of functional and diffusion MRI datasets, supporting the modelling of emerging patterns of brain connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonios Makropoulos
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma C Robinson
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Andreas Schuh
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Wright
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Fitzgibbon
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Bozek
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Serena J Counsell
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes Steinweg
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katy Vecchiato
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gregor Lenz
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Filippo Mortari
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tencho Tenev
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eugene P Duff
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Matteo Bastiani
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lucilio Cordero-Grande
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emer Hughes
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Tusor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jana Hutter
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony N Price
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rui Pedro A G Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Murgasova
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suresh Victor
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Kelly
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary A Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen M Smith
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - A David Edwards
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph V Hajnal
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilson RC, Hancock ER, Pekalska E, Duin RPW. Spherical and Hyperbolic Embeddings of Data. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE 2014; 36:2255-69. [PMID: 26353065 DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2014.2316836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Many computer vision and pattern recognition problems may be posed as the analysis of a set of dissimilarities between objects. For many types of data, these dissimilarities are not euclidean (i.e., they do not represent the distances between points in a euclidean space), and therefore cannot be isometrically embedded in a euclidean space. Examples include shape-dissimilarities, graph distances and mesh geodesic distances. In this paper, we provide a means of embedding such non-euclidean data onto surfaces of constant curvature. We aim to embed the data on a space whose radius of curvature is determined by the dissimilarity data. The space can be either of positive curvature (spherical) or of negative curvature (hyperbolic). We give an efficient method for solving the spherical and hyperbolic embedding problems on symmetric dissimilarity data. Our approach gives the radius of curvature and a method for approximating the objects as points on a hyperspherical manifold without optimisation. For objects which do not reside exactly on the manifold, we develop a optimisation-based procedure for approximate embedding on a hyperspherical manifold. We use the exponential map between the manifold and its local tangent space to solve the optimisation problem locally in the euclidean tangent space. This process is efficient enough to allow us to embed data sets of several thousand objects. We apply our method to a variety of data including time warping functions, shape similarities, graph similarity and gesture similarity data. In each case the embedding maintains the local structure of the data while placing the points in a metric space.
Collapse
|
7
|
HYDER MASHUD, ISLAM MDMONIRUL, AKHAND MAH, MURASE KAZUYUKI. SYMMETRY AXIS BASED OBJECT RECOGNITION UNDER TRANSLATION, ROTATION AND SCALING. Int J Neural Syst 2011; 19:25-42. [DOI: 10.1142/s0129065709001811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This paper presents a new approach, known as symmetry axis based feature extraction and recognition (SAFER), for recognizing objects under translation, rotation and scaling. Unlike most previous invariant object recognition (IOR) systems, SAFER puts emphasis on both simplicity and accuracy of the recognition system. To achieve simplicity, it uses simple formulae for extracting invariant features from an object. The scheme used in feature extraction is based on the axis of symmetry and angles of concentric circles drawn around the object. SAFER divides the extracted features into a number of groups based on their similarity. To improve the recognition performance, SAFER uses a number of neural networks (NNs) instead of single NN are used for training and recognition of extracted features. The new approach, SAFER, has been tested on two of real world problems i.e., English characters with two different fonts and images of different shapes. The experimental results show that SAFER can produce good recognition performance in comparison with other algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MASHUD HYDER
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Dhaka University of Engineering and Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh
| | - MD. MONIRUL ISLAM
- Department of Human and Artificial Intelligence Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Fukui, 3-9-1 Bunkyo, Fukui 910-8507, Japan
| | - M. A. H. AKHAND
- Department of Human and Artificial Intelligence Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Fukui, 3-9-1 Bunkyo, Fukui 910-8507, Japan
| | - KAZUYUKI MURASE
- Department of Human and Artificial Intelligence Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Fukui, 3-9-1 Bunkyo, Fukui 910-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|