Minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome

The dimensions of "failed back surgery syndrome": what is behind a label?

BACKGROUND

The term failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) has been criticized for being too unspecific and several studies have shown that a variety of conditions may underlie this label. The aims of the present study were to describe the specific symptoms and to investigate the primary and secondary underlying causes of FBSS in a contemporary series of patients who had lumbar spinal surgery before.

METHODS

We used a multilevel approach along three different axes defining symptomatic, morphological, and functional pathology dimensions.

RESULTS

Within the study period of 3 years, a total of 145 patients (74 f, 71 m, mean age 51a, range 32-82a) with the external diagnosis of FBSS were included. Disk surgery up to 4 times and surgery for spinal stenosis up to 3 times were the commonest index operations. Most often, the patients complained of low back pain (n = 126), pseudoradicular pain (n = 54), and neuropathic pain (n = 44). Imaging revealed osteochondrosis (n = 61), spondylarthrosis (n = 48), and spinal misalignment (n = 32) as the most frequent morphological changes. The majority of patients were assigned at least to two different symptomatic subcategories and morphological subcategories, respectively. According to these findings, one or more functional pathologies were assigned in 131/145 patients that subsequently enabled a specific treatment strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

FBSS has become rather a vague and imprecisely used generic term. We suggest that it should be avoided in the future both with regard to its partially stigmatizing connotation and its inherent hindering to provide individualized medicine.

Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Lumbar Medial Branch Thermal Radiofrequency Neurotomy, Stratified for Diagnostic Methods and Procedural Technique

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of lumbar medial branch thermal radiofrequency neurotomy based on different selection criteria and procedural techniques.

Design

Comprehensive systematic review.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, and all authors screened and evaluated the studies. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to assess all eligible studies.

Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measure assessed was the success rate of the procedure, defined by varying degrees of pain relief following neurotomy. Data are stratified by number of diagnostic blocks and degree of pain relief, as well as procedural technique with perpendicular or parallel placement of electrodes.

Results

Results varied by selection criteria and procedural technique. At six months, 26% of patients selected via single medial branch block with 50% pain relief and treated via perpendicular technique achieved at least 50% pain relief; 49% of patients selected via dual medial branch blocks with 50% pain relief and treated via parallel technique achieved at least 50% pain relief. The most rigorous patient selection and technique—two diagnostic medial branch blocks with 100% pain relief and parallel electrode placement—resulted in 56% of patients experiencing 100% relief of pain at six months.

Conclusions

This comprehensive systematic review found differences in the effectiveness of lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy when studies were stratified by patient selection criteria and procedural technique. The best outcomes are achieved when patients are selected based on high degrees of pain relief from dual medial branch blocks with a technique employing parallel electrode placement.

Optimizing the Management and Outcomes of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Proposal of a Standardized Multidisciplinary Team Care Pathway

Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a major, worldwide health problem that generates considerable expense for healthcare systems. A number of controversial issues concerning the management of FBSS are regularly debated, but no clear consensus has been reached. This pitfall is the result of lack of a standardized care pathway due to insufficient characterization of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, which are essential to identify in order to offer appropriate treatment, and the paucity of evidence of treatment outcomes. In an attempt to address the challenges and barriers in the clinical management of FBSS, an international panel of physicians with a special interest in FBSS established the Chronic Back and Leg Pain (CBLP) Network with the primary intention to provide recommendations through consensus on how to optimize outcomes. In the first of a series of two papers, a definition of FBSS was delineated with specification of criteria for patient assessment and identification of appropriate evaluation tools in order to choose the right treatment options. In this second paper, we present a proposal of a standardized care pathway aiming to guide clinicians in their decision-making on how to optimize their management of FBSS patients. The utilization of a multidisciplinary approach is emphasized to ensure that care is provided in a uniform manner to reduce variation in practice and improve patient outcomes.

