1
|
Delint-Ramirez I, Madabhushi R. DNA damage and its links to neuronal aging and degeneration. Neuron 2025; 113:7-28. [PMID: 39788088 PMCID: PMC11832075 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2024] [Revised: 11/07/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025]
Abstract
DNA damage is a major risk factor for the decline of neuronal functions with age and in neurodegenerative diseases. While how DNA damage causes neurodegeneration is still being investigated, innovations over the past decade have provided significant insights into this issue. Breakthroughs in next-generation sequencing methods have begun to reveal the characteristics of neuronal DNA damage hotspots and the causes of DNA damage. Chromosome conformation capture-based approaches have shown that, while DNA damage and the ensuing cellular response alter chromatin topology, chromatin organization at damage sites also affects DNA repair outcomes in neurons. Additionally, neuronal activity results in the formation of programmed DNA breaks, which could burden DNA repair mechanisms and promote neuronal dysfunction. Finally, emerging evidence implicates DNA damage-induced inflammation as an important contributor to the age-related decline in neuronal functions. Together, these discoveries have ushered in a new understanding of the significance of genome maintenance for neuronal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse Delint-Ramirez
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Peter O' Donnell Brain Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ram Madabhushi
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Peter O' Donnell Brain Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carrothers E, Appleby M, Lai V, Kozbenko T, Alomar D, Smith BJ, Hamada N, Hinton P, Ainsbury EA, Hocking R, Yauk C, Wilkins RC, Chauhan V. AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for deposition of energy leading to cataracts. ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS 2024; 65 Suppl 3:31-56. [PMID: 38644659 DOI: 10.1002/em.22594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Cataracts are one of the leading causes of blindness, with an estimated 95 million people affected worldwide. A hallmark of cataract development is lens opacification, typically associated not only with aging but also radiation exposure as encountered by interventional radiologists and astronauts during the long-term space mission. To better understand radiation-induced cataracts, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was used to structure and evaluate knowledge across biological levels of organization (e.g., macromolecular, cell, tissue, organ, organism and population). AOPs identify a sequence of key events (KEs) causally connected by key event relationships (KERs) beginning with a molecular initiating event to an adverse outcome (AO) of relevance to regulatory decision-making. To construct the cataract AO and retrieve evidence to support it, a scoping review methodology was used to filter, screen, and review studies based on the modified Bradford Hill criteria. Eight KEs were identified that were moderately supported by empirical evidence (e.g., dose-, time-, incidence-concordance) across the adjacent (directly linked) relationships using well-established endpoints. Over half of the evidence to justify the KER linkages was derived from the evidence stream of biological plausibility. Early KEs of oxidative stress and protein modifications had strong linkages to downstream KEs and could be the focus of countermeasure development. Several identified knowledge gaps and inconsistencies related to the quantitative understanding of KERs which could be the basis of future research, most notably directed to experiments in the range of low or moderate doses and dose-rates, relevant to radiation workers and other occupational exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Carrothers
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meghan Appleby
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vita Lai
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tatiana Kozbenko
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dalya Alomar
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Benjamin J Smith
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nobuyuki Hamada
- Biology and Environmental Chemistry Division, Sustainable System Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Chiba, Japan
| | - Patricia Hinton
- Defense Research & Development Canada, Canadian Forces Environmental Medicine Establishment, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth A Ainsbury
- Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Division, UK Health Security Agency, Birmingham, UK
- Environmental Research Group within the School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine at Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK
| | - Robyn Hocking
- Learning and Knowledge and Library Services, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carole Yauk
- Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ruth C Wilkins
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vinita Chauhan
- Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Poetsch AR. The genomics of oxidative DNA damage, repair, and resulting mutagenesis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2020; 18:207-219. [PMID: 31993111 PMCID: PMC6974700 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 226] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species are a constant threat to DNA as they modify bases with the risk of disrupting genome function, inducing genome instability and mutation. Such risks are due to primary oxidative DNA damage and also mediated by the repair process. This leads to a delicate decision process for the cell as to whether to repair a damaged base at a specific genomic location or better leave it unrepaired. Persistent DNA damage can disrupt genome function, but on the other hand it can also contribute to gene regulation by serving as an epigenetic mark. When such processes are out of balance, pathophysiological conditions could get accelerated, because oxidative DNA damage and resulting mutagenic processes are tightly linked to ageing, inflammation, and the development of multiple age-related diseases, such as cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Recent technological advancements and novel data analysis strategies have revealed that oxidative DNA damage, its repair, and related mutations distribute heterogeneously over the genome at multiple levels of resolution. The involved mechanisms act in the context of genome sequence, in interaction with genome function and chromatin. This review addresses what we currently know about the genome distribution of oxidative DNA damage, repair intermediates, and mutations. It will specifically focus on the various methodologies to measure oxidative DNA damage distribution and discuss the mechanistic conclusions derived from the different approaches. It will also address the consequences of oxidative DNA damage, specifically how it gives rise to mutations, genome instability, and how it can act as an epigenetic mark.
Collapse
|