Analysis of DNA Interstrand Cross-Links and their Repair by Modified Comet Assay

Repair of genomic interstrand crosslinks

Genomic interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are formed by reactive species generated during normal cellular metabolism, produced by the microbiome, and employed in cancer chemotherapy. While there are multiple options for replication dependent and independent ICL repair, the crucial step for each is unhooking one DNA strand from the other. Much of our insight into mechanisms of unhooking comes from powerful model systems based on plasmids with defined ICLs introduced into cells or cell free extracts. Here we describe the properties of exogenous and endogenous ICL forming compounds and provide an historical perspective on early work on ICL repair. We discuss the modes of unhooking elucidated in the model systems, the concordance or lack thereof in drug resistant tumors, and the evolving view of DNA adducts, including ICLs, formed by metabolic aldehydes.

Replication-Independent ICL Repair: From Chemotherapy to Cell Homeostasis

Interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are a type of covalent lesion that can prevent transcription and replication by inhibiting DNA strand separation and instead trigger cell death. ICL inducing compounds are commonly used as chemotherapies due to their effectiveness in inhibiting cell proliferation. Naturally occurring crosslinking agents formed from metabolic processes can also pose a challenge to genome stability especially in slowly or non-dividing cells. Cells maintain a variety of ICL repair mechanisms to cope with this stressor within and outside the S phase of the cell cycle. Here, we discuss the mechanisms of various replication-independent ICL repair pathways and how crosslink repair efficiency is tied to aging and disease.

STIM1 translocation to the nucleus protects cells from DNA damage

DNA damage represents a challenge for cells, as this damage must be eliminated to preserve cell viability and the transmission of genetic information. To reduce or eliminate unscheduled chemical modifications in genomic DNA, an extensive signaling network, known as the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, ensures this repair. In this work, and by means of a proteomic analysis aimed at studying the STIM1 protein interactome, we have found that STIM1 is closely related to the protection from endogenous DNA damage, replicative stress, as well as to the response to interstrand crosslinks (ICLs). Here we show that STIM1 has a nuclear localization signal that mediates its translocation to the nucleus, and that this translocation and the association of STIM1 to chromatin increases in response to mitomycin-C (MMC), an ICL-inducing agent. Consequently, STIM1-deficient cell lines show higher levels of basal DNA damage, replicative stress, and increased sensitivity to MMC. We show that STIM1 normalizes FANCD2 protein levels in the nucleus, which explains the increased sensitivity of STIM1-KO cells to MMC. This study not only unveils a previously unknown nuclear function for the endoplasmic reticulum protein STIM1 but also expands our understanding of the genes involved in DNA repair.

The central role of DNA damage in immunosenescence

Ageing is the biggest risk factor for the development of multiple chronic diseases as well as increased infection susceptibility and severity of diseases such as influenza and COVID-19. This increased disease risk is linked to changes in immune function during ageing termed immunosenescence. Age-related loss of immune function, particularly in adaptive responses against pathogens and immunosurveillance against cancer, is accompanied by a paradoxical gain of function of some aspects of immunity such as elevated inflammation and increased incidence of autoimmunity. Of the many factors that contribute to immunosenescence, DNA damage is emerging as a key candidate. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting the hypothesis that DNA damage may be a central driver of immunosenescence through senescence of both immune cells and cells of non-haematopoietic lineages. We explore why DNA damage accumulates during ageing in a major cell type, T cells, and how this may drive age-related immune dysfunction. We further propose that existing immunosenescence interventions may act, at least in part, by mitigating DNA damage and restoring DNA repair processes (which we term "genoprotection"). As such, we propose additional treatments on the basis of their evidence for genoprotection, and further suggest that this approach may provide a viable therapeutic strategy for improving immunity in older people.

Lymphocyte-based challenge DNA-repair assays for personalized health risk assessment

Combinations of genetic and environmental factors are responsible for the development of many human diseases, such as cancer, as demonstrated using various biomarkers. Within this scenario, DNA repair holds a gate-keeper position which determines outcomes after appearance of DNA damage and, therefore, adverse cellular consequences, e.g., initiation of carcinogenesis. DNA repair deficiency and some of the subsequent events can be validated from studies using live cells from cancer patients. However, these deficiencies/events are difficult to demonstrate in live cells from normal individuals because individual variations in DNA repair capacities (DRC) are too low to be measured easily. Such lack of information has been hindering progress in developing personalized disease prevention and intervention protocols, especially among exposed populations. However, using a variety of challenge assays as biomarkers, variations in individual's DRC can be amplified in live cells and be determined. Furthermore, evidence indicates that DRC are not only inherited but can also be modified by environmental factors (e.g., nutritional status and exposure to genotoxic substances). Using these challenge assays, e.g., in live lymphocytes, individual's DRC can be holistically and functionally determined as well as quantitated. With the more precise information, assessment of health risk can be better determined on an individual rather than on a population basis. This review provides a succinct summary on the development and application of recent challenge assays in lymphocytes which can provide measurements of individuals' DRC, and on the latest data for more precise disease prevention and intervention.

Genotoxicity of selected pyrrolizidine alkaloids in human hepatoma cell lines HepG2 and Huh6

INTRODUCTION

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) are found in many plant species as secondary metabolites which affect humans via contaminated food sources, herbal medicines and dietary supplements. Hundreds of compounds belonging to PAs have been identified. PAs undergo hepatic metabolism, after which they can induce hepatotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Many aspects of their mechanism of carcinogenicity are still unclear and it is important for human risk assessment to investigate this class of compounds further.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Human hepatoma cells HepG2 were used to investigate the genotoxicity of different chemical structural classes of PAs, namely europine, lycopsamine, retrorsine, riddelliine, seneciphylline, echimidine and lasiocarpine, in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay. The different ester type PAs europine, seneciphylline, and lasiocarpine were also tested in human hepatoma Huh6 cells. Six different PAs were investigated in a crosslink comet assay in HepG2 cells.

RESULTS

The maximal increase of micronucleus formation was for all PAs in the range of 1.64-2.0 fold. The lowest concentrations at which significant induction of micronuclei were found were 3.2 μM for lasiocarpine and riddelliine, 32 μM for retrorsine and echimidine, and 100 μM for seneciphylline, europine and lycopsamine. Significant induction of micronuclei by lasiocarpine, seneciphylline, and europine were achieved in Huh6 cells at similar concentrations. Reduced tail formation after hydrogen peroxide treatment was found in the crosslink comet assay for all diester type PAs, while an equimolar concentration of the monoesters europine and lycopsamine did not significantly reduce DNA migration.

CONCLUSION

The widely available human hepatoma cell lines HepG2 and Huh6 were suitable for the assessment of PA-induced genotoxicity. Selected PAs confirmed previously published potency rankings in the micronucleus assay. In HepG2 cells, the crosslinking activity was related to the ester type, which is a first report of PA mediated effects in the comet assay.