Endoscopic foraminal decompression for failed back surgery syndrome under local anesthesia

BACKGROUND

The most common causes of failed back surgery are residual or recurrent herniation, foraminal fibrosis and foraminal stenosis that is ignored, untreated, or undertreated. Residual back ache may also be from facetal causes or denervation and scarring of the paraspinal muscles.(1-6) The original surgeon may advise his patient that nothing more can be done on the basis of his opinion that the nerve was visually decompressed by the original surgery, supported by improved post-op imaging and follow-up studies such as EMG and conduction velocity studies. Post-op imaging or electrophysiological assessment may be inadequate to explain all the reasons for residual or recurrent symptoms. Treatment of Failed back surgery by repeat traditional open revision surgery usually incorporates more extensive decompression causing increased instability and back pain, therefore necessitating fusion. The authors, having limited their practice to endoscopic MIS surgery over the last 15-20 years, report on their experience gained during that period to relieve pain by endoscopically visualizing and treating unrecognized causative patho-anatomy in FBSS.(7.)

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with FBSS presenting with back and leg pain that had supporting imaging diagnosis of lateral stenosis and /or residual / recurrent disc herniation, or whose pain complaint was supported by relief from diagnostic and therapeutic injections (Figure 1), were offered percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and foraminoplasty over a repeat open procedure. Each patient sought consultation following a transient successful, partially successful or unsuccessful open translaminar surgical treatment for disc herniation or spinal stenosis. Endoscopic foraminoplasty was also performed to either decompress the bony foramen for foraminal stenosis, or foraminoplasty to allow for endoscopic visual examination of the affected traversing and exiting nerve roots in the axilla, also known as the "hidden zone" of Macnab (Figure 2).(8, 9) The average follow up time was, average 40 months, minimum 12 months. Outcome data at each visit included Macnab, VAS and ODI. Fig. 1A diagnostic and therapeutic epidural gram may help identify unrecognized lateral recess stenosis underestimated by MRI. An excellent result from a therapeutic block lends excellent prognosis for a more lasting and "permanent" result from transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression.Fig. 2Kambin's Triangle provides access to the "hidden zone" of Macnab by foraminoplasty. The foramen and lateral recess is decompressed by removing the ventral aspect and tip of the superior articular process to gain access to the axilla between the traversing and exiting nerve. FBSS contains patho-anatomy in the axilla between the traversing and exiting nerve that hides the pain generators of FBSS.

RESULTS

The average pre-operative VAS improved from 7.2 to 4.0, and ODI 48% to 31%. While temporary dysesthesia occurred in 4 patients in the early post-operative period, all were happy, as all received additional relief of their pre-op symptoms. They were also relieved to be able to avoid "open" decompression or fusion surgery.

CONCLUSIONS / LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3

The transforaminal endoscopic approach is effective for FBSS due to residual/recurrent HNP and lateral stenosis. Failed initial index surgery may involve failure to recognize patho-anatomy in the axilla of the foramen housing the traversing and the exiting nerve, including the DRG, which is located cephalad and near the tip of SAP.(10) The transforaminal endoscopic approach effectively decompresses the foramen and does not further destabilize the spine needing stabilization.(11) It also avoids going through the previous surgical site.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Disc narrowing as a consequence of translaminar discectomy and progressive degenerative narrowing and spondylolisthesis (Figure 3) as a natural history of degenerative disc disease can lead to central and lateral stenosis. The MRI may underestimate the degree of stenosis from a bulging or a foraminal disc protrusion and residual lateral recess stenosis. Pain can be diagnosed and confirmed by evocative discography and by clinical response to transforaminal diagnostic and therapeutic steroid injections.(12) Foraminal endoscopic decompression of the lateral recess is a MIS technique that does not "burn bridges" for a more conventional approach and it adds to the surgical armamentarium of FBSS. Fig. 3Cadaver Illustration of Foraminal Stenosis (courtesy of Wolfgang Rauschning). As the disc narrows, the superior articular process impinges on the exiting nerve and DRG, creating lateral recess stenosis, lumbar spondylosis, and facet arthrosis.

