Towards scarless surgery: an endoscopic-ultrasound navigation system for transgastric access procedures

Review of advanced catheter technologies in radiation oncology brachytherapy procedures

The development of new catheter and applicator technologies in recent years has significantly improved treatment accuracy, efficiency, and outcomes in brachytherapy. In this paper, we review these advances, focusing on the performance of catheter imaging and reconstruction techniques in brachytherapy procedures using magnetic resonance images and electromagnetic tracking. The accuracy of catheter reconstruction, imaging artifacts, and other notable properties of plastic and titanium applicators in gynecologic treatments are reviewed. The accuracy, noise performance, and limitations of electromagnetic tracking for catheter reconstruction are discussed. Several newly developed applicators for accelerated partial breast irradiation and gynecologic treatments are also reviewed. New hypofractionated high dose rate treatment schemes in prostate cancer and accelerated partial breast irradiation are presented.

Navigated laparoscopic ultrasound in abdominal soft tissue surgery: technological overview and perspectives

PURPOSE

Two-dimensinal laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) is commonly used for many laparoscopic procedures, but 3D LUS and navigation technology are not conventional tools in the clinic. Navigated LUS can help the user understand and interpret the ultrasound images in relation to the laparoscopic view and preoperative images. When combined with information from MRI or CT, navigated LUS has the potential to provide information about anatomic shifts during the procedure. In this paper, we present an overview of the ongoing technological research and development related to LUS combined with navigation technology, The purpose of this overview is threefold: (1) an introduction for those new to the field of navigated LUS; (2) an overview for those working in the field and; and (3) as a reference for those searching for literature on technological developments related to navigation in ultrasound-guided laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

Databases were searched to identify relevant publications from the last 10 years.

RESULTS

We were able to identify 18 key papers in the area of navigated LUS for the abdomen, originating from about 10-11 groups. We present the literature overview, including descriptions of our own experience in the field, and a discussion of the important clinical and technological aspects related to navigated LUS.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS integrated with miniaturized tracking technology is likely to play an important role in guiding future laparoscopic surgery.

EUS with CT improves efficiency and structure identification over conventional EUS

BACKGROUND

EUS is complicated because of the subtleties of US interpretation, small fields of observation, and uncertainty of probe position and orientation.

OBJECTIVE

Improved EUS performance is sought by providing contextual information to support US probe positioning and identification of features in US images. Our aims were to demonstrate the feasibility of the image registered gastroscopic US (IRGUS) system in a porcine model and to compare the effectiveness and the efficiency of IRGUS with traditional EUS.

DESIGN

Animal feasibility study.

INTERVENTIONS

The IRGUS system uses preprocedure CT and miniature US probe trackers to create real-time synthetic displays of the position of the probe tip and a matched slice of CT data for comparison with the US image. Participants used EUS and IRGUS systems in a porcine model to evaluate the speed and accuracy of structure identification.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The performance and utility of IRGUS were determined by the number of correctly identified structures in a timed trial, kinematic variables, and a structured survey.

RESULTS

IRGUS was twice as effective as EUS in localizing and identifying individual structures. In timed trials, IRGUS users identified over 25% more structures than EUS users. Improvement in examination efficiency and accuracy of feature identification was statistically significant, and 90% of the users preferred IRGUS to EUS for these tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

IRGUS appears feasible and may be superior to conventional EUS in efficiency and accuracy of probe positioning and in image interpretation. IRGUS has the potential to shorten the EUS learning curve and to broaden the adoption of EUS techniques by gastroenterologists.