Assessment of Platelet Function by High-Throughput Screening Light Transmission Aggregometry: Optimul Assay

Innovative Diagnostic Solutions in Hemostasis

Hemostasis describes the process of blood clotting homeostasis. Hemostasis reflects a balance of procoagulant and anticoagulant mechanisms that aim to prevent both bleeding and thrombosis. If hemostasis is disrupted, and bleeding or thrombosis occur, then laboratory testing may ensue to either diagnose the reason for bleeding or thrombosis, or to manage patients under therapy or treatment for bleeding or thrombosis. A wide range of tests of hemostasis are available to laboratories and to clinicians, from routine coagulation assays to specialized hemostasis assays and platelet function. In the current narrative review, we highlight some of the history of innovative diagnostic solutions, such as the integration of chemiluminescence and flow cytometry in the hemostasis diagnostic armamentarium, as well as providing a glimpse to the possible future of diagnostic hemostasis testing. Future directions include the potential for artificial intelligence in diagnostics, the development of more global test systems that can assess both primary and secondary hemostasis, and several innovations to enable the ongoing evolution of therapies to rebalance hemostasis and requiring precise monitoring. This review underscores the ongoing need for innovation to enhance the diagnostic landscape of hemostasis, ensuring better patient outcomes through more accurate and efficient diagnostic methods.

The study of platelet aggregation using a microtiter plate reader ‒ methodological considerations

Optical aggregometry by 96-well plate assay, the microplate method, is a fast, efficient, and readily available method for measuring the pharmacological effects of antiplatelet drugs. Even though recent years have witnessed growing interest in adopting the microplate method for widespread use, it remains in the shadow of the standard light transmission aggregometry (LTA). Regardless of the method used, the results of platelet aggregation depend on a variety of factors and often vary among laboratories worldwide. While several methodological papers have examined the microplate method, no standards have been established, most likely because the approach is not used as a diagnostic tool. Currently, the microplate method is recommended by researchers to be used in conjunction with LTA or as an adjunct to LTA. This raises the question of whether an optimal protocol exists for microplate aggregometry, and what are the key considerations in a good experimental protocol for obtaining reliable results? This article attempts to address these questions by summarizing the knowledge accumulated in this field over the last three decades.