N/OFQ-NOP System in Peripheral and Central Immunomodulation

Evaluating the tumor immune profile based on a three-gene prognostic risk model in HER2 positive breast cancer

To date, there have not been great breakthroughs in immunotherapy for HER2 positive breast cancer (HPBC). This study aimed to build a risk model that might contribute to predicting prognosis and discriminating the immune landscape in patients with HPBC. We analyzed the tumor immune profile of HPBC patients from the TCGA using the ESTIMATE algorithm. Thirty survival-related differentially expressed genes were selected according to the ImmuneScore and StromalScore. A prognostic risk model consisting of PTGDR, PNOC and CCL23 was established by LASSO analysis, and all patients were classified into the high- and low-risk score groups according to the risk scores. Subsequently, the risk model was proven to be efficient and reliable. Immune related pathways were the dominantly enriched category. ssGSEA showed stronger immune infiltration in the low-risk score group, including the infiltration of TILs, CD8 T cells, NK cells, DCs, and so on. Moreover, we found that the expression of immune checkpoint genes, including PD-L1, CTLA-4, TIGIT, TIM-3 and LAG-3, was significantly upregulated in the low-risk score group. All the results were validated with corresponding data from the GEO database. In summary, our investigation indicated that the risk model composed of PTGDR, PNOC and CCL23 has potential to predict prognosis and evaluate the tumor immune microenvironment in HPBC patients. More importantly, HPBC patients with a low-risk scores are likely to benefit from immune treatment.

The role of opioids in cancer response to immunotherapy

Background

The response to immunotherapy can be impaired by several factors including external intervention such as drug interactions with immune system. We aimed to examine the immunomodulatory action of opioids, since immune cells express opioid receptors able to negatively influence their activities.

Methods

This observational, multicenter, retrospective study, recruited patients with different metastatic solid tumors, who have received immunotherapy between September 2014 and September 2019. Immunotherapy was administered according to the standard schedule approved for each primary tumor and line of treatment. The concomitant intake of antibiotics, antifungals, corticosteroids and opioids were evaluated in all included patients. The relationship between tumor response to immunotherapy and the oncological outcomes were evaluated. A multivariate Cox-proportional hazard model was used to identify independent prognostic factors for survival.

Results

One hundred ninety-three patients were recruited. Overall, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in those patients taking opioids than in those who didn’t (median PFS, 3 months vs. 19 months, HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.37–2.09, p < 0.0001; median OS, 4 months vs. 35 months, HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.26–2.02, p < 0.0001). In addition, PFS and OS were significantly impaired in those patients taking corticosteroids, antibiotics or antifungals, in those patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 1 and in patients with a high tumor burden. Using the multivariate analyses, opioids and ECOG PS were independent prognostic factors for PFS, whereas only ECOG PS resulted to be an independent prognostic factor for OS, with trend toward significance for opioids as well as tumor burden.

Discussion

Our study suggests that the concomitant administration of drugs as well as some clinical features could negatively predict the outcomes of cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. In particular, opioids use during immunotherapy is associated with early progression, potentially representing a predictive factor for PFS and negatively influencing OS as well.

Conclusions

A possible negative drug interaction able to impair the immune response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents has been highlighted. Our findings suggest the need to further explore the impact of opioids on immune system modulation and their role in restoring the response to immunotherapy treatment, thereby improving patients' outcomes.