Clinical Trials for Stimulant Use Disorders: Addressing Heterogeneities That May Undermine Treatment Outcomes

Promising immunomodulators for management of substance and alcohol use disorders

INTRODUCTION

The neuroimmune system has emerged as a novel target for the treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs), with immunomodulation producing encouraging therapeutic benefits in both preclinical and clinical settings.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we describe the mechanism of action and immune response to methamphetamine, opioids, cocaine, and alcohol. We then discuss off-label use of immunomodulators as adjunctive therapeutics in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, demonstrating their potential efficacy in affective and behavioral disorders. We then discuss in detail the mechanism of action and recent findings regarding the use of ibudilast, minocycline, probenecid, dexmedetomidine, pioglitazone, and cannabidiol to treat (SUDs). These immunomodulators are currently being investigated in clinical trials described herein, specifically for their potential to decrease substance use, withdrawal severity, central and peripheral inflammation, comorbid neuropsychiatric disorder symptomology, as well as their ability to improve cognitive outcomes.

EXPERT OPINION

We argue that although mixed, findings from recent preclinical and clinical studies underscore the potential benefit of immunomodulation in the treatment of the behavioral, cognitive, and inflammatory processes that underlie compulsive substance use.

Can pharmacotherapy improve treatment outcomes in people with co-occurring major depressive and cocaine use disorders?

Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) and cocaine use disorder (CUD) are prevalent and frequently co-occur. When co-occurring, the presence of one disorder typically negatively impacts the prognosis for the other. Given the clinical relevance, we sought to examine pharmacotherapies for co-occurring CUD and MDD. While multiple treatment options have been examined in the treatment of each condition individually, studies exploring pharmacological options for their comorbidity are fewer and not conclusive.Areas Covered: For this review, the authors searched the literature in PubMed using clinical query options for therapies and keywords relating to each condition. Then, they described potentially promising pharmacologic therapeutic options based on shared mechanisms between the two conditions and/or results from individual clinical trials conducted to date.Expert opinion: Medications like stimulants, dopamine (D3) receptors partial agonists or antagonists, antagonists of kappa opioid receptors, topiramate, and ketamine could be promising as there is significant overlap relating to reward deficiency models, antireward pathways, and altered glutamatergic systems. However, the available clinical literature on any one of these types of agents is mixed. Additionally, for some agents there is possible concern related to abuse potential (e.g. ketamine and stimulants).

Testing the effects of the GLP-1 receptor agonist exenatide on cocaine self-administration and subjective responses in humans with cocaine use disorder

BACKGROUND

Preclinical rodent studies have demonstrated reduced cocaine taking after administration of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogues. We investigated effects of a GLP-1 analogue (exenatide) on behavioral and subjective effects of cocaine in individuals with cocaine use disorder (CUD).

METHODS

Non-treatment-seeking CUD subjects underwent two human laboratory cocaine self-administration test sessions following an acute 3 -h pre-treatment with exenatide (5 mcg; subcutaneously) or placebo. Primary outcomes consisted of infusions of cocaine and visual analog scale self-ratings of euphoria and wanting cocaine. Secondary outcomes consisted of pertinent hormone levels (GLP-1, insulin, and amylin).

RESULTS

Thirteen individuals completed the study. Acute pretreatment with exenatide versus placebo did not change cocaine infusions (8.5 ± 1.2 vs. 9.1 ± 1.2; p = 0.39), self-reported euphoria (4.4 ± 0.8 vs. 4.1 ± 0.8; p = 0.21), or wanting of cocaine (5.6 ± 0.9 vs. 5.4 ± 0.9; p = 0.46). Exenatide vs. placebo reduced levels of GLP-1 (p = 0.03) and insulin (p = 0.02). Self-administered cocaine also reduced levels of GLP-1 (p < 0.0001), insulin (p < 0.0001), and amylin (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence that low dose exenatide alters cocaine self-administration or the subjective effects of cocaine in people with CUD. Limitations such as single acute rather than chronic pre-treatment, as well as evaluation of only one dose, preclude drawing firm conclusions about the efficacy of exenatide. Exenatide and cocaine independently reduced levels of GLP-1 and insulin, while cocaine also reduced levels of amylin.