Serum 25-hydroxy-calciferol level and failed back surgery syndrome

PURPOSE

To assess the association of serum 25-hydroxy-calciferol levels with pain and low back function in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

METHODS

Records of 6 men and 3 women aged 25 to 54 (mean, 39.2) years who had failed back surgery syndrome after pedicular screw and rod instrumentation for lower lumbar degenerative diseases were reviewed. They had moderate-to-severe pain (visual analogue scale [VAS] score of >6) and low back function disability (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] back score of <10). In all patients, the serum 25-hydroxy-calciferol level was <30 ng/ ml, indicating vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D2 (20 000 IU per day) was given for 10 days, and vitamin D3 (600 IU per day) was given for maintenance. Patients were followed up at months 3 and 6. Three men and 4 women aged 27 to 55 (mean, 41.3) years who were age- and disease-matched but achieved good outcomes (VAS score of 0-1 and mean JOA low back score of 14.7) were used as indirect referents. All 7 matched patients except one had a normal serum 25-hydroxy-calciferol level (mean, 40.6 ng/ml).

RESULTS

In the 9 patients with failed back surgery syndrome, the mean duration of chronic pain was 2.6 years; the mean VAS score for pain was 7.7; the mean JOA low back score was 7.6; the mean number of reoperations was 2.2; and the mean serum 25-hydroxy-calciferol level was 17.0 ng/ml. Two male patients had grade-IV motor weakness and decreased sensory function based on the pin prick test. One patient had a history of prolonged (>3 months) antibiotic use after primary surgery, but had no evidence of infection. Six months after vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation, the mean serum 25-hydroxy-calciferol level improved significantly (17.0 vs. 42.5 ng/ml), as did the mean pain score (7.7 vs. 4.2) and mean JOA back score (7.6 vs. 11.1). Seven of the patients had a pain score of <6 and a JOA back score of >10, the remaining 2 patients had neurological deficits and only slight improvement.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D supplementation may be used as an adjuvant treatment for patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

Long term intrathecal infusion of opiates for treatment of failed back surgery syndrome

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) is a multidimensional painful condition and its treatment remains a challenge for the surgeons. Prolonged intrathecal infusion of opiates for treatment of noncancer pain also remains a controversial issue. The authors present a prospective study about the long-term treatment of 30 patients with nonmalignant pain treated with intrathecal infusion of morphine from February, 1996 to May, 2004. Self-administration pumps were implanted in 18 patients and constant-flow pumps in 12. The mean intensity of pain reduced from 9.5 to 4.6 according to the visual analogue scale (p < 0.001); the mean daily dose of morphine necessary for pain control became constant after the sixth month of treatment. No difference was observed in the results between patients treated with bolus or constant infusion. Side effects were more frequent at the beginning and became tolerable after the first month of treatment. There was improvement of the quality of life measured by SF-36 (30.8-49.6) and in all dimensions of the Treatment of Pain Survey, except for working capacity. The follow-up period ranged from 18 to 98 months (mean = 46.7 months). It was concluded that intrathecal infusion of morphine is a useful and safe tool for long-term treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain.

Fulminating septicemia secondary to oxygen-ozone therapy for lumbar disc herniation: case report

STUDY DESIGN

A case report and clinical discussion.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a rare but fatal complication secondary to oxygen-ozone therapy for the treatment of herniated lumbar disc.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previously reported complications secondary to oxygen-ozone therapy are rarely reported. Septic discitis and epidural abscesses have been reported after myelography, lumbar puncture, paravertebral injections, epidural anesthesia, acupuncture, and intradiscal therapy with chymopapain. We report the first case of a local infection with systemic fatal dissemination secondary to this treatment.

METHODS

A 57-year-old man previously treated with oxygen-ozone therapy presented low back and bilateral pain. The lumbar computed tomography revealed the presence of L4-L5 and L5-S1 herniated discs.

RESULTS

Three days after admission in the hospital, the patient developed a fulminant septicemia. An abdominal-pelvic and chest computed tomography and blood culture led to the diagnosis of pyogenic lumbar muscle involvement, accompanied with septic pulmonary embolism secondary to Escherichia coli infection.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report identifies a rare and fatal complication of oxygen-ozone therapy in the treatment of a herniated lumbar disc. Acute fatal septicemia should be considered among the major complications of the oxygen-ozone therapy in the treatment of a herniated lumbar disc.