Balance of risk of therapeutic hypothermia

Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Hypothermia for Traumatic Brain Injury in Adult and Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic hypothermia has been used to attenuate the effects of traumatic brain injuries. However, the required degree of hypothermia, length of its use, and its timing are uncertain. We undertook a comprehensive meta-analysis to quantify benefits of hypothermia therapy for traumatic brain injuries in adults and children by analyzing mortality rates, neurologic outcomes, and adverse effects.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov and manual searches of studies were conducted for relevant publications up until February 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Forty-one studies in adults (n = 3,109; age range, 18-81 yr) and eight studies in children (n = 454; age range, 3 mo to 18 yr) met eligibility criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Baseline patient characteristics, enrollment time, methodology of cooling, target temperature, duration of hypothermia, and rewarming protocols were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Risk ratios with 95% CIs were calculated. Compared with adults who were kept normothermic, those who underwent therapeutic hypothermia were associated with 18% reduction in mortality (risk ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.96; p = 0.01) and a 35% improvement in neurologic outcome (risk ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.18-1.54; p < 0.00001). The optimal management strategy for adult patients included cooling patients to a minimum of 33°C for 72 hours, followed by spontaneous, natural rewarming. In contrast, adverse outcomes were observed in children who underwent hypothermic treatment with a 66% increase in mortality (risk ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.06-2.59; p = 0.03) and a marginal deterioration of neurologic outcome (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-1.01; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic hypothermia is likely a beneficial treatment following traumatic brain injuries in adults but cannot be recommended in children.

Long-Term Effects of Induced Hypothermia on Local and Systemic Inflammation - Results from a Porcine Long-Term Trauma Model

Background

Hypothermia has been discussed as playing a role in improving the early phase of systemic inflammation. However, information on the impact of hypothermia on the local inflammatory response is sparse. We therefore investigated the kinetics of local and systemic inflammation in the late posttraumatic phase after induction of hypothermia in an established porcine long-term model of combined trauma.

Materials & Methods

Male pigs (35 ± 5kg) were mechanically ventilated and monitored over the study period of 48 h. Combined trauma included tibia fracture, lung contusion, liver laceration and pressure-controlled hemorrhagic shock (MAP < 30 ± 5 mmHg for 90 min). After resuscitation, hypothermia (33°C) was induced for a period of 12 h (HT-T group) with subsequent re-warming over a period of 10 h. The NT-T group was kept normothermic. Systemic and local (fracture hematoma) cytokine levels (IL-6, -8, -10) and alarmins (HMGB1, HSP70) were measured via ELISA.

Results

Severe signs of shock as well as systemic and local increases of pro-inflammatory mediators were observed in both trauma groups. In general the local increase of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediator levels was significantly higher and prolonged compared to systemic concentrations. Induction of hypothermia resulted in a significantly prolonged elevation of both systemic and local HMGB1 levels at 48 h compared to the NT-T group. Correspondingly, local IL-6 levels demonstrated a significantly prolonged increase in the HT-T group at 48 h.

Conclusion

A prolonged inflammatory response might reduce the well-described protective effects on organ and immune function observed in the early phase after hypothermia induction. Furthermore, local immune response also seems to be affected. Future studies should aim to investigate the use of therapeutic hypothermia at different degrees and duration of application.

Avoiding hypothermia, an intervention to prevent morbidity and mortality from pneumonia in young children

Observations and experiments in animals and human beings grant plausibility to the hypothesis that hypothermia is a risk factor for pneumonia. Exposure of body to cold stress causes alterations in the systemic and local defenses against respiratory infections, favoring the infection by inhalation of pathogens normally present in the oropharynx. Neonates and young infants with hypothermia have an increased risk of death; however, there is no strong demonstration that hypothermia leads to pneumonia in these children. Studies that properly addressed the problem of confounding variables have shown an association between cold weather and pneumonia incidence. Probably the strongest evidence that supports the plausibility of the hypothesis is provided by the controlled comparison between patients with traumatic brain injury treated with hypothermia and those treated under normal body temperature. The association between exposure to cold and pneumonia is strong enough to warrant further research focused in young children in developing countries.

