Urinary Biomarkers In Bladder Cancer

Enzyme-labeled liquid-based cytology (ELLBC): a new noninvasive diagnostic method for bladder cancers

BACKGROUND

Based on liquid-based cytology, we performed an enzyme histochemical staining using acid phosphatase as a marker and termed it ELLBC. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of ELLBC in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

METHODS

Fifty patients who were initially diagnosed with suspected bladder cancers (hematuria or bladder irritation symptoms, urinary ultrasound suggestive of bladder mass) at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Anhui, China) from January 2022 to December 2022 were selected as the study subjects, all of whom underwent ELLBC, CC, and histopathology Histopathology was used as the gold standard to calculate the diagnostic efficacy of ELLBC, CC and ELLBC combined with CC in bladder cancer.

RESULTS

Histopathological examination revealed 35 positive cases in 50 patients, including 15 cases of high-grade uroepithelial carcinoma (HGUC) and 20 cases of low-grade uroepithelial carcinoma (LGUC.) The sensitivity of ELLBC was 82.86%, the specificity was 93.33%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 96.67%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 70.00%, and the accuracy was 86.00%; CC had a sensitivity of 37.14%, specificity of 80.00%, PPV of 81.25%, NPV of 35.29%, and accuracy of 50%; ELLBC combined with CC had a sensitivity of 88.57%, specificity of 73.33%, PPV of 88.57%, NPV of 73.33%, and accuracy of 84.00%. The sensitivity and specificity of ELLBC were higher than that of CC, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), ELLBC combined with CC achieved higher sensitivity, but the diagnostic accuracy decreased. For clinical staging, the diagnostic accuracy was 86.36% for ELLBC and 40.91% for CC in patients in Stage I, and 90.91% for ELLBC and 36.36% for CC in patients in Stage II.

CONCLUSION

ELLBC has high clinical application value for the diagnosis of bladder cancer and can provide new options and methods for the early screening of bladder cancer.

Diagnostic value comparison of CellDetect, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and cytology in urothelial carcinoma

Background

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a novel CellDetect staining technique, compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and urine cytology, in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma (UC).

Methods

A total of 264 patients with suspicious UC were enrolled in this study. All tissue specimens were collected by biopsy or surgery. Urine specimen was obtained for examinations prior to the surgical procedure. CellDetect staining was carried out with CellDetect kit, and FISH was performed with UroVysion detection kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For urine cytology, all specimens were centrifuged using the cytospin method, and the slides were stained by standard Papanicolaou stain.

Results

In this study, there were 128 cases of UC and 136 cases of non-UC, with no significant difference in gender and age between the two groups. Results for sensitivity of CellDetect, FISH, and urine cytology were 82.8%, 83.6%, and 39.8%, respectively. The specificity of the three techniques were 88.2%, 90.4%, and 86.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of CellDetect and FISH are significantly superior compared to the conventional urine cytology; however, there was no significant difference in specificity among three staining techniques. In addition, the sensitivity of CellDetect in lower urinary tract UC, upper urinary tract UC, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) were 83.3%, 81.8%, 83.5%, and 72.0%, respectively. The screening ability of CellDetect has no correlation with tumor location and the tumor stage. The sensitivity of CellDetect in low-grade UC and high-grade UC were 51.6 and 92.8%. Thus, screening ability of CellDetect in high-grade UC is significantly superior compared to that in low-grade UC.

Conclusions

CellDetect and FISH show equal value in diagnosing UC, both are superior to conventional urine cytology. Compared to FISH, CellDetect is cost effective, easy to operate, with extensive clinical application value to monitor recurrence of UC, and to screen indetectable UC.