Quality Control of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies at the Hospital After Their Compounding and Before Their Administration to Patients

Use of failure mode and effect analysis to improve the monoclonal antibody drugs management process in pharmacy intravenous admixture services

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) constitute a new form of immunotherapy that has shown great success in long-term tumour control. These injectable drugs are managed and compounded by the Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services (PIVAS) staff in a specified sterile environment. This study utilized failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) as a risk management tool to manage mAb drugs within the PIVAS. The nine-member multidisciplinary team mapped the processes; evaluated the severity, occurrence, and detection of each subprocess; and calculated the risk priority number (RPN). Further corrective actions were taken for high-risk steps, followed by re-evaluation and scoring to achieve a low-risk process. We identified seven major processes and twenty-eight subprocesses involved in the management of mAb drugs in PIVAS. A total of thirteen high-risk failure modes with an assigned RPN 1 were selected. This selection represents the first calculated RPN values, resulting in a total score of 3375. After a first round of evaluation and implementation of corrective actions, the RPN 2 score decreased to 464. Following a second round of the FMEA process, the RPN 3 score was further reduced to 51. Through refinement, we successfully mitigated the occurrence of high-risk failure modes of mAb drugs in PIVAS. These efforts are aimed at enhancing the safety and efficacy of mAb drugs, ultimately ensuring patient safety.

Imaged capillary isoelectric focusing associated with multivariate analysis: A powerful tool for quality control of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies are increasingly used in cancer therapy. To guarantee the quality of these mAbs from compounding to patient administration, characterization methods are required (e.g. identity). In a clinical setting, these methods must be fast and straightforward. For this reason, we investigated the potential of image capillary isoelectric focusing (icIEF) combined with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). icIEF profiles obtained from monoclonals antibodies (mAbs) analysis have been pre-processed and the data submitted to principal component analysis (PCA). This pre-processing method has been designed to avoid the impact of concentration and formulation. Analysis of four commercialized mAbs (Infliximab, Nivolumab, Pertuzumab, and Adalimumab) by icIEF-PCA led to the formation of four clusters corresponding to each mAb. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) applied to these data allowed us to build models to predict which monoclonal antibody is analyzed. The validation of this model was obtained from k-fold cross-validation and prediction tests. The selectivity and the specificity of the model performance parameters were assessed by the excellent classification obtained. In conclusion, we established that the combination of icIEF and chemometric approaches is a reliable approach for unambiguously identifying compounded therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) before patient administration.

Cluster endophthalmitis due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia following intravitreal bevacizumab: outcomes of patients from North India

Purpose

To study features, management and outcomes of cluster endophthalmitis following intravitreal bevacizumab (BCZ) injection in North India.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 28 patients (23 men) (mean age of 59.07±13 years) who received intravitreal injection of BCZ were included. Demographic details, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), clinical features, microbiological findings and management of patients who developed endophthalmitis after injection of contaminated BCZ injections were reviewed. The organism isolated was Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Results

All patients suffered from painful diminution of vision within 24–48 hours. Of the 28 eyes, 12 had lid and corneal oedema, raised intraocular pressure (IOP) (difference between mean preinjection and postinjection IOP: 4.42 mm Hg; p=0.005) and toxic anterior segment syndrome-like picture. 16 eyes presented with clear cornea, severe vitritis and poor media clarity. Among these, three eyes showed posterior hypopyon. Seventeen eyes underwent primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and intravitreal vancomycin+ceftazidime based on severity of inflammation. Eleven eyes underwent primary tap and inject. Among these, four eyes required PPV due to persistent inflammation. Eleven eyes showed positive staining for Gram-negative bacilli. Seven eyes were culture positive for S. maltophilia. Mean preinjection BCVA was 0.77±0.48. The first recorded postinjection BCVA was 2.52±0.82. BCVA (at 1 month) improved to 0.88±0.66.

Conclusions

S. maltophilia can be found contaminating hospital surfaces and water supply. Early PPV, prompt intravitreal antibiotics and close communication with microbiologists greatly aided in salvaging all eyes from our cohort. Majority of the patients recovered their preinjection BCVA and IOP and achieved quiescence of inflammation.