Hypothermia for traumatic head injury

BACKGROUND

Hypothermia has been used in the treatment of head injury for many years. Encouraging results from small trials and laboratory studies led to renewed interest in the area and some larger trials.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the effect of mild hypothermia for traumatic head injury on mortality and long-term functional outcome complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Injuries Group Specialised Register, Current Controlled Trials MetaRegister of trials, Zetoc, ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE and EMBASE. We handsearched conference proceedings and checked reference lists of all relevant articles. The search was last updated in January 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of hypothermia to a maximum of 35 degrees C for at least 12 consecutive hours versus control in patients with any closed traumatic head injury requiring hospitalisation. Two authors independently assessed all trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data on death, Glasgow Outcome Scale and pneumonia were sought and extracted, either from published material or by contacting the investigators. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each trial on an intention-to-treat basis.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 23 trials with a total of 1614 randomised patients. Twenty-one trials involving 1587 patients reported deaths. There were fewer deaths in patients treated with hypothermia than in the control group (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.05). Nine trials with good allocation concealment showed no decrease in the likelihood of death compared with the control group, and this result was not statistically significant (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.47). Twenty-one trials involving 1587 patients reported data on unfavourable outcomes (death, vegetative state or severe disability). Patients treated with hypothermia were less likely to have an unfavourable outcome than those in the control group (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93). Nine trials with good allocation concealment showed patients treated with hypothermia were less likely to have an unfavourable outcome than those in the control group, but the reduction was small and non-significant (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.20). Hypothermia treatment was associated with a slight increase in the odds of pneumonia (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.86) but there was a reduction in pneumonia for trials with good allocation concealment (4 trials analysed separately, 294 patients, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.27) although in both cases the results are not statistically significant.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that hypothermia is beneficial in the treatment of head injury. Hypothermia may be effective in reducing death and unfavourable outcomes for traumatic head injured patients, but significant benefit was only found in low quality trials. Low quality trials have a tendency to overestimate the treatment effect. The high quality trials found no decrease in the likelihood of death with hypothermia, but this finding was not statistically significant and could be due to the play of chance. Hypothermia should not be used except in the context of a high quality randomised controlled trial with good allocation concealment.

Hypothermia for traumatic head injury

BACKGROUND

Hypothermia has been used in the treatment of head injury for many years. Encouraging results from small trials and laboratory studies led to renewed interest in the area and some larger trials.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the effect of mild hypothermia for traumatic head injury on mortality and long-term functional outcome complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Injuries Group Specialised Register, Current Controlled Trials MetaRegister of trials, Zetoc, Web of Knowledge; Science Citation Index [expanded], CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We handsearched conference proceedings and checked reference lists of relevant articles. The search was updated on 23 May 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of hypothermia to a maximum of 35 degrees C for at least 12 hours versus control in patients with any closed traumatic head injury requiring hospitalisation. Two authors independently assessed all trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data on death, Glasgow Outcome Scale and pneumonia were sought and extracted, either from published material or by contacting the investigators. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each trial on an intention-to-treat basis.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 22 trials with a total of 1409 randomised patients. Twenty trials involving 1382 patients reported deaths. There were fewer deaths in patients treated with hypothermia than in the control group (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.97). Eight trials with good allocation concealment showed a non-significant reduction in the likelihood of death for patients treated with hypothermia (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.35). Twenty trials involving 1382 patients reported data on unfavourable outcomes (death, vegetative state or severe disability). Patients treated with hypothermia were less likely to have an unfavourable outcome than those in the control group (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.86). Eight trials with good allocation concealment showed a non-significant reduction in the likelihood of unfavourable outcome for patients treated with hypothermia (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.08). Hypothermia treatment was associated with an increase in odds of pneumonia but this increase was not statistically significant for trials with good allocation concealment (3 trials, 69 patients, OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.97).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hypothermia may be effective in reducing death and unfavourable outcomes for traumatic head injured patients, but significant benefit was only found in low quality trials. Low quality trials have a tendency to overestimate the treatment effect. The high quality trials found some statistically non-significant benefit of hypothermia which could be due to the play of chance. Hypothermia may increase the risk of pneumonia. Due to uncertainties in its effects, hypothermia should only be given to patients taking part in a randomised controlled trial with good allocation concealment.

Bench to bedside strategies for optimizing neuroprotection following perinatal hypoxia-ischaemia in high and low resource settings

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic hypothermia gathers impetus in the developed world as a safe and effective therapy for term asphyxial encephalopathy. Although many questions still remain about the optimal application of hypothermic neuroprotection it is difficult to ignore the developing world where the prevalence of asphyxial encephalopathy is much higher. Experimental studies to optimize high tech cooling need to run in parallel with trials to determine the possible benefits of therapeutic hypothermia in low resource settings.

METHODS

We used a validated newborn piglet model of transient HI to determine (i) whether optimal neuroprotection occurs at different temperatures in the cortical and deep grey matter; (ii) the effect of body size on regional brain temperature under normothermia and hypothermia; (iii) the effect of insult severity on the therapeutic window duration; (iv) whether cooling using a water bottle is feasible. In this model hypoxia-ischaemia is induced by reversible occlusion of the common carotid arteries by remotely controlled vascular occluders and simultaneous reduction in the inspired oxygen fraction to 0.12. Intensive care can be administered to the piglet maintaining metabolic and physiological homeostasis throughout the experiment, and cerebral energy metabolism is monitored continuously providing quantitative measures of the HI insult, latent phase and secondary energy failure using phosphorus-31 ((31)P) magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).

RESULTS

(i) The optimal temperature for cooling was lower in the cortex than deep grey matter. (ii) Cerebral temperatures were body-weight dependent: a smaller body weight led to a lower brain temperature especially with selective head cooling. (iii) Latent-phase duration is inversely related to insult severity. (iv) Low tech, simple cooling methods using a water bottle can induce and maintain moderate hypothermia.

CONCLUSIONS

Small shifts in brain temperature critically influence the survival of neuronal cells and body size critically influences brain-temperature gradients - smaller subjects have a larger surface area to brain volume and hence more heat is lost. The clinical implication is that smaller infants may require higher cap or body temperatures to avoid detrimental effects of over-zealous cooling. Latent-phase brevity may explain less effective neuroprotection following severe HI in some clinical studies. "Tailored" treatments which take into account individual and regional characteristics may increase the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia in the developed world. Low tech cooling methods using water bottles may be feasible although adequate staffing and monitoring would be required.

The antiinflammatory effects of propofol in endotoxemic rats during moderate and mild hypothermia

PURPOSE

We previously found that propofol attenuated the mortality rate and inflammatory responses during endotoxemia in rats; however, whether propofol retains its antiinflammatory effects during hypothermia has not been determined. We investigated the effects of propofol on endotoxemic rats subjected to moderate or mild hypothermia.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats (n = 88) were anesthetized intraperitoneally with pentobarbital sodium and assigned to one of two protocols: one representing moderate hypothermia (30 degrees -32 degrees C) and the other representing mild hypothermia (33 degrees -35 degrees C). Each protocol included four equal-sized groups: group A, Escherichia coli endotoxin (15 mg x kg(-1), i.v.) and normothermia; group B, propofol (10 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1), i.v.) and normothermia after endotoxin injection; group C, endotoxin (15 mg x kg(-1), i.v.) and hypothermia; and group D, propofol (10 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1), i.v.) and hypothermia after endotoxin injection. Rats then were warmed or cooled to maintain rectal temperatures as above for 6 h. The mortality rate was assessed up to 6 h after endotoxin injection. In addition, we assessed hemodynamics, acid-base status, and plasma cytokine concentrations.

RESULTS

Endotoxemic rats developed hypotension and metabolic acidosis as well as increased plasma cytokine concentrations. Mortality rates 6 h after endotoxin injection were 70%, 40%, 10%, and 0% for groups A-D, respectively, at moderate hypothermia. Propofol administration to endotoxemic rats with hypothermia, whether moderate or mild, also attenuated the high mortality rate, metabolic acidosis, and elevation of cytokines, but these effects were not superior to those of hypothermia alone.

CONCLUSION

During hypothermia, propofol administration does not have additive beneficial antiinflammatory effects.

Rapidly induced hypothermia with extracorporeal lung and heart assist (ECLHA) improves the neurological outcome after prolonged cardiac arrest in dogs

PURPOSE

We reported previously that therapeutic hypothermia with extracorporeal lung and heart assist (ECLHA) improved neurological outcome after 15 min cardiac arrest (CA) in dogs, although 45 min was needed to achieve hypothermia. We now investigate whether rapidly induced hypothermia with ECLHA (RHE) would result in a better outcome than slowly induced hypothermia with ECLHA (SHE) in dogs.

METHODS

Fifteen mongrel female dogs were divided into two groups: an RHE (n = 7) and an SHE (n = 8) group. Normothermic ventricular fibrillation was induced for 15 min and the animals were resuscitated by ECLHA. Rapid hypothermia was induced with a heat exchanger added to the ECLHA circuit in the RHE group, and by immersing the drainage tube of the ECLHA circuit in an ice water bath in the SHE group. Hypothermia (33 degrees C) was maintained for 20 h. The dogs were weaned from ECLHA at 24 h after resuscitation and treated for 96 h; neurological deficit scores (NDS) were measured throughout this period.

RESULTS

It took 1.6+/-0.8 min to reach 33 degrees C in the RHE group and 49.5+/-12.1 min to reach 33 degrees C in the SHE group. There was no difference in survival rate between the two groups. The NDS at 96 h in the RHE group was better than that in the SHE group (26% (range: 10-28%) versus 32% (26-37%); p < 0.05) although there was no significant difference in NDS between the two groups until 72 h.

CONCLUSION

Rapid hypothermic induction might be an important factor to improve neurological outcomes in prolonged CA models.